| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." |
| Date: |
26 Jun 2003 01:58:32 AM |
| Object: |
Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
In article <bddvmo$tue$1@pencil.math.missouri.edu>, Rich Winkel says...
The Prozac That Ate America
Are you massively depressed? Sure you are. Survey says so.
No really, you are! Stop resisting!
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, June 25, 2003
Do you suffer from persistent sad, anxious or "empty" moods?
Feelings of hopelessness, pessimism, guilt, helplessness, bad breath, lame
parallel parking, that sad realization that you suddenly hate every single
one of your outfits and despise your car and are tired of your hairstyle and
really sort of sick of all of your furniture?
Have you lost interest or pleasure in hobbies and activities like knitting
or obsessive nail biting or porn? Are you tired, fatigued, bitchy like Lynne
Cheney after a gin bender? Have difficulty concentrating, remembering or
making decisions, like Dubya after one too many lemonades following a hard
game of T-ball?
Have you ever thought of death or contemplated suicide? You have? Great!
Because if you answered yes to any or all or even some of the above
questions, you might very well be one of the estimated 14 million Americans
walking around at this very moment suffering from severe and untreated
depression. That's right! You! Very, very depressed! And you think you're
fine! But you're not!
Here's how we know: Harvard-trained brain doctors who absolutely swear they
have no direct affiliation to the multibillion-dollar pharmacological
industry ha-ha yeah right have taken a big survey and discovered that a
shockingly huge number of Americans are apparently just totally bummed about
one helluva lot of things, and aren't seeking help for it.
That's right! This means you! You might think you feel all normal. You might
think it's just part of the human condition and especially the BushCo-reamed
anti-fun unemployed undereducated war-gutted faux-macho American condition
to feel waves of ennui and anxiety and pessimism and guilt and sadness over
the world and the environment and the quality of the above-mentioned porn
nowadays.
You might even go so far as to wholeheartedly believe that if you, as a
human anywhere on this planet, somehow don't feel these "downer" things at
least once a month or once a week or once a day just before cocktail hour,
why, you're not actually human, you don't actually feel the world, have an
active brain, a nimble soul, a sense of perspective, and hence you are
probably one of those creepy lizard super-beings from the fifth dimension.
This is where you are wrong. These stern-faced doctors and the industry at
whose tit they suckle very, very much want you to know that if you feel the
slightest bit of stress or sleeplessness or feelings of existential angst,
asking wacky eternal questions like, why the hell am I here and what's the
point anyway and what's it all for and isn't Bush a total lying dink and God
but I'd love more sex and a cool dog and maybe to get my life going in a
different direction, why, you need to call them ASAP and get yourself some
treatment. Preferably in nice, expensive pill form.
And no, you most definitely do not need to learn new and healthy ways to
deeply and profoundly relax and calm down and get yourself and your spirit
in tune. What are you, a terrorist wacko?
You most definitely do not need to, say, start a meditation practice, or get
into yoga, or radically alter/improve your diet, or get regular exercise, or
cut out toxic sugar/alcohol/processed foods.
Nor do you need to begin investigating gentle holistic remedies, or get
regular bodywork, or take more long hot baths and indulge in more oral sex
and good books and maybe get your ***** out of the city more often and into
the woods or out to the ocean.
And you especially should not just realize many of these intense feelings,
these "danger signs" of depression, are pretty much mostly completely normal
and that there are roughly four thousand healthy alternatives to doctors and
often spiritually deadening "magic bullet" drugs that mutate your brain
chemistry and disfigure your dreams and cause impotence and twitchiness and
bad taste in shoes.
And yes, by the way, this was a real survey. That 14 million is a real
number they extrapolated. And those questions, that "criteria" for
depression in the first paragraphs above, those are (mostly) real too.
And this is a real concern by mental-health practitioners and the major
pharmacological corporations who love them and have a vested interest in
making sure you know just how ***** depressed you really are even if you
don't think so. See? That's the first major sign! Denial!
Look. The numbers are staggering. An estimated 152 gazillion Americans (and
counting) are now on some sort of behavioral modifier, as is roughly every
child above the age of birth. Never mind about that recent dire FDA warning
about no more Paxil prescriptions for anyone under 18 due to severe violent
outbreaks and suicidal tendencies. Whoops. Shhh.
And no, it really doesn't matter that only a fraction of the millions who
are sucking these meds down like M&Ms truly need them. It doesn't matter
that tens of thousands of people really do truly benefit from these
medications, people who suffer nasty chemical imbalances and hence these
drugs restore sanity and hope. We don't really care about them. We care
about you. The untreated. The seemingly normal. Because as we all know, the
first step toward recovery is convincing you that you have a problem.
Look. These doctors. Maybe they mean well. Maybe they genuinely care about
your mental health. But they also have a job to do. They have a certain
perspective, a rather simplistic, non-holistic, black-and-white
sickness/cure worldview, all coupled with a capitalistic industry-backed
motive.
And that motive is certainly not based on the idea that if you feel anxiety
and sleeplessness and moroseness, and if you simply know, like billions of
others, that Bush is a dangerous idiot and the U.S. has lost some heart and
you regularly worry about the soul of the planet, that maybe expensive
behavioral drugs aren't always the answer.
Their first suggestion is usually not that maybe you just need to, you know,
retrain yourself, rewire on your own terms, deeply, seriously, regularly
unplug and meditate and get outside and eat less noxious brain-altering
foods and avoid pesticides and turn off the ***** cell phone and the TV
and really talk to your lover and learn to breathe.
Nah. That takes, you know, work. Practice. Serious life change. A rejection
of the norm. A rejection of these stern-faced docs and their persistently
Western obsession with insta-chemical cures. And who needs that when you can
just call and get a nice little blue pill? There. Don't you feel happier
already?
Thoughts for the author? E-mail him:
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
26 Jun 2003 08:15:39 AM |
|
|
The Prozac That Ate America
Are you massively depressed? Sure you are. Survey says so.
No really, you are! Stop resisting!
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, June 25, 2003
<(((*> >It doesn't matter
<(((*> >that tens of thousands of people really do truly benefit from these
<(((*> >medications, people who suffer nasty chemical imbalances and hence these
<(((*> >drugs restore sanity and hope. We don't really care about them.
I am a real person who benefits from antidepressant medications.
They have enabled me to live a full and happy life instead of a
grimly miserable one. ***** you very much for not caring.
JMHO, Mr. Morford.
Tara J. Ballance
Montreal, Canada
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
27 Jun 2003 09:46:49 AM |
|
|
In article <g7slfvsdhg38a6a5f9dvgd08tm7cbfss05@4ax.com>,
says...
The Prozac That Ate America
Are you massively depressed? Sure you are. Survey says so.
No really, you are! Stop resisting!
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, June 25, 2003
<(((*> >It doesn't matter
<(((*> >that tens of thousands of people really do truly benefit from these
<(((*> >medications, people who suffer nasty chemical imbalances and hence these
<(((*> >drugs restore sanity and hope. We don't really care about them.
I am a real person who benefits from antidepressant medications.
They have enabled me to live a full and happy life instead of a
grimly miserable one. ***** you very much for not caring.
JMHO, Mr. Morford.
Tara J. Ballance
Montreal, Canada
Be like that then!
.
|
|
|
| User: "robertmaasjr" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
27 Jun 2003 12:22:12 PM |
|
|
Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in message news:<tNYKa.4353$cJ5.512@www.newsranger.com>...
In article <g7slfvsdhg38a6a5f9dvgd08tm7cbfss05@4ax.com>,
says...
The Prozac That Ate America
Are you massively depressed? Sure you are. Survey says so.
No really, you are! Stop resisting!
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, June 25, 2003
<(((*> >It doesn't matter
<(((*> >that tens of thousands of people really do truly benefit from these
<(((*> >medications, people who suffer nasty chemical imbalances and hence these
<(((*> >drugs restore sanity and hope. We don't really care about them.
I am a real person who benefits from antidepressant medications.
They have enabled me to live a full and happy life instead of a
grimly miserable one. ***** you very much for not caring.
JMHO, Mr. Morford.
Tara J. Ballance
Montreal, Canada
Be like that then!
The retards will never learn. We are a species that has to believe in
a fairy tale like the bible to get through life. Let the fools pay for
the placeboes.
I hope they all get tardive dyskinesia.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
27 Jun 2003 03:00:29 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"Indigo Moon Man" <indigomoonman250@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2003 11:22, robertmaasjr wrote:
The retards will never learn. We are a species that has to believe in
a fairy tale like the bible to get through life. Let the fools pay for
the placeboes.
I hope they all get tardive dyskinesia.
I believe in the Bible and I do not
believe it's a fairy and neither am I a retard.
D y ls blv n trnsltns thr thsnd yrs ftr
smthng ws wrttn dwn n lngg whch ds
lv t ll vwls?
Thomas, trying to simulate written ancient Hebrew
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
27 Jun 2003 06:40:27 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Friday 27 Jun 2003 9:00 pm, Thomas Dehn
<thomas-usenet@arcor.de> wrote:
snip
D y ls blv n trnsltns thr thsnd yrs ftr
smthng ws wrttn dwn n lngg whch ds
lv t ll vwls?
Thomas, trying to simulate written ancient Hebrew
Did they leave gaps between the words?
ddth'yl'vgpsbtwnthwds
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
27 Jun 2003 09:53:55 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote:
In alt.support.depression on Friday 27 Jun 2003 9:00 pm, Thomas Dehn
<thomas-usenet@arcor.de> wrote:
D y ls blv n trnsltns thr thsnd yrs ftr
smthng ws wrttn dwn n lngg whch ds
lv t ll vwls?
Thomas, trying to simulate written ancient Hebrew
Did they leave gaps between the words?
I don't know.
ddth'yl'vgpsbtwnthwds
But I agree that this is even harder to read, and leaves
even more room for misinterpretation.
Thomas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
28 Jun 2003 01:14:09 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote:
In alt.support.depression on Saturday 28 Jun 2003 3:53 am, Thomas Dehn
<thomas-usenet@arcor.de> wrote:
ddth'yl'vgpsbtwnthwds
But I agree that this is even harder to read, and leaves
even more room for misinterpretation.
I think it was a Terry Pratchett novel where I read about a (fictional)
dispute, descending into almost permanent war, between two religious
groups; they worshipped the same god, and used the same scriptures, in the
same language; the only difference was down to a mark on the page of the
original, which had a big effect on the meaning of a passage. One group
said it was a part of the true text, the other group said it was a
fly-dropping.
That sounds like something Pratchett would write, indeed.
He has a good eye for illogical human behaviour.
Thomas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
28 Jun 2003 04:48:18 PM |
|
|
In article <bdkmeq$tl3p6$1@ID-57266.news.dfncis.de>, Thomas Dehn
<thomas-usenet@arcor.de> writes
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote:
In alt.support.depression on Saturday 28 Jun 2003 3:53 am, Thomas Dehn
<thomas-usenet@arcor.de> wrote:
ddth'yl'vgpsbtwnthwds
But I agree that this is even harder to read, and leaves
even more room for misinterpretation.
I think it was a Terry Pratchett novel where I read about a (fictional)
dispute, descending into almost permanent war, between two religious
groups; they worshipped the same god, and used the same scriptures, in the
same language; the only difference was down to a mark on the page of the
original, which had a big effect on the meaning of a passage. One group
said it was a part of the true text, the other group said it was a
fly-dropping.
That sounds like something Pratchett would write, indeed.
He has a good eye for illogical human behaviour.
His 'Small gods' is my favourite theological text. :)
--
Alan@harding.demon.co.uk = Alan Harding =
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Indigo Moon Man" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
27 Jun 2003 03:25:56 PM |
|
|
On Friday 27 June 2003 14:00, Thomas Dehn wrote:
"Indigo Moon Man" <indigomoonman250@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2003 11:22, robertmaasjr wrote:
I believe in the Bible and I do not
believe it's a fairy and neither am I a retard.
D y ls blv n trnsltns thr thsnd yrs ftr
smthng ws wrttn dwn n lngg whch ds
lv t ll vwls?
Thomas, trying to simulate written ancient Hebrew
I believe that God is and was able to preserve his Word to us through the
ages.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
27 Jun 2003 03:46:32 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"Indigo Moon Man" <indigomoonman250@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2003 14:00, Thomas Dehn wrote:
"Indigo Moon Man" <indigomoonman250@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2003 11:22, robertmaasjr wrote:
I believe in the Bible and I do not
believe it's a fairy and neither am I a retard.
D y ls blv n trnsltns thr thsnd yrs ftr
smthng ws wrttn dwn n lngg whch ds
lv t ll vwls?
Thomas, trying to simulate written ancient Hebrew
I believe that God is and was able to
preserve his Word to us through the ages.
How do you explain all those well-known mistranslations
of the Bible throughout the centuries,
and the fact that the Bible clearly contains passages which
were not written by the original authors, but added
later, like St. Mark's 16:9-20, or the German protestant
removing various references to ovens from their
Bibles after 1945?
And lets not ignore that even a correct translation can
easily be misinterpreted, because words are fully understood
only in their cultural context. An example would be
the restrictions against pork.
I am not saying that the Bible is not correct.
I am only saying that understanding the Bible
three thousand years later (2000 for the NT)
is impossible.
Thomas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
27 Jun 2003 07:19:25 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Friday 27 Jun 2003 9:46 pm, Thomas Dehn
<thomas-usenet@arcor.de> wrote:
snip
And lets not ignore that even a correct translation can
easily be misinterpreted, because words are fully understood
only in their cultural context. An example would be
the restrictions against pork.
I am not saying that the Bible is not correct.
I am only saying that understanding the Bible
three thousand years later (2000 for the NT)
is impossible.
I think having access to a number of independent translations can help to
reach some understanding of the original, provided one can trust the
sincerity and scholarship of the translators, and provided they have access
to reliable sources (which for most of the New Testament, often means
finding the oldest legible copy of each verse; not terribly satisfactory,
but it's the best we can get). Even becoming fluent in the original
languages isn't going to overcome all obstacles; no-one in the 21st century
can really get into the minds of people living in the 1st century.
In English we have the "New International Version", which in the 'study
Bible' edition has a lot of footnotes and commentary, including alternative
renderings and indications of possibly unreliable text. We also have the
"New English Bible" and the "Jerusalem Bible"; all scholarly and sincere
attempts to put the Bible into modern English, and reflect the 'style' of
the original documents.
I still have a fondness for the "Authorized Version" of 1611, which I was
brought up with, but wouldn't want to rely on it for understanding the
message.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Indigo Moon Man" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
27 Jun 2003 04:07:22 PM |
|
|
On Friday 27 June 2003 14:46, Thomas Dehn wrote:
How do you explain all those well-known mistranslations
of the Bible throughout the centuries,
and the fact that the Bible clearly contains passages which
were not written by the original authors, but added
later, like St. Mark's 16:9-20, or the German protestant
removing various references to ovens from their
Bibles after 1945?
And lets not ignore that even a correct translation can
easily be misinterpreted, because words are fully understood
only in their cultural context. An example would be
the restrictions against pork.
I am not saying that the Bible is not correct.
Then what are you saying? Don't you think that maybe an all knowing, all
powerful God would be able to preserve a message to his people in some form
or another down thru time? I believe that he can and did. Rather than
discuss and debate the mistakes that man has made I choose to search for
that message that God is trying to get through to us.
I am only saying that understanding the Bible
three thousand years later (2000 for the NT)
is impossible.
And I'm saying that I don't think it is impossible. And that's all I'm
saying. If you are looking for a theological debate then please look
elsewhere. I'm not interested.
--
Subtract 250 to email me.
Apostolic Voice:
http://www.apostolic-voice.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "robertmaasjr" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
28 Jun 2003 10:03:52 PM |
|
|
Indigo Moon Man <indigomoonman250@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bdibob$ti6gn$1@ID-70710.news.dfncis.de>...
On Friday 27 June 2003 14:46, Thomas Dehn wrote:
How do you explain all those well-known mistranslations
of the Bible throughout the centuries,
and the fact that the Bible clearly contains passages which
were not written by the original authors, but added
later, like St. Mark's 16:9-20, or the German protestant
removing various references to ovens from their
Bibles after 1945?
And lets not ignore that even a correct translation can
easily be misinterpreted, because words are fully understood
only in their cultural context. An example would be
the restrictions against pork.
I am not saying that the Bible is not correct.
Then what are you saying? Don't you think that maybe an all knowing, all
powerful God would be able to preserve a message to his people in some form
or another down thru time? I believe that he can and did. Rather than
discuss and debate the mistakes that man has made I choose to search for
that message that God is trying to get through to us.
I am only saying that understanding the Bible
three thousand years later (2000 for the NT)
is impossible.
And I'm saying that I don't think it is impossible. And that's all I'm
saying. If you are looking for a theological debate then please look
elsewhere. I'm not interested.
There is zero probability that the bible is anything but a fairy tale.
I'd rather have a lobotomy than enter to your fantasy world. I can't
believe we allow these cults to continue to exploit people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
29 Jun 2003 03:14:10 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"robertmaasjr" <grigoruk89@yahoo.com> wrote:
There is zero probability that the bible is anything but a fairy tale.
It is a sure thing that some excerpts
of the Bible are accurate historical documents.
See, for example, the description of the ancient city
of Theben in the Bible, which seemed to contradict
scientific evidence about when the Egyptian developed
chariots, and a few other things. When Theben was
found, it turned out that the Bible's description
were correct.
The difficult task is to decide which parts
of the Bible originated from accurate sources,
and priests' visions and other less accurate stuff.
Thomas
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
27 Jun 2003 05:00:01 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"Indigo Moon Man" <indigomoonman250@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2003 14:46, Thomas Dehn wrote:
How do you explain all those well-known mistranslations
of the Bible throughout the centuries,
and the fact that the Bible clearly contains passages which
were not written by the original authors, but added
later, like St. Mark's 16:9-20, or the German protestant
removing various references to ovens from their
Bibles after 1945?
And lets not ignore that even a correct translation can
easily be misinterpreted, because words are fully understood
only in their cultural context. An example would be
the restrictions against pork.
I am not saying that the Bible is not correct.
Then what are you saying?
The Bible is very complex. It comprises various different
sources, different legimate sources, such as visions
of priests, or historical documents, plus a few illegimate
sources where mankind tampered with the Bible. There
also exist legitimate sources which are not (or no longer)
contained in the Bible, such as St. Thomas', because they didn't
appeal to the ancient RCC.
The Bible is like putting together a Stephen Hawking article,
plus 15 minutes of "Friends", plus an essay of a Historican,
plus a few pages from Gandhi's diary,
plus a Jim Morrison song, plus a usenet thread, plus
an excerpt from "Independence Day", plus selected
New York Times headlines, all onto one CD.
Most ordinary people have no idea which parts of the
Bible originated from what source. And most will
just believe what they want to believe, and will ignore
those parts of the Bible which contradict their believes
and their habits. Do you respect Numbers: 15, 38?
Probably not. Does it bother you that the Bible contains
different versions how God created mankind, versions
which contradict eachother? Probably not, either.
Yet, many people believe that the Ten Commandments are
the word of God. Literally. There even are different
groups who have different, contradictory translations
of the Bible, each one claiming that their own
favorized translation is authorized by God himself.
Me, I am puzzled how people can fail to notice
all these contradictions, and say that they "believe
in the Bible". From my PoV, you can respect the
Ten Commandsments, but believing in the Bible
(all of it at the same time) does not make much
sense to me, it would be like believing in creationism
and evolutionary theory at the same time.
Don't you think that maybe an all knowing, all
powerful God would be able to
preserve a message to his people in some form
or another down thru time?
But what would that form be? Would be as simple
as "exactly to this, then do that", or would it
contain various tests, where you would have
to work out the right thing to do, rather than
stricly follow orders? Are you actually are
expected to learn ancient Hebrew to understand
God's word, rather than go the cheap road
an read a faulty translation of a faulty translation
of a faulty translation (ancient Hebrew -> ancient Greek -> Latin
-> English)? Would God prevent people
from changing his words, or would he test
whether people can resist temptation, such as he
did not prevent various crimes which were
committed by humans in his name?
And, are you expected to know that you are
only human and cannot fully understand the will
of God, or are you allowed to put yourself
on a level close to God, claiming that you
know exactly what God meant when he said this or that?
Thomas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
28 Jun 2003 11:24:18 AM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Saturday 28 Jun 2003 4:56 am, Velvet
<s4041966@student.uq.edu.au> wrote:
snip
Needless to say,
upon sober and very painful reflection, and many months of agonising, I
left the whole system of beliefs behind, am now back to atheist / Buddhist
if I had to pigeon hole myself. Now please don't tell me that it was just
them, and there are other Christians who are "good and true to the word of
god "
out there - I've seen more groups than fingers on my hands, and these
people were some of the best!
It is sad that Good News can be spoiled or obscured by messengers who make
mistakes or rub people up the wrong way.
I'm not too keen on Organised Religion, but I do think that individual
'spirituality' (for want of a better word) is real, and valuable, and that
personal study of scriptures (of various religions and philosophies) is
worth the effort. I don't necessarily agree with (or believe) all that
I've read, but I hope I can respect other people's beliefs. It's one thing
to say "I believe ...", but quite another for anyone to say "You should
believe ..." (let alone "You must believe, or else"). (And I do know that
creates a paradox).
I'm sad that anyone gets hurt or confused or misled by people who claim to
be acting as members of any religious group (I don't think 'Christian'
groups are the only culprits) - and I know that there are people, and
groups, 'out there', who do not act like that or try to impose their own
beliefs, but rather try to live up to an ideal. Those people don't exploit
any power they might have, and I honestly think they try not to hurt anyone
- and would be extremely upset if they inadvertantly did - but they don't
get publicity, and don't want it, so it's easy to not notice them. They
follow many paths of faith, many are 'members' of one or another Organised
Religion, probably as many are not active members of any religious group.
They won't necessarily stand up and identify themselves as being such
people either, if asked: many of them probably don't know they are, they
just get on with it.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Velvet" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
28 Jun 2003 08:18:52 PM |
|
|
snip
It is sad that Good News can be spoiled or obscured by messengers who make
mistakes or rub people up the wrong way.
I'm not too keen on Organised Religion, but I do think that individual
'spirituality' (for want of a better word) is real, and valuable, and that
personal study of scriptures (of various religions and philosophies) is
worth the effort. I don't necessarily agree with (or believe) all that
I've read, but I hope I can respect other people's beliefs. It's one
thing
to say "I believe ...", but quite another for anyone to say "You should
believe ..." (let alone "You must believe, or else"). (And I do know
that
creates a paradox).
"It is either my way or the wrong way"
I'm sad that anyone gets hurt or confused or misled by people who claim to
be acting as members of any religious group (I don't think 'Christian'
groups are the only culprits) - and I know that there are people, and
groups, 'out there', who do not act like that or try to impose their own
beliefs, but rather try to live up to an ideal. Those people don't
exploit
any power they might have, and I honestly think they try not to hurt
anyone
- and would be extremely upset if they inadvertantly did - but they don't
get publicity, and don't want it, so it's easy to not notice them. They
follow many paths of faith, many are 'members' of one or another Organised
Religion, probably as many are not active members of any religious group.
They won't necessarily stand up and identify themselves as being such
people either, if asked: many of them probably don't know they are, they
just get on with it.
You speak wise words... I know that they did not intend to do the things
that they did, if fact that the people who actually did all the hurt to my
friend and me did it out of their own fear and ignorance.. They could do
envisage a good, morally upstanding (or whatever) life without a rigid
belief in the Catechism. They were very scared of "the dark side" and did
not allow themselves to be tested, so to say. They apologised to my friend,
but not me, and even then their apology was "We are sorry that you feel hurt
about this" - kind of like saying "i am sorry that your foot is hurting, but
I still meant to stomp on it." And the Archbishop did bugger all, even
though it was his respoinsibility to ensure that people in his parish did
not suffer emotional abuse at the hands of people in authority. I still
think that my friend should have gone to the media and embarrassed the hell
out the group, but its a bit too late now. (he agrees with me in
retrospect).
Its such a pity that there aren't controlling agents when it comes to those
groups - like a body they must account to. A lot of abuse goes on behind
closed doors, and people find it difficult to overcome the guilt and "but
they meant well, I can't be angry with them" attitude.
I am not too crash hot on Organised Religion either... Terry Pratchett in
the "Small gods" pretty much said it all. :)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
29 Jun 2003 01:03:33 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Sunday 29 Jun 2003 2:18 am, Velvet
<s4041966@student.uq.edu.au> wrote:
You speak wise words... I know that they did not intend to do the things
that they did, if fact that the people who actually did all the hurt to my
friend and me did it out of their own fear and ignorance.. They could do
envisage a good, morally upstanding (or whatever) life without a rigid
belief in the Catechism. They were very scared of "the dark side" and did
not allow themselves to be tested, so to say.
Some people really are scared about these things, and some of them are
teachers or priests of one sort or another; some of these people are
scared even to think for themselves. Some strands of Organised Religion
have a long history of having been used (or abused) by secular powers,
exploiting the fear and encouraging ignorance for their own purposes.
Medieval Europe was run like that for centuries, and it's a hard legacy to
overcome - as you have discovered.
They apologised to my
friend, but not me, and even then their apology was "We are sorry that you
feel hurt about this" - kind of like saying "i am sorry that your foot is
hurting, but I still meant to stomp on it."
The infamous "Spanish Inquisition" did far worse, with the very best of
intentions.
And the Archbishop did bugger
all, even though it was his respoinsibility to ensure that people in his
parish did not suffer emotional abuse at the hands of people in authority.
Archbishops are still only ordinary people, underneath the fancy titles and
so on. Some of them are as scared as their 'flock' - and that, of course,
perpetuates the mindset. Those people who are most afraid to start with,
are the ones most likely to seek an 'authority figure' they can surrender
their thinking to - and so the thing is perpetuated. I'm afraid it's part
of human nature. (And also a good reason to encourage as many people as
possible to study the original sources, and make up their own minds -
without any teacher or priest trying to "show the way". It's an uphill
struggle, and not always appreciated, and contradicts the way some
Organised Religious groups are constructed).
I still think that my friend should have gone to the media and embarrassed
the hell out the group, but its a bit too late now. (he agrees with me in
retrospect).
Doing that would have had unpredictable results.
Its such a pity that there aren't controlling agents when it comes to
those groups - like a body they must account to. A lot of abuse goes on
behind closed doors, and people find it difficult to overcome the guilt
and "but they meant well, I can't be angry with them" attitude.
As far as the people themselves are concerned, they /are/ responsible to a
Higher Authority. Getting 'religion' and worldly authorities tangled up
with each other, is what started much of the mess we are living with now.
When people in a position of trust abuse their power and harm those in their
care, they become subject to the Law of whatever community they are living
in; more and more victims are learning that they can, and should, report
abuses to the legal system. It will take a long time, but that trend will,
I hope, eventually help to remove the secrecy and shame - and remove the
power of abusers. That goes for many organisations, not only religious
ones.
I am not too crash hot on Organised Religion either... Terry Pratchett in
the "Small gods" pretty much said it all. :)
He's a pretty decent philosopher, as well as darn good spinner of funny
stories :))
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Indigo Moon Man" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
27 Jun 2003 05:11:16 PM |
|
|
On Friday 27 June 2003 16:00, Thomas Dehn wrote:
only human and cannot fully understand the will
of God, or are you allowed to put yourself
on a level close to God, claiming that you
know exactly what God meant when he said this or that?
You seem to have accidently left out the part where I said I didn't care to
get into a theological debate with you so allow me to reinsert it here.
--
Subtract 250 to email me.
Apostolic Voice:
http://www.apostolic-voice.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe User" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
29 Jun 2003 03:37:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:56:09 +1000, "Velvet"
<s4041966@student.uq.edu.au> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
How do you explain all those well-known mistranslations
of the Bible throughout the centuries,
and the fact that the Bible clearly contains passages which
were not written by the original authors, but added
later, like St. Mark's 16:9-20, or the German protestant
removing various references to ovens from their
Bibles after 1945?
My biggest grumble about all things Biblical is the sheer amount of violence
and nastiness in it, in both Testaments.
Weather you like it or not is beside the point, you are but dust, a
spec in the infinite ocean of eternity. God had a plan, the devil and
man decided to rebel, this is the consequence.
Contradictions and deliberate electives and bad translations just add to the picture.
Rule 1: The bible can not contradict itself, if you believe that it is
contradicting itself, you just don't get it since by definition, God
is never wrong. It boils down to who do you trust, a all powerful,
all knowing being, or you own insignificant human understanding.
I agree with Indigo
on that the message is undoubtedly good, but personally I wouldn't read past
the gospels for it - the rest of it is even more muddled.
Heaven and Earth will pass away, but the words in that book will never
pass away, as divinely proclaimed. It's all the truth, every word, if
any man(person) lacks knowledge/widom (of the word) - let him ask of
God who gives all good things liberally.
You have not, because you ask not
There are 3 (or is t 4?) versions of the 10 commandments
No, there are only one set of commandments, they were/are written in
ancient hebrew, so there have been some mis translations, most notably
Thou shall not kill, which literally translated states thou shall not
commit first degree murder, but if people actually READ THE BOOK, and
saw the chapters explaining what the commandments meant with examples
and everything, there would be no mistakes.
two varieties of the Hebrew Law
(the second written upon their release from Babylon, and its a lot harsher
than the first as they were rebuilding their society). Most people doesn't
realise just how nasty the story of Sodom is, or that there is another,
similar, story in the OT that supports the view that its much better to give
your two teenage daughters (or a concubine) to be gang raped by the feral
crowds rather than let strangers suffer same ( how on earth the story of
Sodom is used to illustrate that God doesn't like "gay" people is beyond
me... )
It's IN THE BOOK, and it's repeated over and over, and over again to
pound it into retarded humans thick skulls.
Homosexuality is the one of the epitomize of a corrupt evil society,
things have gotten so bad that homosexuality runs rampet, it's a
barometer.
You know you a society is really sick when homosexuality runs rampet,
that simple.
Or that God doesn't want menstruating women to prepare food or go
into churches or indeed talk to men (men were to go and wash themselves
after touching a menstruating woman - they were made unclean, apparently).
Those are the old deutoromical(sp) laws, and that is how the ancient
hebrews were to conduct themselves, many parts have been
scientifically proven, 3,000 years ago, people didn't have modern
medicine, so God gave them made things very simple for them because of
their limited understanding - Menstruating women are unclean,
discharging of bodily fluids propagate diseases.
I don't explain the reasons to my pets or small children why they
should not do things, they wouldn't understand even if I did, No don't
do that because I said so. They live alot longer that way. Again,
it's a matter of trust, do you trust God to look after you, or will
you be a stupid animal and rely on your own limited understanding.
Or being put to death for eating shellfish.
That isn't biblical, what is biblical is that shellfish were
considered "unclean" animals, you wouldn't be put to death, you would
eat them and you would die. Sure enough, how many cases of people
dying from shellfish happen every year?
However that 'rule' has been superceeded by the new testimate where
the Lord (Jesus) told Peter "How are you to call what I made
unclean????"
Or masturbating.
Like Homosexuality, it's a symptom of a bigger problem - Lust.
Again, Do you follow the Lord, or the worthless crap that humans come
up with?
Or that women were supposed to keep their mouths shut in public places and always defer to
their husbands or fathers for any decision (St Paul said that)
Yes, he did, and if you READ THE BOOK, you will notice that he
explicitly states that He, Paul, thinks it's the way it should be, it
is NOT divinely commanded.
Or St John
(as well as many others) evidently pigging out on magic mushies before
writing Apocalypse
I need a cite to answer, but to feminists, the absolute truth is this,
in the beginning, God made MAN, God gave man a mind, and free will, he
is made in God's image, but is not God. God observed Man and though,
gee he looks lonely, this is not good, Let us make him a help mate,
and thus women was 'born'.
Women were explicitly created to help men, by divine decree, you don't
like it, ***** at God, but be forewarned, he, like everyone else hates
whinners and ingrates.
..
My BIG question is, where do you draw the line between "belief" and
disregarding the inconvenient bits?
For every word that is added, the Lord shall add plagues onto those
who add, for every word that is discarded, God will take away their
eternal reward, how's that.
What in the Bible is cultural,
irrelevant, outdated or specific to those people and that situation.
So is everything else, but it's the fundamental principals that
matter, not the specifics.
If you think the bible is complicated, try calculus or physics, you
start with very broad, utterly complicated rules, and by understanding
how they work, derive simple solutions for specific problems.
what is mythology and what is the true voice of the divine?
The "bible" is an immortal, living thing, there are no 'myths'.
And whom do you listen to when you are trying to answer that question? Your preacher or priest,
your sense of rational or your heart?
Both are the wrong answer, if you have a question, why not try asking
the person who wrote the book (a/k/a God).
I spent 4 years of my life running around with a Catholic community of
sorts, and still can't forget the sheer hypocrisy and bigotry of these
otherwise nice, reasonable, people.
It would be interesting to hear what the specifics of the bigotry
where, as for hypocrisy, that too is the human condition, do as I say,
not as I do.
Its a long and bitter story. They used
the Bible to support their treatment of me and my close friend who was
driven to nervous breakdown by them. Even those of them who were studying /
doing postgrad / lecturing at universities put all their scientific training
and logical thinking on hold when talking about religion.
The early scientists, including Einstein had the right approach, God
designed the universe, we are just trying to figure out how he did it.
"Intellectuals" discount the absolute truths, having no faith, they
are educated fools, and are and should be treated accordingly.
Needless to say,
upon sober and very painful reflection, and many months of agonising, I left
the whole system of beliefs behind, am now back to atheist / Buddhist
I rip on Buddha and every other heathen god the way every Christian is
suppose to, see Elijah and prophets of Baal. there is a very good
reason why God told the children of Israel not to allow foreigners and
their pagan gods amongst their mists, this is why.
THOU SHALL NOT HAVE ANY OTHER GODS.
Period, end of discussion, no comprises, God doesn't give a ***** about
your reasoning, I think that's why he phased it THOU SHALL NOT...
if I
had to pigeon hole myself. Now *please* don't tell me that it was just them,
and there are other Christians who are "good and true to the word of god "
out there - I've seen more groups than fingers on my hands, and these
people were some of the best!
Regardless of what Pig fucking other religions say, man is not God,
never will be god, they are but dust, judging god on the basis of
humans makes as much sense as relating sand dunes to the Sears tower.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
29 Jun 2003 05:07:13 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Sunday 29 Jun 2003 9:37 pm, Joe User
<genocide@fallenangel.org> wrote:
snip
I rip on Buddha and every other heathen god the way every Christian is
suppose to, see Elijah and prophets of Baal. there is a very good
reason why God told the children of Israel not to allow foreigners and
their pagan gods amongst their mists, this is why.
THOU SHALL NOT HAVE ANY OTHER GODS.
Period, end of discussion, no comprises, God doesn't give a ***** about
your reasoning, I think that's why he phased it THOU SHALL NOT...
snip
Regardless of what Pig fucking other religions say, man is not God,
never will be god, they are but dust, judging god on the basis of
humans makes as much sense as relating sand dunes to the Sears tower.
In this post you seem to be telling everyone to accept and believe in the
very same 'religion' as the one which in another post in this thread, you
say caused you so much suffering as a child that "I turned my back on
religion a long time ago. I have no regrets."
You can't reject it and preach it; what do you really believe? (You don't
have to answer that question here, but I think you need to think about it!)
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Velvet" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
29 Jun 2003 09:34:10 PM |
|
|
whoa, Joe... I was going to respond properly to your post, but I don't think
I am going to bother wasting my breath and fingertips of someone as rabid as
you. Just for your information, Buddhism has NO god. Buddha is not a god, he
is teacher.
You discounted everything I said on principle - eg. going on in a way that
is typical of fundamentalism about how god hates gay people (I resent you
saying that, btw), but discounting the fact that the very same god doesn't
mind women being gang raped. The story that mirrors the story of Sodom talks
about a man giving up his concubine to the crowd to save his own skin. The
woman was found the next morning on the doorstep of the house, presumably
covered in wounds and bruised, soaked in sweat and semen and blood. YOUR GOD
APPROVED OF THAT!! Your god approved of homicide, murder, adultery, torture,
kidnapping, rape and all manner of violent assault - as long as it was done
by the right people. READ the bible yourself, don't just listen to your
preachers.
All I can say - read the bible attentively! - there ARE 4 versions of the
commandments in the same book. The bible contradicts itself on every turn,
and you contradict yourself writing first that there is nothing un-important
in the bible, that ALL of it is the word of god, and then claiming that some
laws are simply sanitary, and that the words of st. Paul are just words of a
fallible human being. You are making every classic argument of a person
blinded by their Organised Religion.
And man, think for yourself, would you? god gave you the brains, its a sin
not to use them.
Velvet
Joe User <genocide@fallenangel.org> wrote in message
news:55gufv8mbog8t2ifbfeci4fi2hunvi4m40@4ax.com...
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:56:09 +1000, "Velvet"
<s4041966@student.uq.edu.au> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
How do you explain all those well-known mistranslations
of the Bible throughout the centuries,
and the fact that the Bible clearly contains passages which
were not written by the original authors, but added
later, like St. Mark's 16:9-20, or the German protestant
removing various references to ovens from their
Bibles after 1945?
My biggest grumble about all things Biblical is the sheer amount of
violence
and nastiness in it, in both Testaments.
Weather you like it or not is beside the point, you are but dust, a
spec in the infinite ocean of eternity. God had a plan, the devil and
man decided to rebel, this is the consequence.
Contradictions and deliberate electives and bad translations just add to
the picture.
Rule 1: The bible can not contradict itself, if you believe that it is
contradicting itself, you just don't get it since by definition, God
is never wrong. It boils down to who do you trust, a all powerful,
all knowing being, or you own insignificant human understanding.
I agree with Indigo
on that the message is undoubtedly good, but personally I wouldn't read
past
the gospels for it - the rest of it is even more muddled.
Heaven and Earth will pass away, but the words in that book will never
pass away, as divinely proclaimed. It's all the truth, every word, if
any man(person) lacks knowledge/widom (of the word) - let him ask of
God who gives all good things liberally.
You have not, because you ask not
There are 3 (or is t 4?) versions of the 10 commandments
No, there are only one set of commandments, they were/are written in
ancient hebrew, so there have been some mis translations, most notably
Thou shall not kill, which literally translated states thou shall not
commit first degree murder, but if people actually READ THE BOOK, and
saw the chapters explaining what the commandments meant with examples
and everything, there would be no mistakes.
two varieties of the Hebrew Law
(the second written upon their release from Babylon, and its a lot
harsher
than the first as they were rebuilding their society). Most people
doesn't
realise just how nasty the story of Sodom is, or that there is another,
similar, story in the OT that supports the view that its much better to
give
your two teenage daughters (or a concubine) to be gang raped by the feral
crowds rather than let strangers suffer same ( how on earth the story of
Sodom is used to illustrate that God doesn't like "gay" people is beyond
me... )
It's IN THE BOOK, and it's repeated over and over, and over again to
pound it into retarded humans thick skulls.
Homosexuality is the one of the epitomize of a corrupt evil society,
things have gotten so bad that homosexuality runs rampet, it's a
barometer.
You know you a society is really sick when homosexuality runs rampet,
that simple.
Or that God doesn't want menstruating women to prepare food or go
into churches or indeed talk to men (men were to go and wash themselves
after touching a menstruating woman - they were made unclean,
apparently).
Those are the old deutoromical(sp) laws, and that is how the ancient
hebrews were to conduct themselves, many parts have been
scientifically proven, 3,000 years ago, people didn't have modern
medicine, so God gave them made things very simple for them because of
their limited understanding - Menstruating women are unclean,
discharging of bodily fluids propagate diseases.
I don't explain the reasons to my pets or small children why they
should not do things, they wouldn't understand even if I did, No don't
do that because I said so. They live alot longer that way. Again,
it's a matter of trust, do you trust God to look after you, or will
you be a stupid animal and rely on your own limited understanding.
Or being put to death for eating shellfish.
That isn't biblical, what is biblical is that shellfish were
considered "unclean" animals, you wouldn't be put to death, you would
eat them and you would die. Sure enough, how many cases of people
dying from shellfish happen every year?
However that 'rule' has been superceeded by the new testimate where
the Lord (Jesus) told Peter "How are you to call what I made
unclean????"
Or masturbating.
Like Homosexuality, it's a symptom of a bigger problem - Lust.
Again, Do you follow the Lord, or the worthless crap that humans come
up with?
Or that women were supposed to keep their mouths shut in public places
and always defer to
their husbands or fathers for any decision (St Paul said that)
Yes, he did, and if you READ THE BOOK, you will notice that he
explicitly states that He, Paul, thinks it's the way it should be, it
is NOT divinely commanded.
Or St John
(as well as many others) evidently pigging out on magic mushies before
writing Apocalypse
I need a cite to answer, but to feminists, the absolute truth is this,
in the beginning, God made MAN, God gave man a mind, and free will, he
is made in God's image, but is not God. God observed Man and though,
gee he looks lonely, this is not good, Let us make him a help mate,
and thus women was 'born'.
Women were explicitly created to help men, by divine decree, you don't
like it, ***** at God, but be forewarned, he, like everyone else hates
whinners and ingrates.
.
My BIG question is, where do you draw the line between "belief" and
disregarding the inconvenient bits?
For every word that is added, the Lord shall add plagues onto those
who add, for every word that is discarded, God will take away their
eternal reward, how's that.
What in the Bible is cultural,
irrelevant, outdated or specific to those people and that situation.
So is everything else, but it's the fundamental principals that
matter, not the specifics.
If you think the bible is complicated, try calculus or physics, you
start with very broad, utterly complicated rules, and by understanding
how they work, derive simple solutions for specific problems.
what is mythology and what is the true voice of the divine?
The "bible" is an immortal, living thing, there are no 'myths'.
And whom do you listen to when you are trying to answer that question?
Your preacher or priest,
your sense of rational or your heart?
Both are the wrong answer, if you have a question, why not try asking
the person who wrote the book (a/k/a God).
I spent 4 years of my life running around with a Catholic community of
sorts, and still can't forget the sheer hypocrisy and bigotry of these
otherwise nice, reasonable, people.
It would be interesting to hear what the specifics of the bigotry
where, as for hypocrisy, that too is the human condition, do as I say,
not as I do.
Its a long and bitter story. They used
the Bible to support their treatment of me and my close friend who was
driven to nervous breakdown by them. Even those of them who were studying
/
doing postgrad / lecturing at universities put all their scientific
training
and logical thinking on hold when talking about religion.
The early scientists, including Einstein had the right approach, God
designed the universe, we are just trying to figure out how he did it.
"Intellectuals" discount the absolute truths, having no faith, they
are educated fools, and are and should be treated accordingly.
Needless to say,
upon sober and very painful reflection, and many months of agonising, I
left
the whole system of beliefs behind, am now back to atheist / Buddhist
I rip on Buddha and every other heathen god the way every Christian is
suppose to, see Elijah and prophets of Baal. there is a very good
reason why God told the children of Israel not to allow foreigners and
their pagan gods amongst their mists, this is why.
THOU SHALL NOT HAVE ANY OTHER GODS.
Period, end of discussion, no comprises, God doesn't give a ***** about
your reasoning, I think that's why he phased it THOU SHALL NOT...
if I
had to pigeon hole myself. Now *please* don't tell me that it was just
them,
and there are other Christians who are "good and true to the word of god
"
out there - I've seen more groups than fingers on my hands, and these
people were some of the best!
Regardless of what Pig fucking other religions say, man is not God,
never will be god, they are but dust, judging god on the basis of
humans makes as much sense as relating sand dunes to the Sears tower.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe User" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
30 Jun 2003 12:25:43 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:34:10 +1000, "Velvet"
<s4041966@student.uq.edu.au> wrote:
whoa, Joe... I was going to respond properly to your post, but I don't think
I am going to bother wasting my breath and fingertips of someone as rabid as
you. Just for your information, Buddhism has NO god. Buddha is not a god, he
is teacher.
A mear easter inferior human being, something form me to squash under
my boot.
Whatever he has, I don't want, and will make sure no one else has it
either, since that would probably make them stinger.
Point of story, consolidate as much power as inhumanly possible, and
then rub pathetic humanity face in the dirt with it, stupid animals.
and I like animals.
You discounted everything I said on principle - eg. going on in a way that
is typical of fundamentalism about how god hates gay people (I resent you
saying that, btw),
Technically God doesn't hate people, he hates the fact they are gay,
by rejecting his law, he rejects them (their choice), and because they
homos are not under his benevolent protection, I am able to trash them
as much as I want.
but discounting the fact that the very same god doesn't mind women being gang raped.
Now that he has HUGE problems with, sexual immorality, will destroy
the penetrators for that.
The story that mirrors the story of Sodom talks about a man giving up his concubine to the crowd to save his own skin.
Not his skin, Angelic beings wearing the guise of man. Of course they
are more than capable of defending themselves, as was pointed out
latter.
The moral of the story is that Lot had his priorities straight, God
first, always, even if it meant his daughters, that is true faith.
God says jump, the faithful say how high.
Thewoman was found the next morning on the doorstep of the house, presumably
covered in wounds and bruised, soaked in sweat and semen and blood. YOUR GOD
APPROVED OF THAT!!
I don't know what bible you have, mine says that the homos insisted on
the angelic beings disgused as men, who then went out and promptly
blinded the whole band of them. Sodom was destroyed the next day.
Your god approved of homicide, murder, adultery, torture,
kidnapping, rape and all manner of violent assault - as long as it was done
by the right people.
Like I said, he's God, he can do whatever he wants, he says no more
eating cherreos for breakfast, as dumb as it sounds, I don't eat
cherreos for breakfast.
If I was God, I would have different rules, but I'm not, so I follow
his.
READ the bible yourself, don't just listen to your
preachers.
Oh you must have the pathetic 'alternative' version that's interlaced
with Eastern *****, I don't learn from other cultures, I destroy
them, preferably from the safety of an AC-130 gunship.
All I can say - read the bible attentively! - there ARE 4 versions of the
commandments in the same book. The bible contradicts itself on every turn,
and you contradict yourself writing first that there is nothing un-important
in the bible, that ALL of it is the word of god, and then claiming that some
laws are simply sanitary, and that the words of st. Paul are just words of a
fallible human being. You are making every classic argument of a person
blinded by their Organised Religion.
Nothing 'organized' about truth, it is what it is, that simple.
If you don't like the truth, that's your problem, advocate for
pathetic eastern philosphy/humanism, it just became my problem.
How do I solve all problems, hunt down their source and destroy them
like the pathetic animals they are.
It's not like God (whom they hate) will avenge them.
I get a freebee, what's not to love.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Velvet" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
30 Jun 2003 05:06:25 AM |
|
|
Welcome to kill file honey - I don't have time for your racist poison.
Seethe in your hatred of all living things, and go back to your cave. BTW,
that pig in front of the cave is the only lay you are going to get for the
rest of your life, or at least until the SPCA gets on your back and sends
you to jail to contemplate eternity in hell for abusing animals. No decent
human being is going to come close to you or your religion of hatred.
And all you nice Americans wonder why your country has an image that it
does! I realise that this guy is a crazy fundamentalist who is also probably
mentally disturbed and cannot think straight to save his soul, but for
goodness sake! I 'd prefer Jamal to him any day (BTW, are they the same
person?) Isn't there any way to block these people from posting in this
group?
velvet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe User" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
30 Jun 2003 01:06:15 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:06:25 +1000, "Velvet"
<s4041966@student.uq.edu.au> wrote:
Welcome to kill file honey - I don't have time for your racist poison.
Of course not, since you are a different one that wishes the same
rights as real higher life forms. And why would I ever want to do
that? You have nothing to offer, a giant read mark(liablity) in the
balance sheet that is life.
Seethe in your hatred of all living things,
No, actually I like 99.99% of all living things, except humans, the
"peers" that are forced down my throat, I don't have peers, nor do I
want them, they are just life size skeets, targets, Nothing you can
ever do in 10,000 years will ever be good enough, and even if it was,
I'd burn it to the ground just to spite you.
and go back to your cave. BTW
Oh no, and that's the fight, what pathetic human is going to be beated
down like a ***** into submission, forced to live it's pathetic
worthless life in suffering and misery, while the victor just gloats.
that pig in front of the cave is the only lay you are going to get for the
rest of your life, or at least until the SPCA gets on your back and sends
you to jail to contemplate eternity in hell for abusing animals.
You are the eastern religion animal fucker, not me, get your facts
straight. Maybe Buddha or Krishna can save you, then again, probably
not, road kill waiting to happen.
No decent human being is going to come close to you or your religion of hatred.
A/K/A the diverse excluded peoples of the world, ***** them let them
suffer and die while I laugh. Try hope dream, it's all in vain,
nothing but a painful death at the end of your road, and I'm just
laughing.
And all you nice Americans wonder why your country has an image that it
does!
***** the world and their surplus billions, Organic sewage that should
be treated accordingly. It's like cleaning out a litter box, they
smell bad, they are toxic, but it's got to be cleaned out or your
house smells like *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jernau Gurgeh" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
30 Jun 2003 06:25:05 AM |
|
|
Velvet wrote on 30 Jun 2003 in alt.support.depression
Welcome to kill file honey - I don't have time for your racist poison.
Seethe in your hatred of all living things, and go back to your cave.
BTW, that pig in front of the cave is the only lay you are going to
get for the rest of your life, or at least until the SPCA gets on your
back and sends you to jail to contemplate eternity in hell for abusing
animals. No decent human being is going to come close to you or your
religion of hatred.
Velvet, meet Joe. Sorry you hadn't figured him out sooner, I can imagine
the shock.
snip
I realise that this guy is a crazy fundamentalist who is also
probably mentally disturbed and cannot think straight to save his
soul
There ya go, that realization should be in the back of your mind whenever
he eludes your killfile.
I 'd prefer Jamal to him any day (BTW,
are they the same person?)
They are not, and personally I prefer Joe. He suffers from extreme Foot
in Mouth Syndrome, and he can be as entertaining as he is delusional.
There are even occasions when he surprises us by being nice and he always
plays straight when discussing cats.
Isn't there any way to block these people
from posting in this group?
No, not without moderation. But I think that is the beauty of usenet,
everybody gets to have their say. Use your killfile liberally, and don't
take anything said in the anonimity of cyberspace too seriously.
Jernau
--
Watch out where the huskies go,
and don't you eat that yellow snow
- FZ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Velvet" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
30 Jun 2003 06:15:22 PM |
|
|
Velvet, meet Joe. Sorry you hadn't figured him out sooner, I can imagine
the shock.
I don't think I've encountered this side of him before. Oh well... i've
always wanted to say something like this to a mad fnudametalist -i know,
its not very naci but it made me feel a bit better. Its hard to keep one's
temper after going through several years of abuse at the hands of a fairly
straight religious group (a Catholic one of all things) and supporting a
close friend through a nervious breakdown which he got because of their
treatment of him.
I would like to apologise to all except Joe for my previous comments. :)
Sorry guys, I really lost my temper there.
I realise that this guy is a crazy fundamentalist who is also
probably mentally disturbed and cannot think straight to save his
soul
There ya go, that realization should be in the back of your mind whenever
he eludes your killfile.
It will now.
I 'd prefer Jamal to him any day (BTW,
are they the same person?)
They are not, and personally I prefer Joe. He suffers from extreme Foot
in Mouth Syndrome, and he can be as entertaining as he is delusional.
There are even occasions when he surprises us by being nice and he always
plays straight when discussing cats.
I am more of a dog person myself :) But I've had a cat too. Yeah, I guess
he can, but fundamentalism is abit of a sore spot at times and I loose my
temper. :) discussing religion as rational beings is not a problem at all -
I've studied a lot of theologies at uni and in my own time and find it
fascinating, its justthe blatant hatred of fundamentalism that gets me
going.
Isn't there any way to block these people
from posting in this group?
No, not without moderation. But I think that is the beauty of usenet,
everybody gets to have their say. Use your killfile liberally, and don't
take anything said in the anonimity of cyberspace too seriously.
Nah, I won't. But , seriously, thank you. I really appreciate your words.
Take care sweetie
velvet
Jernau
--
Watch out where the huskies go,
and don't you eat that yellow snow
- FZ
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
28 Jun 2003 04:51:24 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"Velvet" <s4041966@student.uq.edu.au> wrote:
Or being put to death for eating shellfish.
There probably was some real reason for that rule
3000 years ago. Might be difficult to find out what the
real background of that one is, though.
My BIG question is, where do you draw the line between "belief" and
disregarding the inconvenient bits? What in the Bible is cultural,
irrelevant, outdated or specific to those
people and that situation, what is
mythology and what is the true voice of the divine? And whom do you listen
to when you are trying to answer that question? Your preacher or priest,
your sense of rational or your heart?
I agree, thats the big problem. The priest, of course, will
claim that he has the ultimate authority.
Thomas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Velvet" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible (was: The Prozac That Ate America) |
28 Jun 2003 05:37:14 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
My BIG question is, where do you draw the line between "belief" and
disregarding the inconvenient bits? What in the Bible is cultural,
irrelevant, outdated or specific to those
people and that situation, what is
mythology and what is the true voice of the divine? And whom do you
listen
to when you are trying to answer that question? Your preacher or priest,
your sense of rational or your heart?
I agree, thats the big problem. The priest, of course, will
claim that he has the ultimate authority.
Thomas
of course.. otherwise his choice of profession would loose its meaning and
relevance. this debate has been going on for centuries now, and
unfortunately there are also people in the world who listen to their own
heart but instead of keeping their faith to themselves, they shove it down
other people's throats. I am thinking of all those congregationalist church
pastors and christian cult leaders (BTW, the Mormons fit all the official
criteria for a "cult styled group" :) a bit of a worry, that ) who take
advantage of their charisma and an ego desperately in need of stroking. At
least the big churches have their dogma and boundaries more or less worked
out !
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: The Prozac That Ate America |
26 Jun 2003 02:05:10 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:58:32 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In article <bddvmo$tue$1@pencil.math.missouri.edu>, Rich Winkel says...
The Prozac That Ate America
Are you massively depressed? Sure you are. Survey says so.
No really, you are! Stop resisting!
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, June 25, 2003
Do you suffer from persistent sad, anxious or "empty" moods?
Feelings of hopelessness, pessimism, guilt, helplessness, bad breath, lame
parallel parking, that sad realization that you suddenly hate every single
one of your outfits and despise your car and are tired of your hairstyle and
really sort of sick of all of your furniture?
Have you lost interest or pleasure in hobbies and activities like knitting
or obsessive nail biting or porn? Are you tired, fatigued, bitchy like Lynne
Cheney after a gin bender? Have difficulty concentrating, remembering or
making decisions, like Dubya after one too many lemonades following a hard
game of T-ball?
Have you ever thought of death or contemplated suicide? You have? Great!
Because if you answered yes to any or all or even some of the above
questions, you might very well be one of the estimated 14 million Americans
walking around at this very moment suffering from severe and untreated
depression. That's right! You! Very, very depressed! And you think you're
fine! But you're not!
Here's how we know: Harvard-trained brain doctors who absolutely swear they
have no direct affiliation to the multibillion-dollar pharmacological
industry ha-ha yeah right have taken a big survey and discovered that a
shockingly huge number of Americans are apparently just totally bummed about
one helluva lot of things, and aren't seeking help for it.
That's right! This means you! You might think you feel all normal. You might
think it's just part of the human condition and especially the BushCo-reamed
anti-fun unemployed undereducated war-gutted faux-macho American condition
to feel waves of ennui and anxiety and pessimism and guilt and sadness over
the world and the environment and the quality of the above-mentioned porn
nowadays.
You might even go so far as to wholeheartedly believe that if you, as a
human anywhere on this planet, somehow don't feel these "downer" things at
least once a month or once a week or once a day just before cocktail hour,
why, you're not actually human, you don't actually feel the world, have an
active brain, a nimble soul, a sense of perspective, and hence you are
probably one of those creepy lizard super-beings from the fifth dimension.
This is where you are wrong. These stern-faced doctors and the industry at
whose tit they suckle very, very much want you to know that if you feel the
slightest bit of stress or sleeplessness or feelings of existential angst,
asking wacky eternal questions like, why the hell am I here and what's the
point anyway and what's it all for and isn't Bush a total lying dink and God
but I'd love more sex and a cool dog and maybe to get my life going in a
different direction, why, you need to call them ASAP and get yourself some
treatment. Preferably in nice, expensive pill form.
And no, you most definitely do not need to learn new and healthy ways to
deeply and profoundly relax and calm down and get yourself and your spirit
in tune. What are you, a terrorist wacko?
You most definitely do not need to, say, start a meditation practice, or get
into yoga, or radically alter/improve your diet, or get regular exercise, or
cut out toxic sugar/alcohol/processed foods.
Nor do you need to begin investigating gentle holistic remedies, or get
regular bodywork, or take more long hot baths and indulge in more oral sex
and good books and maybe get your ***** out of the city more often and into
the woods or out to the ocean.
And you especially should not just realize many of these intense feelings,
these "danger signs" of depression, are pretty much mostly completely normal
and that there are roughly four thousand healthy alternatives to doctors and
often spiritually deadening "magic bullet" drugs that mutate your brain
chemistry and disfigure your dreams and cause impotence and twitchiness and
bad taste in shoes.
And yes, by the way, this was a real survey. That 14 million is a real
number they extrapolated. And those questions, that "criteria" for
depression in the first paragraphs above, those are (mostly) real too.
And this is a real concern by mental-health p | |