| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"% surfs@uniserve" |
| Date: |
01 Dec 2003 01:19:35 PM |
| Object: |
THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
they can help you find out ,
anything you want to know about any teacher / professor anywhere in the
world ,
even if you only have the teachers e-mail address ,
they won't give you personal info , just their work record ,
i'm waiting for an answer back from them
.
|
|
| User: "old coyote" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
01 Dec 2003 05:36:54 PM |
|
|
"%" <surfs@uniserve> wrote in news:vsn52jdmo7uqc8@corp.supernews.com:
they can help you find out ,
anything you want to know about any teacher / professor anywhere in the
world ,
even if you only have the teachers e-mail address ,
they won't give you personal info , just their work record ,
i'm waiting for an answer back from them
Check up on Ms. Whittington (from sixth grade). If she's not doing time,
I'll be much surprised.
--
-=oc=-
.
|
|
|
| User: "pannah1" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
01 Dec 2003 05:58:40 PM |
|
|
"old coyote" <the_oldcoyote@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9444AB1CD2E8Etheoldcoyote@130.133.1.4...
"%" <surfs@uniserve> wrote in news:vsn52jdmo7uqc8@corp.supernews.com:
they can help you find out ,
anything you want to know about any teacher / professor anywhere in the
world ,
even if you only have the teachers e-mail address ,
they won't give you personal info , just their work record ,
i'm waiting for an answer back from them
Check up on Ms. Whittington (from sixth grade). If she's not doing time,
I'll be much surprised.
--
-=oc=-
the canadian teacher federation has no such program to look up anyone's
work records, he's full of *****. no one can look up employee information, it
is protected by US law. it's confidentiality, the employer needs permission
from the employee to give out any information to anyone.
.
|
|
|
| User: "% surfs@uniserve" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
01 Dec 2003 08:26:03 PM |
|
|
"pannah1" <pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bqgkfp$21spdl$1@ID-169578.news.uni-berlin.de...
"old coyote" <the_oldcoyote@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9444AB1CD2E8Etheoldcoyote@130.133.1.4...
"%" <surfs@uniserve> wrote in news:vsn52jdmo7uqc8@corp.supernews.com:
they can help you find out ,
anything you want to know about any teacher / professor anywhere in
the
world ,
even if you only have the teachers e-mail address ,
they won't give you personal info , just their work record ,
i'm waiting for an answer back from them
Check up on Ms. Whittington (from sixth grade). If she's not doing
time,
I'll be much surprised.
--
-=oc=-
the canadian teacher federation has no such program to look up anyone's
work records, he's full of *****. no one can look up employee information,
it
is protected by US law. it's confidentiality, the employer needs
permission
from the employee to give out any information to anyone.
if you want to know where a teacher has taught they'll tell you ,
and what do you know about canadian law anyway
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
01 Dec 2003 06:29:54 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:58:40 -0500, "pannah1"
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
<(((*> the canadian teacher federation has no such program to look up anyone's
<(((*> work records, he's full of *****. no one can look up employee information, it
<(((*> is protected by US law. it's confidentiality, the employer needs permission
<(((*> from the employee to give out any information to anyone.
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
Tara J. Ballance
Montreal, Canada
.
|
|
|
| User: "pannah1" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
01 Dec 2003 06:43:37 PM |
|
|
<thehouse@pooh.corner> wrote in message
news:t6nnsvg92ffm16b6ma00kghuocl43bpm3d@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:58:40 -0500, "pannah1"
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
<(((*> the canadian teacher federation has no such program to look up
anyone's
<(((*> work records, he's full of *****. no one can look up employee
information, it
<(((*> is protected by US law. it's confidentiality, the employer needs
permission
<(((*> from the employee to give out any information to anyone.
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when Americans
don't?
please.
.
|
|
|
| User: "% surfs@uniserve" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
01 Dec 2003 08:26:46 PM |
|
|
"pannah1" <pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bqgn4b$22i14i$1@ID-169578.news.uni-berlin.de...
<thehouse@pooh.corner> wrote in message
news:t6nnsvg92ffm16b6ma00kghuocl43bpm3d@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:58:40 -0500, "pannah1"
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
<(((*> the canadian teacher federation has no such program to look up
anyone's
<(((*> work records, he's full of *****. no one can look up employee
information, it
<(((*> is protected by US law. it's confidentiality, the employer needs
permission
<(((*> from the employee to give out any information to anyone.
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans
don't?
please.
because we do
.
|
|
|
| User: "neoholistic" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
02 Dec 2003 02:22:44 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
% escribió:
"pannah1" <pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bqgn4b$22i14i$1@ID-169578.news.uni-berlin.de...
<thehouse@pooh.corner> wrote in message
news:t6nnsvg92ffm16b6ma00kghuocl43bpm3d@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:58:40 -0500, "pannah1"
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
<(((*> the canadian teacher federation has no such program to look up
anyone's
<(((*> work records, he's full of *****. no one can look up employee
information, it
<(((*> is protected by US law. it's confidentiality, the employer needs
permission
<(((*> from the employee to give out any information to anyone.
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans
don't?
please.
because we do
Canada rulez
--
To reach me by email: transform my account name like IBM -> HAL.
.
|
|
|
| User: "% surfs@uniserve" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
02 Dec 2003 02:29:09 AM |
|
|
"neoholistic" <ekqbwpo@terra.es> wrote in message
news:oZXyb.1550252$uj6.3836791@telenews.teleline.es...
x-no-archive: yes
% escribió:
"pannah1" <pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bqgn4b$22i14i$1@ID-169578.news.uni-berlin.de...
<thehouse@pooh.corner> wrote in message
news:t6nnsvg92ffm16b6ma00kghuocl43bpm3d@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:58:40 -0500, "pannah1"
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
<(((*> the canadian teacher federation has no such program to look up
anyone's
<(((*> work records, he's full of *****. no one can look up employee
information, it
<(((*> is protected by US law. it's confidentiality, the employer
needs
permission
<(((*> from the employee to give out any information to anyone.
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans
don't?
please.
because we do
Canada rulez
--
To reach me by email: transform my account name like IBM -> HAL.
yea , we just look like we suck
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
02 Dec 2003 05:34:43 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 12:43 am, pannah1
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans don't?
please.
Some information, such as places of employment or education, is public
anyway. But it isn't about /what/, it's about /where/. US law doesn't
apply outside US borders. Apparently US law doesn't even apply in US bases
in other countries.
(I'm waiting for the first "Guantanamo" defence for a US citizen charged
with a crime against US law and scheduled for trial in a US overseas base.
Especially if it's in Afghanistan ... It will also be interesting to see
what happens when another country uses the 'illegal non-combatant' nonsense
to detain a US citizen incummunicado for an indefinite period.)
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
| User: "% surfs@uniserve" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
02 Dec 2003 08:56:45 PM |
|
|
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:l5kv91-9rm.ln1@ID-107770.user.uni-berlin.de...
In alt.support.depression on Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 12:43 am, pannah1
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans don't?
please.
Some information, such as places of employment or education, is public
anyway. But it isn't about /what/, it's about /where/. US law doesn't
apply outside US borders. Apparently US law doesn't even apply in US
bases
in other countries.
(I'm waiting for the first "Guantanamo" defence for a US citizen charged
with a crime against US law and scheduled for trial in a US overseas base.
Especially if it's in Afghanistan ... It will also be interesting to see
what happens when another country uses the 'illegal non-combatant'
nonsense
to detain a US citizen incummunicado for an indefinite period.)
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
he's correct
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "pannah1" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
03 Dec 2003 06:38:13 PM |
|
|
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:l5kv91-9rm.ln1@ID-107770.user.uni-berlin.de...
In alt.support.depression on Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 12:43 am, pannah1
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans don't?
please.
Some information, such as places of employment or education, is public
anyway. But it isn't about /what/, it's about /where/. US law doesn't
apply outside US borders. Apparently US law doesn't even apply in US
bases
in other countries.
I realise that, but still, you need permission from the employee to give out
any information about them. For my present boss to get my last employment
information I needed to call the place, ask for a permission form to be
faxed to me, siign the form and send it back. and they were taking forever
to send me the permission form and i couldnt be hired at my new job until
they got the permission to get my information. there's no way someone
anywhere would get info about me from that company wthout my permission
because they would not allow it. They can be sued and they know it, so
that's the way it is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "% surfs@uniserve" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
03 Dec 2003 09:20:38 PM |
|
|
"pannah1" <pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bqlvkc$233nko$1@ID-169578.news.uni-berlin.de...
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:l5kv91-9rm.ln1@ID-107770.user.uni-berlin.de...
In alt.support.depression on Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 12:43 am, pannah1
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans don't?
please.
Some information, such as places of employment or education, is public
anyway. But it isn't about /what/, it's about /where/. US law doesn't
apply outside US borders. Apparently US law doesn't even apply in US
bases
in other countries.
I realise that, but still, you need permission from the employee to give
out
any information about them. For my present boss to get my last employment
information I needed to call the place, ask for a permission form to be
faxed to me, siign the form and send it back. and they were taking forever
to send me the permission form and i couldnt be hired at my new job until
they got the permission to get my information. there's no way someone
anywhere would get info about me from that company wthout my permission
because they would not allow it. They can be sued and they know it, so
that's the way it is.
they've already answered me back with the info I requested ,
so lets try looking at it this way , you go on thinking the way you think ,
and I'll go on getting results
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
05 Dec 2003 07:13:11 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Thursday 04 Dec 2003 12:38 am, pannah1
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
there's no way someone
anywhere would get info about me from that company wthout my permission
because they would not allow it. They can be sued and they know it, so
that's the way it is.
There's a surprising amount of personal information 'in the public domain';
even if some of it shouldn't be. Finding out where someone worked and when
they joined and left, seems to pretty straight-forward. I don't know
precisely what details are available to whoever it is % has found, there
may be no breach of any law involved - and what's illegal in one country
may not be illegal in another (it might even be compulsory).
If a company in the USA out-sources some of its wage-roll work, say, to
India, then whose law applies to the data? There are lots of new questions
that the internet raises, for which there are no effective answers.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
| User: "% surfs@uniserve" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
05 Dec 2003 10:41:32 PM |
|
|
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:a2n7a1-b1e.ln1@ID-107770.user.uni-berlin.de...
In alt.support.depression on Thursday 04 Dec 2003 12:38 am, pannah1
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
there's no way someone
anywhere would get info about me from that company wthout my permission
because they would not allow it. They can be sued and they know it, so
that's the way it is.
There's a surprising amount of personal information 'in the public
domain';
even if some of it shouldn't be. Finding out where someone worked and
when
they joined and left, seems to pretty straight-forward. I don't know
precisely what details are available to whoever it is % has found, there
may be no breach of any law involved - and what's illegal in one country
may not be illegal in another (it might even be compulsory).
If a company in the USA out-sources some of its wage-roll work, say, to
India, then whose law applies to the data? There are lots of new
questions
that the internet raises, for which there are no effective answers.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
you tell em , i tried , i already have my report back
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
06 Dec 2003 07:31:28 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Saturday 06 Dec 2003 4:41 am, %
<surfs@uniserve> wrote:
snip
you tell em , i tried , i already have my report back
Even before the internet was thought of, it didn't take more than a few days
for a competent private detective to come up with bank statements, marital
history, employment record, criminal record, driving offences, court
judgements, adresses for the last 10 years, and sometimes a few indicators
of health problems. Even your own bank-manager could 'tip you the wink'
about a potential customer's financial status, quite often. I'm not
condoning it, just saying that it happens.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
| User: "% surfs@uniserve" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
07 Dec 2003 12:15:43 AM |
|
|
"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:jgcaa1-83q.ln1@ID-107770.user.uni-berlin.de...
In alt.support.depression on Saturday 06 Dec 2003 4:41 am, %
<surfs@uniserve> wrote:
snip
you tell em , i tried , i already have my report back
Even before the internet was thought of, it didn't take more than a few
days
for a competent private detective to come up with bank statements, marital
history, employment record, criminal record, driving offences, court
judgements, adresses for the last 10 years, and sometimes a few indicators
of health problems. Even your own bank-manager could 'tip you the wink'
about a potential customer's financial status, quite often. I'm not
condoning it, just saying that it happens.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
I agree , if you got a sin number you traceable
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "old coyote" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
02 Dec 2003 11:37:29 PM |
|
|
Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in
news:l5kv91-9rm.ln1@ID-107770.user.uni-berlin.de:
In alt.support.depression on Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 12:43 am, pannah1
<pannah623@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
Why would US law apply in a Canadian jurisdiction?
he said "anywhere in the world".
that's why.
why would Canada have jurisdiction over American work records when
Americans don't?
please.
Some information, such as places of employment or education, is public
anyway. But it isn't about /what/, it's about /where/. US law
doesn't apply outside US borders. Apparently US law doesn't even
apply in US bases in other countries.
(I'm waiting for the first "Guantanamo" defence for a US citizen
charged with a crime against US law and scheduled for trial in a US
overseas base. Especially if it's in Afghanistan ... It will also be
interesting to see what happens when another country uses the 'illegal
non-combatant' nonsense to detain a US citizen incummunicado for an
indefinite period.)
Scary stuff, Mr. Whiskers. Indeed. Those issues concern more than a few
of us here.
--
-=oc=-
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: THE CANADIAN TEACHERS FEDERATION |
03 Dec 2003 02:58:11 PM |
|
|
In alt.support.depression on Wednesday 03 Dec 2003 5:37 am, old coyote
<the_oldcoyote@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip
Scary stuff, Mr. Whiskers. Indeed. Those issues concern more than a few
of us here.
I've noticed.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^ Interested in Citroens?
-- Whiskers <http://www.aacit.net>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ <news:alt.autos.citroen>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
