| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"%" |
| Date: |
12 Jul 2007 12:12:38 PM |
| Object: |
WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
.
|
|
| User: "humble life" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 12:21:26 PM |
|
|
% wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
i thought she was a he, blimey, she knows quite a bit about mens parts
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 12:23:07 PM |
|
|
"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:5fn67qF3alslpU2@mid.individual.net...
% wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
i thought she was a he, blimey, she knows quite a bit about mens parts
well Humble its kind of like this , the burke thinks its a deb but its
really a pansy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 01:37:50 PM |
|
|
"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:5fn67qF3alslpU2@mid.individual.net...
% wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
i thought she was a he, blimey, she knows quite a bit about mens parts
You were right the first time, he is a he.
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cyberhive" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 02:26:07 PM |
|
|
On Jul 12, 7:37 pm, "Rhiannon" <rhia...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
"humble life" <humble.l...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:5fn67qF3alslpU2@mid.individual.net...
% wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
i thought she was a he, blimey, she knows quite a bit about mens parts
You were right the first time, he is a he.
--
Rhi
Gracias senorita. ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "the_dawggie" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 07:35:35 PM |
|
|
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 07:38:36 PM |
|
|
"the_dawggie" <the_dawggie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184286935.518540.115680@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
i'll be how i'll be ,
its still no excuse for name forging and saying ***** ,
and if that don't suit you , meet me and we'll chat about it
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_dawggie" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 05:53:59 AM |
|
|
On Jul 13, 10:38 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"the_dawggie" <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184286935.518540.115680@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
i'll be how i'll be ,
its still no excuse for name forging and saying ***** ,
and if that don't suit you , meet me and we'll chat about it
See later post about it. I'm not CH, so can't speak for
you or him. You however tend to have issues I also
don't understand, however you can be abusive and
nasty, and don't rate highly on my list.
There is one thing I do pick up with you,
and that is "I'll do what I want to whoever
I want". I guess you are worse off than me. It
doesn't mean I hate you.
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Janithor" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 06:22:49 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
the_dawggie wrote:
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
I'd put it more like 20% I wouldn't shed any tears for, and a tiny % (no
pun intended) that I'd actually cheer for. Overpopulaton is a different
issue.
YMMV of course.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cyberhive" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 06:26:51 AM |
|
|
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
the_dawggie wrote:
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
I'd put it more like 20% I wouldn't shed any tears for, and a tiny % (no
pun intended) that I'd actually cheer for. Overpopulaton is a different
issue.
YMMV of course.
hi
--
€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€
===> Cyberhive <===
€€€€€€€€ 0 €€€€€€€€€
0
0
_
_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ www.cyberhive.tk @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
++++++++++++++++++++++
======================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Janithor" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 06:33:31 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
the_dawggie wrote:
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
I'd put it more like 20% I wouldn't shed any tears for, and a tiny %
(no pun intended) that I'd actually cheer for. Overpopulaton is a
different issue.
YMMV of course.
hi
Will the real Cyberhive please stand up?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cyberhive" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 06:34:49 AM |
|
|
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
the_dawggie wrote:
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
I'd put it more like 20% I wouldn't shed any tears for, and a tiny %
(no pun intended) that I'd actually cheer for. Overpopulaton is a
different issue.
YMMV of course.
hi
Will the real Cyberhive please stand up?
Lol!
--
€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€
===> Cyberhive <===
€€€€€€€€ 0 €€€€€€€€€
0
0
_
_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ www.cyberhive.tk @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
++++++++++++++++++++++
======================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Janithor" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 06:38:25 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
the_dawggie wrote:
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
I'd put it more like 20% I wouldn't shed any tears for, and a tiny %
(no pun intended) that I'd actually cheer for. Overpopulaton is a
different issue.
YMMV of course.
hi
Will the real Cyberhive please stand up?
Lol!
You narcissist you. Say hi to Stefanie and Lily for me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cyberhive" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 06:48:57 AM |
|
|
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
the_dawggie wrote:
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
I'd put it more like 20% I wouldn't shed any tears for, and a tiny
% (no pun intended) that I'd actually cheer for. Overpopulaton is
a different issue.
YMMV of course.
hi
Will the real Cyberhive please stand up?
Lol!
You narcissist you. Say hi to Stefanie and Lily for me.
Will do. Shall I errrrr.......... pass on any money to them from you?
I don't think there'd be prepared to travel to America for you, but I
could have sex with them on your behalf? Whadda ya say?
--
€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€
===> Cyberhive <===
€€€€€€€€ 0 €€€€€€€€€
0
0
_
_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ www.cyberhive.tk @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
@@ @@
++++++++++++++++++++++
======================
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_dawggie" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 07:41:03 AM |
|
|
On Jul 13, 9:48 pm, Cyberhive <cyberh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Cyberhive wrote:
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
the_dawggie wrote:
Quite frankly though, 90% of the world's
population need exterminated. We should
both volenteer for that.
I'd put it more like 20% I wouldn't shed any tears for, and a tiny
% (no pun intended) that I'd actually cheer for. Overpopulaton is
a different issue.
YMMV of course.
hi
Will the real Cyberhive please stand up?
Lol!
You narcissist you. Say hi to Stefanie and Lily for me.
Will do. Shall I errrrr.......... pass on any money to them from you?
I don't think there'd be prepared to travel to America for you, but I
could have sex with them on your behalf? Whadda ya say?
Stop being naughty :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 07:49:40 PM |
|
|
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 08:08:01 PM |
|
|
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
because they have cybersex together even though she's a he , that's why
.
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 08:19:39 PM |
|
|
On 13 Jul, 02:08, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
because they have cybersex together even though she's a > he , that's why
I don't give a ***** what they do, they can whip themselves into a
frenzy of mutual masturbation for all I care, I'm just sick of this
tosser (pun intended) defending the little ***** time and again,
regardless of it's behaviour.
I feel another plonking coming on.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 08:29:21 PM |
|
|
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184289579.413055.32790@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 02:08, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and
why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it
doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
because they have cybersex together even though she's a > he ,
that's why
I don't give a ***** what they do, they can whip themselves into a
frenzy of mutual masturbation for all I care, I'm just sick of this
tosser (pun intended) defending the little ***** time and again,
regardless of it's behaviour.
I feel another plonking coming on.
good plonk it here on the deck and i'll nail it in
.
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 08:56:56 PM |
|
|
On 13 Jul, 02:29, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184289579.413055.32790@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 02:08, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and
why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it
doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
because they have cybersex together even though she's a > he ,
that's why
I don't give a ***** what they do, they can whip themselves into a
frenzy of mutual masturbation for all I care, I'm just sick of this
tosser (pun intended) defending the little ***** time and again,
regardless of it's behaviour.
I feel another plonking coming on.
good plonk it here on the deck and i'll nail it in
Sounds like a plan.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 08:58:40 PM |
|
|
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184291816.984606.97490@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 02:29, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184289579.413055.32790@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 02:08, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty
and
why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it
doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or
form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
because they have cybersex together even though she's a > he ,
that's why
I don't give a ***** what they do, they can whip themselves into a
frenzy of mutual masturbation for all I care, I'm just sick of
this
tosser (pun intended) defending the little ***** time and again,
regardless of it's behaviour.
I feel another plonking coming on.
good plonk it here on the deck and i'll nail it in
Sounds like a plan.
i like nailin new plank
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cyberhive" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 02:14:39 AM |
|
|
DO IT! Go on, let's see if you dare.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 02:15:33 AM |
|
|
"Cyberhive" <cyberhive@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1184310879.244626.74630@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
DO IT! Go on, let's see if you dare.
i win
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 02:19:06 AM |
|
|
% wrote:
"Cyberhive" <cyberhive@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1184310879.244626.74630@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
DO IT! Go on, let's see if you dare.
i win
Funny killfile if you can see my posts.
I win.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 09:14:08 AM |
|
|
In message <1184291816.984606.97490@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
On 13 Jul, 02:29, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184289579.413055.32790@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 02:08, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and
why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it
doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
because they have cybersex together even though she's a > he ,
that's why
I don't give a ***** what they do, they can whip themselves into a
frenzy of mutual masturbation for all I care, I'm just sick of this
tosser (pun intended) defending the little ***** time and again,
regardless of it's behaviour.
I feel another plonking coming on.
good plonk it here on the deck and i'll nail it in
Sounds like a plan.
As the front-line troops said in WW1, there's nothing more dangerous
than a general with a plan.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 11:21:38 AM |
|
|
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
I'm guessing for the same reasons you support Dave. :-)
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 12:16:01 PM |
|
|
On 13 Jul, 17:21, "Rhiannon" <rhia...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
I'm guessing for the same reasons you support Dave. :-)
--
Rhi
This is about Nox, no one else.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cyberhive" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
13 Jul 2007 02:26:04 PM |
|
|
BoredToTears wrote:
On 13 Jul, 17:21, "Rhiannon" <rhia...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
I'm guessing for the same reasons you support Dave. :-)
--
Rhi
This is about Nox, no one else.
Go ahead, sweep Dave's actions under the carpet, but he also possesses
all of the traits of evil that I do.
--
YOUR FATHER HAD YOUR MOTHER, YOUR MOTHER HAD YOUR BROTHER, IT'S JUST TOO
BAD YOUR FATHER'S MAD YOUR MOTHER'S NOW YOUR LOVER.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cal" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
14 Jul 2007 12:17:37 PM |
|
|
On 7/12/07 8:49 PM, in article
1184287780.580330.256160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com, "BoredToTears"
<beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
i find his nastiness well targeted and supportive.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Franz Bestuchev" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 08:05:56 PM |
|
|
On 7/12/2007 6:49 PM, BoredToTears was all like:
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
Fo sheezy! It's a creepy phenomenon and why do you love it so?
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: WATCHOUT FOR CYBERHIVE SAYING SHE'S ME |
12 Jul 2007 08:08:55 PM |
|
|
"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5fo1fiF3d66rcU1@mid.individual.net...
On 7/12/2007 6:49 PM, BoredToTears was all like:
On 13 Jul, 01:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:12 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
i guess the little snot is attention deprived again
Not a little snot at all, folk just shouldn't
be nasty at folk.
I agree. Now tell me, why does he/she/it continue to be nasty and
why
do you continue to support it? It doesn't have depression, it
doesn't
self-harm, it doesn't offer support to anyone in any shape or form
whatsoever. Why else is it here other than to be nasty?
Fo sheezy! It's a creepy phenomenon and why do you love it so?
i'm changing names to the secret chef
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
