| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Used2be" |
| Date: |
16 Jan 2006 02:25:38 PM |
| Object: |
your story was very good, alan... |
i'd have replied to it in the writing room, but it came up as something
called "unicode" and i couldn't reply to it as i normally would.
it was very "real."
good job.
~u2b
.
|
|
| User: "Wanda" |
|
| Title: Re: your story was very good, alan... |
16 Jan 2006 07:16:18 PM |
|
|
"Used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6jTyf.4699$1J1.1166@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i'd have replied to it in the writing room, but it came up as something
called "unicode" and i couldn't reply to it as i normally would.
it was very "real."
good job.
~u2b
I enjoyed it too!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: your story was very good, alan... |
17 Jan 2006 01:45:05 AM |
|
|
In message <CzXyf.12971$Jd.889@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, Wanda
<mmmilady@NOSPAMsbcglobal.net> writes
"Used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6jTyf.4699$1J1.1166@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i'd have replied to it in the writing room, but it came up as something
called "unicode" and i couldn't reply to it as i normally would.
What could that be? It's just another newsgroup.
it was very "real."
good job.
I enjoyed it too!
Thank you both. I hope you found it funny in places. Reality usually is,
whatever the circumstances.
I think it's a lot better now I've re-worked it as the critic's comments
suggested. I'm not sure it's finished, but I think it's getting there.
(Detailed comments are welcome.)
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: your story was very good, alan... |
18 Jan 2006 05:07:33 AM |
|
|
On 2006-01-17, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
In message <CzXyf.12971$Jd.889@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, Wanda
<mmmilady@NOSPAMsbcglobal.net> writes
"Used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6jTyf.4699$1J1.1166@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i'd have replied to it in the writing room, but it came up as something
called "unicode" and i couldn't reply to it as i normally would.
What could that be? It's just another newsgroup.
Someone else's computer getting confused by the non-ASCII codes embeded in
the file. So I'm not the only one ;)) (That's why I quoted it in full
in my reply in ASDW but with all the non-ASCII characters replaced with
plain text equivalents).
it was very "real."
good job.
I enjoyed it too!
Thank you both. I hope you found it funny in places. Reality usually is,
whatever the circumstances.
I think it's a lot better now I've re-worked it as the critic's comments
suggested. I'm not sure it's finished, but I think it's getting there.
(Detailed comments are welcome.)
"Bad language" would increase the verisimilitude, I think.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: your story was very good, alan... |
18 Jan 2006 02:33:49 PM |
|
|
In message <l4k1a3-qmb.ln1@ID-107770.user.individual.net>, Whiskers
<catwheezel@operamail.com> writes
On 2006-01-17, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
In message <CzXyf.12971$Jd.889@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, Wanda
<mmmilady@NOSPAMsbcglobal.net> writes
"Used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6jTyf.4699$1J1.1166@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i'd have replied to it in the writing room, but it came up as something
called "unicode" and i couldn't reply to it as i normally would.
What could that be? It's just another newsgroup.
Someone else's computer getting confused by the non-ASCII codes embeded in
the file. So I'm not the only one ;)) (That's why I quoted it in full
in my reply in ASDW but with all the non-ASCII characters replaced with
plain text equivalents).
it was very "real."
good job.
I enjoyed it too!
Thank you both. I hope you found it funny in places. Reality usually is,
whatever the circumstances.
I think it's a lot better now I've re-worked it as the critic's comments
suggested. I'm not sure it's finished, but I think it's getting there.
(Detailed comments are welcome.)
"Bad language" would increase the verisimilitude, I think.
You want me to use naughty words? Worse than fu*k? I'll have to find a
naughty word dictionary for ideas. There must be something on the
Internet.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: your story was very good, alan... |
18 Jan 2006 03:32:41 PM |
|
|
On 2006-01-18, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
In message <l4k1a3-qmb.ln1@ID-107770.user.individual.net>, Whiskers
<catwheezel@operamail.com> writes
On 2006-01-17, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
In message <CzXyf.12971$Jd.889@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, Wanda
<mmmilady@NOSPAMsbcglobal.net> writes
"Used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6jTyf.4699$1J1.1166@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i'd have replied to it in the writing room, but it came up as something
called "unicode" and i couldn't reply to it as i normally would.
What could that be? It's just another newsgroup.
Someone else's computer getting confused by the non-ASCII codes embeded in
the file. So I'm not the only one ;)) (That's why I quoted it in full
in my reply in ASDW but with all the non-ASCII characters replaced with
plain text equivalents).
it was very "real."
good job.
I enjoyed it too!
Thank you both. I hope you found it funny in places. Reality usually is,
whatever the circumstances.
I think it's a lot better now I've re-worked it as the critic's comments
suggested. I'm not sure it's finished, but I think it's getting there.
(Detailed comments are welcome.)
"Bad language" would increase the verisimilitude, I think.
You want me to use naughty words? Worse than fu*k? I'll have to find a
naughty word dictionary for ideas. There must be something on the
Internet.
Heh <G> Perhaps Wynn could act as consultant?
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: your story was very good, alan... |
19 Jan 2006 12:33:23 AM |
|
|
In message <poo2a3-lga.ln1@ID-107770.user.individual.net>, Whiskers
<catwheezel@operamail.com> writes
On 2006-01-18, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
In message <l4k1a3-qmb.ln1@ID-107770.user.individual.net>, Whiskers
<catwheezel@operamail.com> writes
On 2006-01-17, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
In message <CzXyf.12971$Jd.889@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, Wanda
<mmmilady@NOSPAMsbcglobal.net> writes
"Used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6jTyf.4699$1J1.1166@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i'd have replied to it in the writing room, but it came up as something
called "unicode" and i couldn't reply to it as i normally would.
What could that be? It's just another newsgroup.
Someone else's computer getting confused by the non-ASCII codes embeded in
the file. So I'm not the only one ;)) (That's why I quoted it in full
in my reply in ASDW but with all the non-ASCII characters replaced with
plain text equivalents).
it was very "real."
good job.
I enjoyed it too!
Thank you both. I hope you found it funny in places. Reality usually is,
whatever the circumstances.
I think it's a lot better now I've re-worked it as the critic's comments
suggested. I'm not sure it's finished, but I think it's getting there.
(Detailed comments are welcome.)
"Bad language" would increase the verisimilitude, I think.
You want me to use naughty words? Worse than fu*k? I'll have to find a
naughty word dictionary for ideas. There must be something on the
Internet.
Heh <G> Perhaps Wynn could act as consultant?
His vocabulary is so twentieth century Leeds, I don't recognise most of
the words, though they're obviously naughty.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
