Sociology > Education > America's Nuremberg Trials: Those who violate their oaths, take note.
| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"fx" |
| Date: |
12 Oct 2007 01:20:25 AM |
| Object: |
America's Nuremberg Trials: Those who violate their oaths, take note. |
America's Nuremberg Trials: Those who violate their oaths, take note.
Melinda Pillsbury-Foster
October 4, 2007
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=39368
There is no greater need in America today than the need to get the
Federal government out of our lives. That is the opinion expressed by
individuals across the political spectrum.
America's Constitution laid out a limited role for the Federal
government. That role was clearly defined; nearly all of the functions
for government staying either with the states or the people; instead of
respecting the limited scope of the duties assigned Federal government
has ignored every barrier intended to protect Americans from the assault
of misapplied authority.
Those acting under orders from Congress, the President, or any other
authority should take note; under the mandate of the Constitution you
are guilty of treason. They shoot traitors. The question is not if, but
when.
Just because those now abusing power are not now charged does not mean
they can evade accountability. That accounting will, inevitably, come.
The precedents are how firmly loaded and locked. Americans are patient.
During the period leading up to the Revolution there was a long period
when the colonists asked for redress. Then they stopped asking,
establishing a new theory of government from the idea wherein the
sovereignty was directly in the people. That theory was immortalized in
the Declaration of Independence.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —“
The Constitution is merely the tool adopted to carry out that mission,
covered in the subsequent paragraph.
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,
it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
effect their Safety and Happiness.”
The government of the Constitution is the plumbers helper the Founders
chose. It of itself has no rights and can be changed at will. Despite
the manipulations on the part of all branches of the hired help,
Congress, Executive, and the Supreme Court, the mission statement
remains the foundation on which the rights of individuals stand. America
is not its government; America is the people who decide what they will
use to organize their communities. Government is just that plumbers
helper we use to keep the lines flowing smoothly.
Attempts on the part of those now in power to create the appearance of a
continued mandate through stolen elections, lies, and fraud are all
actionable offenses covered under Title XI. Those involved have no place
to hide when accountability is exacted.
The logic of events now unfolding will take us to America's own
Nuremberg Trials; those considering whether or not to cooperate with the
treasonous agenda now in motion need to confront that reality.
Americans, right and left, are now moving towards a consensus on taking
governance back to the most local level. Formerly big government
leftists are reregistering Republican to support Ron Paul, the only
presidential candidate whose record is consistent regarding the
Constitution. Other campaigns, largely funded and promoted through
corporate interests gauge only their popularity with the corporations in
control.
Paul promises nothing but to get the Federal government out of the lives
of Americans and Americans are listening and working to get him the
Republican nomination.
The Paul campaign, divided into the formal, reporting Headquarters
located in Arlington, Virginia and the fluid, volunteer driven,
decentralized campaign that is redefining the tools provided by the
Internet, represent a revolution themselves. The formal organization is
largely ineffective, according to activists across the country. The
power and weight of the Paul Campaign comes from the people, most of
them focused on the issue of the Constitution.
Because of the media blackout and the lack of means for assessing the
grassroots factors the real size of the campaign is mostly unreported
and overlooked. Those involved, who see it on the ground estimate its
size to be four times as large as indicated by conventional means of
measuring effectiveness.
Therefore, the amount associated for the third quarter, in this week,
should not be the $5,100,000.00 raised but $20,000,000.00. In that third
quarter the money raised came from 127,000 individuals. That is monumental.
All signs point to a massive movement coming into existence, involving
factions and factors that are all but invisible to those in power. Over
the last months the cooperation and communications between those diverse
factions has increased.
When historians write the history of this time the continuing oblivion
of those in power will strike the reader.
Taking governance back to the local level involves several related
steps. Understanding the role of those legally empowered to act on
behalf of the people is just one of those steps. Other factors include
alternative energy, rejection of the role of Federal power, the swelling
peace movement, and the call from Evangelical Christians for no support
of the mainstream candidates, a strong indicator of sentiment in the
group that was once the mainstay of the present regime. The trends are
unmistakable.
The Sheriff in each county can order the Federal government out.
In each county the Constitutional power is placed in the hands of those
elected to exercise those powers on behalf of the citizens. The chief
law enforcement officer in each county is therefore the Sheriff.
What is clearly laid out is the chain of authority. The broad strokes of
the future are therefore determined. The questions here are all details,
essential, but just details.
Agents attempting to enforce Federal laws, statutes, or regulatory
mandates over the objections of the county sheriff are acting in
violation of the Constitution.
The relationship of the Federal government with counties was determined
by the Supreme Court in 1997 with the Mack - Printz Decision. That
decision affirmed the standing of the sheriff in a county to order
Federal agents out when the Sheriff deems federal law to be
unconstitutional.
The issue had arisen with the passage of the federal Brady Gun Control
Act. Attempts to assert Federal control over local law enforcement
failed, resulting in the Mack – Printz Decision. Sheriff Jay Printz of
Montana and Sheriff Richard Mack of Arizona, refused to cooperate with
the asserted power of Federal law enforcement.
That decision did not stop the Feds.
Today there are more laws that are Unconstitutional than those that
stand the test. Despite attempts at conversion of power from the states
to what is effectively a federalized serial monarchy, none of those
attempts are allowed by American principles or by the Constitution.
When Sheriff Jay Printz walked out of the meeting held in Helena,
Montana, having realized that he was being asked to violate the
Constitution no other Sheriff got up and followed him. People tend to be
herd animals; the herd stayed to be intimidated, deer caught in the
headlights of life.
At a sheriff's association meeting in Phoenix, Arizona Sheriff Richard
Mack was handed a documents from ATF to all of the sheriffs assembled.
Mack read the paper placed in his hands and noticed that there were
gross misstatements of even the Constitutionally questionable bill that
Congress had passed into law in 1993.
What Mack saw was the most intrusive bill in the history of the country.
Sheriffs were threatened with arrest if they refused to comply. “Who
ever knowingly fails to comply with these provisions is subject to a
year in jail and a $10,000 fine or both.” The phrase was burned into his
mind; he had announced on public radio that he would not comply.
Both Printz and Mack sought injunctive relief. Attorney General Janet
Reno tried to back off, writing a memo saying this only applied to gun
store owners. The transcript tells another story.
The transcripts from Congress showed that it was the intention to arrest
local law enforcement. This is clear evident of collusion to commit
treason; a long term move to continue the conversion. Those who voted
and spoke for this in Congress are therefore guilty. As subsequent moves
to militarize local police and shift the nexus of control to the Federal
government continues through such measures as LESO, more people in the
pay of government are making themselves vulnerable to justice, delayed
but inevitable.
Today Sheriff Mack is beginning a campaign to awaken in sheriffs across
the country the need to adhere to the Constitution.
The Nuremberg Trials were filled with flaws of procedure; the rights of
many were violated, some confessions were extracted by torture – but the
principle of accountability remains clear. Abuses should never have been
allowed. This time we need to make sure that the record is clear on each
individual charged. From the local cop who tasers a student who asserts
his right to ask questions to the CPS who uses delegated authority to
take a child from parents so that child can be sold to others; From
those at the state level who cooperate; to those in Congress who take
the lavish pay and benefits in exchange for providing the means whereby
Americans are to be enslaved. All need to face the consequences of their
actions. An accounting is due and it will happen just like the stone
dropped from the top of the cliff eventually hits the bottom.
The confrontation is coming. And when the people take back their
government the Trials will follow. Now is the time for those individuals
who have placed themselves in service to tyranny to read the
Constitution, understand the truth and what the costs will be to each of
them.
CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NSA / CIA
WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....
CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.
every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...
http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf
http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com
Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS
*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*
Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5
Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, HAPPILY DESTROYING THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT
FAMILIES YEARLY NATIONWIDE AND COMING TO YOU'RE HOME SOON...
BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
So help me God in presidential oaths
Today's Founder Quote: 'Today' People in America become slaves by their own poor choices, whether in health, nutrition, economics, education or criminality
Today's Founder Quote: 'Today' People in America become slaves by their own poor choices, whether in health, nutrition, economics, education or criminality
Re: ***** Morris Answers some of your questions about his latest book, Off With Their Heads
Secularists forcing their belief on America: pushing to make humanism national religion
New IQ Study Trumps Racists and their Bell Curve
Saddam caught: leftist's howl in outrage over their hero being caught
why atheists are hurting their cause
| Fla Street racers could lose their wheels
Lyin' Injuns change their tune about Ward Churchill !
The People of the Deep South Appreciate Kansas [Their Turn in the Barrel]
People see the world through their religion, attorney says
er Real estate agents Dale Warfel and Mimie Warfel: like to shoot cats with their shotgun for fun lo
GAZA STRIP: Let Their People Go! - Bradley Burston
What prevents better off Indians educating their children on their own?
|
|
|
