Atheist Magicians



 Sociology > Education > Atheist Magicians

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Sociology > Education
User: "Wide Eyed in Wonder"
Date: 30 Mar 2006 01:50:12 PM
Object: Atheist Magicians
Ladies and gentleman, thank you for your time. Now, to your amazement,
I will stick my cape over this dark void and speak the magic
words...Ima braindead dope. And...Voila. The earth appears from
nowhere with no maker out of nothing.
And, yet, this magic is the only scientifically accepted origin belief
system in public schools. Go figure.
Kenny Clifton
http://www.christianjedi.com
.

User: "The Watch Dog"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 02 Apr 2006 04:14:13 AM
Bob LeChevalier wrote:

"The Watch Dog" <tirhuan@aol.com> wrote:

Bob LeChevalier wrote:

Fundies seem to think that he can create hurricanes, earthquakes,
diseases, homosexuality, you name it other "evil" in the world.

Hurricanes may be caused by hot air, but not that kind.


Ah. So here's the problem. I was responding to your comment that "The
BIBLE says god created satan with virtually the same powers as himself"
(emphasis mine). That's very different from what "fundies seem to
think."


The fundies think that every one of their beliefs is supported by a
literal reading of the Bible.

Ephesians 2:6-7 would seem to cover hurricanes.

I agree with you that many people
who conisder themselves religious Christians see Satan as immensely
powerful, almost (but not quite) on par with God. But they're not
getting it from the Bible.


They think they are, and probably could cite you chapter and verse to
support their belief.

A quick look on some random sites:
http://dianedew.com/satan.htm
<1) He has power (2 Thessalonians 2:9; Revelation 2:10),
<but his power is limited: Job 1:12; 2:6; Mark 1:34;
<5:12, 13; 1 Corinthians 10:13-17).
<
<(1) He has power (2 Thessalonians 2:9; Revelation 2:10),
<but his power is limited: Job 1:12; 2:6; Mark 1:34;
<5:12, 13; 1 Corinthians 10:13-17).
<
<5) Nevertheless, Satan can perform lying signs and wonders.
<Exodus 7:9-11; 8:17-19; Deuteronomy 13:1-5;
<Matthew 24:24; Mark 13:22; 2 Thessalonians 2:9;
<Revelation 13:13, 14; 16:14; 19:20
<
<A. "Prince and power of the air." Ephesians 2:2
<B. "God of this age." 2 Corinthians 4:4
<C. "Prince of this world." John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11
<D. "Prince (ruler) of demons." Matthew 9:34; 12:24; Mark 9:34; Luke 11:15


http://www.cuttingedge.org/NEWS/n1050.html
<2) Ephesians 2:6-7, the Apostle Paul calls Satan the "Prince of the
< Power of the Air". The reference to "air" refers to the air
< surrounding this Earth. It is just another way of saying "Earth".
< Paul's picture here is that of Satan being the Absolute Dictator
< (Prince) of this Earth. The Apostle John also speaks of Satan with
< this title, in John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11)

<3) In Daniel, we see that Godly forces and Satanic forces are battling
< for control of the kings of the Earth (Chapter 10). Therefore, we
< know that Satan and his demonic host are actively, powerfully working
< through human agents, specifically human political leaders, to
< achieve their goals. We know that demons can physically possess
< humans, and that Satan himself entered into Judas, empowering him to
< betray Jesus Christ (Luke 22:3). Then, most importantly, we see that,
< at the End of the Age, during the reign of Antichrist, Satan and his
< demons possess the key human leaders of the world (Revelation
< 16:13-16).

<1) Daniel 10 Entire Chapter -- Time and space do not permit us to
< thoroughly cover this Scriptural account, but we encourage you to
< read it carefully. In synopsis, Daniel prayed for Godly understanding
< as to the events of Israel in the Latter Days. On the very day that
< Daniel prayed, God instructed one of His Heavenly angels to go
< personally to Daniel to deliver His answer. The angel immediately
< left Heaven to go to Earth, a journey that takes the blink of an eye.
< However, the angel did not get to Earth, or to Daniel at any rate,
< for three (3) weeks. The angel explained to Daniel that he had been
< held up by a demonic being whom the angel called "The Prince of the
< Kingdom of Persia". In other words, this Heavenly angel had been
< attacked by a most powerful demon, the demon assigned to influence
< the human King of Persia. This angel could not defeat this powerful
< demonic being on his own strength, so he had to call on Michael, the
< angel whom God had assigned to protect Israel. Thus, we see that some
< demonic beings are more powerful than some angelic beings.

All in all quite a cosmic level of power, though not unlimited.

To be able to affect every individual human being on a non-cosmic
level takes cosmic levels of omniscience and omnipotence.


Yes, well, there's no indication in the Bible that Satan actually does
that.


It seems that he has absolute dominion over the earth and over all who
are wicked. Since by "Original Sin", we are all wicked unless we are
saved by the grace of God, and the percentage of human beings that are
saved is relatively small (fundies are a small fraction of all
Christians, and Christians are a minority of the world's people), he
comes pretty close.

If you believe that the tempter in Eden is Satan (the Bible doesn't say
this,


Whose Bible? The Catholic Bible includes:
Wisdom of Solomon 2:24
http://www.newadvent.org/bible/wis002.htm#24

(I will admit that fundies, generally being Protestant, wouldn't
likely quote it, but New Testament writers clearly made use of it

<cf. Matt., xxvii, 42, 43, with Wis., ii, 13, 18; Rom., xi, 34, with Wis., ix, 13; Eph., vi, 13, 17, with Wis., v, 18, 19; Heb., i, 3, with Wis., vii, 26; etc
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15666a.htm

Thanks. It's an interesting list, and there's more to look at than I
thought. But a lot of it's non-probative ("he is powerful but his power
is limited" - no argument there), and a lot more of it is subject to
other translations and interpretations. For example, Daniel says:

But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days:
but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained
there with the kings of Persia.

The reference to "a demonic being" is inferred; it's not in the text.
It's not at all clear what kind of being this is. And it certainly
doesn't say anything about "Satan" or "Lucifer." (While the actual
quote "Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I
remained there with the kings of Persia" is just weird - why did he
remain after Michael helped him?)
Genesis, without question, says that the tempter was an animal - there
is no reference to Satan, Lucifer, fallen angels, or anything like
that, and the story goes on to a version of "how the snake lost its
legs," which, if you're using a literal interpretation, can't possibly
be about a fallen angel.
It is interesting how a scheme largely developed outside of the Bible
(the whole "fallen angel" thing - the Morningstar-falling-from-the-sky
reference in the Bible is quite explicitly about the predicted fall of
the King of Babylon for oppressing the Hebrews) can be imposed on the
Bible, with the right translations and interpretations of passages that
are highly cryptic in the original. But I guess that's one of the
reasons we have so many different Christian sects.
Still, you've pointed me to some things I hadn't seen, and I appreciate
it.
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 02 Apr 2006 10:48:58 AM
"The Watch Dog" <tirhuan@aol.com> wrote:

Thanks. It's an interesting list, and there's more to look at than I
thought. But a lot of it's non-probative ("he is powerful but his power
is limited" - no argument there), and a lot more of it is subject to
other translations and interpretations.

Of course. But when you are arguing about what should be taught in
the classroom, should religions be allowed, only the "correct"
interpretation must be taught.
There are interpretations of the Bible that allow for standard
evolutionary theory (the Catholic interpretation, for example), and
there are interpretations that allow only young earth creationism.
For example, Daniel says:

But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days:
but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained
there with the kings of Persia.


The reference to "a demonic being" is inferred; it's not in the text.

It was someone with the power to restrain an angel on a holy mission
for 21 days. That is a power which is therefore both supernatural and
evil, which is a definition of "demon".

It's not at all clear what kind of being this is. And it certainly
doesn't say anything about "Satan" or "Lucifer." (While the actual
quote "Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I
remained there with the kings of Persia" is just weird - why did he
remain after Michael helped him?)

He remained there *until* Michael had successfully helped him. In
other words it took 3 weeks of the combined power of one of the most
powerful of angels coupled with that of Daniel's angel to overcome
this demon. And this was presumably merely Satan's underling, Satan
being the ruler of all such demons is presumably more powerful than
his minion with the prince of Persia.

Genesis, without question, says that the tempter was an animal - there
is no reference to Satan, Lucifer, fallen angels, or anything like
that, and the story goes on to a version of "how the snake lost its
legs," which, if you're using a literal interpretation, can't possibly
be about a fallen angel.

But since snakes do not talk, Satan's must have been providing the
snake's voice and reasoning capacity. At least so the later Biblical
attribution of the fall to Satan would require.

It is interesting how a scheme largely developed outside of the Bible
(the whole "fallen angel" thing - the Morningstar-falling-from-the-sky
reference in the Bible is quite explicitly about the predicted fall of
the King of Babylon for oppressing the Hebrews) can be imposed on the
Bible, with the right translations and interpretations of passages that
are highly cryptic in the original. But I guess that's one of the
reasons we have so many different Christian sects.

Some of these interpretations evolved during the Jewish period, and
relied also on Jewish scriptures that did not make it into the modern
canon.
lojbab
.


User: "The Watch Dog"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 01 Apr 2006 05:58:44 PM
The Watch Dog wrote:

Bob LeChevalier wrote:


Fundies seem to think that he can create hurricanes, earthquakes,
diseases, homosexuality, you name it other "evil" in the world.

Hurricanes may be caused by hot air, but not that kind.


Ah. So here's the problem. I was responding to your comment that "The
BIBLE says god created satan with virtually the same powers as himself"
(emphasis mine). That's very different from what "fundies seem to
think." The fundamentalist view of Satan (and, for that matter, the
popular view of Satan) has almost nothing to do with the very few
appearances of Satan in the Bible. I agree with you that many people
who conisder themselves religious Christians see Satan as immensely
powerful, almost (but not quite) on par with God. But they're not
getting it from the Bible.


To be able to affect every individual human being on a non-cosmic
level takes cosmic levels of omniscience and omnipotence.


Yes, well, there's no indication in the Bible that Satan actually does
that.

If you believe that the tempter in Eden is Satan (the Bible doesn't say
this, even though the word Satan appears elswhere in the Old Testament;
Genesis says the tempter was "the snake, a cunning ANIMAL," not a
demon, devil, or fallen angel), then he affected two human beings - in
the very ordinary sense of talking them into doing something unwise.
Nothing cosmic about that, human beings do it every day of the week. It
was God who decided that this event should "affect every individual
human being," by making the effects of Adam & Eve's actions heritable,
a completely arbitrary decision of the kind that God is so well known
for in the Bible. (Under ordinary circumstances people are punished for
their own crimes, not the crimes of ancestors who died before the
people in question were ever born.)

Sorry, Bob, I was writing as if you were the poster (Dominic) who made
the original comment about Satan. My mistake.
.

User: "Gray Shockley"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 01 Apr 2006 01:21:24 AM
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:38:19 -0600, Josh wrote
(in article <kOacnUx2q_L2ILDZSa8jmw@karoo.co.uk>):


"Dominic Torrazzi" <DTorrazzi@home4.com> wrote in message
news:122qkui1s42dvb5@corp.supernews.com...


He could have done the whole thing in an instant.



And ...if He did...here it comes are you ready...would it look old?
If He made a man fully grown in an instant...here it comes...he'd
look...old..right?


So how do you know you weren't created yesterday as you were with all your
thoughts and memories making you think you were old?



A very good point, Dominic. I've often thought that God could have created
us a minute ago with all our memories intact. I'm not sure there's any way
of disproving it.

Thinking about it, we might not exist at all, but be memories in some other
person's brain or equivalent. Or I might be God myself, but helpless to
change the world because it has to run by the physical laws I created. Or I
am an experiment, and being watched all the time: I have always thought that
from being a child. I even suspected my own mum and dad being in on it. How
paranoid is that!!! It was comforting to see The Truman Show, which I
identified with. The ending is brilliant: running into the wall of the
dome: how symbolic is that?

Regards, Josh


Both by John D MacDonald:
_Wine of the Dreamers_
_Ballroom of the Skies_
Ya might wanna grab _The Girl, the Gold Watch
and Everything_ if you're over there.
Gray Shockley
-------------------------------
quagmire: an awkward,
complex, or hazardous
situation
.

User: "Midjis"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 31 Mar 2006 07:35:59 AM
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:

And Midjis, you are right: Why did God take six days to fashion the
world? He could have done the whole thing in an instant.


And ...if He did...here it comes are you ready...would it look old?
If He made a man fully grown in an instant...here it comes...he'd
look...old..right?

Irrelevant. The story says that God created the Earth over the course of
six days. Regardless of whether He intentionally made it look older than
that (presumably to 'test our faith' in some way that raises yet another
question about His nature), the question is WHY it took an all-powerful God
six whole days to do something I would expect such a being to be able to
do, as Josh says, in an instant.
.
User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 31 Mar 2006 08:52:05 AM
"Midjis" <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns979795329FBE3axrmxkertsjlpjivdf@216.196.109.145...

Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:

And Midjis, you are right: Why did God take six days to fashion the
world? He could have done the whole thing in an instant.


And ...if He did...here it comes are you ready...would it look old?
If He made a man fully grown in an instant...here it comes...he'd
look...old..right?


Irrelevant. The story says that God created the Earth over the course of
six days. Regardless of whether He intentionally made it look older than
that (presumably to 'test our faith' in some way that raises yet another
question about His nature), the question is WHY it took an all-powerful
God
six whole days to do something I would expect such a being to be able to
do, as Josh says, in an instant.

People, like children, need a more complex answer than "goddidit".
.

User: "Wide Eyed in Wonder"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 31 Mar 2006 08:47:07 AM
Midjis wrote:

Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:

And Midjis, you are right: Why did God take six days to fashion the
world? He could have done the whole thing in an instant.


And ...if He did...here it comes are you ready...would it look old?
If He made a man fully grown in an instant...here it comes...he'd
look...old..right?


Irrelevant. The story says that God created the Earth over the course of
six days. Regardless of whether He intentionally made it look older than
that (presumably to 'test our faith' in some way that raises yet another
question about His nature), the question is WHY it took an all-powerful God
six whole days to do something I would expect such a being to be able to
do, as Josh says, in an instant.

Of course He could, but He didn't. There's likely a reason...like the
thousands of years the earth is around...but that is another debate.
BTW, is this Cary? You sure sound like prior conversations I've had
with him. Do you have an alter-ego?
Kenny Clifton
http://www.christianjedi.com
.
User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 31 Mar 2006 11:29:02 AM
In article <1143816427.047229.300820@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Wide Eyed in Wonder" <kands00@hotmail.com> writes:


Midjis wrote:

Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:

And Midjis, you are right: Why did God take six days to fashion the
world? He could have done the whole thing in an instant.


And ...if He did...here it comes are you ready...would it look old?
If He made a man fully grown in an instant...here it comes...he'd
look...old..right?


Irrelevant. The story says that God created the Earth over the course of
six days. Regardless of whether He intentionally made it look older than
that (presumably to 'test our faith' in some way that raises yet another
question about His nature), the question is WHY it took an all-powerful God
six whole days to do something I would expect such a being to be able to
do, as Josh says, in an instant.


Of course He could, but He didn't. There's likely a reason...like the
thousands of years the earth is around...but that is another debate.
BTW, is this Cary? You sure sound like prior conversations I've had
with him. Do you have an alter-ego?

I thank you for the compliment, as I have always admired Midjis' posts.
But you really don't have to read all that closely to see the difference:
he tends to be more patiently earnest, while I'm faster to wax sardonic.
And beyond that, of course, he's as obviously British as I am
distinctly American.
-- cary
.

User: "Midjis"

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 31 Mar 2006 12:10:24 PM
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:

Of course He could, but He didn't. There's likely a reason...like the
thousands of years the earth is around...but that is another debate.

No - it is this debate.
Your comment here that "He could, but He didn't" is precisely the sort of
response that I believe comes from unquestioning faith rather than from
rational consideration. If you choose to adopt a position of unquestioning
faith then that is your decision. But it does not help convince me that
you have really thought about why you believe what you believe.

BTW, is this Cary? You sure sound like prior conversations I've had
with him. Do you have an alter-ego?

No, I am not Cary. I am Midwinter.
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Atheist Magicians 01 Apr 2006 12:18:55 PM
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:

Ladies and gentleman, thank you for your time. Now, to your amazement,
I will stick my cape over this dark void and speak the magic words...[...]

Sounds exactly like Genesis.
.


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER