Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE?



 Sociology > Education > Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Sociology > Education
User: "Jd"
Date: 24 May 2007 09:20:10 PM
Object: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE?
That bug was a mere beetle. And more than likely it was a beetle known as the "Bombardier" beetle.
Yes, a bug released it's WMDs upon the father of evolutionary theory as if in a great act of
defiance against the theory of evolution itself.
"During Charles Darwin's education at the University of Cambridge he became involved in a national
craze for the competitive collecting of beetles. On one occasion in 1828 he stripped bark from a
dead tree and caught a rare beetle in each hand, then saw another new species. With the habits of an
egg-collector, he popped the beetle from his right hand into his mouth and grabbed the other with
his free hand. The beetle which he had placed in his mouth, likely a bombardier beetle, "ejected
some intensely acrid fluid, which burnt his tongue," forcing him to spit it out; he lost the beetle,
as well as the third one."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_beetle
See if in this brief description you see a "miracle" of evolution at work.....
"Bombardier beetles are remarkable creatures, truly deserving the attention they have received. They
earned their common name from their ability to defend themselves against predators by firing a
mixture of boiling-hot toxic chemicals from special glands in their posterior."
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/bombardier.html
Darwin a "predator"? Hmmmm.
Here's a more technical description of what you may by now see as a "miracle" (or at least a mockery
of the ToE itself)....
"The Bombardier's defense consists of a complicated well designed system for storing, combining, and
firing its chemical mixture. (Some shaving cream dispensers use a similar method of producing hot
lather.) Two glands near the end of the Bombardier's abdomen store separated amounts of hydrogen
peroxide (an antiseptic) and hydroquinone (used for hydrogen peroxide (an antiseptic) and
hydroquinone (used for photographic developer). A sphincter muscle squeezes the fluid from the
glands into a type of firing chamber where other chemicals are mixed, at just the right instant,
causing pressure to build up. The result is bad news for anything messing with the Bombardier."
"The Bombardier can aim this hot (100 degree) substance with excellent accuracy and can repeat fire
dozens of times. Each shot sounds like a small pop-gun and also produces a puff of smoke with a vile
smell. Other nearby beetles will join in the firing."
http://www.insectman.us/articles/beetle.htm
All I can say is I'll bet Darwin felt lucky to have escaped before 2 or 3 of these WMD carrying
beetles surrounded him. OTOH perhaps that event enforced his thinking wrt "survival of the fittest".
Jd
Nehemiah 4:17 "They which builded on the wall, and they that bare burdens, with those that laded,
every one with one of his hands wrought in the work, and with the other hand held a weapon."
.

User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 21 Jul 2007 12:39:42 AM
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:59:17 GMT there was an Ancient Jd
<ZionsFire@att.net> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism

Douglas Berry wrote:

On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 02:36:09 GMT there was an Ancient Jd
<ZionsFire@att.net> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism

Matthew 28:5-6 And the angel answered and said unto the women, "Fear not ye: for I know that ye
seek Jesus, which was crucified. He is not here: for he is risen, as he said".


There is no hard evidence that has happened. None at all.

Anyway, science has reached a point where we can bring people back
from what was once considered dead. Happened to me, as a matter of
fact. Heart stopped during an operation for close to 90 seconds. No
pulse, no respiration, the traditional indications of death. Without
prompt intervention, I would have died.


That's nothing. There's another guy here who survived cancer. And there's another guy here who
was forgiven of all of his sins and who has talked with God. Me.


Ah, but I can prove that I had cancer and survived it due to medical
science. Can you prove that you talk with God or that you have been
forgiven? If you can't demonstrate an experiment that will prove both
these claims you are either mentally ill or a liar.

Which is it?


You did not survive cancer "due to medical science". You survived cancer by the grace of God (or as
in a small number of cases a miracle of the devil).

No, I survived because of chemotherapy and surgery.

You do understand that the deception of the last days includes many signs, wonders and even miracles
don't you?

Are you now claiming that all science is trickery?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.

User: "Christopher A.Lee"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 21 Jul 2007 07:09:48 AM
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:59:17 GMT, Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:

You do understand that the deception of the last days includes many signs, wonders and even miracles
don't you?

You do understand you're a fucking moron, don't you?

Jd

.

User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 01 Jun 2007 06:46:52 AM
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:37:51 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> claimed:

"I'm having difficulty seeing your reasoning in
your claim that the bombardier beetle causes
some problems for the theory of evolution.

This is a system that either works, or kills it.
Dead beetles don't "pass on" the news of
improvements. :)
Do you understand how this beetle's system works?
--
Pastor Dave
Doctrine is not Scripture.
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 01 Jun 2007 06:32:47 PM
Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote :

"I'm having difficulty seeing your reasoning in
your claim that the bombardier beetle causes
some problems for the theory of evolution.


This is a system that either works, or kills it.
Dead beetles don't "pass on" the news of
improvements. :)

Do you understand how this beetle's system works?

I understand it well enough to know that, however much you twist it, it
doesn't have any problem fitting into evolutionary theory.
Do you understand it well enough to show that I'm wrong on that?
--
Midwinter
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 02 Jun 2007 08:43:19 AM
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:32:47 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> claimed:

Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote :

"I'm having difficulty seeing your reasoning in
your claim that the bombardier beetle causes
some problems for the theory of evolution.


This is a system that either works, or kills it.
Dead beetles don't "pass on" the news of
improvements. :)

Do you understand how this beetle's system works?


I understand it well enough to know that, however much you twist it, it
doesn't have any problem fitting into evolutionary theory.

Do you understand it well enough to show that I'm wrong on that?

I see. So if I show how it defeats evolution,
then I'm automatically twisting it. So what's
the point in talking to you?
You just showed me that what you do, is to
avoid the points and attack the person. You
think you can somehow automatically discredit
anything someone might say, before they
even say it. Then when they see your game
and don't wish to bother with such dishonesty,
you probably claim they ran away because
they knew that evolution is actually true.
Go ahead, do what you wish. I won't play
your game.
--
Pastor Dave
Doctrine is not Scripture.
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 03 Jun 2007 04:32:42 AM
Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote :

I see. So if I show how it defeats evolution,
then I'm automatically twisting it. So what's
the point in talking to you?

No - if you could show me how it defeats evolution, then I'd have to
rethink my views on evolution. But so far you haven't done that: all
you've done is make dogmatic and unsupported claims that it does.
But in order to attack evolutionary theory *effectively* you first need to
understand it - at least the basics of it. So far it doesn't seem that you
do.

Go ahead, do what you wish. I won't play
your game.

No, somehow I didn't think you would.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 03 Jun 2007 09:06:30 AM
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:32:42 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> claimed:

Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote :

I see. So if I show how it defeats evolution,
then I'm automatically twisting it. So what's
the point in talking to you?


No

That is what you implied though.

- if you could show me how it defeats evolution,
then I'd have to
rethink my views on evolution. But so far you haven't done that: all
you've done is make dogmatic and unsupported claims that it does.

No, that is what you did. I asked you a question.
You are being dishonest and have no intent of
examining the evidence and you know it, which
is why you snipped even your own words.
And furthermore, no, I do not have to attack evolution.
YOU call it science. YOU must show that I should
believe it and demonstrate that this beetle's system
arose through evolution!
You evolutionists always claim to be the ones with
all of the science behind you and claim we are just
religious nuts, but when it comes down to it, your
entire defense amounts to, "Prove it didn't happen".
Yea, that's some real evidence for evolution for ya! :)
I don't have to prove a negative. I would have
discussed it with you anyway, but you have
already decided that anything anyone says that
doesn't agree with evolution, is "twisting it".
You said this about me and all I did was ask
you an innocent question! (:
So I will part company with you here. I'm not here
to spin my wheels, while you insult me. Goodbye.
At least for now.
--
Pastor Dave
Doctrine is not Scripture.
.
User: "James Powell"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 03 Jun 2007 01:03:03 PM
"Pastor Dave" <noway@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:uei5635phkfi3e7ip8k36ucbgbs3npel5m@4ax.com...

On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:32:42 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> claimed:


And furthermore, no, I do not have to attack evolution.
YOU call it science. YOU must show that I should
believe it and demonstrate that this beetle's system
arose through evolution!

Belief is not required for science. the world does not care if you believe
in it. gravity will work whether you believe or not. Your belief will not
stop evolutionary processes that are occurring today.

You evolutionists always claim to be the ones with
all of the science behind you and claim we are just
religious nuts, but when it comes down to it, your
entire defense amounts to, "Prove it didn't happen".

No. We are more than willing to offer explanations. However, the response
has always been to misunderstand - willfully at times - said explanation.

Yea, that's some real evidence for evolution for ya! :)

Here you go. Chew on this one.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/bombardier.html
Explain how, point by point, this explanation is not possible. Make sure you
read the original research referenced to make sure you understand the
mechanisms.
James Powell


Pastor Dave

Doctrine is not Scripture.

.

User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 04 Jun 2007 04:30:13 AM
Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote :

You said this about me and all I did was ask
you an innocent question! (:

So I will part company with you here. I'm not here
to spin my wheels, while you insult me. Goodbye.
At least for now.

*clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap*
Bravo. Bra-VO.
A fine performance, sir.
Such impressive melodramatic drama-queenery to cover your retreat.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 04 Jun 2007 10:52:13 AM
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:30:13 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> claimed:

Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote :

You said this about me and all I did was ask
you an innocent question! (:

So I will part company with you here. I'm not here
to spin my wheels, while you insult me. Goodbye.
At least for now.



*clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap*

Bravo. Bra-VO.

A fine performance, sir.

Such impressive melodramatic drama-queenery to cover your retreat.

War is what you seek. The only problem is,
you'll die bitter.
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall
be called the children of God." - Matthew 5:9
John 3:16-21
16) For God so loved the world, that he gave
his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth
in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17) For God sent not his Son into the world to
condemn the world; but that the world through
him might be saved.
18) He that believeth on him is not condemned:
but he that believeth not is condemned already,
because he hath not believed in the name of
the only begotten Son of God.
19) And this is the condemnation, that light is
come into the world, and men loved darkness
rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20) For every one that doeth evil hateth the light,
neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should
be reproved.
21) But he that doeth truth cometh to the light,
that his deeds may be made manifest, that they
are wrought in God.
--
Pastor Dave
Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith.
God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest
part of the water.
The world says that seeing is believing.
The Bible says that believing is seeing.
Doctrine is not Scripture.
.


User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 03 Jun 2007 10:06:01 AM
Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

And furthermore, no, I do not have to attack evolution.

Actually you do. It is so well-established as the only workable
explanation for the data that we have, that the burden of
counterevidence falls on those who do not accept it.
Just like the theory of gravity. Merely saying that we haven't yet
figure out everything about gravity and black holes does not disprove
or even cast doubt on the theory of gravity. You need evidence that
specifically counters some prediction, and possibly some alternative
explanation that is testable, and which does explain what happened.
Until then, evolution, and gravity, will stand.

YOU call it science.

Because s/he knows what science is, and you don't.

YOU must show that I should believe it

You can believe that the moon is made of green cheese, for all anyone
cares.

and demonstrate that this beetle's system arose through evolution!

It arose through evolution because all such systems arose through
evolution, and there has never been any observed feature that COULDN'T
have arisen through evolution. We don't need to show how everything
DID arise, merely that we don't find evidence AGAINST it having arisen
through evolution. And yes, that is hard to do these days.

You evolutionists always claim to be the ones with
all of the science behind you

They are.

and claim we are just religious nuts,

You are.

but when it comes down to it, your
entire defense amounts to, "Prove it didn't happen".

No. The requirement is that you show how to the beetle is
COUNTERevidence AGAINST evolution. If the beetle doesn't counter any
prediction that evolution makes, then it is not COUNTERevidence,
merely an as-yet-unexplained data point.
Proving that it *didn't* happen with evolution is only the most
straightforward way of doing so.

Yea, that's some real evidence for evolution for ya! :)

It is not evidence AGAINST evolution. We have more than enough
evidence FOR evolution.

I don't have to prove a negative.

You have to provide evidence for a negative.
lojbab
.






User: "Ronald More-More Moshki"

Title: Re: Bug having WMDs bomb Darwin: revenge over ToE? 25 May 2007 12:40:40 AM
On May 24, 10:20 pm, Jd <ZionsF...@att.net> wrote:

That bug was a mere beetle. And more than likely it was a beetle known as the "Bombardier" beetle.
Yes, a bug released it's WMDs upon the father of evolutionary theory as if in a great act of
defiance against the theory of evolution itself.

"During Charles Darwin's education at the University of Cambridge he became involved in a national
craze for the competitive collecting of beetles. On one occasion in 1828 he stripped bark from a
dead tree and caught a rare beetle in each hand, then saw another new species. With the habits of an
egg-collector, he popped the beetle from his right hand into his mouth and grabbed the other with
his free hand. The beetle which he had placed in his mouth, likely a bombardier beetle, "ejected
some intensely acrid fluid, which burnt his tongue," forcing him to spit it out; he lost the beetle,
as well as the third one."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_beetle

See if in this brief description you see a "miracle" of evolution at work.....

"Bombardier beetles are remarkable creatures, truly deserving the attention they have received. They
earned their common name from their ability to defend themselves against predators by firing a
mixture of boiling-hot toxic chemicals from special glands in their posterior."

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/bombardier.html

Darwin a "predator"? Hmmmm.

Here's a more technical description of what you may by now see as a "miracle" (or at least a mockery
of the ToE itself)....

"The Bombardier's defense consists of a complicated well designed system for storing, combining, and
firing its chemical mixture. (Some shaving cream dispensers use a similar method of producing hot
lather.) Two glands near the end of the Bombardier's abdomen store separated amounts of hydrogen
peroxide (an antiseptic) and hydroquinone (used for hydrogen peroxide (an antiseptic) and
hydroquinone (used for photographic developer). A sphincter muscle squeezes the fluid from the
glands into a type of firing chamber where other chemicals are mixed, at just the right instant,
causing pressure to build up. The result is bad news for anything messing with the Bombardier."

"The Bombardier can aim this hot (100 degree) substance with excellent accuracy and can repeat fire
dozens of times. Each shot sounds like a small pop-gun and also produces a puff of smoke with a vile
smell. Other nearby beetles will join in the firing."

http://www.insectman.us/articles/beetle.htm

All I can say is I'll bet Darwin felt lucky to have escaped before 2 or 3 of these WMD carrying
beetles surrounded him. OTOH perhaps that event enforced his thinking wrt "survival of the fittest".

Jd

Nehemiah 4:17 "They which builded on the wall, and they that bare burdens, with those that laded,
every one with one of his hands wrought in the work, and with the other hand held a weapon."

you see, it's all about Jd.
Jd is bigger than JC; just ask 'im.
.


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
Child Protective Services worker accused of having sex with girl
Chicagoland schools a sest pool - principal and teacher caught on video having sex in principal's office
One Of Every Three Kids Is Having Sex By Age Ten
Kids sleep in CPS offices after foster-care rejection: Having 148children sleep in Child Protective Service offices is unacceptable," saidHouse Human Services Chairman Patrick Rose...
NEW CASTLE -- A foster father accused of having sex with and impregnatinga 15-year-old girl placed in his care has reached a plea deal with prosecutors.
Ping Ken Clifton, I'm having trouble to respond to your post
Age-old problem: babies having babies: foster kids are more likelyto get pregnant and give birth than children living at home....
Child Protective Services' Gile taking paid leave from job, CPSSupervisor was having romance with child abuser....
as one Foster Child put It,, "Everywhere I Go, Somebody Gets Moneyto Keep Me From Having a Mom and a Dad."
DHS employee accused of having sex with woman in his care
Children Having Children
CPS worker accused of having sex with 15-year-old girl he was supervising:the girl told police, her child was present during the incidents, most ofwhich took place in the caseworker's car.
Mother can block CPS from having her child vaccinated
Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder
Re: as one Foster Child put It,, "Everywhere I Go, Somebody GetsMoney to Keep Me From Having a Mom and a Dad."
 

NEWER

pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER