| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"God is Redeemer" |
| Date: |
30 May 2007 07:41:22 PM |
| Object: |
Christ Died For Karma |
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
30 May 2007 08:31:03 PM |
|
|
God is Redeemer <kands00@hotmail.com>
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Um, pretty standard stuff if you've read much at all about
Buddhism (which grew out of Hinduism). What's your question,
exactly?
(um, you DO now that escaping samsara and achieving nirvina --
maybe better said the outher way around, actually -- means something
quite a bit different from the Christian concept of heaven, yes?)
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "God is Redeemer" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
30 May 2007 10:01:28 PM |
|
|
On May 30, 8:31 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
God is Redeemer <kand...@hotmail.com>
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Um, pretty standard stuff if you've read much at all about
Buddhism (which grew out of Hinduism). What's your question,
exactly?
(um, you DO now that escaping samsara and achieving nirvina --
maybe better said the outher way around, actually -- means something
quite a bit different from the Christian concept of heaven, yes?)
-- cary
Ahh, but do either Hinduism or Buddhism claim that anyone else (God or
man) can pay for our Karma?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "met00" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
30 May 2007 10:32:43 PM |
|
|
God is Redeemer wrote:
Ahh, but do either Hinduism or Buddhism claim that anyone else (God or
man) can pay for our Karma?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Read this and you will get a better understanding of Buddhist thought.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion/browse_thread/thread/980e7afa2560f4a1/6d5c23a6be8fab17?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1#
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
31 May 2007 07:36:48 PM |
|
|
On May 30, 2007, God is Redeemer wrote
(in article <1180580488.439692.163540@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>):
On May 30, 8:31 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
God is Redeemer <kand...@hotmail.com>
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Um, pretty standard stuff if you've read much at all about
Buddhism (which grew out of Hinduism). What's your question,
exactly?
(um, you DO now that escaping samsara and achieving nirvina --
maybe better said the outher way around, actually -- means something
quite a bit different from the Christian concept of heaven, yes?)
-- cary
Ahh, but do either Hinduism or Buddhism claim that anyone else (God or
man) can pay for our Karma?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
There's no "Get Out of Hell Free" card as there is with Christianity.
Christianity - in its fundamentalist and terrorist ranks, at least -
fervently believes in "The Free Lunch".
That/those "type(s)" of "Christians" totally ignore Fram's First
Principle of Religion: "You can pay now or you can pay later but
you will pay. In full."
The only way you can possibly expect /not/ to pay is to be -
admittedly or not - spiritually bankrupt.
Gray Shockley
-------------------------------------------------
Rapture? Or, maybe, Raptor.
Guten appetite.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sensi" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
31 May 2007 11:15:02 AM |
|
|
God is Redeemer wrote:
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Sensi:
Jesus is the Enlightened God the One who realized Total
Compassion thus fulfilled His Divine Mission
to pay for the consequences of our sins and
so negate the cycle of death, that I may experience
*Eternal Happiness and Bliss* in the Company of the Godhead.
I've found that when we run with forgiveness as our banner
of God's truth there is no need to argue, fight or create
division.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
31 May 2007 12:13:55 PM |
|
|
In article <eYadnd8uULwVacPbnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@accessus.net> Sensi <sensi4sight@home.com> writes:
God is Redeemer wrote:
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Sensi:
Jesus is the Enlightened God the One who realized Total
Compassion thus fulfilled His Divine Mission
to pay for the consequences of our sins and
so negate the cycle of death, that I may experience
*Eternal Happiness and Bliss* in the Company of the Godhead.
I've found that when we run with forgiveness as our banner
of God's truth there is no need to argue, fight or create
division.
Well, if having "no need to argue, fight or create
division" is the result, then I'd say our Ken has
quite a few incarnations facing him still...
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
31 May 2007 05:47:01 AM |
|
|
God is Redeemer wrote:
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
.....and they have used it and abused it. Forgetting of course that sin
was here long before the first ever god was invented by early man. The
priesthood lost no time in latching on to sin, and have never let go.
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "old man joe" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
01 Jun 2007 03:32:27 AM |
|
|
On 30 May 2007 17:41:22 -0700, God is Redeemer <kands00@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
it's an interesting concept to bridge the intent of the language of
one dialect to another... in other words... when the Bible calls it
" sin " another dialect calls it " karma. "
when the Apostle Paul was on his missionary journeys as recorded in
Acts, as well as his writings, the language he used to explain the
gospel was Greek when speaking to Gentiles and Hebrew when speaking to
Jews. Greek was the business language used around the Mediterranean.
everybody spoke Greek. now, English is the business language of the
world. so how does one explain the Bible in English in order for the
non English speaking world to understand the gospel ?
for karma to be sin which separates a person from God ( Is. 59:2 )
karma must mean transgression of God's Law. if karma doesn't mean
exactly that then it's a different gospel and different gospels are
man's concoctions which do not have an efficacy to save.
" believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved "
Acts 16:31
" and as many as had been appointed to eternal life, believed."
Acts 13:48
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
01 Jun 2007 11:43:09 AM |
|
|
From: old man joe <not@home.com>
On 30 May 2007 17:41:22 -0700, God is Redeemer <kands00@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
it's an interesting concept to bridge the intent of the language of
one dialect to another... in other words... when the Bible calls it
" sin " another dialect calls it " karma. "
Well, partially... except that you can't have "good sin", positive
sin, whereas "karma" can be negative or positive.
when the Apostle Paul was on his missionary journeys as recorded in
Acts, as well as his writings, the language he used to explain the
gospel was Greek when speaking to Gentiles and Hebrew when speaking to
Jews. Greek was the business language used around the Mediterranean.
everybody spoke Greek. now, English is the business language of the
world. so how does one explain the Bible in English in order for the
non English speaking world to understand the gospel ?
for karma to be sin which separates a person from God ( Is. 59:2 )
karma must mean transgression of God's Law. if karma doesn't mean
exactly that then it's a different gospel and different gospels are
man's concoctions which do not have an efficacy to save.
" believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved "
Acts 16:31
" and as many as had been appointed to eternal life, believed."
Acts 13:48
.
|
|
|
| User: "Padraic Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
01 Jun 2007 04:53:49 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:43:09 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
From: old man joe <not@home.com>
On 30 May 2007 17:41:22 -0700, God is Redeemer <kands00@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Typically, I try to avoid using the terms of other religions, so this
is out of character for me. However, I was reading this very
intriguing article in Christianity Today about a Christian multi-
national business man and politician, who was born a Hindu but became
a Christian. His terminology for the process of salvation might reach
those of that heritage, if the message is put in a way that they can
understand.
According to Ram Gidoomal, it is important for Hindus and those of
Indian heritage to hear that Christ died for our Karma, since they use
Karma in the same way Christians use "sin."
There are two of his quotes that I found to be the most impactive.
I'm not sure I totally understand the terms, so I don't endorse,
necessarily, his words. However, I thought they deserved discussion
online.
1. First, he says, "Not only is he a sanatan (eternal) sat guru (true
living way - John 14:6), he paid for karma. He paid our karmic debt."
2. Then...and this is the one I'm most concerned I don't know the
terms enough on...he said, "...Jesus as the bodhisattva who fulfilled
his dharma to pay for my karma to negate samsara and achieve nirvana!"
Anyone?
Ken Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
it's an interesting concept to bridge the intent of the language of
one dialect to another... in other words... when the Bible calls it
" sin " another dialect calls it " karma. "
Well, partially... except that you can't have "good sin", positive
sin, whereas "karma" can be negative or positive.
In Christianity, there's right action and wrong action (good karma /
bad karma) -- one is the result of choosing to be as Christ, the other
is the result of choosing the opposite. The terms, while not perfect
synonyms, are parallel and handy for understanding the other religion
in terms of one's own.
when the Apostle Paul was on his missionary journeys as recorded in
Acts, as well as his writings, the language he used to explain the
gospel was Greek when speaking to Gentiles and Hebrew when speaking to
Jews. Greek was the business language used around the Mediterranean.
everybody spoke Greek. now, English is the business language of the
world. so how does one explain the Bible in English in order for the
non English speaking world to understand the gospel ?
for karma to be sin which separates a person from God ( Is. 59:2 )
karma must mean transgression of God's Law. if karma doesn't mean
exactly that then it's a different gospel and different gospels are
man's concoctions which do not have an efficacy to save.
Which in and of itself is a "man made concoction" -- a doctrine of a
human religion. Leave to God the decision as to what has "efficacy to
save".
Padraic
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "met00" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
02 Jun 2007 12:40:00 AM |
|
|
Padraic Brown wrote:
In Christianity, there's right action and wrong action (good karma /
bad karma) -- one is the result of choosing to be as Christ, the other
is the result of choosing the opposite. The terms, while not perfect
synonyms, are parallel and handy for understanding the other religion
in terms of one's own.
Baseball is just like football because they both have scores.
Is that statement true?
I think not.
You can NOT understand Buddhism from the frame of reference of any
religion, as it is not a religion. There is no faith. There is no
answer. There is no higher power that has created anything. There is no
place to go to when the games over. There is no worship. So coming from
any frame or reference that has those things and trying to say that one
equals the other is bull. The baseball is like football analogy above is
closer to being right than saying that Buddhism is like any religion.
Especially one that has a "deity" anywhere near it.
Think of karma as energy that attracts energy of the same type. So, if
you release positive energy, it attracts positive energy. If you release
negative energy, it attracts negative.
Think of the eightfold path as an instruction book that tells one the
tools and tips needed to understand how to use this energy.
Think of enlightenment as the result of creating enough positive energy
in a single place as to become enlightened.
Thus, by following the eightfold path you will be able to do a much
better job of generating more positive energy. This will result in
having more positive energy attracted to your positive energy. At some
undetermined point you have surrounded yourself with enough positive
energy as to become enlightened.
Now, that is to a religion as a star is to a fish (take that SAT
practitioners). Yes, they share the same universe, but so does
everything else on this plane of existence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Padraic Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
02 Jun 2007 08:45:27 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:40:00 GMT, met00 <met00cigar@gmail.com> wrote:
Padraic Brown wrote:
In Christianity, there's right action and wrong action (good karma /
bad karma) -- one is the result of choosing to be as Christ, the other
is the result of choosing the opposite. The terms, while not perfect
synonyms, are parallel and handy for understanding the other religion
in terms of one's own.
Baseball is just like football because they both have scores.
Is that statement true?
I think not.
Both are games (after Huizinga) and satisfay the same fundamental
needs.
I didn't say Christianity and Buddhism were the "same" religion. They
_do_ share several commonalities.
You can NOT understand Buddhism from the frame of reference of any
religion, as it is not a religion. There is no faith. There is no
answer. There is no higher power that has created anything. There is no
place to go to when the games over. There is no worship.
Depends on the form of Buddhism, of course.
So coming from
any frame or reference that has those things and trying to say that one
equals the other is bull. The baseball is like football analogy above is
closer to being right than saying that Buddhism is like any religion.
Especially one that has a "deity" anywhere near it.
Not all forms of Buddhism are nontheistic. Once you divorce
Christianity of its religious superstructure, you are left with the
plain teachings of Jesus which lie at the core of any form of
Christianity you care to name. It is clear that he and the Buddha were
of a kind.
Think of karma as energy that attracts energy of the same type. So, if
you release positive energy, it attracts positive energy. If you release
negative energy, it attracts negative.
Exactly so. Think of sin as the attracted negative energy (you've
already released the negative energy by choosing to sin). Think of the
"reward stored up in heaven" as the attracted positive energy -- the
opposite of sin (you've already released the positive energy by
choosing to do right).
Think of the eightfold path as an instruction book that tells one the
tools and tips needed to understand how to use this energy.
True that. Think of the Gospel of Jesus (not the gospels of Mark or
John or Luke, though the Gospel of Jesus is contained hidden within
them) as an instruction book that tells one some tips and tools needed
to understand and use this energy.
Think of enlightenment as the result of creating enough positive energy
in a single place as to become enlightened.
Think of entering the kingdom as the result of enlightenment, the last
door to be unlocked on the journey that leads one from outside oneself
to inside.
Thus, by following the eightfold path you will be able to do a much
better job of generating more positive energy. This will result in
having more positive energy attracted to your positive energy. At some
undetermined point you have surrounded yourself with enough positive
energy as to become enlightened.
It is the same Way. Different emphases, different idioms, different
fancy bits attached; but essentially the same.
Now, that is to a religion as a star is to a fish (take that SAT
practitioners). Yes, they share the same universe, but so does
everything else on this plane of existence.
And the lowly fish is greater than the every mighty star in heaven for
with one flick of its fin, it has the power to change its course
within the universe.
Padraic
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Christ Died For Karma |
01 Jun 2007 09:40:29 AM |
|
|
old man joe <not@home.com> wrote:
it's an interesting concept to bridge the intent of the language of
one dialect to another... in other words... when the Bible calls it
" sin " another dialect calls it " karma. "
when the Apostle Paul was on his missionary journeys as recorded in
Acts, as well as his writings, the language he used to explain the
gospel was Greek when speaking to Gentiles and Hebrew when speaking to
Jews. Greek was the business language used around the Mediterranean.
Some form of vulgar Greek was.
everybody spoke Greek.
Everyone probably spoke a few words of Greek, but in the absence of
schools, I suspect that a large percentage spoke Greek like recent
American immigrants speak English - poorly, without great
understanding and minimal vocabulary beyond the basics needed to get
by.
lojbab
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|