| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Dana" |
| Date: |
16 Aug 2003 06:29:44 PM |
| Object: |
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building. Indiana
Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to remove
the monument. The Senate has yet to pass its version of the appropriations
bill.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 1 upheld a lower court ruling
and ordered Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore to remove the
5,280-pound sculpture from the building's rotunda by Aug. 20. Moore had
ordered the monument erected in the first place.
Hostettler is hoping his amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State and the
Judiciary appropriations bill, which the House passed 260-161 on July 23,
will prevent the monument from being moved. Hostettler, in a release, noted
that the U.S. Marshals Service executes and enforces all lawful orders of
U.S. district courts, and as a component of the Justice Department, is
funded by the appropriations bill he amended.
"In Glassroth v. Moore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated the Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by placing a granite
monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama State
judicial building in Montgomery, Ala.," Hostettler said on the House floor
July 22.
"As Hamilton pointed out (in Federalist 78), the legislative branch controls
the purse-strings of this government. When the legislative branch believes
the judicial branch to be in error, the Congress may refuse to fund actions
to enforce the court's judgment by the executive branch agency that would
execute those judgments," Hostettler added.
The circuit court order, which was the subject of CNSNews.com reports on
Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, has many other critics besides Hostettler.
"It's just madness," Walter Berns, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, told CNSNews.com, emphasizing however that while he
disagreed with the court decision on removing the sculpture, he did not
favor the appropriations process as the proper means to block the removal.
"Maybe the Senate will put an end to it," Berns added.
Rob Boston, assistant director of communications for Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, said Hostettler's efforts show disrespect
for the Constitution.
"Whether members of Congress like it or not, they must accept the fact that
they do not have the power to overturn judicial rulings through legislation,
and that's really what this is an attempt to do," Boston told CNSNews.com.
Yet Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate in 2000 who will
be attending a rally in Montgomery, Ala., Saturday opposing the sculpture's
removal, saw no problem with the legislation.
"I think that's one step that would certainly be useful," Keyes told
CNSNews.com. "I think that what we're dealing with here is a clear abuse of
judicial power to destroy one of the most fundamental rights of our
citizenship. It's actually part of a long train of abuse by the courts in
which they have willfully distorted the real meaning of the First Amendment
to the Constitution in order to destroy the very right that amendment is
meant to guarantee."
Critics of Hostettler's amendment said it would only embolden Senate
Democrats who are conducting a filibuster of President Bush's choice to fill
a vacancy on the 11th Circuit Court, the same court that ordered the removal
of the Ten Commandments sculpture. Bush's nominee, conservative Alabama
Attorney General William Pryor, would actually be compelled to enforce the
court order to remove the sculpture.
"Certainly, if Pryor failed to obey the court order to remove the Ten
Commandments sculpture, that would be further evidence of his unfitness for
the bench," Louis Bograd, legal director of the Alliance for Justice, told
reporters.
Berns said he did not see how the amendment to the spending bill could
greatly affect Pryor's nomination.
"There seems to be little prospect of his ever being confirmed by the Senate
anyway," Berns explained.
When asked recently by FOX News Channel talk show host Sean Hannity if he
would remove the sculpture, Moore initially answered "No" but later backed
off slightly.
Moore has scheduled a Thursday afternoon press conference at the Alabama
Supreme Court to announce whether he will obey the court order to remove the
sculpture. In the court order, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson said
fines up to $5,000 per day could be levied against Moore, "and thus the
state of Alabama itself, until the monument is removed."
--
"The Declaration of Independence... [is the] declaratory charter of our
rights, and the rights of man."
-- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), 3rd President of the United States
(1801-1809)
.
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 05:15:42 PM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message news:<vjvg6os25t9nf2@corp.supernews.com>...
"Robert" <wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HEK%a.1893$mY.65253530@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
news:vjtf8nacldja6c@corp.supernews.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030
814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display
of
a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building. Indiana
Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed
appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to
remove
the monument.
What a really stupid idea.
Enforcing court orders and respecting court orders should be paramount.
Not when the court order is legislation from the bench.
America is a Christian nation and as soon as every one realizes it the
better it will be. Non-Christians are tolerated but if they become to
much trouble they better watch out.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 11:37:34 PM |
|
|
(Robert) wrote:
America is a Christian nation and as soon as every one realizes it the
better it will be. Non-Christians are tolerated but if they become to
much trouble they better watch out.
What are you going to do? Exile them to Madagascar?
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joni Rathbun" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 11:59:58 PM |
|
|
robert023@pcpostal.com (Robert) wrote:
America is a Christian nation and as soon as every one realizes it the
better it will be. Non-Christians are tolerated but if they become to
much trouble they better watch out.
You could not be more wrong.
Our Constitution is clearly and without question a secular document
that does not so much as mention God, Christianity, or Jesus. And
as stated in the Treaty of Tripoli, "The Government of the United States
of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion..."
As for the 10Cs... the first four have nothing to do with law or
ethical behavior at all. Only three have any relevence and they
existed long before anyone dreamed up Christianity, Moses or the
Bible.
The US is a secular nation that welcomes and tolerates all religions
because the government neither favors or supports any of those religions,
thus ensuring and protecting the rights and freedoms of all, not just
those who make threats (see above), think they're special and better than
everyone else. Indeed, it is our government's duty to protect us from
people like that. That's why we have both the first and 14th amendments,
to protect people from people like you. Had you and yours behaved
yourselves, those amendments would not have been necessary.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joni Rathbun" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 11:44:59 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
robert023@pcpostal.com (Robert) wrote:
America is a Christian nation and as soon as every one realizes it the
better it will be. Non-Christians are tolerated but if they become to
much trouble they better watch out.
What are you going to do? Exile them to Madagascar?
I can get them some good deals on a cruise ship.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
18 Aug 2003 04:21:10 PM |
|
|
In article <26202302.0308171415.748fc442@posting.google.com> (Robert) writes:
<"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message news:<vjvg6os25t9nf2@corp.supernews.com>...
<> "Robert" <wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com> wrote in message
<> news:HEK%a.1893$mY.65253530@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
<> >
<> > "Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
<> > news:vjtf8nacldja6c@corp.supernews.com...
<> > >
<> >
<> http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030
<> > 814a.html
<> > > Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
<> > > By Steve Brown
<> > > CNSNews.com Staff Writer
<> > > August 14, 2003
<> > >
<> > > (CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display
<> of
<> a
<> > > Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building. Indiana
<> > > Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed
<> appropriations
<> > > bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to
<> remove
<> > > the monument.
<> >
<> > What a really stupid idea.
<> >
<> > Enforcing court orders and respecting court orders should be paramount.
<>
<> Not when the court order is legislation from the bench.
<> >
<> >
<
<
<America is a Christian nation and as soon as every one realizes it the
<better it will be. Non-Christians are tolerated but if they become to
<much trouble they better watch out.
Well, seeing as how many "Christians" do not think Catholics are
"real Christians" -- and vice-versa -- and similarly for Mormons,
Christian Scientists, and others (I've seen vicious arguments
over whether those who have not had a pentacostal experience
are "really saved" or not), I'd say that just about EVERBODY
better watch out.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "me.." |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments .. |
20 Aug 2003 08:30:53 AM |
|
|
On 17 Aug 2003 15:15:42 -0700, (Robert) wrote:
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message news:<vjvg6os25t9nf2@corp.supernews.com>...
"Robert" <wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HEK%a.1893$mY.65253530@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
news:vjtf8nacldja6c@corp.supernews.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030
814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display
of
a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building. Indiana
Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed
appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to
remove
the monument.
What a really stupid idea.
Enforcing court orders and respecting court orders should be paramount.
Not when the court order is legislation from the bench.
America is a Christian nation and as soon as every one realizes it the
better it will be. Non-Christians are tolerated but if they become to
much trouble they better watch out.
What are you going to Bring back the inquisition. You better watch
out Americans are well armed. In this country the constitution give
all the right to defend themselves. Even against Christians like
yourself. Personally I don't think your a true follower of Christ at
all.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 06:51:38 PM |
|
|
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten Commandments.
Those other Christian countries learned the hard way, long ago.
They had their bloody wars over Christianity and they want to put that sort of thing behind them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indiana Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to remove
the monument. The Senate has yet to pass its version of the appropriations
bill.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 1 upheld a lower court ruling
and ordered Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore to remove the
5,280-pound sculpture from the building's rotunda by Aug. 20. Moore had
ordered the monument erected in the first place.
Hostettler is hoping his amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State and the
Judiciary appropriations bill, which the House passed 260-161 on July 23,
will prevent the monument from being moved. Hostettler, in a release, noted
that the U.S. Marshals Service executes and enforces all lawful orders of
U.S. district courts, and as a component of the Justice Department, is
funded by the appropriations bill he amended.
"In Glassroth v. Moore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated the Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by placing a granite
monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama State
judicial building in Montgomery, Ala.," Hostettler said on the House floor
July 22.
"As Hamilton pointed out (in Federalist 78), the legislative branch controls
the purse-strings of this government. When the legislative branch believes
the judicial branch to be in error, the Congress may refuse to fund actions
to enforce the court's judgment by the executive branch agency that would
execute those judgments," Hostettler added.
The circuit court order, which was the subject of CNSNews.com reports on
Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, has many other critics besides Hostettler.
"It's just madness," Walter Berns, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, told CNSNews.com, emphasizing however that while he
disagreed with the court decision on removing the sculpture, he did not
favor the appropriations process as the proper means to block the removal.
"Maybe the Senate will put an end to it," Berns added.
Rob Boston, assistant director of communications for Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, said Hostettler's efforts show disrespect
for the Constitution.
"Whether members of Congress like it or not, they must accept the fact that
they do not have the power to overturn judicial rulings through legislation,
and that's really what this is an attempt to do," Boston told CNSNews.com.
Yet Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate in 2000 who will
be attending a rally in Montgomery, Ala., Saturday opposing the sculpture's
removal, saw no problem with the legislation.
"I think that's one step that would certainly be useful," Keyes told
CNSNews.com. "I think that what we're dealing with here is a clear abuse of
judicial power to destroy one of the most fundamental rights of our
citizenship. It's actually part of a long train of abuse by the courts in
which they have willfully distorted the real meaning of the First Amendment
to the Constitution in order to destroy the very right that amendment is
meant to guarantee."
Critics of Hostettler's amendment said it would only embolden Senate
Democrats who are conducting a filibuster of President Bush's choice to fill
a vacancy on the 11th Circuit Court, the same court that ordered the removal
of the Ten Commandments sculpture. Bush's nominee, conservative Alabama
Attorney General William Pryor, would actually be compelled to enforce the
court order to remove the sculpture.
"Certainly, if Pryor failed to obey the court order to remove the Ten
Commandments sculpture, that would be further evidence of his unfitness for
the bench," Louis Bograd, legal director of the Alliance for Justice, told
reporters.
Berns said he did not see how the amendment to the spending bill could
greatly affect Pryor's nomination.
"There seems to be little prospect of his ever being confirmed by the Senate
anyway," Berns explained.
When asked recently by FOX News Channel talk show host Sean Hannity if he
would remove the sculpture, Moore initially answered "No" but later backed
off slightly.
Moore has scheduled a Thursday afternoon press conference at the Alabama
Supreme Court to announce whether he will obey the court order to remove the
sculpture. In the court order, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson said
fines up to $5,000 per day could be levied against Moore, "and thus the
state of Alabama itself, until the monument is removed."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 07:37:23 AM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
news:vjtn086fs89t98@corp.supernews.com...
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4sgtjvo3eqh71n42skktdi0o1vpcoj2d12@4ax.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL2003
0814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display
of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten
Commandments.
That is because the secular humanists in those countries are not so active
in their war against the religious.
Secular humanist? OK. War against the religious? If you look at history,
it is the religious that started wars and killed other people.
We just don't want your reliigion forced upon us.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 08:56:24 PM |
|
|
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4sgtjvo3eqh71n42skktdi0o1vpcoj2d12@4ax.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL2003
0814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display
of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten Commandments.
That is because the secular humanists in those countries are not so active
in their war against the religious.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are dishonest.
You snipped the reason WHY no other Christian country makes such a fuss :
"Those other Christian countries learned the hard way, long ago.
They had their bloody wars over Christianity and they want to put that sort of thing behind them."
In modern times, secular humanists and Christians get along just fine in those countries.
It would take quite a long discussion to explain why this is so.
The " Ten Commandments Problem" does not occur outside of the USA.
This is something which is unique to America.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Arne Langsetmo" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 11:15:53 PM |
|
|
Dana wrote:
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ddntjvo4jn2be6d91gboui5d6dm2f575c4@4ax.com...
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4sgtjvo3eqh71n42skktdi0o1vpcoj2d12@4ax.com...
[snip]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten
Commandments.
That is because the secular humanists in those countries are not so
active in their war against the religious.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are dishonest.
Nope, I am not a secular humanist.
Dana's not only dishonest (this snippage of his is just
small potatoes; he regularly uses forged quotes that he
gleans off CRW propaganda pages), he's also stoopid. As
you should be able to figure out by his witty rebuttal here.
What's worse is that he's a freakin' hypocrite:
ladies use my tongue for your pleasure
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=
63j187%24nji%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=226>
swm very oral will orally worship any female that wishes
to be worshipped. will kiss and lick your feet and butt .
might be wiling to be your toilet paper if you
are that aggressive
That's our "ButtMaster" Dana. No one else like him (and
I suspect that no one else _likes_ him), and he hails from
the good ol' U.S. of Aye. . . .
Cheers,
-- Arne Langsetmo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 12:13:52 AM |
|
|
"Arne Langsetmo" <zuch@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3F3F013F.33DA6BB4@ix.netcom.com...
Dana wrote:
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ddntjvo4jn2be6d91gboui5d6dm2f575c4@4ax.com...
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4sgtjvo3eqh71n42skktdi0o1vpcoj2d12@4ax.com...
[snip]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten
Commandments.
That is because the secular humanists in those countries are not so
active in their war against the religious.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are dishonest.
Nope, I am not a secular humanist.
Dana's not only dishonest (this snippage of his is just
small potatoes; he regularly uses forged quotes that he
gleans off CRW propaganda pages), he's also stoopid. As
you should be able to figure out by his witty rebuttal here.
As little arnie once again proves that he is incapable of refuting what was
posted, so he launches into a personal attack.
What's worse is that he's a freakin' hypocrite:
Ah so you are reduced to using a fradulent post that gary posted.
How very lame that you are reduced to such tactics. But then we expected
that from people like you.
ladies use my tongue for your pleasure
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=
63j187%24nji%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=226>
swm very oral will orally worship any female that wishes
to be worshipped. will kiss and lick your feet and butt .
might be wiling to be your toilet paper if you
are that aggressive
That's our "ButtMaster" Dana. No one else like him (and
I suspect that no one else _likes_ him), and he hails from
the good ol' U.S. of Aye. . . .
Too bad for you that Gary was kicked off of two ISP's for that post he
posted in my name. Now if this is what you are reduce to, be aware that you
can be held accountable for what you post in the news groups.
Cheers,
-- Arne Langsetmo
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Limbaugh Fart Detector" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 09:00:55 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:41:46 -0800, "Dana" <yourname@example.com>
wrote:
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4sgtjvo3eqh71n42skktdi0o1vpcoj2d12@4ax.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL2003
0814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display
of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten
Commandments.
That is because the secular humanists in those countries are not so active
in their war against the religious.
Hey Buttboy, do secular humanists put ads requesting women to use
them as human toilets like you do?
BTW...answer me this about the non-toilet oriented secular
humanists....why do the self-rightious Conservatics not post the Roman
Cathollc version of the Ten Commandments or
the Jewish version....why do the "Judaio Chirstian tradition" crowd
alway select the Protestant version. Why do you think they do that?
Perhaps if they engaged in bizarre sexual fantasies like youself, they
may see clearer the morality of this issue, right?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indiana Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed
appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to
remove
the monument. The Senate has yet to pass its version of the
appropriations
bill.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 1 upheld a lower court
ruling
and ordered Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore to remove the
5,280-pound sculpture from the building's rotunda by Aug. 20. Moore had
ordered the monument erected in the first place.
Hostettler is hoping his amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State and
the
Judiciary appropriations bill, which the House passed 260-161 on July 23,
will prevent the monument from being moved. Hostettler, in a release,
noted
that the U.S. Marshals Service executes and enforces all lawful orders of
U.S. district courts, and as a component of the Justice Department, is
funded by the appropriations bill he amended.
"In Glassroth v. Moore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated the Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by placing a granite
monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama State
judicial building in Montgomery, Ala.," Hostettler said on the House
floor
July 22.
"As Hamilton pointed out (in Federalist 78), the legislative branch
controls
the purse-strings of this government. When the legislative branch
believes
the judicial branch to be in error, the Congress may refuse to fund
actions
to enforce the court's judgment by the executive branch agency that would
execute those judgments," Hostettler added.
The circuit court order, which was the subject of CNSNews.com reports on
Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, has many other critics besides Hostettler.
"It's just madness," Walter Berns, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, told CNSNews.com, emphasizing however that while he
disagreed with the court decision on removing the sculpture, he did not
favor the appropriations process as the proper means to block the
removal.
"Maybe the Senate will put an end to it," Berns added.
Rob Boston, assistant director of communications for Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, said Hostettler's efforts show disrespect
for the Constitution.
"Whether members of Congress like it or not, they must accept the fact
that
they do not have the power to overturn judicial rulings through
legislation,
and that's really what this is an attempt to do," Boston told
CNSNews.com.
Yet Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate in 2000 who
will
be attending a rally in Montgomery, Ala., Saturday opposing the
sculpture's
removal, saw no problem with the legislation.
"I think that's one step that would certainly be useful," Keyes told
CNSNews.com. "I think that what we're dealing with here is a clear abuse
of
judicial power to destroy one of the most fundamental rights of our
citizenship. It's actually part of a long train of abuse by the courts in
which they have willfully distorted the real meaning of the First
Amendment
to the Constitution in order to destroy the very right that amendment is
meant to guarantee."
Critics of Hostettler's amendment said it would only embolden Senate
Democrats who are conducting a filibuster of President Bush's choice to
fill
a vacancy on the 11th Circuit Court, the same court that ordered the
removal
of the Ten Commandments sculpture. Bush's nominee, conservative Alabama
Attorney General William Pryor, would actually be compelled to enforce
the
court order to remove the sculpture.
"Certainly, if Pryor failed to obey the court order to remove the Ten
Commandments sculpture, that would be further evidence of his unfitness
for
the bench," Louis Bograd, legal director of the Alliance for Justice,
told
reporters.
Berns said he did not see how the amendment to the spending bill could
greatly affect Pryor's nomination.
"There seems to be little prospect of his ever being confirmed by the
Senate
anyway," Berns explained.
When asked recently by FOX News Channel talk show host Sean Hannity if he
would remove the sculpture, Moore initially answered "No" but later
backed
off slightly.
Moore has scheduled a Thursday afternoon press conference at the Alabama
Supreme Court to announce whether he will obey the court order to remove
the
sculpture. In the court order, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson
said
fines up to $5,000 per day could be levied against Moore, "and thus the
state of Alabama itself, until the monument is removed."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Limbaugh Fart Detector" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 08:57:40 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 00:51:38 +0100,
wrote:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten Commandments.
Those other Christian countries learned the hard way, long ago.
They had their bloody wars over Christianity and they want to put that sort of thing behind them.
They should put the Roman Cathollc version of the Ten Commandments or
the Jewish version....but the "Judaio Chirstian tradition" crowd alway
selects the Protestant version. Why do you think they do that?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indiana Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to remove
the monument. The Senate has yet to pass its version of the appropriations
bill.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 1 upheld a lower court ruling
and ordered Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore to remove the
5,280-pound sculpture from the building's rotunda by Aug. 20. Moore had
ordered the monument erected in the first place.
Hostettler is hoping his amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State and the
Judiciary appropriations bill, which the House passed 260-161 on July 23,
will prevent the monument from being moved. Hostettler, in a release, noted
that the U.S. Marshals Service executes and enforces all lawful orders of
U.S. district courts, and as a component of the Justice Department, is
funded by the appropriations bill he amended.
"In Glassroth v. Moore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated the Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by placing a granite
monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama State
judicial building in Montgomery, Ala.," Hostettler said on the House floor
July 22.
"As Hamilton pointed out (in Federalist 78), the legislative branch controls
the purse-strings of this government. When the legislative branch believes
the judicial branch to be in error, the Congress may refuse to fund actions
to enforce the court's judgment by the executive branch agency that would
execute those judgments," Hostettler added.
The circuit court order, which was the subject of CNSNews.com reports on
Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, has many other critics besides Hostettler.
"It's just madness," Walter Berns, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, told CNSNews.com, emphasizing however that while he
disagreed with the court decision on removing the sculpture, he did not
favor the appropriations process as the proper means to block the removal.
"Maybe the Senate will put an end to it," Berns added.
Rob Boston, assistant director of communications for Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, said Hostettler's efforts show disrespect
for the Constitution.
"Whether members of Congress like it or not, they must accept the fact that
they do not have the power to overturn judicial rulings through legislation,
and that's really what this is an attempt to do," Boston told CNSNews.com.
Yet Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate in 2000 who will
be attending a rally in Montgomery, Ala., Saturday opposing the sculpture's
removal, saw no problem with the legislation.
"I think that's one step that would certainly be useful," Keyes told
CNSNews.com. "I think that what we're dealing with here is a clear abuse of
judicial power to destroy one of the most fundamental rights of our
citizenship. It's actually part of a long train of abuse by the courts in
which they have willfully distorted the real meaning of the First Amendment
to the Constitution in order to destroy the very right that amendment is
meant to guarantee."
Critics of Hostettler's amendment said it would only embolden Senate
Democrats who are conducting a filibuster of President Bush's choice to fill
a vacancy on the 11th Circuit Court, the same court that ordered the removal
of the Ten Commandments sculpture. Bush's nominee, conservative Alabama
Attorney General William Pryor, would actually be compelled to enforce the
court order to remove the sculpture.
"Certainly, if Pryor failed to obey the court order to remove the Ten
Commandments sculpture, that would be further evidence of his unfitness for
the bench," Louis Bograd, legal director of the Alliance for Justice, told
reporters.
Berns said he did not see how the amendment to the spending bill could
greatly affect Pryor's nomination.
"There seems to be little prospect of his ever being confirmed by the Senate
anyway," Berns explained.
When asked recently by FOX News Channel talk show host Sean Hannity if he
would remove the sculpture, Moore initially answered "No" but later backed
off slightly.
Moore has scheduled a Thursday afternoon press conference at the Alabama
Supreme Court to announce whether he will obey the court order to remove the
sculpture. In the court order, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson said
fines up to $5,000 per day could be levied against Moore, "and thus the
state of Alabama itself, until the monument is removed."
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 09:32:00 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 00:51:38 +0100,
wrote:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten Commandments.
Those other Christian countries learned the hard way, long ago.
They had their bloody wars over Christianity and they want to put that sort of thing behind them.
They should put the Roman Cathollc version of the Ten Commandments or
the Jewish version....but the "Judaio Chirstian tradition" crowd always
selects the Protestant version. Why do you think they do that?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My personal opinion, is that religion is a private matter not a public matter.
Anybody is free to express their religion --- In private.
In this context, I would class a church as a private place.
A church is private property.
The exception to this rule, is a holy shrine, at a public place where vast
numbers of pilgrims visit.
If a "Ten Commandments Location" can be proven to be a place of pilgrimage,
then it should not be disturbed.
As far as I'm aware, no such place of pilgrimage exists in the USA.
But I'm prepared to be proven wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indiana Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to remove
the monument. The Senate has yet to pass its version of the appropriations
bill.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 1 upheld a lower court ruling
and ordered Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore to remove the
5,280-pound sculpture from the building's rotunda by Aug. 20. Moore had
ordered the monument erected in the first place.
Hostettler is hoping his amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State and the
Judiciary appropriations bill, which the House passed 260-161 on July 23,
will prevent the monument from being moved. Hostettler, in a release, noted
that the U.S. Marshals Service executes and enforces all lawful orders of
U.S. district courts, and as a component of the Justice Department, is
funded by the appropriations bill he amended.
"In Glassroth v. Moore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated the Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by placing a granite
monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama State
judicial building in Montgomery, Ala.," Hostettler said on the House floor
July 22.
"As Hamilton pointed out (in Federalist 78), the legislative branch controls
the purse-strings of this government. When the legislative branch believes
the judicial branch to be in error, the Congress may refuse to fund actions
to enforce the court's judgment by the executive branch agency that would
execute those judgments," Hostettler added.
The circuit court order, which was the subject of CNSNews.com reports on
Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, has many other critics besides Hostettler.
"It's just madness," Walter Berns, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, told CNSNews.com, emphasizing however that while he
disagreed with the court decision on removing the sculpture, he did not
favor the appropriations process as the proper means to block the removal.
"Maybe the Senate will put an end to it," Berns added.
Rob Boston, assistant director of communications for Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, said Hostettler's efforts show disrespect
for the Constitution.
"Whether members of Congress like it or not, they must accept the fact that
they do not have the power to overturn judicial rulings through legislation,
and that's really what this is an attempt to do," Boston told CNSNews.com.
Yet Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate in 2000 who will
be attending a rally in Montgomery, Ala., Saturday opposing the sculpture's
removal, saw no problem with the legislation.
"I think that's one step that would certainly be useful," Keyes told
CNSNews.com. "I think that what we're dealing with here is a clear abuse of
judicial power to destroy one of the most fundamental rights of our
citizenship. It's actually part of a long train of abuse by the courts in
which they have willfully distorted the real meaning of the First Amendment
to the Constitution in order to destroy the very right that amendment is
meant to guarantee."
Critics of Hostettler's amendment said it would only embolden Senate
Democrats who are conducting a filibuster of President Bush's choice to fill
a vacancy on the 11th Circuit Court, the same court that ordered the removal
of the Ten Commandments sculpture. Bush's nominee, conservative Alabama
Attorney General William Pryor, would actually be compelled to enforce the
court order to remove the sculpture.
"Certainly, if Pryor failed to obey the court order to remove the Ten
Commandments sculpture, that would be further evidence of his unfitness for
the bench," Louis Bograd, legal director of the Alliance for Justice, told
reporters.
Berns said he did not see how the amendment to the spending bill could
greatly affect Pryor's nomination.
"There seems to be little prospect of his ever being confirmed by the Senate
anyway," Berns explained.
When asked recently by FOX News Channel talk show host Sean Hannity if he
would remove the sculpture, Moore initially answered "No" but later backed
off slightly.
Moore has scheduled a Thursday afternoon press conference at the Alabama
Supreme Court to announce whether he will obey the court order to remove the
sculpture. In the court order, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson said
fines up to $5,000 per day could be levied against Moore, "and thus the
state of Alabama itself, until the monument is removed."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "me.." |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 08:44:02 PM |
|
|
This congressman is a traitor to the USA and should be treated as
such. The supreme court is the ultimate athority on the constitution
not some ***** in congress that will use our money to further his
religious beliefs. That money he wants to cut off belongs to all the
people including those that are not Christian.
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 00:51:38 +0100,
wrote:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20030814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten Commandments.
Those other Christian countries learned the hard way, long ago.
They had their bloody wars over Christianity and they want to put that sort of thing behind them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indiana Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to remove
the monument. The Senate has yet to pass its version of the appropriations
bill.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 1 upheld a lower court ruling
and ordered Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore to remove the
5,280-pound sculpture from the building's rotunda by Aug. 20. Moore had
ordered the monument erected in the first place.
Hostettler is hoping his amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State and the
Judiciary appropriations bill, which the House passed 260-161 on July 23,
will prevent the monument from being moved. Hostettler, in a release, noted
that the U.S. Marshals Service executes and enforces all lawful orders of
U.S. district courts, and as a component of the Justice Department, is
funded by the appropriations bill he amended.
"In Glassroth v. Moore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated the Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by placing a granite
monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama State
judicial building in Montgomery, Ala.," Hostettler said on the House floor
July 22.
"As Hamilton pointed out (in Federalist 78), the legislative branch controls
the purse-strings of this government. When the legislative branch believes
the judicial branch to be in error, the Congress may refuse to fund actions
to enforce the court's judgment by the executive branch agency that would
execute those judgments," Hostettler added.
The circuit court order, which was the subject of CNSNews.com reports on
Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, has many other critics besides Hostettler.
"It's just madness," Walter Berns, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, told CNSNews.com, emphasizing however that while he
disagreed with the court decision on removing the sculpture, he did not
favor the appropriations process as the proper means to block the removal.
"Maybe the Senate will put an end to it," Berns added.
Rob Boston, assistant director of communications for Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, said Hostettler's efforts show disrespect
for the Constitution.
"Whether members of Congress like it or not, they must accept the fact that
they do not have the power to overturn judicial rulings through legislation,
and that's really what this is an attempt to do," Boston told CNSNews.com.
Yet Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate in 2000 who will
be attending a rally in Montgomery, Ala., Saturday opposing the sculpture's
removal, saw no problem with the legislation.
"I think that's one step that would certainly be useful," Keyes told
CNSNews.com. "I think that what we're dealing with here is a clear abuse of
judicial power to destroy one of the most fundamental rights of our
citizenship. It's actually part of a long train of abuse by the courts in
which they have willfully distorted the real meaning of the First Amendment
to the Constitution in order to destroy the very right that amendment is
meant to guarantee."
Critics of Hostettler's amendment said it would only embolden Senate
Democrats who are conducting a filibuster of President Bush's choice to fill
a vacancy on the 11th Circuit Court, the same court that ordered the removal
of the Ten Commandments sculpture. Bush's nominee, conservative Alabama
Attorney General William Pryor, would actually be compelled to enforce the
court order to remove the sculpture.
"Certainly, if Pryor failed to obey the court order to remove the Ten
Commandments sculpture, that would be further evidence of his unfitness for
the bench," Louis Bograd, legal director of the Alliance for Justice, told
reporters.
Berns said he did not see how the amendment to the spending bill could
greatly affect Pryor's nomination.
"There seems to be little prospect of his ever being confirmed by the Senate
anyway," Berns explained.
When asked recently by FOX News Channel talk show host Sean Hannity if he
would remove the sculpture, Moore initially answered "No" but later backed
off slightly.
Moore has scheduled a Thursday afternoon press conference at the Alabama
Supreme Court to announce whether he will obey the court order to remove the
sculpture. In the court order, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson said
fines up to $5,000 per day could be levied against Moore, "and thus the
state of Alabama itself, until the monument is removed."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
16 Aug 2003 09:38:28 PM |
|
|
<> wrote in message
news:2qotjv0keadkhi9969jqeabliadhitsga4@4ax.com...
Atheists are taxpayers.
||||||||||||||||||||||
And a very large majority of atheists are intolerant bigots.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 00:51:38 +0100,
wrote:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200308/CUL20
030814a.html
Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments Monument
By Steve Brown
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 14, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Congress is now involved in the battle over the display
of a
Ten Commandments monument at the Alabama Supreme Court building.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is ridiculous.
In no other Christian country is there such a fuss over the Ten
Commandments.
Those other Christian countries learned the hard way, long ago.
They had their bloody wars over Christianity and they want to put that
sort of thing behind them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indiana Republican Rep. John Hostettler's amendment to a House-passed
appropriations
bill would cut federal funds used to enforce a federal court order to
remove
the monument. The Senate has yet to pass its version of the
appropriations
bill.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 1 upheld a lower court
ruling
and ordered Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore to remove the
5,280-pound sculpture from the building's rotunda by Aug. 20. Moore had
ordered the monument erected in the first place.
Hostettler is hoping his amendment to the Commerce, Justice, State and
the
Judiciary appropriations bill, which the House passed 260-161 on July
23,
will prevent the monument from being moved. Hostettler, in a release,
noted
that the U.S. Marshals Service executes and enforces all lawful orders
of
U.S. district courts, and as a component of the Justice Department, is
funded by the appropriations bill he amended.
"In Glassroth v. Moore, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that
the
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated the
Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by placing a granite
monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama State
judicial building in Montgomery, Ala.," Hostettler said on the House
floor
July 22.
"As Hamilton pointed out (in Federalist 78), the legislative branch
controls
the purse-strings of this government. When the legislative branch
believes
the judicial branch to be in error, the Congress may refuse to fund
actions
to enforce the court's judgment by the executive branch agency that
would
execute those judgments," Hostettler added.
The circuit court order, which was the subject of CNSNews.com reports
on
Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, has many other critics besides Hostettler.
"It's just madness," Walter Berns, resident scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, told CNSNews.com, emphasizing however that while
he
disagreed with the court decision on removing the sculpture, he did not
favor the appropriations process as the proper means to block the
removal.
"Maybe the Senate will put an end to it," Berns added.
Rob Boston, assistant director of communications for Americans United
for
Separation of Church and State, said Hostettler's efforts show
disrespect
for the Constitution.
"Whether members of Congress like it or not, they must accept the fact
that
they do not have the power to overturn judicial rulings through
legislation,
and that's really what this is an attempt to do," Boston told
CNSNews.com.
Yet Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate in 2000 who
will
be attending a rally in Montgomery, Ala., Saturday opposing the
sculpture's
removal, saw no problem with the legislation.
"I think that's one step that would certainly be useful," Keyes told
CNSNews.com. "I think that what we're dealing with here is a clear
abuse of
judicial power to destroy one of the most fundamental rights of our
citizenship. It's actually part of a long train of abuse by the courts
in
which they have willfully distorted the real meaning of the First
Amendment
to the Constitution in order to destroy the very right that amendment
is
meant to guarantee."
Critics of Hostettler's amendment said it would only embolden Senate
Democrats who are conducting a filibuster of President Bush's choice to
fill
a vacancy on the 11th Circuit Court, the same court that ordered the
removal
of the Ten Commandments sculpture. Bush's nominee, conservative Alabama
Attorney General William Pryor, would actually be compelled to enforce
the
court order to remove the sculpture.
"Certainly, if Pryor failed to obey the court order to remove the Ten
Commandments sculpture, that would be further evidence of his unfitness
for
the bench," Louis Bograd, legal director of the Alliance for Justice,
told
reporters.
Berns said he did not see how the amendment to the spending bill could
greatly affect Pryor's nomination.
"There seems to be little prospect of his ever being confirmed by the
Senate
anyway," Berns explained.
When asked recently by FOX News Channel talk show host Sean Hannity if
he
would remove the sculpture, Moore initially answered "No" but later
backed
off slightly.
Moore has scheduled a Thursday afternoon press conference at the
Alabama
Supreme Court to announce whether he will obey the court order to
remove the
sculpture. In the court order, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson
said
fines up to $5,000 per day could be levied against Moore, "and thus the
state of Alabama itself, until the monument is removed."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 12:42:43 AM |
|
|
"Arne Langsetmo" <zuch@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3F3F08C7.2EE2431@ix.netcom.com...
Dana wrote:
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2qotjv0keadkhi9969jqeabliadhitsga4@4ax.com...
Atheists are taxpayers.
||||||||||||||||||||||
And a very large majority of atheists are intolerant bigots.
Unlike those bastions of toleration that want _their_ religious
views affirmed from every courthouse in the land
And again arnie has to lie. So tell us arnie, why can't you refute what was
posted. Why must you engage in personal attacks. You might feel safe behind
your keyboard. But do remember that you can be held accountable for your
actions.
So tell us what dewey said about secular humanism, even dewey called it a
religion, yet you are making the claim it is not a religion, yet it's
founders claim it is a religion. You claim I am a fundy, yet you could never
prove that. You post a fraudulent disgusting post thinking you are getting
one over, when in reality all you are doing is exposing yourself as a
hypocrite.
You are a very good example of why man will never be able to have a perfect
peace in our life time. Hopefully mankind will ditch the acts with which
drive you to engage in personal attacks because of viewpoints you do not
like. It is this intolerance and hatred that you have, and that indeed
mankind as a species has that causes war and conflict. When people like you
who cannot control their intolerance and hatred become a very small minority
of the population as a whole, than maybe mankind will reach the level of
humanity needed where people will not wage war on each other. But until then
there will always be people like I who will defend society from people like
you, who tend towards tyranny and oppressive behaviors against their fellow
men. Your attitude which is quite similar to most on the left in America
today will ensure that the country will not stay as a republic of 50 states.
Society is fracturing and the country is being polarized into two major
camps. One camp is those that believe in individual freedom and liberty
living in a moral society where people are held accountable for their
actions, and all are treated equally, and the other camp is the socialist
side, where people are not held accountable for their actions, and that the
government will take care of them. This will become a moral-less society
where there will be two classes, the well off, and everyone else. The well
off would make all the rules, and everyone else will be just pawns to be
used by the well off when and where needed. You will be just another cog in
the big machine. You will be just as free as your fellow slave, so long as
you behave just like him/her.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 12:36:25 PM |
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:bk4vjvcqmecttilvhn88u9dljhoggnk9gv@4ax.com...
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
So tell us what dewey said about secular humanism,
Why should anyone care what Dewey said?
Being that dewey is the person who laid out the framework of our public
education system, and he is considered as the father of our public education
system, his views are very relevant.
even dewey called it a religion,
His unsubstantiated opinion is noted, and irrelevant.
Dewey was one of the founders of secular humanism.
yet you are making the claim it is not a religion, yet it's
founders claim it is a religion.
You claim I am a fundy, yet you could never prove that.
You walk like a duck and quack like one. Who cares whether you are
one?
In other words you just admitted you are lying.
You post a fraudulent disgusting post thinking you are getting
one over,
You do that several times a week, and you violate copyright laws when
you do so.
Nope, I have never violated any copyright laws. Maybe you should read up on
what copyright laws do.
when in reality all you are doing is exposing yourself as a hypocrite.
You are a very good example of why man will never be able to have a
perfect
peace in our life time.
Why would one ever expect that man would have a perfect peace?
Well you socialists need for man to be in strife all the time.
Hopefully mankind will ditch the acts with which
drive you to engage in personal attacks because of viewpoints you do not
like. It is this intolerance and hatred that you have, and that indeed
mankind as a species has that causes war and conflict.
But until then there will always be people like I who will defend society
Society is fracturing and the country is being polarized into two major
One camp is those that believe in individual freedom and liberty
living in a moral society where people are held accountable for their
actions, and all are treated equally, and the other camp is the socialist
side, where people are not held accountable for their actions, and that
the
government will take care of them.
This will become a moral-less society
where there will be two classes, the well off, and everyone else. The
well
off would make all the rules, and everyone else will be just pawns to be
used by the well off when and where needed. You will be just another cog
in
the big machine. You will be just as free as your fellow slave, so long
as
you behave just like him/her.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 02:08:54 PM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" < > wrote in message
news:bk4vjvcqmecttilvhn88u9dljhoggnk9gv@4ax.com...
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
So tell us what dewey said about secular humanism,
Why should anyone care what Dewey said?
Being that dewey is the person who laid out the framework of our public
education system, and he is considered as the father of our public education
system, his views are very relevant.
False. Most people attribute that to Mann, who was several decades
before Dewey.
But even if so, his views on anything other than public education are
irrelevant to public education.
Dewey's primary impact on education was on the METHODS of teaching:
http://www.pbs.org/kcet/publicschool/innovators/dewey.html
As an alternative to the drill-and-recitation methods of the
nineteenth century, Dewey’s School and Society (1899) espoused the
notion that ideas should be grounded in experience. In Experience and
Education (1938), he argued that education should be based on the
child’s psychological and physical development, as well as the world
outside the schoolroom.
even dewey called it a religion,
His unsubstantiated opinion is noted, and irrelevant.
Dewey was one of the founders of secular humanism.
Nope. Humanism was around long before Dewey, and if it wasn't
religious humanism, it was secular humanism. Some people date it from
the Renaissance, which Dewey had no part in:
http://www.italian-art.org/history/humanism.html
However, humanism can be found in ancient Greek manuscripts:
http://www.humanistsofutah.org/1993/flosep93.html
Dewey was one of 34 signers of something called The Humanist Manifesto
http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto1.html
However, that document does not define "secular humanism". It defines
what they called "religious humanism".
To see the definition of "secular humanism", one might look at
http://www.secularhumanism.org/intro/declaration.html
where one will not find Dewey's name among the subscribers, nor any
indication that secular humanism is intended to be a religion or
religious in nature. In particular, it says:
Secular humanism is not a dogma or a creed.
You post a fraudulent disgusting post thinking you are getting
one over,
You do that several times a week, and you violate copyright laws when
you do so.
Nope, I have never violated any copyright laws. Maybe you should read up on
what copyright laws do.
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#102
§ 102. Subject matter of copyright: In general
(a) Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in
original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of
expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be
perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or
with the aid of a machine or device.
§ 106. Exclusive rights in copyrighted works
Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this
title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the
^^^^^^^^^
following:
(1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;
(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;
(3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to
the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental,
lease, or lending;
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use
of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies
or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching
(including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or
research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether
the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the
factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use
is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the copyrighted work as a whole; and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of
the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of
fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above
factors.
See also point #4 of
http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Arne Langsetmo" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 11:35:34 AM |
|
|
Dana wrote:
"Arne Langsetmo" <zuch@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3F3F08C7.2EE2431@ix.netcom.com...
Dana wrote:
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2qotjv0keadkhi9969jqeabliadhitsga4@4ax.com...
Atheists are taxpayers.
||||||||||||||||||||||
And a very large majority of atheists are intolerant bigots.
Unlike those bastions of toleration that want _their_ religious
views affirmed from every courthouse in the land
And again arnie has to lie. So tell us arnie, why can't you refute what was
posted. Why must you engage in personal attacks. . . .
What personal attacks? Oh, did you mean _this_, "ButtMaster":
ladies use my tongue for your pleasure
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=
63j187%24nji%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=226>
swm very oral will orally worship any female that wishes to be
worshipped.
will kiss and lick your feet and butt .
might be wiling to be your toilet paper if you
are that aggressive
Google's a wonderful thing.
If you think that's atypical, just do "advanced search" with:
"butt author:raffaniello author:dana", and you get more, like
this:
From: dana raffaniello ()
Subject: will worship female butt and feet
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: houston.personals
Date: 1997/11/02
swm will worship your feet and butt nothing but oral. use
my tongue and mouth for your pleasure. no penetration
unless wanted.
and:
From: dana raffaniello ()
Subject: want to kiss female feet
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: houston.personals
Date: 1997/11/02
ladies I am a swm/35 looking to please you orally. I will
kiss and lick your feet, and butt. no penetration just
orally using my tongue on your body.
Hell, here's your "virgin" post to Usenet under the
"Danaraffaniello@worldnet.att.net" account, early in
1997, the oldest post in Google:
From:
()
Subject: golden/brown showers
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.personals.fetish, alt.sex.fetish.watersports
Date: 1997/03/30
swm/34 houston tx. looking for females to use me as an oral slave.
no physical penetration,just use my tongue and mouth for your
satisfaction. will perform toilet service for both golden and brown
showers. will worship feet and *****. trampling and smothering ok
also. cyber or in person. ladies tell me your fantasy,on
watersports.
No replies, eh? Maybe you're just too stoopid to know
that the people you want to humiliate you don't respond
to the title "lady", and prefer appellations such as
"Your holey excrescence" and "oh, dear gawd, mistress
of pain and humiliation". . . .
So tell me, Dana: How does someone spoof your addy before you
_ever started_ posting with that address? Do we have psychics
out there?
. . . You might feel safe behind
your keyboard. But do remember that you can be held accountable for your
actions.
ROFLMAO. I'm quaking, Mr. "Let Me Be Your Human Toilet".
So tell us what dewey said about secular humanism, even dewey called it a
religion, . . .
WTF cares what Dewey said?
. . . yet you are making the claim it is not a religion, yet it's
founders claim it is a religion. . . .
There's a difference between "secular humanism" and "Secular Humanism"
(and even more with "Humanism").
But FWIW, is the Democratic People's Republic of Korea "democratic"?
Here's more on this:
http://candst.tripod.com/sechum.htm
. . . You claim I am a fundy, yet you could never
prove that. . . .
Nah. I think you're a troll. See above for what it is that
you think "salvation" consists of. A stoopid troll, at that.
. . . You post a fraudulent disgusting post thinking you are getting
one over, . . .
Not a fraud, "ButtMaster". As I said, your claim that someone
else spoofed these "disgusting" posts is not borne out by
the evidence (and so it would be seen in a court of law).
. . . when in reality all you are doing is exposing yourself as a
hypocrite.
You misspelled one of the shortest words in the English language: "me".
That takes some talent, Dana.
You are a very good example of why man will never be able to have a perfect
peace in our life time. Hopefully mankind will ditch the acts with which
drive you to engage in personal attacks because of viewpoints you do not
like. . . .
It's the hypocrisy I don't like, Dana. I am perfectly content to
let you engage in your watersports (_if_ you can find someone
else willing to humiliate you). But when you pretend to be
a holy roller, I will whack _your_ butt until it's glowing
red. Good luck on your quest for big smelly butts.
. . . It is this intolerance and hatred that you have, and that indeed
mankind as a species has that causes war and conflict. . . .
Oh, nonsense. The (supposedly) piously religious are the more
in tolerant, the most _sanguinary_ bunch around. That comes
from a sense of moral certitude that their way is the _only_
way in accord with their vengeful and vicious Gawd. They're
not doing anything worse than GAwd has planned for the
"infidels" when they cut off their heads, burn them to death,
stone them, rape their women, anonanonanonanon for many,
many, many bloody centuries. Right down to Sept. 11th and
onward from there. . . .
. . . When people like you
who cannot control their intolerance and hatred become a very small minority
of the population as a whole, . . .
That'd be you and the people you keep quoting from. I _am_
in a "very small minority". But I'm not the one trying to
tell others whether they should engage in "golden/brown showers".
. . . than maybe mankind will reach the level of
humanity needed where people will not wage war on each other. But until then
there will always be people like I who will defend society from people like
you, who tend towards tyranny and oppressive behaviors against their fellow
men. . . .
I think you're projecting, "ButtMaster".
. . . Your attitude which is quite similar to most on the left in America
today will ensure that the country will not stay as a republic of 50 states.
Rather than the "one theocracy" you pretend to seek???
Society is fracturing and the country is being polarized into two major
camps. . . .
So, in your mind, obviously one has to win, eh?
. . . One camp is those that believe in individual freedom and liberty
living in a moral society where people are held accountable for their
actions, . . .
You might ask what the "morals police" you extol would do to folks
who get their rocks off on "brown showers". . . .
. . . and all are treated equally, and the other camp is the socialist
side, . . .
False dichotomy.
. . . where people are not held accountable for their actions, and that the
government will take care of them. . . .
No one taken seriously extols such a thing.
. . . This will become a moral-less society
where there will be two classes, the well off, and everyone else. . . .
Sounds like the Libertarians. Who, granted, aren't real friends of
the fundies, but they're far from being "Secular Humanists" (or
even humanists, for that matter). In fact, it's the lack of any
humanist element in Libertarianism that most offends me there
(outside of the hackneyed "epistemology" they've cobbled together
to "prove" that they, and they alone, are "right").
. . . The well
off would make all the rules, and everyone else will be just pawns to be
used by the well off when and where needed. . . .
Your folks aren't at all adverse to rules. They just want to make
the rules _their_ favourite ones. Like stoning adulterers to
death.
. . . You will be just another cog in
the big machine. You will be just as free as your fellow slave, so long as
you behave just like him/her.
Nonsense. But your faves at "Human Events" would dearly like to
set up "One Nation Under Gawd", a Christian Reconstructionist
state where everyone must bend a knee to the vicious Gawd of
the Old Testament ... and where "brown showers" are punished by
stoning. Good luck to ya. . . .
Cheers,
-- Arne Langsetmo
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 07:40:57 AM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
news:vjtqahdgrq3j22@corp.supernews.com...
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2qotjv0keadkhi9969jqeabliadhitsga4@4ax.com...
Atheists are taxpayers.
||||||||||||||||||||||
And a very large majority of atheists are intolerant bigots.
How many atheists do you know?
I know that wonderful christian bigots kept breaking my Darwin emblem off my
car
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 12:29:38 PM |
|
|
"Robert" <wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:tJK%a.1896$QV.65156248@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
news:vjtqahdgrq3j22@corp.supernews.com...
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2qotjv0keadkhi9969jqeabliadhitsga4@4ax.com...
Atheists are taxpayers.
||||||||||||||||||||||
And a very large majority of atheists are intolerant bigots.
How many atheists do you know?
Quite a few.
I know that wonderful christian bigots kept breaking my Darwin emblem off
my
car
You do not know that.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 12:06:55 AM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2qotjv0keadkhi9969jqeabliadhitsga4@4ax.com...
Atheists are taxpayers.
||||||||||||||||||||||
And a very large majority of atheists are intolerant bigots.
Your unsubstantiated opinion is noted but worthless.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: Congressman Seeks to Protect Alabama's Ten Commandments |
17 Aug 2003 12:44:41 AM |
|
|
| | | | | |