| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Stan de SD" |
| Date: |
18 Apr 2006 03:13:41 AM |
| Object: |
Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment'
A "sexual harassment" investigation is ongoing at an Ohio college after the
school's librarian suggested that students read a few books from a
conservative perspective.
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that aggressively
defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio State University at
Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual harassment" charge after he
suggested that freshmen read four best-selling conservative books.
Scott Savage is a reference librarian at OSU Mansfield and a member of the
school's First Year Reading Experience Committee. After suggesting that
students read "The Marketing of Evil" by David Kupelian, "The Professors" by
David Horowitz, "Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis" by Bat Ye'or, and "It Takes a
Family" by Sen. Rick Santorum, Savage was put under "investigation."
The Alliance Defense Fund reports that three professors filed a complaint of
discrimination and harassment against Savage because the list of books he
suggested made them feel "unsafe."
"Universities are one of the most hostile places for Christians and
conservatives in America," said ADF Senior Legal Counsel David French, who
heads ADF's Center for Academic Freedom. "It is shameful that OSU would
investigate a Christian librarian for simply recommending books that are at
odds with the prevailing politics of the university."
The Alliance Defense Fund sent a letter to school officials informing them
of the librarian's constitutional rights -- just in case they forgot. But,
according to the ADF, the university is proceeding with its investigation
saying it takes "any allegation of sexual harassment seriously."
Even more troubling, this ridiculous "sexual harassment" claim was supported
by the school's entire faculty as they voted without dissent to file charges
against Savage. Later they voted to allow the individual professors to file
charges, according to the ADF.
"The OSU Mansfield faculty is attempting to label a librarian as a 'sexual
harasser' because they disagree with his book suggestions," said French.
"It is astonishing that an entire faculty would vote to launch a sexual
harassment investigation because a librarian offered book suggestions in a
committee whose purpose was to solicit such suggestions."
Curious as to which chapter of the Nazis Party was running this university,
"the Dean" of Human Events U visited the school's website and found the
following statement on "diversity" -- ".we celebrate and learn from our
diversity and we value individual differences. Academic freedom is defended
within an environment of civility, tolerance,
and mutual respect."
But, apparently, this policy doesn't extend to conservatives.
I also found an incomplete list of the "Top Ten Reasons" why someone should
attend OSU Mansfield. I say "incomplete" because while the school listed
such attributes as "student tickets to OSU athletic events," "housing on
campus" and "convenient location with free parking," the school didn't
mention its most attractive feature: vilifying conservatives.
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/blog-detail.php?id=14083
.
|
|
| User: "Godzilla Pimp" |
|
| Title: Close down all colleges |
18 Apr 2006 09:21:10 PM |
|
|
Allow only trade and technical schools until sanity can be restored. Come to
think of it, close them permanently.
GP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Antimiltyculture" |
|
| Title: Re: Close down all colleges |
19 Apr 2006 04:05:24 PM |
|
|
Godzilla Pimp wrote:
Allow only trade and technical schools until sanity can be restored. Come
to think of it, close them permanently.
The less educated people are, the more likely they'll embrace Conservative
NeoCon nonsense and the further behind the USA will languish from its
competition.
Good news for the few who are the reich wing elite whose only desire is to
pick America's bones clean and then flee the country with the proceeds.
You look like an uneducated boob. You'll make a perfect doormat.
*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leftists = traitors" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 05:50:53 AM |
|
|
Isn't that freedom of information thing on campus pesky? Good think
the angry left has
been so effective in stamping it out. After all, higher learning need
not mean freedom
to make your own choices, right?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 01:35:13 PM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that aggressively
defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio State University at
Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual harassment" charge after he
suggested that freshmen read four best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Scott Savage is a reference librarian at OSU Mansfield and a member of the
school's First Year Reading Experience Committee. After suggesting that
students read "The Marketing of Evil" by David Kupelian, "The Professors" by
David Horowitz, "Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis" by Bat Ye'or, and "It Takes a
Family" by Sen. Rick Santorum, Savage was put under "investigation."
All of them pure *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
19 Apr 2006 05:32:20 AM |
|
|
<man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145385313.674572.192160@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively
defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio State University at
Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual harassment" charge after he
suggested that freshmen read four best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
And you have proof of this, right? Sources? Cites?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 01:40:15 PM |
|
|
() wrote in
news:1145385313.674572.192160@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com:
Stan de SD wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 04:23:38 PM |
|
|
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid enough to sue for
sexual harassment unless you start actually playing
grab-***** or describing very explicitly what you want
to do with them. And perhaps because right-wingers
use the "It's because I'm a conservative" excuse to
excuse all their behavior.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
19 Apr 2006 05:35:37 AM |
|
|
<man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145395418.594606.324600@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid enough to sue for
sexual harassment unless you start actually playing
grab-***** or describing very explicitly what you want
to do with them. And perhaps because right-wingers
use the "It's because I'm a conservative" excuse to
excuse all their behavior.
Thanks for letting us know that you really had no proof to back up your
observations, and that you merely felt compelled to respond in your typical
knee-jerk Lefty Liberal fashion. You're an excellent illustration of the
validity of the old saying: "A wise man speaks because he has something to
say - a fool speaks because he has to say something." :O|
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 08:17:17 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid [snip *****]
So the answer is "No, you can't."
I figured that would be it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 04:26:36 PM |
|
|
In news:1145395418.594606.324600@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid enough to sue for
sexual harassment unless you start actually playing
grab-***** or describing very explicitly what you want
to do with them. And perhaps because right-wingers
use the "It's because I'm a conservative" excuse to
excuse all their behavior.
Is that just a very complicated way to say you have nothing to support
your assertion?
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
19 Apr 2006 05:36:32 AM |
|
|
"Bert Hyman" <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97A9A7551C198VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7...
In news:1145395418.594606.324600@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid enough to sue for
sexual harassment unless you start actually playing
grab-***** or describing very explicitly what you want
to do with them. And perhaps because right-wingers
use the "It's because I'm a conservative" excuse to
excuse all their behavior.
Is that just a very complicated way to say you have nothing to support
your assertion?
I think it's his way of reminding is that the quality of stupid people has
been going downhill in Usenet as of late. :O|
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 04:38:50 PM |
|
|
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid enough to sue for
sexual harassment unless you start actually playing
grab-***** or describing very explicitly what you want
to do with them. And perhaps because right-wingers
use the "It's because I'm a conservative" excuse to
excuse all their behavior.
Is that just a very complicated way to say you have nothing to support
your assertion?
No, it's just based on facts. Your side of the aisle could be
its own drinking game, actually. Come to think of it, Bush is
his own drinking game.
Either way, if nothing else, santorum is a sexual term. A
frothy mixture of semen, water-based lubricant, and fecal
matter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
19 Apr 2006 05:38:50 AM |
|
|
<man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145396330.653646.324960@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid enough to sue for
sexual harassment unless you start actually playing
grab-***** or describing very explicitly what you want
to do with them. And perhaps because right-wingers
use the "It's because I'm a conservative" excuse to
excuse all their behavior.
Is that just a very complicated way to say you have nothing to support
your assertion?
No, it's just based on facts.
Which of course, you can't present, right?
Your side of the aisle could be
its own drinking game, actually. Come to think of it, Bush is
his own drinking game.
Either way, if nothing else, santorum is a sexual term. A
frothy mixture of semen, water-based lubricant, and fecal
matter.
Thanks for reminding us that you're still a loser, incapable of dealing with
reality...
===============================================
(following courtesy of Jim Alder:)
In 2003 a sociologist from Rutgers University named Ted Goertzel
wrote a paper in which he offered some insight into the psyche
of the left. Interesting reading:
In the 1970s, Stanley Rothman and Robert Lichter
administered Thematic Apperception Tests to a large sample of
"new left" radicals (Roots of Radicalism, 1982). They found that
activists were characterized by weakened self-esteem, injured
narcissism and paranoid tendencies. They were preoccupied with
power and attracted to radical ideologies that offered clear and
unambiguous answers to their questions. . . .
The unwillingness to offer alternatives reveals a lack of
self-confidence and self-esteem. If they offered their own
policy ideas they would be vulnerable to criticism. They would
run the risk that their ideas would fail, or would not seem
persuasive to others. This is especially difficult for anti-
capitalists after the fall of the Soviet Union. It has also been
difficult in the war against terrorism because Saddam Hussein
and Osama bin Laden are such unsympathetic figures.
Psychologically, it is easier to blame America for not finding a
solution than it is to put one's own ideas on the line.
===============================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
19 Apr 2006 02:41:59 PM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
In 2003 a sociologist from Rutgers University named Ted Goertzel
wrote a paper in which he offered some insight into the psyche
of the left. Interesting reading:
In the 1970s, Stanley Rothman and Robert Lichter
administered Thematic Apperception Tests to a large sample of
"new left" radicals (Roots of Radicalism, 1982). They found that
activists were characterized by weakened self-esteem, injured
narcissism and paranoid tendencies. They were preoccupied with
power and attracted to radical ideologies that offered clear and
unambiguous answers to their questions. . . .
The unwillingness to offer alternatives reveals a lack of
self-confidence and self-esteem. If they offered their own
policy ideas they would be vulnerable to criticism. They would
run the risk that their ideas would fail, or would not seem
persuasive to others. This is especially difficult for anti-
capitalists after the fall of the Soviet Union. It has also been
difficult in the war against terrorism because Saddam Hussein
and Osama bin Laden are such unsympathetic figures.
Psychologically, it is easier to blame America for not finding a
solution than it is to put one's own ideas on the line.
===============================================
You know, mentioning Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden
gives people a whole new reason to hate America, seeing as
Reagan funded both of them. Stain de STD is obviously
psychotic.
And FYI, I just think Americans have Munchausen's by proxy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 04:54:24 PM |
|
|
In news:1145396330.653646.324960@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com
man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
Either way, if nothing else, santorum is a sexual term.
Oh, I see... You're psychotic.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
19 Apr 2006 02:31:05 PM |
|
|
Bert Hyman wrote:
Either way, if nothing else, santorum is a sexual term.
Oh, I see... You're psychotic.
Um, no. But affective disorder runs in my family.
But it is true that santorum is a sexual term. Look it up
on urbandictionary if you don't believe me.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
21 Apr 2006 02:42:39 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:23:38 -0500, wrote
(in article <1145395418.594606.324600@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>):
Bert Hyman wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Perhaps because no one's stupid enough to sue for
sexual harassment unless you start actually playing
grab-***** or describing very explicitly what you want
to do with them. And perhaps because right-wingers
use the "It's because I'm a conservative" excuse to
excuse all their behavior.
Lifetime: The Network for Victims
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 03:16:46 PM |
|
|
Burnt Hymen jested:
man_in_black529 wrote :
< < Stain de STD wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio
State University at Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual
harassment" charge after he suggested that freshmen read four
best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Can you provide a reference supporting your assertion? I can't find
any mention of this.
Rimshot, Burnt!
I hope your other reader understands that, what with him being an arch
neocon and all, the guy's top priority was - as always - to screw her
country until it bleeds. And not in a loving way, either.
..
..
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 04:38:41 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that aggressively
defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio State University at
Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual harassment" charge after he
suggested that freshmen read four best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Sounds like you didn't take a look at the information presented.
The librarian was charged with sexual harassment by two
gay *men* because his endorsement of a book with an
anti-gay viewpoint made these men feel unsafe dealing
with a campus library that would hire someone they
percieved as a bigot.
From my read of the emails presented in the Alliance Defense
Fund's Cease and Desist letter, it looks like a case of some
university professors getting pissy because someone dared
to question them in their field of competence, and then getting
nasty when the uppity staffer didn't cringe properly.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
18 Apr 2006 08:03:56 PM |
|
|
<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145396320.997042.225400@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that
aggressively
defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio State University at
Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual harassment" charge after he
suggested that freshmen read four best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Sounds like you didn't take a look at the information presented.
The librarian was charged with sexual harassment by two
gay *men* because his endorsement of a book with an
anti-gay viewpoint made these men feel unsafe dealing
with a campus library that would hire someone they
percieved as a bigot.
You're kidding, right? One wonders who the real bigots are in this episode.
Maybe the librarian should turn around and charge sexual harrassment against
the guys trying to cause trouble. Clearly, he has grounds to feel unsafe...
about his job security.
Unbelievable.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
19 Apr 2006 02:33:21 PM |
|
|
wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that aggressively
defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio State University at
Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual harassment" charge after he
suggested that freshmen read four best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Sounds like you didn't take a look at the information presented.
The librarian was charged with sexual harassment by two
gay *men* because his endorsement of a book with an
anti-gay viewpoint made these men feel unsafe dealing
with a campus library that would hire someone they
percieved as a bigot.
That's not sexual harassment. That's hate speech. And I
feel that Santorum comparing masturbation to bestiality is
a bit much. And then there's Napoli the Wannabe Child
Molester. He'll never be as good a pedo as Janklow, though.
Face it: Gay men don't talk about homosexuality as much
as religious nutbars like yourself do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
20 Apr 2006 09:06:02 AM |
|
|
wrote:
firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
According to the Alliance Defense Fund -- a legal alliance that aggressively
defends religious liberty -- a librarian at Ohio State University at
Mansfield has been slapped with a "sexual harassment" charge after he
suggested that freshmen read four best-selling conservative books.
No, he was slapped with a sexual harassment charge after
very explicitly telling a co-ed what he wanted to do with
her.
Sounds like you didn't take a look at the information presented.
The librarian was charged with sexual harassment by two
gay *men* because his endorsement of a book with an
anti-gay viewpoint made these men feel unsafe dealing
with a campus library that would hire someone they
percieved as a bigot.
That's not sexual harassment. That's hate speech.
Thanks for showing that you *didn't* read the information
presented. I'm certain the campus has hate speech
rules, the two men in question chose to take a *sexual
harrassment* charge to the campus Human Resources
department.
And I
feel that Santorum comparing masturbation to bestiality is
a bit much. And then there's Napoli the Wannabe Child
Molester. He'll never be as good a pedo as Janklow, though.
This is relevant to the case how?
Face it: Gay men don't talk about homosexuality as much
as religious nutbars like yourself do.
That's rich. I love it when people display their knee-jerk
prejudices. Check out my posts on alt.atheism, blackie;
do you scream "religious nutbar" at everyone who points
out your mistakes, or am I special?
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
20 Apr 2006 02:13:04 PM |
|
|
wrote:
That's not sexual harassment. That's hate speech.
Thanks for showing that you *didn't* read the information
presented. I'm certain the campus has hate speech
rules, the two men in question chose to take a *sexual
harrassment* charge to the campus Human Resources
department.
I don't feel the need to read a story from right-wing
tabloids. Regulars include Ann "so much testosterone
it's hard to believe I'm not on steroids" Coulter and
Robert "the estate tax is the Holocaust" Novak.
Supporting Reagan's Star Wars program, which
should've been called Missile Command, but it still
wouldn't have worked.
And I
feel that Santorum comparing masturbation to bestiality is
a bit much. And then there's Napoli the Wannabe Child
Molester. He'll never be as good a pedo as Janklow, though.
This is relevant to the case how?
I consider analyzing why my opponents are the
way they are important.
Face it: Gay men don't talk about homosexuality as much
as religious nutbars like yourself do.
That's rich. I love it when people display their knee-jerk
prejudices. Check out my posts on alt.atheism, blackie;
do you scream "religious nutbar" at everyone who points
out your mistakes, or am I special?
Well, you said you were special . . .
Either way, since neoconservatism depends entirely
on FAITH, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the
contrary of the ideology's assertions, and in fact,
neoconservatives love invoking God, faith, etc., I
believe the term 'religious nutbar' still applies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
21 Apr 2006 02:53:49 PM |
|
|
<man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145560384.261840.300730@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
That's not sexual harassment. That's hate speech.
Thanks for showing that you *didn't* read the information
presented. I'm certain the campus has hate speech
rules, the two men in question chose to take a *sexual
harrassment* charge to the campus Human Resources
department.
I don't feel the need to read a story from right-wing
tabloids. Regulars include Ann "so much testosterone
it's hard to believe I'm not on steroids" Coulter and
Robert "the estate tax is the Holocaust" Novak.
Supporting Reagan's Star Wars program, which
should've been called Missile Command, but it still
wouldn't have worked.
And I
feel that Santorum comparing masturbation to bestiality is
a bit much. And then there's Napoli the Wannabe Child
Molester. He'll never be as good a pedo as Janklow, though.
This is relevant to the case how?
I consider analyzing why my opponents are the
way they are important.
Because pulling ***** out of thin air beats dealing with the facts, right?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
24 Apr 2006 08:14:31 AM |
|
|
wrote:
firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
That's not sexual harassment. That's hate speech.
Thanks for showing that you *didn't* read the information
presented. I'm certain the campus has hate speech
rules, the two men in question chose to take a *sexual
harrassment* charge to the campus Human Resources
department.
I don't feel the need to read a story from right-wing
tabloids.
So you'd rather make ***** up out of thin air to support
your prejudices than actually read what you decide
to share your opinions on. Gotcha.
And I
feel that Santorum comparing masturbation to bestiality is
a bit much. And then there's Napoli the Wannabe Child
Molester. He'll never be as good a pedo as Janklow, though.
This is relevant to the case how?
I consider analyzing why my opponents are the
way they are important.
I wasn't aware that a librarian and some growling professors
that you don't deign to read about were your "opponents".
Face it: Gay men don't talk about homosexuality as much
as religious nutbars like yourself do.
That's rich. I love it when people display their knee-jerk
prejudices. Check out my posts on alt.atheism, blackie;
do you scream "religious nutbar" at everyone who points
out your mistakes, or am I special?
Well, you said you were special . . .
Either way, since neoconservatism depends entirely
on FAITH, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the
contrary of the ideology's assertions, and in fact,
neoconservatives love invoking God, faith, etc., I
believe the term 'religious nutbar' still applies.
And yet another example of how you'd rather cling to
your prejudices than actually learn anything - and
all the while going on and on about how your
"opponents" are the ones with such fossilized
brains. How amusing.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
24 Apr 2006 10:34:21 AM |
|
|
<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145884471.227807.214530@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
That's not sexual harassment. That's hate speech.
Thanks for showing that you *didn't* read the information
presented. I'm certain the campus has hate speech
rules, the two men in question chose to take a *sexual
harrassment* charge to the campus Human Resources
department.
I don't feel the need to read a story from right-wing
tabloids.
So you'd rather make ***** up out of thin air to support
your prejudices than actually read what you decide
to share your opinions on. Gotcha.
Yep, typical MO of the idiot Lefty Liberal.
And I
feel that Santorum comparing masturbation to bestiality is
a bit much. And then there's Napoli the Wannabe Child
Molester. He'll never be as good a pedo as Janklow, though.
This is relevant to the case how?
I consider analyzing why my opponents are the
way they are important.
I wasn't aware that a librarian and some growling professors
that you don't deign to read about were your "opponents".
MIB is your typical narcissistic lefty, who mistakenly thinks he matters in
the greater scheme of things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
24 Apr 2006 02:01:40 PM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
MIB is your typical narcissistic lefty, who mistakenly thinks he matters in
the greater scheme of things.
Except that I don't. And Stain de STD is your typical schizophrenic
neocon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
24 Apr 2006 05:57:13 PM |
|
|
<man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145905300.700052.219200@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
MIB is your typical narcissistic lefty, who mistakenly thinks he matters
in
the greater scheme of things.
Except that I don't.
You're right. You just don't matter because you have nothing of value to
say.
Yet you keep saying it.
And Stain de STD is your typical schizophrenic neocon.
Like that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "hc23hc" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
24 Apr 2006 05:56:35 PM |
|
|
The Pervert, war criminal, wrote:
You just don't matter because you have nothing of value to
say.
Yet you keep saying it.
And Stain de STD is your typical schizophrenic neocon.
Like that.
OK then, Pervert, if Stain de STD isn't your typical schizophrenic
neocon, whose typical schizophrenic neocon is he?
..
..
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Conservative Books Equate to 'Sexual Harassment' |
20 Apr 2006 02:29:25 PM |
|
|
In article <1145560384.261840.300730@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> writes:
firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:
That's not sexual harassment. That's hate speech.
Thanks for showing that you *didn't* read the information
presented. I'm certain the campus has hate speech
rules, the two men in question chose to take a *sexual
harrassment* charge to the campus Human Resources
department.
I don't feel the need to read a story from right-wing
tabloids. Regulars include Ann "so much testosterone
it's hard to believe I'm not on steroids" Coulter and
Robert "the estate tax is the Holocaust" Novak.
Supporting Reagan's Star Wars program, which
should've been called Missile Command, but it still
wouldn't have worked.
Hey, if it were Missle Command, *I* could have
made it work.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
