http://www.polanalysis.net/
CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN STATIST LIBERALISM:
THE STATE CHURCH OF THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL LEFT
By Steven M. Farrell
One of the most controversial and confusing of all issues for many is just
what is the proper role of religion and morality in public life?
In search of the right answer today, we are compelled to conclude that there
"is a famine in the land," with nearly all sides of the debate muddled up to
their necks in poor history, poor politics, poor reasoning, and, all too
often, poor religion-having nothing better to offer than a multifaceted
deliberation where few seem to know where religion and morality are
appropriate and where they are not.
The unspoken consensus, though few will admit it, goes something like this:
"It is appropriate to inject religion and morality into political debate and
into public policy just so long as the moral slant parallels my moral view
of the universe, and it is highly inappropriate if it does not."
One popular point of contention on the issue, Modern Liberalism, favors the
relative ethics of Humanism and Socialism sprinkled creatively with
Judeo-Christian teach- ings. Its cardinal dogma is that "the ends justify
the means," or in other words, "anything goes, just so long as the political
goals of the revolution are served."
It is a flexible creed, which turns a blind eye to any dilemma of conscience
that a constant round of moral reversals ought to cause, one which fights
against all reli- gious involvement in public life, while aggressively
campaigning for a broader and broader interpretation of just what is
public-yet one which applauds any decidedly Liberal professor of religion,
insuring that just such ministers are honored with No- bel Peace Prizes,
idolized with public statues, glorified by children by way of public school
mandates, and held true to the faith throughout their lifetime via
obligatory cultural awareness seminars for all adult "public" employees.
Recognizing the religious nature of most human beings as a fact, while
publicly de- nouncing the same as "mere speculation," the creed of
Liberalism employs other strategic uses of religion, such as placing a
constant parade of victims before our eyes, hoping that the moral
sensitivities every human possesses might be misdi- rected into seeing a
logical link between the biblical invitation to "love thy neighbor as thy
self" and the Marxian mandate to "rob from the rich to give to the poor."
Further, while this creed has banned our forefathers' Judeo-Christian based
teach- ings from the classroom, it has mandated (in many places) the
teaching of the reli- gious traditions of indigenous peoples who, consistent
with the creed of Modern Liberalism, view property and natural resources in
terms of collective ownership.
The truth is Modern Liberalism does not oppose moral law; rather it
haughtily be- lieves that it has a fresher, higher, smarter moral
perspective than that contrived by the rough and puerile rabble. Thus, the
advocates of this creed feel compelled to share it, to order it, to mandate
it-and with the power of the state behind them, they have met with great
success in decreeing their religion throughout the land. Among this creed's
leading precepts, we find the following moral peculiarities, among many
others:
1. Unborn babies do not possess the inalienable right to life; but fungi,
fruit flies, and convicted murderers do.
2. Ranchers and farmers do not have the right to control, develop, and
utilize their private property as they please; but rodents, predators, and
desert tor- toises do.
3. Business owners who have put blood, sweat, tears, and a great deal of fi-
nancial risk into engendering an enterprise, do not possess the right to
man- age their employees creatively, as per their best interest; but distant
bureau- crats do.
4. Religious fundamentalists, heterosexuals, capitalists, and white males do
not have the moral right to equality before the law; but hedonists, gays,
So- cialists, and minorities of every stripe do.
5. Since the advocates of this creed believe in arbitrary law and in the
Hitleri- an principle of collective guilt, gun manufacturers, gun dealers,
and parents who legally produce, sell or own private firearms do not have
the right to le- niency and protection before the law for crimes committed
with those weapons (by others); but criminals who choose to misuse those
same weapons do.
6. The children of industrious and intelligent parents who have labored a
life- time to provide property, finances, employment, and education for
their family members do not have the right to be eligible upon their
parent's death to in- herit what is rightfully theirs; but unrelated
children of indolent and ignorant parents do. (1)
7. Finally, because this creed defends the utilitarian moral position that
the good of the group and the rights of the group always exceed the good of
the individual and the rights of the individual-except when the curators of
this creed say that they don't-its proponents are fully in favor of the
state being fully in charge of every businessman's social responsibility,
every school teacher's curriculum and every parent's children, and the state
being fully trusted and fully the dictator of every fine point of moral
conduct (except de- viant conduct, which must be protected at all costs)-and
thus in favor of the state on the one hand and hedonism on the other being
fully worshipped.
That is, traditional Christians and Jews do not have the right to worship as
they please; but Humanists, Statists and Communists do. (2)
This is the ideology of Modern Liberalism--what some call dysfunctional
morality, or Statism, or the moral force of the coming "civil society." It
is in fact, "The State Church of the Left," a heavy-handed religion whose
ministers, would if they could, "cleanse the earth" of the most virtuous
elements of traditional Christianity and American culture. The fact that
roughly 50 percent of all America worship before this alter of the sovereign
state, begging for free food, unjust privileges and endless moral
accommodations, stands as a sad testimony of the pathetic state of religion,
morality, and education in the United States of America today.
Footnotes:
1. Via inheritance taxes and wealth redistribution.
2. Revealingly, Liberalism added the following to its strange list of whose
morality counts and whose does not: Islamic fundamentalists, who were
granted special pray- er privileges on public school property during public
school hours by the Liberal school establishment in several key Liberal
cities, post-9/11, as a display of Liberal- ism's "blessed tolerance" for
those who, in the name of God, would attack America. Christians and Jews,
hurting and horrified, were denied the same privilege.
--
"The Declaration of Independence... [is the] declaratory charter of our
rights, and the rights of man."
-- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), 3rd President of the United States
(1801-1809)
.
|
