http://yconservatives.com/Fiore-54.html
Dark, Dumb, and Democrat
Vincent Fiore

Before jumping to any conclusions based on the title, read a little

or with keeping in context, see past the cover to the content. In regard

race, most of us in mainstream life see this as little more than a normal
occurrence. Unwilling, and {let us hope}, morally unable, it is always the
value of the individual, as opposed to the mass. But this sentiment is not
as manifest as we would like it to be. Rather, it is obscure. Republicans,
behaving as if there is no color divide within the country, are

demagogued on the politics of race, and often stand mute in defense. The
champions of the minority voter, the Democratic Party, are feted as the
great equalizer of society's "disenfranchised," a blue caped superman with

big "D" on their chests, fighting the wrong's of the country's "Red

the Republicans. Dear Democrats, if only it were the truth, but it is not.

While modern day history is filled with events depicting the Democrats use
of race as nothing more than a vehicle to promote fear and separation,

space will only deal with their latest transgression against a seemingly
unreflective minority electorate, namely the latest exploits of the 9th

Circuit Court of Appeals. A three-judge panel from the 9th circuit has
decided to recall the California recall. Jurists Harry Pregerson, Richard

Paez, and Sidney R. Thomas, Clinton and Carter appointees all, sit amongst

circuit court that was overturned 75% of the time in 2002 by the U.S.
Supreme Court. Out of the nations 11 circuit court districts, the title of
"circus court" seems as appropriate for this venue as green is to grass.

The panel in its decision to recall the recall slated for October 7th,

selective parts of the 2000 mini-series, Bush V. Gore in their 65-page
decision. They also sided in principle with the main plaintiff of the

the ACLU. The thrust of the ACLU's argument was that minority voters would
be disproportionately disenfranchised. How? Simple. There are "chads"
involved, as in Florida 2000, chads from punch card ballots. Six counties

California still possess these diabolical "racist" voting apparatus,

to be changed by March of 2004. But the problem {again} is not so much the
punch ballot, as is the punchee. Yes, Blacks and Latino's, in all their
accomplishments, are just too stupid to vote correctly using a punch card.
But I do not state this; I merely echo the convictions of the liberal
establishment.

Listen instead, to the ACLU legal director Mark Rosenbaum in a press
conference following their successful halting of the October 7th recall.

know going in that if the vote were to take place in October, that the
opportunity for voters of color and low income to have their votes counted
would be one half to one-third of what it is for white voters and affluent
voters." While trying not to sound unhinged, just how the hell can he {or
anybody} know this, and correspondingly use it as a fact in open court?
Surely, you would think they couldn't. But the above illustrates just how
inept and dependent minority's are in the eyes of their modern day

the Democratic Party. I do not say this cavalierly, yet I say it with
conviction. Mr. Rosenbaum's statement cannot mean anything else other than
the indictment that entire races and classes of people cannot summon up

intelligence needed to pop a little piece of paper out of a box. Tag,

and Latino's: Your it.

That statement, as a matter of tactic, is business as usual for Democrats,
and not new to Republicans who have seen this act before. But some thing's
can never cease to amaze. The amazement for me is the trustingly bumptious
loyalty the minority populace affords this elite group of shibboleths.
Blacks especially exhibit a near slavish mentality when voting for any
Democrat running. Stunningly, it has made no difference to blacks with
regard to history, past or present, that the Democratic Party has led the
premier minority group in the country down a dead end street. Republicans,
for their part, are woefully inept in pointing this out. Harboring a near
fatalistic attitude when attempting to address the concerns of black voter
interest, they sound distant and distracted. Forever fearing Democratic

media finger pointing, Republicans have nearly bypassed blacks as a whole
and instead are in pursuit of that other chad challenged minority group,
Latino's.

It is time for Republicans to loudly say they are more than just a
monochromatic Party. And that means pillaging liberals who continue to

of minority's as less capable than everybody else. And on the other side,

is time for minority's to step into the 21st century. This is not Selma,

it is not 1964. You {minorities} are treated as less by your own party
because you demand results less. California has had punch card balloting

25 years for every elected statewide office. There have been few problems.
But because the plaintiff's in this case sued the Secretary of State, and
not the 6 counties still using punch cards, this was never heard. Arguing
that as many as 40,000 votes would not be counted in an area that

44% of the California electorate, the ACLU convinced the 3 judge panel

thwarting the will of the people in California was the better coarse of
action because minority's cannot figure out how to vote.

The California Constitution? Just a minor inconvenience for an activist
court. Just overrule it.

In December of 2000, Mark Levin, President of the Landmark Legal

seemed clairvoyant when writing these words in a commentary for National
Review: "One can only imagine the kinds of lawsuits that will be brought

disgruntled vote! For example, does a Federal cause of action exist if
different ballots are used throughout the state? Does a Federal cause of
action exist if older voting machines are used in poor areas and newer
machines are used in affluent areas?"

The Liberals attack dog, the ACLU, has successfully stopped a
constitutionally mandated election from going forward, calling it a

for California voters." Yet how is it a victory for the nearly 2 million
signing the petition to recall Gov. Grey Davis? Or how about the 400,000
voters who have already voted via absentee ballot? Do the ninth circuits
ruling not now, disenfranchise them? All these questions will eventually
come to light in either an 11-member compliment of jurists in the 9th
circuit, or the U.S. Supreme Court, as either one, or both will hear the
appeal. What will not receive proper review is the caustic callousness and
contempt with which the Democratic Party has treated its most reliable
voting block. The ACLU's sensational use of race as a weapon only to stop

election is just one example of how Democrat's use people color as the
eternal victims of society all in the name of regaining and holding power.

And the caveat to this outrage is you begin to wonder just how in touch
today's minority electorate wants to be. If the events of 40 years past

Civil rights act is any indication as to the mobility of minorities to

for themselves, meaning making informed choices and casting off the chains
of their liberal masters, than it projects a future starkly bleak of
promise. Are minorities too stupid to know what they want? No, despite

the Democrats say. Rather, a political laziness has set in for the near
future.

Maybe the stupid one's here are Republicans, who watch from the sidelines

they let yet another ripe opportunity to underline the differences between
themselves and the party that to this day practices a less corporal form

thralldom, but every bit as malignant.

Vincent Fiore
Does a Federal cause of
action exist if older voting machines are used in poor areas and newer
machines are used in affluent areas?"

the caustic callousness and
contempt with which the Democratic Party has treated its most reliable
voting block.

Are minorities too stupid to know what they want?

Vincent Fiore
It is time for Republicans to loudly say they are more than just a
monochromatic Party.

the ACLU convinced the 3 judge panel that
thwarting the will of the people in California

In December of 2000, Mark Levin, President of the Landmark Legal Foundation,

Vincent Fiore
Mr. Rosenbaum's statement cannot mean anything else other than
the indictment that entire races and classes of people cannot summon up the
intelligence needed to pop a little piece of paper out of a box.

That statement, as a matter of tactic, is business as usual for Democrats,
and not new to Republicans who have seen this act before.

Vincent Fiore
Republicans,
for their part, are woefully inept in pointing this out.

Forever fearing Democratic and
media finger pointing, Republicans have nearly bypassed blacks as a whole
and instead are in pursuit of that other chad challenged minority group,
Latino's.

Vincent Fiore
Six counties in
California still possess these diabolical "racist" voting apparatus, slated
to be changed by March of 2004.

Yes, Blacks and Latino's, in all their
accomplishments, are just too stupid to vote correctly using a punch card.

http://yconservatives.com/Fiore-54.html
Dark, Dumb, and Democrat
Vincent Fiore

Before jumping to any conclusions based on the title, read a little

or with keeping in context, see past the cover to the content. In regard

race, most of us in mainstream life see this as little more than a normal
occurrence. Unwilling, and {let us hope}, morally unable, it is always the
value of the individual, as opposed to the mass. But this sentiment is not
as manifest as we would like it to be. Rather, it is obscure. Republicans,
behaving as if there is no color divide within the country, are

demagogued on the politics of race, and often stand mute in defense. The
champions of the minority voter, the Democratic Party, are feted as the
great equalizer of society's "disenfranchised," a blue caped superman with

big "D" on their chests, fighting the wrong's of the country's "Red

the Republicans. Dear Democrats, if only it were the truth, but it is not.

While modern day history is filled with events depicting the Democrats use
of race as nothing more than a vehicle to promote fear and separation,

space will only deal with their latest transgression against a seemingly
unreflective minority electorate, namely the latest exploits of the 9th

Circuit Court of Appeals. A three-judge panel from the 9th circuit has
decided to recall the California recall. Jurists Harry Pregerson, Richard

Paez, and Sidney R. Thomas, Clinton and Carter appointees all, sit amongst

circuit court that was overturned 75% of the time in 2002 by the U.S.
Supreme Court. Out of the nations 11 circuit court districts, the title of
"circus court" seems as appropriate for this venue as green is to grass.

The panel in its decision to recall the recall slated for October 7th,

selective parts of the 2000 mini-series, Bush V. Gore in their 65-page
decision. They also sided in principle with the main plaintiff of the

the ACLU. The thrust of the ACLU's argument was that minority voters would
be disproportionately disenfranchised. How? Simple. There are "chads"
involved, as in Florida 2000, chads from punch card ballots. Six counties

California still possess these diabolical "racist" voting apparatus,

to be changed by March of 2004. But the problem {again} is not so much the
punch ballot, as is the punchee. Yes, Blacks and Latino's, in all their
accomplishments, are just too stupid to vote correctly using a punch card.
But I do not state this; I merely echo the convictions of the liberal
establishment.

Listen instead, to the ACLU legal director Mark Rosenbaum in a press
conference following their successful halting of the October 7th recall.

know going in that if the vote were to take place in October, that the
opportunity for voters of color and low income to have their votes counted
would be one half to one-third of what it is for white voters and affluent
voters." While trying not to sound unhinged, just how the hell can he {or
anybody} know this, and correspondingly use it as a fact in open court?
Surely, you would think they couldn't. But the above illustrates just how
inept and dependent minority's are in the eyes of their modern day

the Democratic Party. I do not say this cavalierly, yet I say it with
conviction. Mr. Rosenbaum's statement cannot mean anything else other than
the indictment that entire races and classes of people cannot summon up

intelligence needed to pop a little piece of paper out of a box. Tag,

and Latino's: Your it.

That statement, as a matter of tactic, is business as usual for Democrats,
and not new to Republicans who have seen this act before. But some thing's
can never cease to amaze. The amazement for me is the trustingly bumptious
loyalty the minority populace affords this elite group of shibboleths.
Blacks especially exhibit a near slavish mentality when voting for any
Democrat running. Stunningly, it has made no difference to blacks with
regard to history, past or present, that the Democratic Party has led the
premier minority group in the country down a dead end street. Republicans,
for their part, are woefully inept in pointing this out. Harboring a near
fatalistic attitude when attempting to address the concerns of black voter
interest, they sound distant and distracted. Forever fearing Democratic

media finger pointing, Republicans have nearly bypassed blacks as a whole
and instead are in pursuit of that other chad challenged minority group,
Latino's.

It is time for Republicans to loudly say they are more than just a
monochromatic Party. And that means pillaging liberals who continue to

of minority's as less capable than everybody else. And on the other side,

is time for minority's to step into the 21st century. This is not Selma,

it is not 1964. You {minorities} are treated as less by your own party
because you demand results less. California has had punch card balloting

25 years for every elected statewide office. There have been few problems.
But because the plaintiff's in this case sued the Secretary of State, and
not the 6 counties still using punch cards, this was never heard. Arguing
that as many as 40,000 votes would not be counted in an area that

44% of the California electorate, the ACLU convinced the 3 judge panel

thwarting the will of the people in California was the better coarse of
action because minority's cannot figure out how to vote.

The California Constitution? Just a minor inconvenience for an activist
court. Just overrule it.

In December of 2000, Mark Levin, President of the Landmark Legal

seemed clairvoyant when writing these words in a commentary for National
Review: "One can only imagine the kinds of lawsuits that will be brought

disgruntled vote! For example, does a Federal cause of action exist if
different ballots are used throughout the state? Does a Federal cause of
action exist if older voting machines are used in poor areas and newer
machines are used in affluent areas?"

The Liberals attack dog, the ACLU, has successfully stopped a
constitutionally mandated election from going forward, calling it a

for California voters." Yet how is it a victory for the nearly 2 million
signing the petition to recall Gov. Grey Davis? Or how about the 400,000
voters who have already voted via absentee ballot? Do the ninth circuits
ruling not now, disenfranchise them? All these questions will eventually
come to light in either an 11-member compliment of jurists in the 9th
circuit, or the U.S. Supreme Court, as either one, or both will hear the
appeal. What will not receive proper review is the caustic callousness and
contempt with which the Democratic Party has treated its most reliable
voting block. The ACLU's sensational use of race as a weapon only to stop

election is just one example of how Democrat's use people color as the
eternal victims of society all in the name of regaining and holding power.
And the caveat to this outrage is you begin to wonder just how in touch
today's minority electorate wants to be. If the events of 40 years past

Civil rights act is any indication as to the mobility of minorities to

for themselves, meaning making informed choices and casting off the chains
of their liberal masters, than it projects a future starkly bleak of
promise. Are minorities too stupid to know what they want? No, despite

the Democrats say. Rather, a political laziness has set in for the near
future.

Maybe the stupid one's here are Republicans, who watch from the sidelines

they let yet another ripe opportunity to underline the differences between
themselves and the party that to this day practices a less corporal form

thralldom, but every bit as malignant.


--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the

at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.

http://yconservatives.com/Fiore-54.html
Dark, Dumb, and Democrat
Vincent Fiore

Before jumping to any conclusions based on the title, read a little
further; or with keeping in context, see past the cover to the content. In
regard to race, most of us in mainstream life see this as little more than
a normal occurrence. Unwilling, and {let us hope}, morally unable, it is
always the value of the individual, as opposed to the mass. But this
sentiment is not as manifest as we would like it to be. Rather, it is
obscure. Republicans, behaving as if there is no color divide within the
country, are continually demagogued on the politics of race, and often
stand mute in defense. The champions of the minority voter, the Democratic
Party, are feted as the great equalizer of society's "disenfranchised," a
blue caped superman with a big "D" on their chests, fighting the wrong's
of the country's "Red Menace," the Republicans. Dear Democrats, if only it
were the truth, but it is not.

While modern day history is filled with events depicting the Democrats use
of race as nothing more than a vehicle to promote fear and separation,
this space will only deal with their latest transgression against a
seemingly unreflective minority electorate, namely the latest exploits of
the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A three-judge panel from the 9th
circuit has decided to recall the California recall. Jurists Harry
Pregerson, Richard A. Paez, and Sidney R. Thomas, Clinton and Carter
appointees all, sit amongst a circuit court that was overturned 75% of the
time in 2002 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Out of the nations 11 circuit
court districts, the title of "circus court" seems as appropriate for this
venue as green is to grass.

The panel in its decision to recall the recall slated for October 7th,
cited selective parts of the 2000 mini-series, Bush V. Gore in their
65-page decision. They also sided in principle with the main plaintiff of
the case, the ACLU. The thrust of the ACLU's argument was that minority
voters would be disproportionately disenfranchised. How? Simple. There are
"chads" involved, as in Florida 2000, chads from punch card ballots. Six
counties in California still possess these diabolical "racist" voting
apparatus, slated to be changed by March of 2004. But the problem {again}
is not so much the punch ballot, as is the punchee. Yes, Blacks and
Latino's, in all their accomplishments, are just too stupid to vote
correctly using a punch card. But I do not state this; I merely echo the
convictions of the liberal establishment.

Listen instead, to the ACLU legal director Mark Rosenbaum in a press
conference following their successful halting of the October 7th recall.
"We know going in that if the vote were to take place in October, that the
opportunity for voters of color and low income to have their votes counted
would be one half to one-third of what it is for white voters and affluent
voters." While trying not to sound unhinged, just how the hell can he {or
anybody} know this, and correspondingly use it as a fact in open court?
Surely, you would think they couldn't. But the above illustrates just how
inept and dependent minority's are in the eyes of their modern day
masters, the Democratic Party. I do not say this cavalierly, yet I say it
with conviction. Mr. Rosenbaum's statement cannot mean anything else other
than the indictment that entire races and classes of people cannot summon
up the intelligence needed to pop a little piece of paper out of a box.
Tag, Blacks and Latino's: Your it.

That statement, as a matter of tactic, is business as usual for Democrats,
and not new to Republicans who have seen this act before. But some thing's
can never cease to amaze. The amazement for me is the trustingly bumptious
loyalty the minority populace affords this elite group of shibboleths.
Blacks especially exhibit a near slavish mentality when voting for any
Democrat running. Stunningly, it has made no difference to blacks with
regard to history, past or present, that the Democratic Party has led the
premier minority group in the country down a dead end street. Republicans,
for their part, are woefully inept in pointing this out. Harboring a near
fatalistic attitude when attempting to address the concerns of black voter
interest, they sound distant and distracted. Forever fearing Democratic
and media finger pointing, Republicans have nearly bypassed blacks as a
whole and instead are in pursuit of that other chad challenged minority
group, Latino's.

It is time for Republicans to loudly say they are more than just a
monochromatic Party. And that means pillaging liberals who continue to
think of minority's as less capable than everybody else. And on the other
side, it is time for minority's to step into the 21st century. This is not
Selma, and it is not 1964. You {minorities} are treated as less by your
own party because you demand results less. California has had punch card
balloting for 25 years for every elected statewide office. There have been
few problems. But because the plaintiff's in this case sued the Secretary
of State, and not the 6 counties still using punch cards, this was never
heard. Arguing that as many as 40,000 votes would not be counted in an
area that represents 44% of the California electorate, the ACLU convinced
the 3 judge panel that thwarting the will of the people in California was
the better coarse of action because minority's cannot figure out how to
vote.

The California Constitution? Just a minor inconvenience for an activist
court. Just overrule it.

In December of 2000, Mark Levin, President of the Landmark Legal
Foundation, seemed clairvoyant when writing these words in a commentary
for National Review: "One can only imagine the kinds of lawsuits that will
be brought by disgruntled vote! For example, does a Federal cause of
action exist if different ballots are used throughout the state? Does a
Federal cause of action exist if older voting machines are used in poor
areas and newer machines are used in affluent areas?"

The Liberals attack dog, the ACLU, has successfully stopped a
constitutionally mandated election from going forward, calling it a
"victory for California voters." Yet how is it a victory for the nearly 2
million signing the petition to recall Gov. Grey Davis? Or how about the
400,000 voters who have already voted via absentee ballot? Do the ninth
circuits ruling not now, disenfranchise them? All these questions will
eventually come to light in either an 11-member compliment of jurists in
the 9th circuit, or the U.S. Supreme Court, as either one, or both will
hear the appeal. What will not receive proper review is the caustic
callousness and contempt with which the Democratic Party has treated its
most reliable voting block. The ACLU's sensational use of race as a weapon
only to stop an election is just one example of how Democrat's use people
color as the eternal victims of society all in the name of regaining and
holding power. And the caveat to this outrage is you begin to wonder just
how in touch today's minority electorate wants to be. If the events of 40
years past the Civil rights act is any indication as to the mobility of
minorities to think for themselves, meaning making informed choices and
casting off the chains of their liberal masters, than it projects a future
starkly bleak of promise. Are minorities too stupid to know what they
want? No, despite what the Democrats say. Rather, a political laziness has
set in for the near future.

Maybe the stupid one's here are Republicans, who watch from the sidelines
as they let yet another ripe opportunity to underline the differences
between themselves and the party that to this day practices a less
corporal form of thralldom, but every bit as malignant.