And you are the biggest cut and paste artist around here. You holocaust
historians are not trustworthy and we all know this. The same goes for
you holocaust I know the mafia would be very happy if the did have the
same power as the Jews being the investigators and money collectors at
the same time. All you have to do in getting your scam going is let
nobody see the real facts.
Kurt Knoll.
=
<philnancy@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1110489703.005870.159020@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
s...@free.info wrote:
Do revisionists 'deny the Holocaust'?
Revisionists may not, but deniers do, and Chrissy and the authors of
his little cut and paste jobs are deniers.
The phrase "Holocaust denial" was popularized by a Holoscribe named
Deborah Lipstadt who occupies the Dorot Chair in Modern Jewish and
Holocaust Studies at Emory University. Its purpose is to imply
Holocaust revisionists are not rational in their opinions.
Such as denying historical facts about the Holocaust!
Dr.
Lipstadt believes the current view of the Holocaust cannot be
questioned and debate on the topic cannot be tolerated.
No, she says no such thing. The historical fact of an event occuring
is
not a "view", but a fact.
Denying that fact is....denial!
As for her views on debate, she only holds that scholars should waste
their time pretending that people like Chrissy have anything
intelligent to say on the matter.
She doesn't mind at all if others wish to make Chrissy look foolish.
To this end
she created the epithet "Holocaust denier." Revisionists are
skeptical
of postwar testimony of gas chambers at the Nazi concentration camps
and are of the opinion the six million figure is a baseless
exaggeration.
No, deniers deny all the evidence of gas chambers, including the
testimonial evidence. That has nothing to do with revisionism.
And as we can see they also deny the magnitude of the genocide, even
though they have no qualifications or evidence to support their
charge.
It is not a matter of denying anything.
Then why do they deny gas chambers, the magnitude of the killing, the
intentionality of Nazi efforts?
The issue is whether this
emotionally charged and politically important event can be examined
critically.
Deniers haven't shown it hasn't been.
Researchers -- some professional, some amateur -- have
been questioning aspects of the Nazi extermination story since the
war
ended fifty years ago.
A handful of deniers, motivated by Jew hatred and/or infatuation with
National Socialism have, no professional researchers or historians.
The evidence has been difficult to obtain, but
in the last twenty-five years enough has been gathered to conclude
the
gas chamber story is definitely false and the Nazi program to kill
the
Jews is a myth.
They've gathered no evidence to support such a claim.
They merely deny the evidence which exists.
The problem that has arisen is established political interests have
done their best to suppress this research and prevent the evidence
to
support these startling conclusions from being presented to the
general public.
LOL!
--
Philip Mathews
.
