i hope the lawsuit runs its full course, ie there are no out of court
self-serving settlements. the plaintiff has approached the court using his
hindu hurt identity, and thus in a way has assumed an identity larger than
the person himself. hence, htere should be no out of court
take-this-money-and-and-go-away kinda settlements. let it burn baby.


www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:

HINDU CIVIL RIGHTS - LAWSUIT IN U.S. - 6 CAUSES OF ACTION

Forwarded message from Srinivasan Kalyanaraman

[ Subject: Hindu civil rights: Federal law suit in
[ America with six causes of action
[ From: Srinivasan Kalyanaraman
[ Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006

Full text is available as pdf format file at

http://tinyurl.com/fujwo

Or,

http://www.capeem.org/capeem1_files/COMPLAINT%20FINAL%20FILED%20COPY.pdf

Complaint filed by Attorney for the Plaintiffs, Venkat Subramani, vs.
Defendants California State Department of Education, California Board
of Education (Members including Alan Bersin) and Tom Adams.

Date - 14 March 2006 (Holi day)

Complaint for:

1. Violations of Cal. Educ. Code 51500, 51501 and 60044

2. Violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to

the US Constitution

3. Violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution

4. 42 USC no. 1983

5. Violation of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act

6. Violation of SBE and CDE Rules, Regulations, and Guidelines

End of forwarded message from Srinivasan Kalyanaraman

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti