| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Mark T fl@out0002682" |
| Date: |
22 Dec 2005 05:15:09 PM |
| Object: |
Hypocrisy on misc.education.home-school.christian - EXAMPLE 1 |
Hypocrisy on misc.education.home-school.christian
EXAMPLE 1 - KANGA MOM
(More to follow)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Kanga Mom" wrote:
He wishes to convey an impression that he's a blustering dork full of
hot air? Okay.
"dork" is a naughty word that would be censored under Kanga Mom's
dictatorship.
dork (dôrk)
n. Vulgar Slang. The penis.
Is it acceptable to call someone a penis?
Some more of Kanga Mom's words to others on
misc.education.home-school.christian:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- spitting and spewing
- name calling and stupidity
- Many of his posts here really do look as though they were written while
drunk, and maybe they were for all I know
- vitriolic name calling
- troll
- trolling
- raging mental instability
- He's basically just been defacating on the furniture around here
- He cuts and pastes the same mindless twaddle over and
over again here because she finds us so boring
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Does Kanga Mom suffer from PMS 24/7, 28 days a month???????????
OR is it just a part of her ad hominem diatribe that should be reported to
her ISP or her internet industry association?
#######################################################
ad ho·mi·nem (äd h$Æmi nemÅ; Eng. ad homÆÃ nÃm), Latin.
1. appealing to one's PREJUDICES, EMOTIONS, or SPECIAL INTEREST rather than
to one's intellect or reason.
2. ATTACKING AN OPPONENT'S CHARACTER RATHER THAN ANSWERING HIS ARGUMENT.
(What misc.education.home-school.christian does by addressing regulars on a
PUBLIC newsgroup as trolls!)
[lit., to the man]
######################################################
How Homeskoolers BULLY on misc.education.home-school.christian
Note their use of claiming victimisation by those who challenge their
abusive behaviour (Stage 6) and spreading of derogatory stories about people
on work and personal topics (Stage 7) and continuing to remind people
through
innuendo, suggestion, and intimidating stories, that their silly demands
will be complied with.(Stage 8)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BIDERMAN'S STAGES OF COERCION
(From "Bullying: From Backyard to Boardroom", McCarthy et al editors;
Millenium Books; Sydney:1996)
Key:
# - STAGE
Abuser's Actions
##############################
....
2 - MONOPOLISATION OF PERCEPTION
Informs Victim through stories about power alliances.
Outlines superior knowledge and skills.
Intimates that Victim does not possess necessary knowledge and skill buit
may be able to acquire it through association with abuser.
....
4 - THREATS
Reminds of power over Victim's acceptance in the hierarchy of the
[newsgroup]
Warns with stories of the demise of predecessors who did not reach the
acceptable standard.
6 - DEMONSTRATING "OMNIPOTENCE"
Exercises complete control over the Victim, who is taken for granted.
Has 'read my mind' expectations.
Affects martyrdom for the [newsgroup] and of being indispensable to the
[newsgroup]
Claims victimisation by those who challenge abusive behaviour.
7 - DEGRADATION
Spreads derogatory stories about the Victim on work and personal topics.
8 - ENFORCING TRIVIAL DEMANDS
Continues to remind Victim through innuendo, suggestion, and intimidatimng
stories, that abuser's demands will be complied with.
###########################################
Developed from Biderman's Chart of Coercion in Amnesty International (1975)
Report on Torture, London, Gerald Duckworth & Co, p 53.
############################################################
To the extent that churches *[OR CHRISTIAN NEWSGROUPS!] are pietistic, they
will reject, or at least be uncomfortable with, art, science, not to mention
real people! Art and science ask hard questions; real people are not all
respectable. Art and science address complex problems; genuine people behave
in unrespectable ways that often raise perplexing questions. Pietists, like
all tribalists, long for cultic simplicity and easy solutions: lists of dos
and don'ts. ... The original, true, odd, creative person in such a context
is a nuisance regarded with suspicion.
- Franky Schaeffer "Sham Pearls For Real Swine" ( Wolgemuth & Hyatt;
Brentwood:1990) [Francis Schaeffer's son] p.130
--
FREE SPEECH on misc.education.home-school.christian???????
....................................... PIG'S ARSE!!!!!!!!!
"As rare as a homeschooler who loves professional teachers."
.
|
|
| User: "Jon Houts" |
|
| Title: Re: Hypocrisy on misc.education.home-school.christian - EXAMPLE 1 |
22 Dec 2005 08:17:26 PM |
|
|
Mark T wrote:
"dork" is a naughty word that would be censored under Kanga Mom's
dictatorship.
dork (d=F4rk)
n. Vulgar Slang. The penis.
Is it acceptable to call someone a penis?
Schmuck. ;-)
but,but...
Jon
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=3Dschmuck
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark T fl@out0002690" |
|
| Title: Re: Hypocrisy on misc.education.home-school.christian - EXAMPLE 1 |
22 Dec 2005 08:31:38 PM |
|
|
"Jon Houts" wrote:
"dork" is a naughty word that would be censored under Kanga Mom's
dictatorship.
dork (dôrk)
n. Vulgar Slang. The penis.
Is it acceptable to call someone a penis?
schmuck. ;-)
ttp://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=schmuck
"contemptible person," 1892, from E.Yiddish shmok, lit. "penis," .... In
Jewish homes, the word was "regarded as so vulgar as to be taboo" [Leo
Rosten, "The Joys of Yiddish," 1968] and Lenny Bruce wrote that saying it on
stage got him arrested on the West Coast "by a Yiddish undercover agent who
had been placed in the club several nights running to determine if my use of
Yiddish terms was a cover for profanity."
You would also be censored ... if there wasn't any bias or hypocrisy.
--
misc.education.home-school.christian is a PUBLIC newsgroup which is
"unmoderated and basically open to any and all home schooling discussions,
with the understanding that readers will use kill files and/or threaded news
readers - not flame throwers." - (Founder of
misc.education.home-school.christian)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
