| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Godzilla Pimp" |
| Date: |
05 Jan 2004 01:18:38 PM |
| Object: |
Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
Did you see the first part of the PBS series on DNA.? That Jim Watson is a
really cool guy. He figured out the structure of the double helix in spite
of some Jewess and her efforts to hide data from him.
Anyway, he's not only an atheist but also believes in eugenics and likes
hot-looking women (and wants to make more of them). I am not alone and It
feels good! The truth will win in the end.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/dna/
Some Jew who named himself Ralph "Brave" (Braverman?) wrote this disparaging
article about him:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16026
GP
.
|
|
| User: "Mirco Vivaldo" |
|
| Title: HELP PLEASE!!! |
06 Jan 2004 09:54:07 AM |
|
|
Dear friends
I'm writing to you because I need your help.
My problem is that, unfortunatly, me and my girlfriend don't have sufficient
money to get married.
We are engaged since 3 years.
My parents are overflowed of debts and they cannot help us.
Her parents, instead, don't want us to get married because they know that I
wouldn't be a good husband because I don't have money.
Her parents have spent all their money to cure a father's serious heart
illness.
I asking you with big humility to donate us also just 1$ and to pay it into
my bank account.
To: Vivaldo Mirco,
Banca Antonveneta
ABI: 05040
CAB: 88330
CIN: Z
country: IT - checkdigit: 15.
mirco_vivaldo@yahoo.it
We will be very thankful for your big help
"Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:iMiKb.10316$6B.742@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Did you see the first part of the PBS series on DNA.? That Jim Watson is a
really cool guy. He figured out the structure of the double helix in spite
of some Jewess and her efforts to hide data from him.
Anyway, he's not only an atheist but also believes in eugenics and likes
hot-looking women (and wants to make more of them). I am not alone and It
feels good! The truth will win in the end.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/dna/
Some Jew who named himself Ralph "Brave" (Braverman?) wrote this
disparaging
article about him:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16026
GP
.
|
|
|
| User: "LarbGai@remove thisto replylycos.com LarbGai" |
|
| Title: Re: HELP PLEASE!!! |
06 Jan 2004 05:15:25 PM |
|
|
In article <zSAKb.234711$e6.9278168@twister2.libero.it>,
says...
Dear friends
I'm writing to you because I need your help.
My problem is that, unfortunatly, me and my girlfriend don't have sufficient
money to get married.
We are engaged since 3 years.
My parents are overflowed of debts and they cannot help us.
Her parents, instead, don't want us to get married because they know that I
wouldn't be a good husband because I don't have money.
Her parents have spent all their money to cure a father's serious heart
illness.
I asking you with big humility to donate us also just 1$ and to pay it into
my bank account.
To: Vivaldo Mirco,
Banca Antonveneta
ABI: 05040
CAB: 88330
CIN: Z
country: IT - checkdigit: 15.
We will be very thankful for your big help
*****Please accept my $20 cyber and best wishes in your little scam.
Are you Nigerian by any chance??????
;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 02:05:17 PM |
|
|
In article <iMiKb.10316$6B.742@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> "Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> writes:
<
{...}
<
<Some Jew who named himself Ralph "Brave" (Braverman?) wrote this disparaging
<article about him:
<
<http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16026
What did you find "disparaging"? It was Watson In His Own Words. I
seriously doubt that you could get Watson to disagree with a single
thing said about him.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 01:55:32 PM |
|
|
In article <iMiKb.10316$6B.742@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> "Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> writes:
<
<Did you see the first part of the PBS series on DNA.? That Jim Watson is a
<really cool guy. He figured out the structure of the double helix in spite
<of some Jewess and her efforts to hide data from him.
"some Jewess", eh? I assume you're talking about Rosiland Franklin,
who was widely thought to be doing the best X-ray crystallography
in the world at that time?
Why in heaven's name do you think that a scientist is obliged to
share her pre-publication data with anyone else? This is not
how the science game is played. If Franklin had shared her
data widely at that point, there's a serious possibility that
Pauling would have scooped Watson and Crick anyhow.
<
<Anyway, he's not only an atheist but also believes in eugenics and likes
<hot-looking women (and wants to make more of them).
You should read a bit of Watson's writing. Including his behavior
towards "Rosy" [sic].
< I am not alone and It feels good! The truth will win in the end.
<
Which truth would that be now?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Godzilla Pimp" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 02:41:43 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:btcffk$236$1@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <iMiKb.10316$6B.742@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> "Godzilla
Pimp" <god@heaven.org> writes:
<
<Did you see the first part of the PBS series on DNA.? That Jim Watson is
a
<really cool guy. He figured out the structure of the double helix in
spite
<of some Jewess and her efforts to hide data from him.
"some Jewess", eh? I assume you're talking about Rosiland Franklin,
who was widely thought to be doing the best X-ray crystallography
in the world at that time?
She did not develop the equipment or technique but was brought in to get the
pics, which she suppressed. The jooz at PBS tried to make her a bigger deal
than she was...figgers, the power-mad bastards.
Why in heaven's name do you think that a scientist is obliged to
share her pre-publication data with anyone else? This is not
how the science game is played.
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
If Franklin had shared her
data widely at that point, there's a serious possibility that
Pauling would have scooped Watson and Crick anyhow.
Naw, Pauling was too busy curing colds with vitamin C....lol...the pompous
old fart (yeah, that came later).
<Anyway, he's not only an atheist but also believes in eugenics and likes
<hot-looking women (and wants to make more of them).
You should read a bit of Watson's writing. Including his behavior
towards "Rosy" [sic].
She apparently was very hostile toward cute little Watson....that goyim twit
might steal her photos!
< I am not alone and It feels good! The truth will win in the end.
<
Which truth would that be now?
That Nazism is factually correct and that religion is Middle Eastern
*****.
GP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 09:38:54 PM |
|
|
"Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> wrote:
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
I see. You are not a supporter of the American Constitution, which
explicitly calls for copyright laws.
Which truth would that be now?
That Nazism is factually correct
Hilarious (but sad, too).
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Godzilla Pimp" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
06 Jan 2004 09:20:40 AM |
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:1bbkvvo796qpb7q5k01r3cn1g8d907fqk9@4ax.com...
"Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> wrote:
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
I see. You are not a supporter of the American Constitution, which
explicitly calls for copyright laws.
It merely says that congress "shall have power" to do so, jut as it "shall
have power" to declare war.
I'd be in favor of amending the Constitution to eliminate that clause.
The Wright brothers suppressed their discoveries for nearly a decade because
of patent laws. Glenn Curtis, whom the Wrights drove into bankruptcy by
lawsuits, finally shamed them out of hiding by giving the fist public
demonstration of controlled flight. History is littered with similar
examples.
Which truth would that be now?
That Nazism is factually correct
Hilarious (but sad, too).
In what way were they incorrect?
GP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dpr why" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 11:23:12 PM |
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:1bbkvvo796qpb7q5k01r3cn1g8d907fqk9@4ax.com...
"Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> wrote:
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
I see. You are not a supporter of the American Constitution, which
explicitly calls for copyright laws.
Seems you have a problem with copyrights as well. What about that work you
stole from Mr Brown and his logical language he made up.
And we know you despise the Constitution, as your posts on the subject have
indicated, especially when you say the Court can do whatever it wants to do,
even if it is legislation from the bench.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
06 Jan 2004 04:37:20 AM |
|
|
"dpr" <why> wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" < > wrote in message
news:1bbkvvo796qpb7q5k01r3cn1g8d907fqk9@4ax.com...
"Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> wrote:
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
I see. You are not a supporter of the American Constitution, which
explicitly calls for copyright laws.
Seems you have a problem with copyrights as well.
Not at all.
What about that work you stole from Mr Brown and his logical language he made up.
Well, you see, it is like this. We completely redid the research and
devised new words, and our own formulation of the grammar specifically
BECAUSE we respected Dr. Brown's copyright claims, even though we felt
that he was misusing them (and that in part he was not in fact
entitled to copyright because he himself had used others' work). We
played it straight specifically to ensure that we took the high road.
And we know you despise the Constitution, as your posts on the subject have
indicated, especially when you say the Court can do whatever it wants to do,
even if it is legislation from the bench.
Cite please. And I won't hold my breath, but just cite you:
Still waiting liar, where is your proof.
Oh that's right, you do not have any proof as you are a liar.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phil \Fair & Balanced\ MacRackin" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 03:22:52 PM |
|
|
Godzilla Pimp wrote:
<snippity snip>
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
In that case, please post your credit card numbers, bank account
numbers, PIN numbers and your income taxes forms for the last 5 years.
Oh, and your *real* name might also be useful.
I'll wait
<rest of drivel snipped>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Godzilla Pimp" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 04:03:05 PM |
|
|
"Phil "Fair & Balanced" MacRackin" <pmr@plumberpants.com> wrote in message
news:3FF9D5AC.777ACA84@plumberpants.com...
Godzilla Pimp wrote:
<snippity snip>
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
In that case, please post your credit card numbers, bank account
numbers, PIN numbers and your income taxes forms for the last 5 years.
Oh, and your *real* name might also be useful.
So anti-Nazis can attack me? It might be nice to get to use my shotgun on a
few tho.
The odd thing was, Watson and Cricket showed Franklin (Frankel,
Frankenstein?) a model which she immediately saw was "inside out". So why
didn't she go right home and make one which was right side in? Surely, the
Goyimic Duo gave her as big a hint as she gave them with her x-ray pics,
which Watson finally managed to sneak a peak at.
The fact is, women are good for sex and grunt work but do not have the
inventive powers of Aryan men.
GP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 09:41:11 PM |
|
|
"Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> wrote:
"Phil "Fair & Balanced" MacRackin" <pmr@plumberpants.com> wrote in message
news:3FF9D5AC.777ACA84@plumberpants.com...
Godzilla Pimp wrote:
The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
In that case, please post your credit card numbers, bank account
numbers, PIN numbers and your income taxes forms for the last 5 years.
Oh, and your *real* name might also be useful.
So anti-Nazis can attack me?
If they wish. The point is that you claim that you cannot defend
suppressing that information. So provide it. Here:
The fact is, women are good for sex and grunt work but do not have the
inventive powers of Aryan men.
How would you know? You are neither "Aryan" nor a "man", just
subhuman Nazi slime.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 03:32:50 PM |
|
|
In article <b_jKb.10585$6B.9644@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> "Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> writes:
<
<
<"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
<news:btcffk$236$1@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...
<> In article <iMiKb.10316$6B.742@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> "Godzilla
<Pimp" <god@heaven.org> writes:
<> <
<> <Did you see the first part of the PBS series on DNA.? That Jim Watson is
<a
<> <really cool guy. He figured out the structure of the double helix in
<spite
<> <of some Jewess and her efforts to hide data from him.
<>
<> "some Jewess", eh? I assume you're talking about Rosiland Franklin,
<> who was widely thought to be doing the best X-ray crystallography
<> in the world at that time?
<
<She did not develop the equipment or technique
Right. She did not. Nor did Jackson Pollock invent painting, or Pele
invent soccer. All were just very, very good at it.
<but was brought in to get the pics, which she suppressed.
"brought in"? She was doing her own ongoing research.
<The jooz at PBS tried to make her a bigger deal
<than she was...figgers, the power-mad bastards.
"The joos at PBS", along with the authors of every single
book or article I've read on the saga. Franklin's role
was indispensible. More than a few feel she should have
shared the Nobel.
<
<>
<> Why in heaven's name do you think that a scientist is obliged to
<> share her pre-publication data with anyone else? This is not
<> how the science game is played.
<
<The supression of information can never be defended. I'd get rid of
<copyright and patents laws, for that reason.
If it's your research, you can do whatever you want with it, including
putting it on the Net, thorwing it in the wastebasket -- or waiting
until your project has all the loose ends tidied up so that you
can publish.
Incidentally, you aren't under the misapprehension that Watson and
Crick shared their thinking to date with Franklin, are you?
<
< If Franklin had shared her
<> data widely at that point, there's a serious possibility that
<> Pauling would have scooped Watson and Crick anyhow.
<
<Naw, Pauling was too busy curing colds with vitamin C....lol...the pompous
<old fart (yeah, that came later).
It did. Pauling was Watson and Crick's main competition. As I recall,
he was thinking along the lines a triple helix, but Franklin's data
might well have pointed him in the right direction.
<
<> <Anyway, he's not only an atheist but also believes in eugenics and likes
<> <hot-looking women (and wants to make more of them).
<>
<> You should read a bit of Watson's writing. Including his behavior
<> towards "Rosy" [sic].
<
<She apparently was very hostile toward cute little Watson....that goyim twit
<might steal her photos!
Steal her work you mean? Yes, that would make me wax hostile too.
<
<> < I am not alone and It feels good! The truth will win in the end.
<> <
<>
<> Which truth would that be now?
<
<That Nazism is factually correct and that religion is Middle Eastern
<*****.
Which facts are we talking about here?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
06 Jan 2004 08:08:02 AM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell writes:
Cary> "The joos at PBS", along with the authors of every single
Cary> book or article I've read on the saga. Franklin's role
Cary> was indispensible. More than a few feel she should have
Cary> shared the Nobel.
Wasn't she already dead when Watson and Crick won it?
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
06 Jan 2004 11:36:43 AM |
|
|
In article <kpgr7yd8919.fsf@panix2.panix.com> <ahall@no-spam-panix.com> writes:
<
<>>>>> Cary Kittrell writes:
<
< Cary> "The joos at PBS", along with the authors of every single
< Cary> book or article I've read on the saga. Franklin's role
< Cary> was indispensible. More than a few feel she should have
< Cary> shared the Nobel.
<
<Wasn't she already dead when Watson and Crick won it?
<
Yep. I corrected myself on that in a subsequent post.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Jim Watson, atheist Nazi like me! |
05 Jan 2004 05:50:39 PM |
|
|
In article <btcl62$5ah$1@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu> (Cary Kittrell) writes:
<
<In article <b_jKb.10585$6B.9644@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> "Godzilla Pimp" <god@heaven.org> writes:
<<
<<
<
<<The jooz at PBS tried to make her a bigger deal
<<than she was...figgers, the power-mad bastards.
<
<"The joos at PBS", along with the authors of every single
<book or article I've read on the saga. Franklin's role
<was indispensible. More than a few feel she should have
<shared the Nobel.
I should correct myself on this last: "more than a few" think
she has not gotten the credit she deserved, but Franklin
could not have shared the Nobel, not when it was awarded
in 1962 -- she had been dead for several years at that
point.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
