| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Revolution 2" |
| Date: |
21 Sep 2003 11:53:11 AM |
| Object: |
PBS Jews: Bananas don't exist! |
I am a brilliant Jew with many degrees and am often interviewed on PBS.
Genetic testing shows that bananas and pineapples are 99.9% genetically
identical so neither can be said to actually exist. Humans are 50% identical
to bananas (non-existent, BTW) so they don't truly exist either but do have
50% juice content. BTW, my parents (semi-existing) spent $40K/yr to send me
to Cornell (100% existing according to bank records).
.
|
|
| User: "Revenant" |
|
| Title: Re: PBS Jews: Bananas don't exist! |
22 Sep 2003 04:39:08 PM |
|
|
"Revolution 2" <rev@two.org> wrote in
news:XHkbb.47233$NM1.27238@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:
I am a brilliant Jew with many degrees and am often interviewed on
PBS. Genetic testing shows that bananas and pineapples are 99.9%
genetically identical so neither can be said to actually exist. Humans
are 50% identical to bananas (non-existent, BTW) so they don't truly
exist either but do have 50% juice content. BTW, my parents
(semi-existing) spent $40K/yr to send me to Cornell (100% existing
according to bank records).
Hmm... except that the bankers who maintain and process your accounts via
the banan argument don't exist. Therefore any information from them is
suspect, and Cornell cannot be conclusively said to exist. Your parents,
and indeed you yourself, all fail the banana test as well, leading me to
conclud that your post may well not exist. That being the case, the
information contained in your post (namely the basic argument that neither
bananas nor pineapples exist) is invalidated.
That said, we still can neither conclude nor deny the existance of Cornell.
However, it can be shown that the existence of rice pudding CAN be
implicitly deduced from the initial proposition that "I think therefore I
am". I leave this proof as an exercise to the reader.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
