| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Dana" |
| Date: |
10 Nov 2004 10:11:04 PM |
| Object: |
Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy |
http://www.pawcreek.org/articles/endtimes/PlannedParenthood.htm
Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy
If there is a phrase or expression that best describes abortion and the
Planned Parenthood federation, it is "genocidal madness." Any organization
that pits itself against the family, dividing parents from children, is an
enemy to that society.
When you add to that a complete departure from the absolutes of the
Judeo-Christian values system, you have the seed to total moral anarchy.
America is reaping the brokenness of this decay right now. Even sadder is
their future agenda to solve the problems they help create. Their solution
is worse than the problem.
This organization has led the way in making a mother's womb the most
hazardous place for a human being in America. The dangers of neighborhood
crime or natural disasters doesn't even compare with the threat from
expectant mothers.
If any person on earth was created with the instinct to protect her
responsibilities, it is a mother. She has a built-in mechanism that will
react instantly when danger threatens her unborn. That instinct is so strong
that the fear of death to the mother is not even considered.
The horrible monster of abortion has created a climate where these beautiful
attributes of motherhood have been exchanged for the selfish option of
pro-choice. The word "pro-choice" may sound more civilized than abortion but
the killing is the same.
Dr. Bernard Nathanson was one of the leading abortionists in the western
world. After his conversion to an anti-abortion view, he called Planned
Parenthood "The Empire." He apparently did so because they preside over this
"gas chamber" type treatment of unborn children.
The very founder of this organization, Margaret Higgins Sanger, was
everything but a saint. It is reported that she became involved both
sexually and intellectually (??) with a collection of social extremists. Her
most intimate contacts were reported to be H.G. Wells, called "apostle of
the new science", and Havelock Ellis, a promoter of a pseudo-science called
eugenics. Eugenics advocated the stock breeding or "selective breeding" of
the human race.
She became a racist. Upon returning to America, she championed the idea of
sterilizing the so-called "unfit." Her "unfit" were Jews, Poles, Blacks and
the poor and uneducated. She lumped them together as human weeds.
Her organization, Planned Parenthood, may appear more civilized than she but
that's only the "P.R." and I mean "Public Relations" not "Parental Rights."
They championed a Supreme Court case, "Planned Parenthood versus Danforth"
(July 1, 1976) in which husbands and parents of minor girls lost any right
of mutual consent to abortion.
In "Planned Parenthood" versus Bellotti (1980) parents were robbed of their
right to be informed of their minor daughter's abortion, in some instances,
at the discretion of the judge.
It's hard to believe that this organization could tout itself as
"pro-family" when in fact they are one of America's most anti-family crowd.
When they use the term "family", it is not likely to mean a man, his wife,
and their children.
A prominent sociologist, Phillips Cutright, laid out the blueprint for
Planned Parenthood's program for the 70's. This was his three-pronged
approach:
1. Universal sex education in the schools.
2. A nationwide network of birth control clinics to distribute
contraceptives to teenagers, and,
3. Legalized abortion as a backup.
He admitted that it would not solve the problem of teenage pregnancy and
that in areas where contraceptives were available the problem would get
worse. He even suggested that the real purpose was to overcome the
"pseudomoral barriers."
If you will put those three words in a layman's language, it will spell
immorality, homosexuality and free love. Their agenda is to have a society
where the moral teaching of the Judeo-Christian faith is eliminated. If the
world goes to the dogs in the meantime, at least they won't have any sex
hang-ups. If America doesn't close this outfit down, we are fools.
--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the state
at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.
.
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy |
10 Nov 2004 10:59:07 PM |
|
|
"Dana Raffaniello" wrote in message
news:<d3fe3e2835d570496a0365f39a359b0a@news.meganetnews.com>...
<snip copyrighted material spammed to usenet>
Dana Raffaniello's sole purpose for spamming altered, copyrighted material
to usenet is to prove to us he has stolen the intellectual property of
someone else to pass off as his own.
From whence stealeth thou the following, Dana?
<<Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the
state
at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.>>
Why are you ashamed of the source?
Why don't you give credit to the author?
Why don't you do the right thing, Dana?
<< http://www.pawcreek.org/articles/endtimes/PlannedParenthood.htm
Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy >>
.
|
|
|
| User: "BRUCE" |
|
| Title: Do you represent the University of Wisconsin woman? |
12 Nov 2004 10:54:23 AM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
Do you represent the University of Wisconsin woman?
Does the University of Wisconsin condone or reflect your atheist views?
Then you Carol Lee Smith are the one committing plagiarism.
For those of you who what to find out if "Carol Lee Smith" speaks for the
University of Wisconsin
******************
Proud member of the vast Right Wing conspiracy,
BRUCE.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Do you represent the University of Wisconsin woman? |
12 Nov 2004 02:23:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, BRUCE wrote:
Do you represent the University of Wisconsin woman?
No.
Nor do I represent the University of Wisconsin women.
Does the University of Wisconsin condone or reflect your atheist views?
There is no religious test at ANY UWM entity for employment or for seeking
or earning a degree.
This should be of interest; it is a link to usenet posters with @uwm.edu
eddresses.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&q=%40uwm.edu&btnG=Search&meta=
Then you Carol Lee Smith are the one committing plagiarism.
You need to look up the definition of plagiarism. When I steal the words
of others and post them as my own, you may accuse me of plagiarism.
For those of you who what [sic] to find out if "Carol Lee Smith"
speaks for the University of Wisconsin
Using a @uwm.edu eddress is no indication of whether or not one represents
or doesn't represent the university. All students, faculty and staff have
@uwm.edu eddresses.
Thank you for asking.
" ... the real difference between liberals and conservatives in this
country is that conservatives think sex is very, very important and
liberals think sex is essentially trivial. ... " --Jane Haddam
http://www.janehaddam.com/chd/sex.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy (dana spam) |
11 Nov 2004 08:32:46 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 04:11:04 GMT, "Dana" <%^@losers@#.com> wrote:
If there is a phrase or expression that best describes abortion and the
Planned Parenthood federation, it is "genocidal madness.
Could have prevented this..........
------------------------------------------------------
houston toilet for ladies
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=63j
060%24j0j%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=225>
use me as your toilet. will be toilet for female parties.
can also be used as a rug, so you can walk on me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy (dana spam) |
11 Nov 2004 02:32:33 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 04:11:04 GMT, "Dana Raffaniello" <dpraff@gci.net>
wrote:
If there is a phrase or expression that best describes abortion and the
Planned Parenthood federation, it is "genocidal madness.
Could have prevented this..........
------------------------------------------------------
houston toilet for ladies
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=63j
060%24j0j%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=225>
use me as your toilet. will be toilet for female parties.
can also be used as a rug, so you can walk on me.
Did Dana Raffaniello really say that?
I thought what he said about yellow showers was much more poetic.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy |
10 Nov 2004 11:04:07 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Dana wrote:
http://www.pawcreek.org/articles/endtimes/PlannedParenthood.htm
Planned Parenthood -- Society's Enemy
America is reaping the brokenness of this decay right now. Even sadder is
The very founder of this organization, Margaret Higgins Sanger, was
everything but a saint. It is reported that she became involved both ...
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to post the truth about Margaret
Sanger.
http://snipurl.com/5gyn
The truth about Margaret Sanger is here:
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about/thisispp/sanger.html
and here:
www.msu.edu/course/mc/112/1920s/ Sanger/Information.htmland here:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevents/p_sanger.html
----begin excerpt----
Although Sanger uniformly repudiated the racist exploitation of
eugenics
principles, she agreed with the "progressives" of her day who favored
incentives for the voluntary hospitalization and/or sterilization of
people with untreatable, disabling, hereditary conditions
the adoption and enforcement of stringent regulations to prevent the
immigration of the diseased and "feebleminded" into the U.S.
placing so-called illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals,
prostitutes, and dope-fiends on farms and open spaces as long as
necessary
for the strengthening and development of moral conduct
Planned Parenthood Federation of America finds these views
objectionable
and outmoded. Nevertheless, anti-family planning activists continue to
attack Sanger, who has been dead for over 30 years, because she is an
easier target than the unassailable reputation of PPFA and the
contemporary family planning movement. However, attempts to discredit
the
family planning movement because its early 20th-century founder was
not a
perfect model of early 21st-century values is like disavowing the
Declaration of Independence because its author, Thomas Jefferson,
bought
and sold slaves.
-----end of excerpt-----
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about/thisispp/sanger.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
