Polemic fails to discredit Leuchter
Book-length 'Scholarly' polemic fails to discredit Leuchter
Truth Prevails: Demolishing Holocaust Denial: The End of the Leuchter
Report. Edited by Shelly Shapiro. New York, N.Y.: The Beate Klarsfeld
Foundation, and Holocaust Survivors & Friends in Pursuit of Justice,
1990. Softcover. 135 pages. Illustrations. Index. $15.00. ISBN
1-879437-00-7.
Reviewed by Mark Weber
In response to Fred Leuchter's findings about the alleged wartime
extermination gas chambers, the Holocaust lobby has mounted a
well-orchestrated campaign of slander, distortion, half-truth and
falsehood to discredit him and destroy his career as a consultant to
state governments on execution technology.
At the forefront of this effort have been the Paris-based Beate
Klarsfeld Foundation and a US-based group that calls itself "Holocaust
Survivors & Friends in Pursuit of Justice." An important propaganda
tool in this international campaign is this angry, awkwardly written
and poorly organized 135-page polemic, which is perhaps the most
ambitious effort so far to discredit Leuchter and his findings.
Published jointly by these two organizations in 1990, it bears the
pretentious and rather bombastic title Truth Prevails: Demolishing
Holocaust Denial: The End of the Leuchter Report.
As Journal readers know, this is not the first time that these two
groups have sought to discredit Holocaust Revisionism with a
book-length publication. In 1989 the Klarsfeld Foundation released
Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, an ambitious
564-page work by French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac. (See the
reviews of Pressac's book in the IHR Journal by Mark Weber, Summer
1990, and Robert Faurisson, Spring and Summer 1991.)
Truth Prevails consists of a preface by editor Shelly Shapiro (who is
also director of "Holocaust Survivors & Friends"), six essays
(including two by Jean-Claude Pressac), and a short commentary by
Serge Klarsfeld. In spite of its erudite pretension, this is a poorly
written, edited and organized work. Its language is often snide and
crude.
All the same, Truth Prevails has had a measurable impact. Libelous and
error-ridden articles based on it have appeared in daily newspapers
and weekly Jewish community papers around the country. In addition to
the usual and untruthful attacks against the IHR and Holocaust
Revisionism in general, these articles viciously attack Leuchter as a
man.
Throughout this book, Revisionists are routinely referred to as
"Holocaust deniers," a formulation that suggests a medieval
Inquisition against religious heretics who have blasphemed against a
sacred dogma. By treating "Holocaust denial" as the most terrible sin
that anyone can commit these days, this book serves to underscore the
way that the Holocaust has become, for many, a kind of religion.
In the preface, "Holocaust denial" is also compared to denying the
existence of slavery in 18th and 19th century America, or denying the
atomic bombing of Hiroshima. However, one might reasonably ask, if
"Holocaust denial" is really so obviously absurd, why bother about it?
No rational person wastes time refuting those who might deny the 1945
bombing of Hiroshima.
The preface also sets the tone of Truth Prevails, where the reader is
told: "The incomprehensible death factories 'with their bulging gas
chambers and smoke-belching crematoria eclipsed man's visions of
hell.' The name of Auschwitz means the epitomy [sic] of evil."
Overlooking the emotion-charged rhetoric here, it should be pointed
out that, as anyone who is even superficially familiar with the
reality of Auschwitz knows, there were no "smoke-belching crematoria"
there (or anywhere, for that matter). Like similar facilities
elsewhere, the crematory facilities at Auschwitz were structurally not
able to "belch" smoke. (Accordingly, Allied aerial reconnaissance
photos taken of the camp complex in 1944 - at the height of the
supposed extermination process there - show absolutely no trace of any
smoke whatsoever.)
Editor Shapiro also expresses outrage at a reference (in the British
edition of the Leuchter Report) to an inmates' swimming pool at
Auschwitz. In point of fact, there was such a pool. (On this, see: R.
Lenski, The Holocaust on Trial, pp. 38, 132, 142, 358-359, 385, and,
R. Faurisson, IHR Journal, Summer 1991, pp. 133-134.)
Truth Prevails seeks to discredit the Leuchter Report by, above all,
attacking its author's qualifications. A main purpose of this book is
to prove that Leuchter lacks the expertise he claims, and to show,
instead, that he is a pretentious fraud. "Our goal," the preface
explains, "is to show Leuchter's lack of expertise" as an execution
hardware specialist, and "to demonstrate that 'The Leuchter Report' is
not a credible scientific analysis. . ." (p. 1).
Charging that "Leuchter does not have the scientific background or
experience despite his claims" (p. 11), Truth Prevails insists that
Leuchter is simply not qualified to give an expert opinion about the
alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and Majdanek.
In this regard, much is made of the fact that Judge Ron Thomas
declined to accept the Leuchter Report as a defense exhibit during the
1988 Zündel trial. Strictly speaking, this is true. But Truth Prevails
essentially ignores the fact that Judge Thomas did decide to accept
Leuchter as an expert of homicidal gas chamber technology, and
accordingly permitted him to give opinion evidence. During his
testimony, Leuchter was allowed to read extensively from his Report,
which became part of the court record.
As detailed in an article published elsewhere in this issue of the
Journal, Leuchter's impressive expertise in the field of execution
hardware is a matter of public record, and has been authoritatively
and publicly confirmed. For example, in a letter of January 13, 1988,
Missouri state prison director William Armontrout wrote: "Mr. Leuchter
is an engineer specializing in gas chambers and executions. He is well
versed in all areas and is the only consultant in the United States
that I know of." Testifying in the 1988 Zuendel trial, Armontrout also
declared that he had consulted with Leuchter on the design,
maintenance and operation of the Missouri state gas chamber, and
reaffirmed that, to the best of his knowledge, Leuchter is the only
such consultant in the United States.
As part of its vicious assault against Leuchter's character, this book
charges that financial greed was the motive behind his forensic
investigation of the alleged extermination gas chambers, and his
conclusion that they were never used as killing facilities. Leuchter's
motivation, Pressac writes here, was "to collect the steep fee he
asked of Zundel and which the latter paid him." (p. 32)
In another chapter, contributor Arthur Goodman provides a mendacious
explanation of how Leuchter was chosen to carry out his forensic
investigation (p. 76):
Faurisson quickly applied himself to the task of finding an "engineer"
who would testify for Zündel. Very soon thereafter, Faurisson dug up
the hitherto unknown Leuchter whom he contacted and who was only too
willing to earn the money, gain the notoriety and establish a
reputation as the one man whose investigation would sustain the
[Revisionist] thesis . . . Leuchter [was] only too eager to be won
over . . .
In fact (and as explained in more detail elsewhere in this issue of
the Journal), Leuchter's motives in conducting his forensic
investigation of the alleged wartime gas chambers in Poland were
entirely honorable and professional. Prof. Robert Faurisson and Ernst
Zündel sought out Leuchter not because of any pre-existing views or
prejudices he may have had on this issue, but solely because he was,
at that time, the only acknowledged execution gas chamber specialist
in the United States.
While it is true that he was paid a standard fee by Zündel, this is
not at all remarkable. Any expert witnesses who testifies in a court
case under such circumstances is normally paid a fee in keeping with
his or her professional standing. Christopher Browning, for example,
the star prosecution witness in the 1988 Zündel trial, received 150
(Canadian) dollars an hour for his services.
Shapiro and the Klarsfelds are understandably angry that, in spite of
their efforts, the major media continues to acknowledge Leuchter's
expertise as America's foremost expert of execution technology.
Shapiro expresses outrage that "major news organizations" have given
him with "a semblance of respectability and credibility."
The Atlantic monthly, for example, is taken to task for an illustrated
article about Leuchter in the February 1990 issue. In this piece,
attorney and author Susan Lehman factually described Leuchter as the
nation's only commercial supplier of execution equipment . . . A
trained and accomplished engineer, he is versed in all types of
execution equipment. He makes lethal-injection machines, gas chambers,
and gallows, as well as electrocution systems. [He] . . . probably
knows more about electric chair technology than anyone else.
The Zionist Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith responded to this
rather flattering profile with an angry letter of protest. In her
reply to the ADL, Susan Lehman correctly pointed out that Leuchter's
findings about the Holocaust "gas chambers," and his testimony in the
Zündel trial, "have no direct bearing. . .on the subject of my
report." In his essay in Truth Prevails, Charles R. Allen, Jr.,
dismisses Lehman's reply as "insolence."
An even greater calamity, in the view of Shapiro and her friends, was
a profile of Leuchter broadcast nationwide May 10, 1990, on the widely
viewed ABC television news program "Prime Time Live." Co-host Diane
Sawyer described Leuchter as "the country's foremost expert at
creating, designing and maintaining execution equipment."
Particularly galling to the Shapiro crowd is the fact that ABC news
television went ahead with its profile of "Dr. Death" even after it
had been "informed" of Leuchter's shocking views on the Holocaust
extermination story, and of his links with the infamous Institute for
Historical Review. Shelly Shapiro and Beate Klarsfeld had even met
with producer Bob Currie to urge him not to air the report.
Finally, The New York Times is castigated for prominently featuring an
article, October 13, 1990, which included a front-page photograph of
Leuchter, that describes him as "the nation's leading adviser to
states on capital punishment." Leuchter, the article also reported,
has "advised 16 states on every kind of execution equipment. Four
states have bought his lethal injection systems. . ."
This unequivocal acknowledgment of Leuchter's expertise by the
nation's most influential daily paper is all the more significant
because its author, and the paper's editors, were entirely aware of
the Shapiro/Klarsfled team's criticisms of Leuchter when the article
went to press.
And much more recently, Leuchter's standing as the premier expert of
execution hardware was affirmed in "The Execution Protocol," a
television report broadcast November 1, 1992, on the Discovery cable
television network, as well as on the session of the popular Phil
Donahue show broadcast nationwide November 13, 1992.
Truth Prevails tries to explain away these embarrassing tributes by
contending that Leuchter has somehow been able to trick or fool these
savvy periodicals into accepting his bogus claims of expertise. If
Leuchter was actually able to somehow "take in" the media as this book
suggests, he must be gifted with truly extraordinary powers of
persuasion.
Truth Prevails ruefully notes that Leuchter "is still sought by the
media as the only available spokesman on the technology of the death
penalty in the U.S." (p. 24). One can be certain that if there is
anyone (besides Leuchter) in the United States who could plausibly be
portrayed as a "real" expert on execution hardware, Shapiro and her
diligent colleagues certainly would have found him. Interestingly,
though, the Shapiro/Klarsfeld team has not produced any such person:
To date, the best they have been able to come up with is a confused
and unqualified suburban French pharmacist, Jean-Claude Pressac.
Fittingly, much of this book consists of two essays by Pressac that
seek to refute the Leuchter Report on technical grounds. (For a point
by point response to Pressac's critique of Leuchter's findings, see
the detailed essay by Paul Grubach in this issue of the Journal.)
Shapiro and Klarsfeld use a grotesque double standard in deciding just
who qualifies as a gas chamber expert. While Leuchter is dismissed as
an untrained fraud and crank, Pressac is praised here (by Serge
Klarsfeld, on page 29) as "one of the world's rare research
specialists in gas chamber extermination technique." This description
is almost laughable in light of Pressac's lack of any formal training,
credentials or recognized expertise in architecture, engineering,
history or document analysis.
Leuchter is not this book's only target. Prof. Faurisson is accused of
"intellectual dishonesty" (p. 36), and Ernst Zündel is referred to as
Canada's "prime practitioner of Holocaust denial" (p. 22), as if he is
the high priest of an evil satanic cult, and historian David Irving is
called a "Nazi propagandist" (p. 85).
In a ten-page chapter by H. L. Silets, a specialist of legal history
at the University of Cambridge, the 1946 "Zyklon B" trial is cited as
irrefutable proof that German officials used hydrogen cyanide gas from
Zyklon to exterminate Jews in wartime concentration camps. Dr. Bruno
Tesch, the German businessman who headed the company that supplied
Zyklon, and his assistant and business manager Karl Weinbacher were
the two main defendants in the 1946 trial in Hamburg. They were found
guilty by the British military court, sentenced to death, and hanged.
Revisionist scholars are familiar with this important trial, which was
a travesty of justice. (Retired American research chemist Dr. William
B. Lindsey provides a thorough examination of it in a carefully
researched article in the Fall 1983 IHR Journal.) Even Jean-Claude
Pressac has rightly castigated this trial as unjust and probably a
"masquerade." (J.-C. Pressac, Auschwitz, 1989, p. 17.)
A key witness in the trial was Charles (or Paul) Bendel, a Jewish
doctor who had been an inmate physician in Birkenau in 1944. His
"eyewitness" testimony about extermination gassings in the camp helped
to send Tesch and Weinbacher to the gallows. As even Pressac has
confirmed, Bendel's testimony is demonstrably wrong on numerous key
points. (J.-C. Pressac, Auschwitz, 1989, pp. 469-472.)
Perhaps most remarkably, this British court determined that, of a
grand total of six million people killed in the German camps, no less
than four and a half million were "systematically exterminated" with
Zyklon B at Auschwitz-Birkenau alone. (United Nations War Crimes
Commission, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, London: HMSO,
1947, Vol. 1, p. 94. See also Nuremberg document NI-12207.)
As further proof of extermination gassings at Auschwitz, Truth
Prevails contributor Silets cites the postwar "confession" of former
Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss. However, as even prominent Holocaust
historians (including J.-C. Pressac in his 1989 book) now concede, key
statements in this "confession" are quite demonstrably untrue.
Moreover, it has been indisputably established that Höss' infamous
"confession" was extracted by brutal torture. (See: R. Faurisson, IHR
Journal, Winter 1986-87, pp. 389-403.)
Beate Klarsfeld has announced that Leuchter "has to understand that in
denying the Holocaust, he cannot remain unpunished." (JTA dispatch,
Detroit Jewish News, March 1, 1991.) In this spirit, Ms. Shapiro has
boasted about the measures that she and her collaborators have taken
to pressure public officials, prison wardens, state correction
departments, politicians and journalists into blacklisting Leuchter.
In August 1990, for example, the Shapiro/Klarsfeld group succeeded in
pressuring the Illinois Department of Corrections into canceling its
$8,320 consulting contract with Leuchter to inspect and supervise
administration of its lethal injection equipment. (p. 17) Complaints
were also made to state prison officials in Alabama, North Carolina,
California, Arizona and Maryland. In one state, a lawmaker said that
to retain Leuchter as an execution consultant would conflict with the
state's requirement of mandatory "Holocaust studies" for every public
school pupil. (For more on this campaign, see the IHR Newsletter,
July-August 1991, p. 3.)
Sadly, this insidious campaign to "punish" Leuchter for his insolent
refusal to toe the Holocaust line has been largely successful. As he
explains in his essay elsewhere in this issue of the Journal, his
livelihood has largely been destroyed.
Although it is actually little more than a mean-spirited, bigoted and
error-ridden polemic, Truth Prevails is not ineffective as a work of
Holocaust propaganda. It will undoubtedly continue to have an impact
among the ignorant. All the same, its very existence is somewhat
gratifying because it is a tangible expression of the growing impact
of Holocaust Revisionism.
--
"The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination
of the Jews was arrived at"..."hardly a conference" and "little of what was said there was executed in detail."
Yehuda Bauer
Canadian Jewish News (Toronto), Jan. 30, 1992.
.
|
