| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Dana" |
| Date: |
25 Aug 2003 07:27:29 PM |
| Object: |
Re: anti-heritage quest against moore |
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:pcikkv423seo2971t0cco2pqendtiaf26i@4ax.com...
kands00@hotmail.com (K C) wrote:
Since when is intent a defining factor?
Since the Supreme Court defined the Establishment Clause with
reference to the purpose of an action.
Gee bob, that has never happened like you wish it would.
Face it bob, judge Thompson is wrong, and we have told him that we will not
abide by his legislation from the bench. The court has no power to enforce
it's decisions, so when it steps over the line, the people will stop
listening to the court. So you leftist who like to legislate from the bench
bought this upon yourselves. We are telling you to take a hike. See Bob this
is what happens when you believe that rights only come from the government,
you end up ticking off a whole lot of people, and they tell you to take your
beliefs elsewhere.
Now this whole issue is a state issue, the feds do not even have to get
involved. It is the state courthouse, not the federal courthouse. Now bob,
you and your ilk will have to mind your own business.
Read the decision.
Bobbie, maybe you should read the Constitutuion and the Declaration of
Independence.
.
|
|
| User: "Dave Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-heritage quest against moore |
25 Aug 2003 08:59:38 PM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
news:vkla0kooppn668@corp.supernews.com...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:pcikkv423seo2971t0cco2pqendtiaf26i@4ax.com...
kands00@hotmail.com (K C) wrote:
Since when is intent a defining factor?
Since the Supreme Court defined the Establishment Clause with
reference to the purpose of an action.
Gee bob, that has never happened like you wish it would.
Face it bob, judge Thompson is wrong, and we have told him that we will
not
abide by his legislation from the bench.
I'm sure he's just quivering over the thought.
The court has no power to enforce
it's decisions, so when it steps over the line, the people will stop
listening to the court.
Fine. Then they will go to jail.
So you leftist who like to legislate from the bench
bought this upon yourselves. We are telling you to take a hike.
And we are telling you to go ***** yourselves. In jail.
See Bob this
is what happens when you believe that rights only come from the
government,
you end up ticking off a whole lot of people, and they tell you to take
your
beliefs elsewhere.
Actually you demonstraste why we can't accept that rights come from god -
because any insane idiot can decide what it is that god is telling them.
Now this whole issue is a state issue, the feds do not even have to get
involved.
They obviously do, if insane jackasses like yourself start saying you have
the right to defy a federal court decision. I want you to do something for
us, Dana, as an exhibition of your resolve and righteousness. I want you to
go to Alabama with your gun and stand down the feds over Judge Moore's
tombstone. If you are right, as you believe, and if the people are behind
you and liberals are pussies you could lead a the revolution you have been
crowing about incessantly.
Please be an example for what you preach and stand up for your convictions
you little loudmouthed chickenshit. I would love to see you do it.
It is the state courthouse, not the federal courthouse. Now bob,
you and your ilk will have to mind your own business.
Read the decision.
Bobbie, maybe you should read the Constitutuion and the Declaration of
Independence.
Maybe you should do the same. Start with the 14th amendment.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-heritage quest against moore |
25 Aug 2003 09:35:42 PM |
|
|
"Dave Thompson" <dav13795@wdmdx1.com> wrote in message
news:vklfompt9tilf1@corp.supernews.com...
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote in message
news:vkla0kooppn668@corp.supernews.com...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:pcikkv423seo2971t0cco2pqendtiaf26i@4ax.com...
kands00@hotmail.com (K C) wrote:
Since when is intent a defining factor?
Since the Supreme Court defined the Establishment Clause with
reference to the purpose of an action.
Gee bob, that has never happened like you wish it would.
Face it bob, judge Thompson is wrong, and we have told him that we will
not
abide by his legislation from the bench.
I'm sure he's just quivering over the thought.
The commandments are still there
The court has no power to enforce
it's decisions, so when it steps over the line, the people will stop
listening to the court.
Fine. Then they will go to jail.
Moore is not is jail.
So you leftist who like to legislate from the bench
bought this upon yourselves. We are telling you to take a hike.
And we are telling you to go ***** yourselves. In jail.
And we are laughing at you, while we slap you silly.
See Bob this
is what happens when you believe that rights only come from the
government,
you end up ticking off a whole lot of people, and they tell you to take
your
beliefs elsewhere.
Now this whole issue is a state issue, the feds do not even have to get
involved.
They obviously do,
Nope not at all.
if insane jackasses like yourself start saying you have
the right to defy a federal court decision.
Go choke yourself fool. We are done listening to your whine
Please be an example for what you preach and stand up for your convictions
you little loudmouthed chickenshit. I would love to see you do it.
Stop doing your mother, don't you know incest is bad for the gene pool.
Every one needs to slap and punch a leftist everyday.
It is the state courthouse, not the federal courthouse. Now bob,
you and your ilk will have to mind your own business.
Read the decision.
Bobbie, maybe you should read the Constitutuion and the Declaration of
Independence.
Maybe you should do the same. Start with the 14th amendment.
Maybe you should just put a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger.
We are done letting you intolerant bigots force your beliefs on us. We are
now fighting back, and fight we will.
And there is nothing you can do to stop us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-heritage quest against moore |
26 Aug 2003 03:49:42 AM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
I'm sure he's just quivering over the thought.
The commandments are still there
Not for long.
The court has no power to enforce
it's decisions, so when it steps over the line, the people will stop
listening to the court.
Fine. Then they will go to jail.
Moore is not is jail.
He is suspended from office.
Please be an example for what you preach and stand up for your convictions
you little loudmouthed chickenshit. I would love to see you do it.
Stop doing your mother, don't you know incest is bad for the gene pool.
Every one needs to slap and punch a leftist everyday.
Thereby proving that you are a loudmouthed chickenshit as accused.
Thanks for the admission.
Maybe you should do the same. Start with the 14th amendment.
Maybe you should just put a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger.
Loudmouthed chickenshit strikes again.
We are done letting you intolerant bigots force your beliefs on us. We are
now fighting back, and fight we will.
And there is nothing you can do to stop us.
Try it and just watch.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-heritage quest against moore |
26 Aug 2003 11:00:31 AM |
|
|
In article <sj7mkvc1isvd25iqon672o64n0jtgc1r40@4ax.com> Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> writes:
<
<"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
<>> I'm sure he's just quivering over the thought.
<>
<>The commandments are still there
<
<Not for long.
<
<>> The court has no power to enforce
<>> > it's decisions, so when it steps over the line, the people will stop
<>> > listening to the court.
<>>
<>> Fine. Then they will go to jail.
<>
<>Moore is not is jail.
<
<He is suspended from office.
<
<>> Please be an example for what you preach and stand up for your convictions
<>> you little loudmouthed chickenshit. I would love to see you do it.
<>
<>Stop doing your mother, don't you know incest is bad for the gene pool.
<>
<>Every one needs to slap and punch a leftist everyday.
<
<Thereby proving that you are a loudmouthed chickenshit as accused.
<Thanks for the admission.
<
Ooooh, careful there Bob. Remember, Dana puts wimpy leftists
in the hospital. He told us so.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: Re: "Stop doing My mother" SCREECHES poor BUTTMASTER |
26 Aug 2003 09:55:17 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:30:07 -0600, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:35:42 -0800, "Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
Stop doing your mother
Did your mommy ever have to buy *****-wipe Dana?
Or were YOU here favorite?
STILL WAITING!
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/218/region/State_to_reduce_welfare_benefiP.shtml
State to reduce welfare benefits for 16,000
By Associated Press, 8/6/2003 13:08
BOSTON (AP) The state will reduce welfare benefits to 16,000
recipients on Sept. 1 due to budget cuts approved by the Legislature
in June, according to the state Department of Health and Human
Services.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Stop doing My mother" SCREECHES poor BUTTMASTER |
26 Aug 2003 02:17:17 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:55:17 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:30:07 -0600, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:35:42 -0800, "Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
Stop doing your mother
Did your mommy ever have to buy *****-wipe Dana?
Or were YOU here favorite?
STILL WAITING!
Answer this first, you dumb *****
Bush never told America that Saddam had capabilities to launch weapons
within 45 minutes.
Show me a cite where GWB states that the US is within hours of an
Iraqi attack.
Bush DID say it, YOU said he didn't
Bush LIED
Americans DIED
.
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: Re: "Stop doing My mother" SCREECHES poor BUTTMASTER |
26 Aug 2003 03:37:23 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:17:17 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:55:17 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:30:07 -0600, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:35:42 -0800, "Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
Stop doing your mother
Did your mommy ever have to buy *****-wipe Dana?
Or were YOU here favorite?
STILL WAITING!
Answer this first, you dumb *****
Bush never told America that Saddam had capabilities to launch weapons
within 45 minutes.
Show me a cite where GWB states that the US is within hours of an
Iraqi attack.
Bush DID say it, YOU said he didn't
Then I admitted I was incorrect.
NOW,
STILL WAITING!
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/218/region/State_to_reduce_welfare_benefiP.shtml
State to reduce welfare benefits for 16,000
By Associated Press, 8/6/2003 13:08
BOSTON (AP) The state will reduce welfare benefits to 16,000
recipients on Sept. 1 due to budget cuts approved by the Legislature
in June, according to the state Department of Health and Human
Services.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: // GARY "GOV'T CHEESE" WINGNUT'S READING COMPREHENSION ISSUES \\ |
26 Aug 2003 03:38:38 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:17:17 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:55:17 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:30:07 -0600, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:35:42 -0800, "Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
Stop doing your mother
Did your mommy ever have to buy *****-wipe Dana?
Or were YOU here favorite?
STILL WAITING!
Answer this first, you dumb *****
Bush never told America that Saddam had capabilities to launch weapons
within 45 minutes.
Show me a cite where GWB states that the US is within hours of an
Iraqi attack.
Bush DID say it, YOU said he didn't
Then I admitted I was incorrect. Bush said it. You got.... nothing!
NOW, STILL WAITING....GOING ON ONE MONTH!
STILL WAITING!
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/218/region/State_to_reduce_welfare_benefiP.shtml
State to reduce welfare benefits for 16,000
By Associated Press, 8/6/2003 13:08
BOSTON (AP) The state will reduce welfare benefits to 16,000
recipients on Sept. 1 due to budget cuts approved by the Legislature
in June, according to the state Department of Health and Human
Services.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: " I was incorrect. Bush said it." WHINES DISCREDITED POOTIS |
26 Aug 2003 07:32:24 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:38:38 -0400, Otis <> wrote:
I was incorrect. Bush said it.
But I said that from day one, you stupid *****
-------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:38:40 -0400,
Defending his lying, rat-***** deserter/appointe wrote:
Show me a cite where GWB states that the US is within hours of an
Iraqi attack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: Re: " I was incorrect. Bush said it." WHINES DISCREDITED POOTIS |
26 Aug 2003 08:27:04 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:32:24 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:38:38 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
I was incorrect. Bush said it.
But I said that from day one, you stupid *****
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
NOW:
STILL WAITING!
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/218/region/State_to_reduce_welfare_benefiP.shtml
State to reduce welfare benefits for 16,000
By Associated Press, 8/6/2003 13:08
BOSTON (AP) The state will reduce welfare benefits to 16,000
recipients on Sept. 1 due to budget cuts approved by the Legislature
in June, according to the state Department of Health and Human
Services.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: "Yup, you win", CRIES POOT WHIPPED/BEATEN POOTIS |
26 Aug 2003 11:29:04 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:27:04 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:32:24 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:38:38 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
I was incorrect. Bush said it.
But I said that from day one, you stupid *****
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
Since I told you from the beginning, and you lied, whined, obfuscated, and
deflected, you're credibility is gone.
Your rat-*****, coke-snorting idiot also maintained the lies he told were "truth" (just
like you did)
NOW, you have to admit that HE also lied
Remember now, You've already been proven to have lied twice, Pootis. Defending
the indefensible.
You're claiming that your rat-***** ***** is "protecting America"........and that's a
fucking lie also
At the same time, you're trying to promote some other silly-assed ***** as
"truth"......when, in fact, you can't seem to recognize the lies in the propaganda you
read and spam us with------all the time trying to get everyone to accept the recent
issue as worthy of discussion
You simply aren't intellectually able to comprehend the depth of your stupidity and
ignorance, are you Pootis??
Since I've proven you wrong every time, I should think you'd accept what I say.
Don't you?
------------------------------------------------
otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com
--"I only wish I had the juice of POTUS".
(Mouth open, I presume?)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: Re: "Yup, you win", CRIES POOT WHIPPED/BEATEN POOTIS |
27 Aug 2003 08:59:06 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:29:04 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:27:04 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:32:24 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:38:38 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
I was incorrect. Bush said it.
But I said that from day one, you stupid *****
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
Since I told you from the beginning, and you lied, whined, obfuscated, and
deflected, you're credibility is gone.
See, I didn't see the original quote. Being human I can make AND
admit a mistake.
STILL WAITING!
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/218/region/State_to_reduce_welfare_benefiP.shtml
State to reduce welfare benefits for 16,000
By Associated Press, 8/6/2003 13:08
BOSTON (AP) The state will reduce welfare benefits to 16,000
recipients on Sept. 1 due to budget cuts approved by the Legislature
in June, according to the state Department of Health and Human
Services.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Yup, you win", CRIES POOT WHIPPED/BEATEN POOTIS |
27 Aug 2003 12:21:58 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:59:06 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
Since I told you from the beginning, and you lied, whined, obfuscated, and
deflected, you're credibility is gone.
See, I didn't see the original quote.
Makes no difference, you dumb *****
You claimed you KNEW.....for a "fact", that what you said was "Truth"
Your rat-***** ***** LIED about the reasons for an attack on Iraq, relying on false
intelligence and a pathological drive to go to war
He couldn't make a case based on Saddam being a "bad guy" so he LIED about the 5 other
reasons.
YOU, OTOH, also claimed you had "truth" to back you up. You were proven to have
been stupid. You relied on half-truths, half-researched beliefs and got your ignorant *****
whipped. Your problem isn't that you're "human"........it's that you're a dumb *****. !
Now you're trying to spam us with more propaganda as "truth" and you can't understand why
no one will "debate", much less not laugh at you.
----------------------------------------------------------
Another well said evaluation of PoOTIS'S drooling hero:
USS Ronald Reagan...First of the 'Nimitz' class carriers to be named after a
drooling, brain-dead, combat-avoiding talking-head *****. What a
difference from 'Dwight D. Eisenhower', 'Nimitz', 'Theodore Roosevelt' and
'Abraham Lincoln', real heroes, proud names for proud ships.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: Re: "Yup, you win", CRIES POOT WHIPPED/BEATEN POOTIS |
27 Aug 2003 12:51:30 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:21:58 -0600, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:59:06 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
Since I told you from the beginning, and you lied, whined, obfuscated, and
deflected, you're credibility is gone.
See, I didn't see the original quote.
Makes no difference, you dumb *****
You claimed you KNEW.....for a "fact", that what you said was "Truth"
You claimed Clinton never lied!
LOL!!
YOU ARE A LYING, WELFARE-SUCKING FOOL!!!!!!!
"We fundamentally disagree with the complaint filed today and will
defend vigorously against it."
- B.J. Clinton, July 1, 2000
I have accepted a five-year suspension of my law license, agreed to pay a $25,000 fine to cover counsel fees, and acknowledged a violation of one of the Arkansas model rules of professional conduct
because of testimony in my Paula Jones case deposition. The disbarment suit will now be dismissed.
In this consent order, I acknowledge having knowingly
violated Judge Wright's discovery orders in my deposition in that case.
I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully
and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I
did not fully accomplish this goal and that certain
of my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false.
-William Jefferson Clinton.
-Jan 19, 2001
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: // GARY WINGNUT LIES AGAIN AND AGAIN! \\ |
27 Aug 2003 12:52:11 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:21:58 -0600, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:59:06 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
Since I told you from the beginning, and you lied, whined, obfuscated, and
deflected, you're credibility is gone.
See, I didn't see the original quote.
Makes no difference, you dumb *****
You claimed you KNEW.....for a "fact", that what you said was "Truth"
You claimed Clinton never lied!
LOL!!
YOU ARE A LYING, WELFARE-SUCKING FOOL!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: YOU ARE A LYING, WELFARE-SUCKING FOOL", SCREECHES PoOTISLOON |
27 Aug 2003 04:37:52 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:52:11 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:21:58 -0600, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:59:06 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
Since I told you from the beginning, and you lied, whined, obfuscated, and
deflected, you're credibility is gone.
See, I didn't see the original quote.
Makes no difference, you dumb *****
You claimed you KNEW.....for a "fact", that what you said was "Truth"
You claimed Clinton never lied!
Post ANY proven lie he's told, PoOTIS
(his "confession" isn't proof of any crime)
YOU ARE A LYING, WELFARE-SUCKING FOOL!!!!!!!
Strike Three in one dumb-***** sentence, you moron
a) it aint a lie
b) ain't ever been on welfare
c) and if your definition of "fool" is kicking your dumb *****, then you MIGHT be right.
------------------------------------------------
otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com
--"I only wish I had the juice of POTUS".
(Mouth open, I presume?)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Otis" |
|
| Title: Re: YOU ARE A LYING, WELFARE-SUCKING FOOL", SCREECHES PoOTISLOON |
27 Aug 2003 06:43:03 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:37:52 -0600, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:52:11 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:21:58 -0600, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:59:06 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yup, you win. You're cool. You rock. You 'da man.
Since I told you from the beginning, and you lied, whined, obfuscated, and
deflected, you're credibility is gone.
See, I didn't see the original quote.
Makes no difference, you dumb *****
You claimed you KNEW.....for a "fact", that what you said was "Truth"
You claimed Clinton never lied!
Post ANY proven lie he's told, PoOTIS
Don't have to, CLINTON DID IT FOR ME!
Today, I signed a consent order in the lawsuit brought by
the Arkansas Committee on Professional Conduct which
brings to an end that proceeding.
I have accepted a five-year suspension of my law license, agreed to
pay a $25,000 fine to cover counsel fees, and acknowledged a violation
of one of the Arkansas model rules of professional conduct
because of testimony in my Paula Jones case deposition. The disbarment
suit will now be dismissed.
I have had occasion frequently to reflect on the Jones
case.
In this consent order, I acknowledge having knowingly
violated Judge Wright's discovery orders in my deposition in that
case.
I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully
and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I
did not fully accomplish this goal and that certain
of my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false.
-William Jefferson Clinton.
-Jan 19, 2001
"My responses were false".
Deal with it, burgerboy.
b) ain't ever been on welfare
Yet, you DO suck public funds.
Right?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: !GARY "GOV'T CHEESE" WINGNUT'S READING COMPREHENSION ISSUES |
10 Nov 2003 12:01:08 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:38:38 -0400, Otis <otis_p_driftwood@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:17:17 -0600, wrote:
Bush never told America that Saddam had capabilities to launch weapons
within 45 minutes.
Show me a cite where GWB states that the US is within hours of an
Iraqi attack.
Bush DID say it, YOU said he didn't
Then I admitted I was incorrect. Bush said it. You got.... nothing!
I nailed you, ya dumb *****.
---------------------------------------------------
ladies use my tongue for your pleasure
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=
63j187%24nji%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=226>
swm very oral will orally worship any female that wishes to be worshipped.
will kiss and lick your feet and butt .
might be wiling to be your toilet paper if you
are that aggressive
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-heritage quest against moore |
26 Aug 2003 03:45:48 AM |
|
|
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" < > wrote in message
news:pcikkv423seo2971t0cco2pqendtiaf26i@4ax.com...
kands00@hotmail.com (K C) wrote:
Since when is intent a defining factor?
Since the Supreme Court defined the Establishment Clause with
reference to the purpose of an action.
Gee bob, that has never happened like you wish it would.
Everson v Board (1947)
Face it bob, judge Thompson is wrong,
Read the decision.
and we have told him that we will not abide by his legislation from the bench.
You have told him no such thing. You are a wimp who posts lies to
Usenet.
The court has no power to enforce it's decisions, so when it steps over the line,
the people will stop listening to the court.
No. The State of Alabama will enforce its decisions, as that have
already started to, by suspending the scofflaw. Even
darling-of-the-right Pryor knows the difference between law and your
silly opinion.
So you leftist who like to legislate from the bench bought this upon yourselves.
I've never been at a bench, so I can hardly like to legislate from it.
We are telling you to take a hike.
And I am telling you to obey the Constitution. But more importantly,
Judge Thompson is telling the State of Alabama to obey the
Constitution. And the State of Alabama is listening, so you lose,
loser.
See Bob this
is what happens when you believe that rights only come from the government,
you end up ticking off a whole lot of people, and they tell you to take your
beliefs elsewhere.
"A whole lot"? You mean the driblets that pray at the holy shrine?
Now this whole issue is a state issue,
The court says otherwise. Read the decision.
the feds do not even have to get involved.
They did.
It is the state courthouse,
Emphasis on "state".
not the federal courthouse.
The state courthouse is under federal jurisdiction when the state
violates the 1th amendment.
Now bob, you and your ilk will have to mind your own business.
The public is minding its business.
Read the decision.
Bobbie, maybe you should read the Constitutuion and the Declaration of
Independence.
I have, multiple times. Now read the decision.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-heritage quest against moore |
26 Aug 2003 08:55:23 PM |
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:j37mkvkdeao1u1g35amioib8bkig3at77m@4ax.com...
"Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:pcikkv423seo2971t0cco2pqendtiaf26i@4ax.com...
kands00@hotmail.com (K C) wrote:
Since when is intent a defining factor?
Since the Supreme Court defined the Establishment Clause with
reference to the purpose of an action.
Gee bob, that has never happened like you wish it would.
Face it bob, judge Thompson is wrong,
..
and we have told him that we will not abide by his legislation from the
bench.
The court has no power to enforce it's decisions, so when it steps over
the line,
the people will stop listening to the court.
So you leftist who like to legislate from the bench bought this upon
yourselves.
We are telling you to take a hike.
See Bob this
is what happens when you believe that rights only come from the
government,
you end up ticking off a whole lot of people, and they tell you to take
your
beliefs elsewhere.
Now this whole issue is a state issue,
the feds do not even have to get involved.
It is the state courthouse,
not the federal courthouse.
Now bob, you and your ilk will have to mind your own business.
Bobbie, maybe you should read the Constitutuion and the Declaration of
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-heritage quest against moore and poor Buttmaster |
25 Aug 2003 07:22:37 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:27:29 -0800, "Dana" <yourname@example.com> wrote:
Bobbie, maybe you should read the Constitutuion and the Declaration of
Independence.
Like YOU do, you stupid fuckwit?
You haven't managed to "read the constitution" in ANY issue and come up
with a rational argument in ANYTHING
That's why you're a dumb *****
You're a Sick, disgusting idiot for this, however.................
---------------------------------------------------
ladies use my tongue for your pleasure
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=
63j187%24nji%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=226>
swm very oral will orally worship any female that wishes to be worshipped.
will kiss and lick your feet and butt .
might be wiling to be your toilet paper if you
are that aggressive
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
