Re: Law and religion - moral issues



 Sociology > Education > Re: Law and religion - moral issues

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Sociology > Education
User: ""
Date: 29 Nov 2003 11:14:44 AM
Object: Re: Law and religion - moral issues
(M. Clark) wrote:

:|<tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote:
:|
:|> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:55:07 -0700,

(M. Clark)
:|> wrote:
:|>
:|> ><Draccus874@netscape.net> wrote:
:|> >
:|> snip
:|> >Again, even Thomas Jefferson, Mr. "separation of church and state"
:|> >himself, said that the 1st and 10th Amendments were meant to work
:|> >together to give the States the power to address religious issues. So
:|> >you don't know what you're talking about when you say that government
:|> >and religion are mutually exclusive.
:|>
:|> It happens to be the law of the land idiot.
:|
:|If you review key Supreme Court decisions concerning church/state
:|separation issues, you will see that the Court placed a heavy emphasis
:|on Jefferson's church/state separation writing. Everson v. Board of
:|Education is one example. The Murdock opinion is another example.
:|
:|M. Clark

You enjoy lying and must enjoy being caught lying;
Everson v. Bd of Ed defined the Establishment Clause. Here are the
footnotes that the court used to pen the definition: Footnotes to Everson
V. Bd of Ed.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S12525BA6
You will find that a good many sources were used with Jefferson only being
one of many.
But you have been told that before and you still lie.
.

 

NEWER

pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER