Ruling upholds state law requiring contraception coverage



 Sociology > Education > Ruling upholds state law requiring contraception coverage

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Sociology > Education
User: ""
Date: 15 Jan 2006 11:48:09 AM
Object: Ruling upholds state law requiring contraception coverage
Ruling upholds state law requiring contraception coverage
http://albany.bizjournals.com/albany/stories/2006/01/09/daily53.html
Albany Business Review - Albany,NY,USA
A state appeals court in Albany, N.Y., ruled Thursday that religious
groups must abide by a state law that they had complained forces them to
pay for contraception for employees in violation of their groups' religious
opposition to birth control.
Religious groups have contended since the Legislature and Gov. George
Pataki approved the Women's Health and Wellness Act in 2002 that their
constitutional rights to free exercise of their religion and the principle
of separation of church and state are being violated.
**************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Why A Federal District Court Was Wrong to Apply Strict Scrutiny to a Washington State Law Requiring Pharmacies, But Not Individual Pharmacists,
Re: Alabamakabala coverage
Today's Founder Quote: Sepperate but equal...unless a robed Activist judge who thinks he is the Ultimate higher Ruling Authority creates law from his...
New Book -- Ruling Russia: Law, Crime, and Justice
Area clergy disagree with judge's ruling
The anti-sodomy ruling by the Supreme Court was a just ruling.
Scalia Slams Gay-Sex Ruling
Re: Today's Founder Quote: Men of good character & conscience have as their guide, Thee Higher Ruling Authority
State school boards join Tangi's call to reverse prayer ruling
Schools around the nation ponder ruling and its impact
Ruling has 'quick and dramatic' impact on church-state cases
Virginians react to evolution ruling
Judge's ID ruling fortifies separation of church, state
Fla. Governor Challenges Schiavo Ruling
Voucher ruling doesn't stop state money flowing to private schools
 

NEWER

pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER