| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"Tommy" |
| Date: |
31 Oct 2005 09:24:37 PM |
| Object: |
Some Lies Never Die. |
Film Review: 'Protocols of Zion: Some Lies Never Die'
Film; Posted on: 2005-10-31 18:58:56 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
Incredibly smug Jews dominate documentary meant to dispel the idea that Jews
dominate anything.
by Andy Sylvan
To my amazement, the new documentary, ?The Protocols of Zion: Some Lies
Never Die,? does far more to substantiate the allegations and claims of
so-called ?anti-Semites? than any anti-Semite ever could.
Munching on seven-dollar popcorn at Manhattan?s Angelika Theater with my
wife, I bore witness to a disturbing and fascinating exposé on Jewish
power. How the film made it to a public cinema, I still cannot imagine.
Directed by the ostensibly fair-minded Jew Marc Levin, the film attempts to
examine and dispel ?The Protocols? as an ugly myth, borne of Gentile
paranoia and jealousy. Historically, The Protocols allege to be a blueprint
for world domination, transcribed from a meeting of Jews in late nineteenth
century Russia. However, in systematically listing and discussing a handful
of the most notorious protocols, the film finds itself substantiating the
supposed ?lie that won?t die? rather than dispelling it (i.e. Jewish media
domination, Jewish involvement in pushing America into Iraq, and Israeli
foreknowledge of the World Trade Center attacks).
Levin assembles an all-star cast to dispute the Protocols, including Abraham
Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Rabbi Shmuley Boteach,
?Holocaust survivors," and various Likud Zionists. We are treated to an
intriguing assortment of revealing glances at Jewish Supremacists boasting
of their ?corrosive? presence in and contempt for gentile societies.
Perhaps you had trouble convincing your friend or cousin that the
neoconservatives were mostly Jews? This film shows American Jews candidly
acknowledging it.
Eventually, the film must retreat in its argument, having unintentionally
proven Jewish power and Jewish manipulation in media and foreign policy. It
ends pathetically by showcasing the life of a Jewish man who died in the
9/11 attacks. By logical inference, the film timidly attempts to say that
not all Jews are aware of a Jewish conspiracy for world domination, though
all signs point to the contrary. Levin over-extends, attempting to drive
home this point by obscuring facts with ?Holocaust? rhetoric. Yet it is so
transparent that the audience can really see how such techniques are
continually used to obscure real discourse and divert attention.
?The Protocols of Zion? is an amateurish documentary. It lacks a concise
narrative focus, meandering between both thoughtful and idiotic interviews
with African-Americans, Palestinians, White separatists, and Jews. It
leaves the audience uneasy about The Protocols as being a "lie." Instead,
it demonstrates a specific awareness of Jewish supremacism amongst many
diverse peoples.
In sum, the movie audience was exposed to new perspectives which, though
kept from the mainstream, have the weight of history behind them.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/
.
|
|
| User: "Jason James" |
|
| Title: Re: Some Lies Never Die. |
01 Nov 2005 10:24:26 AM |
|
|
"Tommy" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:2525202.qIWlgTu5qE@FreeBSD...
Film Review: 'Protocols of Zion: Some Lies Never Die'
Film; Posted on: 2005-10-31 18:58:56 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
Incredibly smug Jews dominate documentary meant to dispel the idea that
Jews
dominate anything.
by Andy Sylvan
To my amazement, the new documentary, ?The Protocols of Zion: Some Lies
Never Die,? does far more to substantiate the allegations and claims of
so-called ?anti-Semites? than any anti-Semite ever could.
Munching on seven-dollar popcorn at Manhattan?s Angelika Theater with my
wife, I bore witness to a disturbing and fascinating exposé on Jewish
power. How the film made it to a public cinema, I still cannot imagine.
Directed by the ostensibly fair-minded Jew Marc Levin, the film attempts
to
examine and dispel ?The Protocols? as an ugly myth, borne of Gentile
paranoia and jealousy. Historically, The Protocols allege to be a
blueprint
for world domination, transcribed from a meeting of Jews in late
nineteenth
century Russia. However, in systematically listing and discussing a
handful
of the most notorious protocols, the film finds itself substantiating the
supposed ?lie that won?t die? rather than dispelling it (i.e. Jewish media
domination, Jewish involvement in pushing America into Iraq, and Israeli
foreknowledge of the World Trade Center attacks).
Levin assembles an all-star cast to dispute the Protocols, including
Abraham
Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Rabbi Shmuley Boteach,
?Holocaust survivors," and various Likud Zionists. We are treated to an
intriguing assortment of revealing glances at Jewish Supremacists boasting
of their ?corrosive? presence in and contempt for gentile societies.
Perhaps you had trouble convincing your friend or cousin that the
neoconservatives were mostly Jews? This film shows American Jews candidly
acknowledging it.
Eventually, the film must retreat in its argument, having unintentionally
proven Jewish power and Jewish manipulation in media and foreign policy.
It
ends pathetically by showcasing the life of a Jewish man who died in the
9/11 attacks. By logical inference, the film timidly attempts to say that
not all Jews are aware of a Jewish conspiracy for world domination, though
all signs point to the contrary. Levin over-extends, attempting to drive
home this point by obscuring facts with ?Holocaust? rhetoric. Yet it is so
transparent that the audience can really see how such techniques are
continually used to obscure real discourse and divert attention.
?The Protocols of Zion? is an amateurish documentary. It lacks a concise
narrative focus, meandering between both thoughtful and idiotic interviews
with African-Americans, Palestinians, White separatists, and Jews. It
leaves the audience uneasy about The Protocols as being a "lie." Instead,
it demonstrates a specific awareness of Jewish supremacism amongst many
diverse peoples.
In sum, the movie audience was exposed to new perspectives which, though
kept from the mainstream, have the weight of history behind them.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/
How can any reasonable person, give any creedance, to an article from this
Hate site (above URL)..?
Just take a look at the 'Groups' header i.e
alt.non.racism,alt.revisionism,alt.conspiracy,alt.education,alt.flame.*****
s,alt.flame.jews
Say no more when 3 of the groups are blatently racist/hate.
Jason
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|