| Topic: |
Sociology > Education |
| User: |
"BradGuth" |
| Date: |
24 Jul 2007 09:49:36 AM |
| Object: |
The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
The traditional swarm mindset of our terrestrial limited faith-based
analogies of most everything under the sun is what I believe is
killing us and traumatising our environment past the point of no
return more than anything else. Why otherwise is there so much Old
Testament flak and their MIB damage-control gauntlet of such profound
naysayism to deal with?
Is it simply anti-Yiddish to openly think that Carl Sagan and Arthus
C. Clarke were actually more right than we'd thought possible?
It seems that faith of one sort or another is what got us into and
sustained most cold or hot wars, as well as this never-ending global
energy domination war and subsequent GW fiasco in the first place, and
it's this undertow of faith that's sucking the life out of us while
such has been puppeteering on behalf of sustaining each of their
status quo mindsets at all cost. Therefore, any possible revision of
the past, present or future simply isn't allowed, no matters what.
Their continual anti-ET, anti-antigravity and anti-FTL cultism are
simply another swarm like realms of a perverted mindset that's willing
to kill off even their own kind in order to keep those various Old
Testament lids on tight.
Earth's seasonal tilt and global warming has extensively to do with
the lithobraking arrival of our moon as of roughly 12,000 BP.
However, on the behalf of various lord/wizard/spook/mole/rusemaster
(aka official Usenet naysayers), I'll gladly share the following
review again and again, with as much honest love and affection as I
can muster in spite of the mainstream gauntlet of damage-control flak
that's sustaining their precious status quo.
Truth has always been in the swarm cultivated eye and subsequent
mindset of the beholder, as well as it's also why we've got to live
with their swarm mindset of our supposedly having walked on that
physically dark and unavoidably anticathode nasty moon of ours, while
all of that time Venus remained invisible as to any possible rad-hard
Kodak moment to boot.
Carl Sagan's constructive yaysayism was absolutely correct, in that
there's endless possibilities of complex and even intelligent other
life within the Universe. Unfortunately, the local realm of this
crazy but otherwise vast universe seems rather unusually taboo/
nondisclosure rated by even SETI, whereas the regular laws of physics
that pertain to our terrestrial existence seem not to apply to other
local planets or moons, especially if there's anything mainstream
faith-based taken into consideration.
Somehow, not even the honestly deductive interpretations on behalf of
any exploration obtained image, especially if it's derived from a
proper composite made of 36 radar looks or confirming exposures per
pixel, is simply not allowed no matters what those interpretations
have to offer, as not even the perfectly natural planetology of such a
geothermally active and thus newish planet such as Venus can be openly
shared, without such topics taking on the lethal gauntlet of all
that's faith-based and/or ulterior motivated past the point of no
return. It's as though whatever laws of physics, the best available
science of planetology and even biology that works on behalf of
interpreting our terrestrial existence simply can not be applied on
behalf of any other planet or moon (including our own moon that's
simply need-to-know or entirely off-limits to anything except their
NASA/Apollo holy grail). We can't even honestly contemplate utilizing
our moon's L1, much less the relocation of our moon to Earth's L1, or
forbid ever having anything to do with establishing POOF City at Venus
L2(VL2) as our first truly interplanetary depot/gateway.
It seems our one and only viable alternative is to accept the past,
present and future as having been interpreted and thus scripted by the
faith-based mindset or swarm like intelligence, that's clearly in
charge of our private parts as well as unwilling to look or even allow
of others to look outside their mainstream status quo box. This
leaves us with the one and only their global domination options of war
upon war until the last of whatever dissenting mindset has been
eliminated. Being that we'll all have to accept whatever the upper
most 0.1% of humanity has to say (or else), doesn't exactly leave all
that many of us off of their NO FLY list.
The ongoing swarm like manipulations of physics and science as having
been made or otherwise forced to suit their faith-based
interpretations of whatever evidence, is simply the exposed tip of
their badly polluted iceberg that's clearly melting rather nicely
before our typically dumbfounded eyes.
Those in charge of our mainstream media and especially of public
textbooks and science journals that are permitted to exist are also
those in charge of having established our past, present and future,
that no matters what has to reinforce upon all that came before.
Therefore, revisionism of any kind simply is not allowed, regardless
of the truths or replicated scientific evidence that gets presented.
Only of whatever allows the past to remain unchanged is permitted, and
even that much usually has to conform to the prevailing faith-based
mindset of those in charge.
In other words, Carl Sagan and Arthur Clarke would each have to agree
that it's far better to hide or exclude whatever truth(s) by way of
excluding evidence, and/or to essentially lie your butt off than to
otherwise rock thy mainstream status quo good ship LOLLIPOP,
especially if that ship has a Jewish captain.
How am I doing so far?
- Brad Guth
.
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
12 Sep 2007 07:58:43 AM |
|
|
What you say would be true if colonisation were to be done
on the surface. But how about underground with sealed doors
to trap air and other resources?
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189624320.558543.145480@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 11, 2:36 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I was also thinking about colonising Mars and Jupiter and Saturn.
Perhaps those planets may have greater fuel to burn.
Now that's seriously "science fiction" worthy, isn't it.
Obviously you're not even a good sf certified spook/mole, are you.
You do realize that any halfwit worthy sf theory is 100% based upon
those pesky regular laws of physics. Perhaps our eventually
accomplishing something on a given moon of Saturn or Jupiter is doable
if we only had rad-hard DNA to start off with, plus decades worth of
spare life to toss away at managing to survive such horrific to/from
commutes.
At least our moon's L1 has been a doable as a mostly robotic quest for
the past four decades, and of POOF City at VL2 affordably and even
biologically doable for the past decade.
Mars is nearly a lost cause unless you're looking for a good supply of
dry ice and of a planet that's belching mostly CO2, and/or perhaps at
best as having all of 1% of the accessible radioactive elements as
Earth, but otherwise hosting a thousand fold more cosmic plus rather
nasty loads of local secondary/recoil gamma and X-ray dosage for our
frail DNA to deal with. Mars is also of a nearly dead/inert
planetology that's damn near older than hell, or didn't you know
that?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
13 Sep 2007 01:42:48 PM |
|
|
On Sep 12, 5:58 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
What you say would be true if colonisation were to be done
on the surface. But how about underground with sealed doors
to trap air and other resources?
I 100+% agree.
Better yet, is them geoid/geode formulated planets or moons with those
pesky crust mascon issues shouldn't be all that uncommon, especially
of those as badly impacted as our once icy and now merely salty old
moon represents, and better yet of those having sufficient spin could
actually be greatly offering that of at least semi-hollow spheres,
within which our frail DNA might actually survive in spite of such
worlds having a humanly lethal surface environment. In other words,
even our low density moon (though hardly spinning) could be made
livable within such geode pockets as is.
The whole idea of my LSE-CM/ISS was for giving us a safe and energy
efficient alternative for the aspects of getting our fail DNA safely
to/from that nasty but likely semi-hollow moon of ours.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
13 Sep 2007 08:21:37 AM |
|
|
Such underground habitations could also be done on other planets
and large celestial bodies besides the moon. So the only obstacle
is human incompetence to end wars and concentrate resources
for one ultimate cause, Survival of the Species.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189708968.504893.307840@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 12, 5:58 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
What you say would be true if colonisation were to be done
on the surface. But how about underground with sealed doors
to trap air and other resources?
I 100+% agree.
Better yet, is them geoid/geode formulated planets or moons with those
pesky crust mascon issues shouldn't be all that uncommon, especially
of those as badly impacted as our once icy and now merely salty old
moon represents, and better yet of those having sufficient spin could
actually be greatly offering that of at least semi-hollow spheres,
within which our frail DNA might actually survive in spite of such
worlds having a humanly lethal surface environment. In other words,
even our low density moon (though hardly spinning) could be made
livable within such geode pockets as is.
The whole idea of my LSE-CM/ISS was for giving us a safe and energy
efficient alternative for the aspects of getting our fail DNA safely
to/from that nasty but likely semi-hollow moon of ours.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
14 Sep 2007 06:34:29 PM |
|
|
On Sep 13, 6:21 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Such underground habitations could also be done on other planets
and large celestial bodies besides the moon. So the only obstacle
is human incompetence to end wars and concentrate resources
for one ultimate cause, Survival of the Species.
Certain faith-basted groups and/or of their silly mindset minions of
brown-nosed clowns clearly do not give an honest hockypuck about our
environment or of its humanity, not even of their own kind as long as
their butt gets all the best of benefits on behalf of surviving no
matters what, whereas other born-again types are clearly operating
under a swarm like mindset which has not a stitch of remorse holding
then back.
So, not much chance of our getting a fresh grip on this fiasco unless
WWIII manages to exterminate most of those responsible, and the odds
of that ever happening are not looking good.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
14 Sep 2007 09:35:57 AM |
|
|
I think your wish could be granted without a WWIII.
Have you heard about the new Russian
Father of all bombs?
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189812869.642772.163150@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 13, 6:21 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Such underground habitations could also be done on other planets
and large celestial bodies besides the moon. So the only obstacle
is human incompetence to end wars and concentrate resources
for one ultimate cause, Survival of the Species.
Certain faith-basted groups and/or of their silly mindset minions of
brown-nosed clowns clearly do not give an honest hockypuck about our
environment or of its humanity, not even of their own kind as long as
their butt gets all the best of benefits on behalf of surviving no
matters what, whereas other born-again types are clearly operating
under a swarm like mindset which has not a stitch of remorse holding
then back.
So, not much chance of our getting a fresh grip on this fiasco unless
WWIII manages to exterminate most of those responsible, and the odds
of that ever happening are not looking good.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
15 Sep 2007 09:19:02 AM |
|
|
On Sep 14, 7:35 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I think your wish could be granted without a WWIII.
Have you heard about the new Russian
Father of all bombs?
No I haven't. Is it another really good Jewish engineered bomb?
I don't think in terms of "bombs", but I know of many Jews or Zion
Yids that do, as well as for their thinking in terms of using their
VX.
What part of our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) did you and others
of yor kind play?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
15 Sep 2007 12:01:00 AM |
|
|
The Russian Father of All Bombs is four times more
powerful than the American Mother of All Bombs.
Don't know whether the yids got anything to do with it.
However if Russia sells these bombs to say Syria,
Lebanon or Iran, then the war in the middle east would
be altered onto another course.
I don't know if there are others of my kind. As far as the
perpetrated war are concerned I played the devil's advocate
only.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/wbomb112.xml
------------------------------------------
Russian army 'tests the father of all bombs'
By Adrian Blomfield in Moscow
Last Updated: 2:30am BST 13/09/2007
Russia has delivered a belligerent message of defiance to the West after army generals claimed to
have tested "the father of all bombs".
# Putin quick to pick Russian prime minister
# Peter Foster blog: Bombs and bombast
Developed in secret, the unchristened bomb, a vacuum device capable of emitting shockwaves as
powerful as a nuclear weapon, was unveiled with great theatre on state television's main evening
broadcast.
A mushroom cloud, Russian army 'tests the father of all bombs'
A mushroom cloud rises over a plain as Russia's military test their latest weapon
Boasting that the weapon had "no match in the world," ORT First Channel television showed a Tupolev
Tu-160 strategic bomber dropping its payload over a testing ground, followed by a massive explosion.
Pictures of what appeared to be crumpled multi-storey apartment blocks were also broadcast.
Although there was no independent verification of the Russian military's claim, the test is likely
to cause further consternation in the West after a series of bellicose statements by the president,
Vladimir Putin.
According to Russian generals, the bomb is four times more powerful than the American Massive
Ordnance Air Blast Bomb or MOAB.
Better known as the Mother of All Bombs, the MOAB is a descendent of the BLU-82 Daisy cutter used in
Tora Bora during the war against the Taliban in 2001.
Although it has never been used, the US military says the MOAB is capable of destroying nine city
blocks in one strike.
According to Gen Alexander Rushkin, the Russian deputy chief of staff, the new bomb is smaller than
the MOAB but much deadlier because, due to nanotechnology, the temperature at the epicentre of the
blast is twice as high.
"Test results of the new airborne weapon have shown that its efficiency and power is commensurate
with a nuclear weapon," he said.
"The main destruction is inflicted by an ultrasonic shockwave and an incredibly high temperature,"
ORT added.
"All that is alive merely evaporates."
Despite its destructive qualities, the bomb is environmentally friendly, Gen Rushkin said.
The test comes after weeks of increasingly belligerent rhetoric from the Kremlin.
Mr Putin has ordered his long-range nuclear bombers to mount patrols in international airspace for
the first time since the Cold War.
Last week, Russian Tupolev bombers approached British airspace for the fourth time in two months and
sorties have also been flown close to US military installations.
Since Mr Putin, an ex-KGB officer, came to power, Russia's annual defence spending has been
quadrupled.
In addition, the Kremlin has announced a £100 billion military modernisation programme.
The new bomb is further proof that Russia's military has regained its technological edge. New ground
and sea launched nuclear missiles have also been developed.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189865942.062842.281760@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 14, 7:35 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I think your wish could be granted without a WWIII.
Have you heard about the new Russian
Father of all bombs?
No I haven't. Is it another really good Jewish engineered bomb?
I don't think in terms of "bombs", but I know of many Jews or Zion
Yids that do, as well as for their thinking in terms of using their
VX.
What part of our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) did you and others
of yor kind play?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
15 Sep 2007 04:13:16 PM |
|
|
On Sep 14, 10:01 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Russian Father of All Bombs is four times more
powerful than the American Mother of All Bombs.
Don't know whether the yids got anything to do with it.
However if Russia sells these bombs to say Syria,
Lebanon or Iran, then the war in the middle east would
be altered onto another course.
I don't know if there are others of my kind. As far as the
perpetrated war are concerned I played the devil's advocate
only.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/wbomb...
Then perhaps we ott to start being a whole lot nicer to them Russians,
as well as to anyone else that's on their side of most any given rant.
What's the "devil's advocate" doing for humanity and otherwise on
behalf of salvaging our badly failing environment, as of lately?
BTW, trust me, there are thousands of your kind within very powerful
positions, and usually with lots of those spendy and lethal strings to
pull or buttons to push, whereas I have to make due with a small
battery of lose cannons that seldom hit their intended target.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
18 Sep 2007 10:18:07 PM |
|
|
Have you heard some latest news about waking up in the morning?
Medically speaking now they say that it is unhealthy for someone
to force oneself to get out of bed in the morning as such an act
would first induce the brain to release some chemicals that is needed
to force alertness and that would cause the heart to beat faster and
thus increase the risk for medical complications.
Since waking up in the morning is unhealthy the devil's advocate
is retired for the moment to recuperate for the next round.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189890796.424358.146960@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 14, 10:01 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Russian Father of All Bombs is four times more
powerful than the American Mother of All Bombs.
Don't know whether the yids got anything to do with it.
However if Russia sells these bombs to say Syria,
Lebanon or Iran, then the war in the middle east would
be altered onto another course.
I don't know if there are others of my kind. As far as the
perpetrated war are concerned I played the devil's advocate
only.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/wbomb...
Then perhaps we ott to start being a whole lot nicer to them Russians,
as well as to anyone else that's on their side of most any given rant.
What's the "devil's advocate" doing for humanity and otherwise on
behalf of salvaging our badly failing environment, as of lately?
BTW, trust me, there are thousands of your kind within very powerful
positions, and usually with lots of those spendy and lethal strings to
pull or buttons to push, whereas I have to make due with a small
battery of lose cannons that seldom hit their intended target.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
06 Sep 2007 12:42:53 AM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 10:04 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Probably they fear an uncontested christian superiority
in world, for the people of the kind of bush would not
hesitate to take revenge on jesus' behalf and slaughter
zionists and jews.
Too bad for so much of Earth, as there's not a chance in hell of our
resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) as another Jewish puppet doing
anything against those Zionist OT commands. And I bet you thought the
DNA of Hitler was dead and gone. (think again)
In order to replace Bush, you have to become a viable puppet, that is
unless you don't mind receiving the same termination as JFK got.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
06 Sep 2007 12:05:37 PM |
|
|
How about the DNA of jesus?
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189057373.669885.133790@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 10:04 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Probably they fear an uncontested christian superiority
in world, for the people of the kind of bush would not
hesitate to take revenge on jesus' behalf and slaughter
zionists and jews.
Too bad for so much of Earth, as there's not a chance in hell of our
resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) as another Jewish puppet doing
anything against those Zionist OT commands. And I bet you thought the
DNA of Hitler was dead and gone. (think again)
In order to replace Bush, you have to become a viable puppet, that is
unless you don't mind receiving the same termination as JFK got.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
07 Sep 2007 12:17:55 AM |
|
|
On Sep 6, 10:05 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
How about the DNA of jesus?
Most likely a species of Kathar/Cathar, not of this world.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
07 Sep 2007 08:18:55 AM |
|
|
Would you think that Jesus will join forces with hitler?
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189142275.362490.186360@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 6, 10:05 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
How about the DNA of jesus?
Most likely a species of Kathar/Cathar, not of this world.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
07 Sep 2007 08:08:21 PM |
|
|
On Sep 7, 6:18 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Would you think that Jesus will join forces with hitler?
Jesus wasn't all that much of a team player to begin with, and that's
pretty much why he got put on that stick by his own kind. Hitler was
just another Jewish puppet, much the same as GW Bush.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
07 Sep 2007 10:50:31 PM |
|
|
So could Zionists be controlled and puppetted?
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189213701.274856.22800@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 7, 6:18 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Would you think that Jesus will join forces with hitler?
Jesus wasn't all that much of a team player to begin with, and that's
pretty much why he got put on that stick by his own kind. Hitler was
just another Jewish puppet, much the same as GW Bush.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
08 Sep 2007 07:26:02 AM |
|
|
On Sep 7, 8:50 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So could Zionists be controlled and puppetted?
Not likely, unless you've got God like powers. Remember, they have no
problems or subsequent remorse with putting their own kind on a stick.
Some genetic mutations are simply past the point of no return.
If history can not be revised in order to share the whole truth and
nothing but the truth, then there's no possible way of correcting a
bad situation that's only going to get a whole lot worse before it
gets better.
Speak to most any Yid, and essentially they want total domination of
Earth, with no exceptions whatsoever. We used to call that as being
very Hitler. What do you think those Zion Yids are calling it?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
08 Sep 2007 08:23:26 AM |
|
|
If that is the case then it is also likely that nature via evolution
also create the anti-Zionist mutants. Don't you think it is about
time for that ?
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189254362.586446.150480@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 7, 8:50 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So could Zionists be controlled and puppetted?
Not likely, unless you've got God like powers. Remember, they have no
problems or subsequent remorse with putting their own kind on a stick.
Some genetic mutations are simply past the point of no return.
If history can not be revised in order to share the whole truth and
nothing but the truth, then there's no possible way of correcting a
bad situation that's only going to get a whole lot worse before it
gets better.
Speak to most any Yid, and essentially they want total domination of
Earth, with no exceptions whatsoever. We used to call that as being
very Hitler. What do you think those Zion Yids are calling it?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
08 Sep 2007 10:56:01 PM |
|
|
On Sep 8, 6:23 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
If that is the case then it is also likely that nature via evolution
also create the anti-Zionist mutants. Don't you think it is about
time for that ?
I think it's too late. Like the borg, many of us have been
assimilated and/or forced into accepting the Yiddish interpretation of
just about everything. Becoming a rich and powerful Jew seems a whole
lot more doable than getting entirely rid of their swarm like
infestation.
Perhaps if history ever since the great flood(s) gets revised, and if
we're ever allowed to know the many truths about our cosmic evolution,
our moon and Venus, it'll become too much for those of us having been
terrestrial faith-based past the point of no return to cope with. In
other words, it might get really downright ugly before it becomes
WWIII.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
08 Sep 2007 08:06:35 PM |
|
|
No matter what achievements humanity had gained
I don't think humanity had crossed the point of no return
when given the excessiveignorance of humanity.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189310161.127803.124350@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 8, 6:23 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
If that is the case then it is also likely that nature via evolution
also create the anti-Zionist mutants. Don't you think it is about
time for that ?
I think it's too late. Like the borg, many of us have been
assimilated and/or forced into accepting the Yiddish interpretation of
just about everything. Becoming a rich and powerful Jew seems a whole
lot more doable than getting entirely rid of their swarm like
infestation.
Perhaps if history ever since the great flood(s) gets revised, and if
we're ever allowed to know the many truths about our cosmic evolution,
our moon and Venus, it'll become too much for those of us having been
terrestrial faith-based past the point of no return to cope with. In
other words, it might get really downright ugly before it becomes
WWIII.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
09 Sep 2007 12:25:40 PM |
|
|
On Sep 8, 6:06 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
No matter what achievements humanity had gained
I don't think humanity had crossed the point of no return
when given the excessiveignorance of humanity.
Either that one didn't come out right, or I'm not smart enough to
understand whatever is meant by that short statement of yours. Which
side are you on?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
09 Sep 2007 02:33:11 PM |
|
|
Well humanity is on the path of destruction and
the current achievements are not adequate enough
to safe humanity.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189358740.366188.152790@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 8, 6:06 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
No matter what achievements humanity had gained
I don't think humanity had crossed the point of no return
when given the excessiveignorance of humanity.
Either that one didn't come out right, or I'm not smart enough to
understand whatever is meant by that short statement of yours. Which
side are you on?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
10 Sep 2007 03:10:38 PM |
|
|
On Sep 9, 12:33 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well humanity is on the path of destruction and
the current achievements are not adequate enough
to safe humanity.
I can't argure against that analogy.
What do you think about relocating the orbit of our salty old moon out
to Earth's L1 ?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
10 Sep 2007 01:55:12 PM |
|
|
The moon is a very important factor in earth's evolution.
Removing it might change everything. However the moon
could be colonised.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189455038.217152.21120@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 9, 12:33 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well humanity is on the path of destruction and
the current achievements are not adequate enough
to safe humanity.
I can't argure against that analogy.
What do you think about relocating the orbit of our salty old moon out
to Earth's L1 ?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
11 Sep 2007 03:14:46 PM |
|
|
On Sep 10, 11:55 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The moon is a very important factor in earth's evolution.
Removing it might change everything. However the moon
could be colonised.
The reorbit of that moon into Earth's L1 is not getting rid of it.
Not by any long shot. We'd still have roughly half the surface tidal
factors and perhaps as littile as 1/16 of those internal and/or
subsequent global warming interactions to deal with. There'd still be
a sun -3% to enjoy, and of much less gamma and X-ray dosage for our
frail DNA to deal with.
It's simply a win-win-win for the old human DNA and environment
gipper, that which could rather badly use a little spot of shade.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
11 Sep 2007 04:33:42 PM |
|
|
Any how do you suggest this be done?
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189541686.495569.149550@b32g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 10, 11:55 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The moon is a very important factor in earth's evolution.
Removing it might change everything. However the moon
could be colonised.
The reorbit of that moon into Earth's L1 is not getting rid of it.
Not by any long shot. We'd still have roughly half the surface tidal
factors and perhaps as littile as 1/16 of those internal and/or
subsequent global warming interactions to deal with. There'd still be
a sun -3% to enjoy, and of much less gamma and X-ray dosage for our
frail DNA to deal with.
It's simply a win-win-win for the old human DNA and environment
gipper, that which could rather badly use a little spot of shade.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
12 Sep 2007 02:25:01 PM |
|
|
On Sep 11, 2:33 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Any how do you suggest this be done?
It's rather complicated, and you don't actually seem the least bit
serious. Am I wrong?
Besides, I've posted this matter of the why and how to accomplish the
daunting task of the relocation of our moon to Earth's L1 dozens of
times. Besides onboard that good ship LOLLIPOP, where have you been?
Do you even know of or care as to what my LSE-CM/ISS is all about? (I
don't think so)
How about "Clarke Station"? (have you got so much as a clue?)
Do you have access to a good supercomputer and of its 3D interactive
orbital simulator?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
12 Sep 2007 07:57:00 AM |
|
|
That's because the move of the moon might cause
unprecedented damage to earth.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189625101.296631.190160@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 11, 2:33 pm, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
How do you suggest this be done?
It's rather complicated, and you don't actually seem the least bit
serious. Am I wrong?
Besides, I've posted this matter of the why and how to accomplish the
daunting task of the relocation of our moon to Earth's L1 dozens of
times. Besides onboard that good ship LOLLIPOP, where have you been?
Do you even know of or care as to what my LSE-CM/ISS is all about? (I
don't think so)
How about "Clarke Station"? (have you got so much as a clue?)
Do you have access to a good supercomputer and of its 3D interactive
orbital simulator?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
13 Sep 2007 01:47:34 PM |
|
|
On Sep 12, 5:57 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
That's because the move of the moon might cause
unprecedented damage to earth.
If you mean that putting an end to global warming, along with a little
badly needed shade to burn (sort of speak), and perhaps even stalling
off the demise of our badly failing magnetosphere is doing
"unprecedented damage to earth", as for that one you'll need to be a
wee bit more specific.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "LKYs Mother" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
13 Sep 2007 08:18:12 AM |
|
|
If earth's health is of importance then one should realise that
humans are the greatest cancer that is killing earth. So to save
earth one should remove humans and not the moon.
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189709254.129435.137730@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 12, 5:57 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
That's because the move of the moon might cause
unprecedented damage to earth.
If you mean that putting an end to global warming, along with a little
badly needed shade to burn (sort of speak), and perhaps even stalling
off the demise of our badly failing magnetosphere is doing
"unprecedented damage to earth", as for that one you'll need to be a
wee bit more specific.
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Good Ship LOLLIPOP and Carl Sagan / Arthur Clarke / Brad Guth |
15 Sep 2007 09:28:12 AM |
|
|
On Sep 13, 6:18 am, "LKYs Mother" <LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
If earth's health is of importance then one should realise that
humans are the greatest cancer that is killing earth. So to save
earth one should remove humans and not the moon.
That's not fair, because I've always stipulated that the one species
that Earth could manage a whole lot better off without is the human
species, as we're takers and not givers, as well as not even all that
intelligent, if not more totally dumbfounded past the point of no
return than not.
However, the relocation of that pesky moon to Earth's L1 is a positive
and thus fully constructive win-win for the old gippers of mother
Earth and humanity. Only a damn pagan fool on the hill, such as
yourself, can't see the greater good in much of anything, so what's
the difference?
- Brad Guth -
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
