The "Money Power" Behind Edwards



 Sociology > Education > The "Money Power" Behind Edwards

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Sociology > Education
User: "Dana"
Date: 11 Jul 2004 11:36:24 AM
Object: The "Money Power" Behind Edwards
http://www.bushcountry.org/news/jul_news_pages/g_070904_kincaid_money_power_edwards.htm
The "Money Power" Behind Edwards
Cliff Kincaid
Why would John Kerry pick John Edwards as a running mate when Edwards is not
likely to even bring his state of North Carolina into the Democratic column
this fall? It has nothing to do with him being "commanding, charismatic and
charming," as reporters said the morning of the pick. The same media that
harp on Vice President ***** Cheney's ties to Halliburton and Big Business
suddenly became silent on Senator Edwards' links to the profitable
pro-litigation lobby of rich trial lawyers. The American Tort Reform
Association (ATRA) has called them the "Learjet lawyers" because they have
made hundreds of millions of dollars exploiting the civil justice system.
The Edwards pick is an opportunity for the media to demonstrate some
fairness, balance, and solid journalism. It's a certain fact that Kerry and
Edwards will campaign on the rising cost of health care, a real problem in
America today. But will the media document how the activities of Edwards and
his trial lawyer friends are a key factor behind those rising costs?
It's also true that Kerry and Edwards will campaign on the theme of keeping
manufacturing jobs in America. So will the media explain how litigious trial
lawyers have bankrupted good companies such as Owens Corning through
litigation, costing jobs and devaluing workers' pensions?
As Edwards talks about "the two Americas," will the media point out that
multimillionaires Edwards and Kerry are far removed from the concerns of
ordinary Americans?
While national reporters acknowledged the elementary fact that Edwards made
millions of dollars as a trial attorney, and has a personal fortune
approaching $50 million, they did not explore how the lawyers lobby had been
pouring money into the Kerry campaign to buy the vice presidential slot for
Edwards. But Rob Christensen of the Raleigh (North Carolina) News & Observer
reported, "Since withdrawing from the presidential race, Edwards has
redirected his financial pipeline-much of it from plaintiffs attorneys-to
Kerry. By some estimates, Edwards' donors have funneled $7 million into
Kerry's coffers. Edwards' chief fund-raiser, Fred Baron, a Dallas trial
lawyer, is working full time to raise money for Kerry."
Groups such as ATRA and websites such as www.overlawyered.com had seen the
Edwards' pick coming, based on how Edwards' backers had switched to Kerry.
Fred Baron had left the Edwards campaign to co-chair the Kerry Victory '04
committee. Specialized publications such as Legal Times had noted the
changeover. Lily Henning of Legal Times reported on June 18, "Shortly after
Edwards dropped out of the race in March, his fund-raisers gathered in
Washington and were addressed by both Kerry and Edwards, who encouraged them
to give to Kerry's campaign."
Walter Olson of the Manhattan Institute has written extensively on "the
money power" behind Edwards and his questionable fundraising practices. He
cites a story by Sam Dealey of The Hill newspaper in Washington. Dealey
analyzed the contributions and found that money came from low-level law firm
employees with "limited financial resources and no prior record of political
donations," and that the checks arrived at the Edwards campaign on the same
day. Clearly, the contributions were coordinated, and employees were asked
or pressured to contribute.
While the lawyers have been making huge amounts of money and spending it on
political power, doctors and hospitals have been losing it, forcing a crisis
in the medical profession that threatens access to the health care system by
ordinary Americans. Medical liability insurance premiums have reached
$200,000 a year in some specialties because of excessive court judgments
generated by suits filed by Edwards and his trial-lawyer allies.
In Maryland, the state's largest malpractice insurance company announced its
intention to raise doctors' premiums by 41 percent, on top of last year's 28
percent hike. Maryland doctors, especially obstetricians and gynecologists,
are already quitting or leaving the state. Medical liability insurance costs
are also rising for hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living programs,
adult day-care operators and nurses.
It's one thing to defend somebody against a negligent doctor or hospital.
But Marc Morano of CNS News has reported that Edwards made a lot of money
off cerebral palsy cases using "junk science," when scientific studies show
that cerebral palsy isn't caused by botched deliveries. Morano confronted
Edwards about this during the campaign. He reported, "Edwards did not say a
word, despite two more attempts to elicit a response. His aides intervened
and moved the senator along."
--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the state
at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.
.

User: "Chris the Liberal"

Title: Re: The "Money Power" Behind Edwards 12 Jul 2004 12:02:26 AM
"Dana" <#$%@%$#.com> wrote in message news:<605598578daecd157cbfda139eefc9d6@news.meganetnews.com>...

http://www.bushcountry.org/news/jul_news_pages/g_070904_kincaid_money_power_edwards.htm
The "Money Power" Behind Edwards
Cliff Kincaid

Why would John Kerry pick John Edwards as a running mate when Edwards is not
likely to even bring his state of North Carolina into the Democratic column
this fall? It has nothing to do with him being "commanding, charismatic and
charming," as reporters said the morning of the pick. The same media that
harp on Vice President ***** Cheney's ties to Halliburton and Big Business
suddenly became silent on Senator Edwards' links to the profitable
pro-litigation lobby of rich trial lawyers. The American Tort Reform
Association (ATRA) has called them the "Learjet lawyers" because they have
made hundreds of millions of dollars exploiting the civil justice system.

Of course Dana is pissed whenever a corporation is required to pay for
its mistakes.
He's certainly no right-to-life member for he would have let the little
girl die who had her guts literally sucked out by a faulty swimming pool
drain and will have to live on intravenous nutrition the rest of her life.
Sure, let the kid die, Dana says.
Edwards proved the company that made it KNEW the drain was faulty,
that less severe injuries had been reported to the company and they did
nothing to fix the product -- and then LIED about it under oath in court
until Edwards produced the documents.
Edwards won enough from the company to provide the medical care to
keep the little girl alive. Dana would of course have preferred they
let the kid die for then the company would not have had to pay nearly
as much as they will to keep her alive.
I guess that is a sample of "compassionave conservatism".
.

User: "Jim Wilson"

Title: Re: The "Money Power" Behind Edwards 11 Jul 2004 12:26:35 PM
The chance of seeing a story like this in the mainstream press is absolutely
zilch.
"Dana" <#$%@%$#.com> wrote in message
news:605598578daecd157cbfda139eefc9d6@news.meganetnews.com...


http://www.bushcountry.org/news/jul_news_pages/g_070904_kincaid_money_power_
edwards.htm

The "Money Power" Behind Edwards
Cliff Kincaid

Why would John Kerry pick John Edwards as a running mate when Edwards is

not

likely to even bring his state of North Carolina into the Democratic

column

this fall? It has nothing to do with him being "commanding, charismatic

and

charming," as reporters said the morning of the pick. The same media that
harp on Vice President ***** Cheney's ties to Halliburton and Big Business
suddenly became silent on Senator Edwards' links to the profitable
pro-litigation lobby of rich trial lawyers. The American Tort Reform
Association (ATRA) has called them the "Learjet lawyers" because they have
made hundreds of millions of dollars exploiting the civil justice system.

The Edwards pick is an opportunity for the media to demonstrate some
fairness, balance, and solid journalism. It's a certain fact that Kerry

and

Edwards will campaign on the rising cost of health care, a real problem in
America today. But will the media document how the activities of Edwards

and

his trial lawyer friends are a key factor behind those rising costs?

It's also true that Kerry and Edwards will campaign on the theme of

keeping

manufacturing jobs in America. So will the media explain how litigious

trial

lawyers have bankrupted good companies such as Owens Corning through
litigation, costing jobs and devaluing workers' pensions?
As Edwards talks about "the two Americas," will the media point out that
multimillionaires Edwards and Kerry are far removed from the concerns of
ordinary Americans?

While national reporters acknowledged the elementary fact that Edwards

made

millions of dollars as a trial attorney, and has a personal fortune
approaching $50 million, they did not explore how the lawyers lobby had

been

pouring money into the Kerry campaign to buy the vice presidential slot

for

Edwards. But Rob Christensen of the Raleigh (North Carolina) News &

Observer

reported, "Since withdrawing from the presidential race, Edwards has
redirected his financial pipeline-much of it from plaintiffs attorneys-to
Kerry. By some estimates, Edwards' donors have funneled $7 million into
Kerry's coffers. Edwards' chief fund-raiser, Fred Baron, a Dallas trial
lawyer, is working full time to raise money for Kerry."

Groups such as ATRA and websites such as www.overlawyered.com had seen the
Edwards' pick coming, based on how Edwards' backers had switched to Kerry.
Fred Baron had left the Edwards campaign to co-chair the Kerry Victory '04
committee. Specialized publications such as Legal Times had noted the
changeover. Lily Henning of Legal Times reported on June 18, "Shortly

after

Edwards dropped out of the race in March, his fund-raisers gathered in
Washington and were addressed by both Kerry and Edwards, who encouraged

them

to give to Kerry's campaign."

Walter Olson of the Manhattan Institute has written extensively on "the
money power" behind Edwards and his questionable fundraising practices. He
cites a story by Sam Dealey of The Hill newspaper in Washington. Dealey
analyzed the contributions and found that money came from low-level law

firm

employees with "limited financial resources and no prior record of

political

donations," and that the checks arrived at the Edwards campaign on the

same

day. Clearly, the contributions were coordinated, and employees were asked
or pressured to contribute.

While the lawyers have been making huge amounts of money and spending it

on

political power, doctors and hospitals have been losing it, forcing a

crisis

in the medical profession that threatens access to the health care system

by

ordinary Americans. Medical liability insurance premiums have reached
$200,000 a year in some specialties because of excessive court judgments
generated by suits filed by Edwards and his trial-lawyer allies.

In Maryland, the state's largest malpractice insurance company announced

its

intention to raise doctors' premiums by 41 percent, on top of last year's

28

percent hike. Maryland doctors, especially obstetricians and

gynecologists,

are already quitting or leaving the state. Medical liability insurance

costs

are also rising for hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living programs,
adult day-care operators and nurses.

It's one thing to defend somebody against a negligent doctor or hospital.
But Marc Morano of CNS News has reported that Edwards made a lot of money
off cerebral palsy cases using "junk science," when scientific studies

show

that cerebral palsy isn't caused by botched deliveries. Morano confronted
Edwards about this during the campaign. He reported, "Edwards did not say

a

word, despite two more attempts to elicit a response. His aides intervened
and moved the senator along."



--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the

state

at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.


.
User: "Roger"

Title: Re: The "Money Power" Behind Edwards 11 Jul 2004 07:47:56 PM
"Jim Wilson" <cirrus@citlink.net> wrote in message
news:fLeIc.476$c87.70@news02.roc.ny...

The chance of seeing a story like this in the mainstream press is

absolutely

zilch.

Of course not. It is one sided and quotes right-wing propaganda groups as if
they are news sources.



"Dana" <#$%@%$#.com> wrote in message
news:605598578daecd157cbfda139eefc9d6@news.meganetnews.com...



http://www.bushcountry.org/news/jul_news_pages/g_070904_kincaid_money_power_

edwards.htm

The "Money Power" Behind Edwards
Cliff Kincaid

Why would John Kerry pick John Edwards as a running mate when Edwards is

not

likely to even bring his state of North Carolina into the Democratic

column

this fall? It has nothing to do with him being "commanding, charismatic

and

charming," as reporters said the morning of the pick. The same media

that

harp on Vice President ***** Cheney's ties to Halliburton and Big

Business

suddenly became silent on Senator Edwards' links to the profitable
pro-litigation lobby of rich trial lawyers. The American Tort Reform
Association (ATRA) has called them the "Learjet lawyers" because they

have

made hundreds of millions of dollars exploiting the civil justice

system.


The Edwards pick is an opportunity for the media to demonstrate some
fairness, balance, and solid journalism. It's a certain fact that Kerry

and

Edwards will campaign on the rising cost of health care, a real problem

in

America today. But will the media document how the activities of Edwards

and

his trial lawyer friends are a key factor behind those rising costs?

It's also true that Kerry and Edwards will campaign on the theme of

keeping

manufacturing jobs in America. So will the media explain how litigious

trial

lawyers have bankrupted good companies such as Owens Corning through
litigation, costing jobs and devaluing workers' pensions?
As Edwards talks about "the two Americas," will the media point out that
multimillionaires Edwards and Kerry are far removed from the concerns of
ordinary Americans?

While national reporters acknowledged the elementary fact that Edwards

made

millions of dollars as a trial attorney, and has a personal fortune
approaching $50 million, they did not explore how the lawyers lobby had

been

pouring money into the Kerry campaign to buy the vice presidential slot

for

Edwards. But Rob Christensen of the Raleigh (North Carolina) News &

Observer

reported, "Since withdrawing from the presidential race, Edwards has
redirected his financial pipeline-much of it from plaintiffs

attorneys-to

Kerry. By some estimates, Edwards' donors have funneled $7 million into
Kerry's coffers. Edwards' chief fund-raiser, Fred Baron, a Dallas trial
lawyer, is working full time to raise money for Kerry."

Groups such as ATRA and websites such as www.overlawyered.com had seen

the

Edwards' pick coming, based on how Edwards' backers had switched to

Kerry.

Fred Baron had left the Edwards campaign to co-chair the Kerry Victory

'04

committee. Specialized publications such as Legal Times had noted the
changeover. Lily Henning of Legal Times reported on June 18, "Shortly

after

Edwards dropped out of the race in March, his fund-raisers gathered in
Washington and were addressed by both Kerry and Edwards, who encouraged

them

to give to Kerry's campaign."

Walter Olson of the Manhattan Institute has written extensively on "the
money power" behind Edwards and his questionable fundraising practices.

He

cites a story by Sam Dealey of The Hill newspaper in Washington. Dealey
analyzed the contributions and found that money came from low-level law

firm

employees with "limited financial resources and no prior record of

political

donations," and that the checks arrived at the Edwards campaign on the

same

day. Clearly, the contributions were coordinated, and employees were

asked

or pressured to contribute.

While the lawyers have been making huge amounts of money and spending it

on

political power, doctors and hospitals have been losing it, forcing a

crisis

in the medical profession that threatens access to the health care

system

by

ordinary Americans. Medical liability insurance premiums have reached
$200,000 a year in some specialties because of excessive court judgments
generated by suits filed by Edwards and his trial-lawyer allies.

In Maryland, the state's largest malpractice insurance company announced

its

intention to raise doctors' premiums by 41 percent, on top of last

year's

28

percent hike. Maryland doctors, especially obstetricians and

gynecologists,

are already quitting or leaving the state. Medical liability insurance

costs

are also rising for hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living programs,
adult day-care operators and nurses.

It's one thing to defend somebody against a negligent doctor or

hospital.

But Marc Morano of CNS News has reported that Edwards made a lot of

money

off cerebral palsy cases using "junk science," when scientific studies

show

that cerebral palsy isn't caused by botched deliveries. Morano

confronted

Edwards about this during the campaign. He reported, "Edwards did not

say

a

word, despite two more attempts to elicit a response. His aides

intervened

and moved the senator along."



--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the

state

at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.




.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER