The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence



 Sociology > Education > The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Sociology > Education
User: ""
Date: 22 Nov 2005 11:22:19 AM
Object: The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/expanding_universe.html
[excerpt]
Expanding Universe
By Frederick Clarkson
The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence
Click on a celestial body to visit the web site of that organization.
**************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.

User: ""

Title: Re: The Religious Right's Orbits of Influence; Orbits diagram fails 10th Amendment teste 23 Nov 2005 01:14:22 PM
"fred" <clarma1@gmail.com> wrote:

:|alt.education removed.
:|
:|buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
:|> http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/expanding_universe.html
:|> [excerpt]
:|
:|As far as I can tell,

is totally irrelevant

:|the Right's Orbit's diagram fails the 10th
:|Amendment test.

No such test exists
**************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Rights Belong to Individuals
RIGHTS UNALIENABLE---BECAUSE GOD-GIVEN
to believe in justice requires that one believe in the inalienable rights of the individual
Bravo to David Horowitz for fighting back - Academic Bill of Rights would prevent Liberals from using a political litmus test for hiring or tinier
Natural Rights and Natural Law
In the state of nature, every man is under God, Judge and sole Judge, of his own rights
Re: Americans: The Time For Action Is Now! Protect the Bill of Rights!
Some Black Ministers Decry Gays' Comparison to Civil Rights Movement
"Hate Crimes" Law Undermines Protection of Rights
This Gay Marriage. Civil Rights. Thing
President signs rights for unborn victims
Liberalism vs. Individual Rights
State's Rights - What happened to them?
People's rights don't come from the Constitution
How Jews violated "Human rights"
 

NEWER

pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER