Time to dump the SATs?



 Sociology > Education > Time to dump the SATs?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Sociology > Education
User: "LeMod Pol"
Date: 24 Aug 2004 01:57:54 PM
Object: Time to dump the SATs?
Some years ago, former University of California
President Richard Atkinson called for dumping the SAT.
He wanted to replace it with tests that try to measure
achievement in specific subjects, rather than overall
aptitude. The testocrats shot him down, but it's still
a good idea and much better than a one-size-fits-all
test that doesn't live up to its promise.
Time to dump the SATs?
by Joe Rodriguez
They're trying to reform the SAT again, which is like
trying to turn a pit bull into a toy poodle. What they
ought to do is euthanize this mutt.
This time they've added a writing section to the
Scholastic Aptitude Test. That's because educators have
been saying that writing is critical for success in
college. Actually, university professors have been
saying this for centuries. You have to wonder why the
College Board, which administers the test, has only now
caught on.
Oh well, an essay question can't hurt, can it? I wish
the SAT had used one when I was a senior at Garfield
High School in East Los Angeles. All I remember are
algebra formulas I had never seen before, and
multiple-choice, verbal questions that looked
suspiciously like an IQ test.
The highest possible SAT score is 1600. I can't
remember my exact score, because I don't want to, but
it was under 900.
On second thought, I don't think a writing test would
have jacked up my score all that much. And it won't
make much difference today for students in schools like
mine. They don't have as many advanced placement
classes or experienced teachers. Nor do they have
affluent parents who can pay for expensive SAT
preparation courses, as they do at privileged schools.
Poor schools that can't teach reading and mathematics
aren't going to teach writing any better.
Did I forget to mention that the poorest schools in
Latino and black neighborhoods often don't have enough
textbooks and other basics? That helps explain the
growing gap between Latino and black SAT scores, and
white and Asian scores.
Since 1990, according to the College Board's own study,
the average verbal score among Mexican-American
students dropped 4 points and their math scores stayed
flat. Meanwhile, white students increased their verbal
scores by 9 points and math by 15. Asian scores rose by
16 on the verbal exam and 19 in math.
Some college systems, including the University of
California and Texas, try to compensate by accepting
the top 10 percent or so of each high school's
graduating class, but with mixed results. The fact is,
most colleges across the country rely too heavily on
the SAT. So do many scholarship programs.
Instead of tinkering with the SAT, we should kill it.
Although the test has its roots in the racist eugenics
movement of the early 20th century - they thought Jews
and African-Americans were inherently dumb and
college-incapable - the supporters of scholastic
testing doggedly pursued an exam that would measure how
much a student had learned in 12 years.
It wasn't a bad idea if it weren't so simplistic, lazy
and easily exploited.
A major flaw of today's SAT is that it's vulnerable to
coaching and short-term improvements. How can you trust
a test that, for the $800 price of a quickie prep
course, can produce a gain of 100 points?
A test isn't much good if it can't predict something,
and the SAT hasn't been proven to be a reliable
predictor of college success.
A few years ago, plucky little Muhlenberg College in
Pennsylvania measured the first-semester grades of
freshman with SAT scores of about 1000 against freshmen
with 1200 scores or better. The results were virtually identical.
But the absolute, worst assumption of the SAT is that
any young person's potential can be reduced to a
number. It assumes that, after four years of college, a
900-point student from a poor school cannot catch up to
or surpass the 1400-point student from a wealthy school.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sure glad
my boss didn't ask for my SAT score when I applied.
Come to think of it, none of my employers have ever asked.
Some years ago, former University of California
President Richard Atkinson called for dumping the SAT.
He wanted to replace it with tests that try to measure
achievement in specific subjects, rather than overall
aptitude. The testocrats shot him down, but it's still
a good idea and much better than a one-size-fits-all
test that doesn't live up to its promise.
Joe Rodriguez is a columnist at the San Jose Mercury
News.
© 2004, San Jose Mercury News
Distd by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.
--
LP
In politics, moderation is the best policy
.

User: "Gary Schnabl"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 04:03:43 PM
"LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message
news:412B8D00.C6B9E51F@igs.net...

Time to dump the SATs?

by Joe Rodriguez

They're trying to reform the SAT again, which is like
trying to turn a pit bull into a toy poodle. What they
ought to do is euthanize this mutt.

This time they've added a writing section to the
Scholastic Aptitude Test. That's because educators have
been saying that writing is critical for success in
college. Actually, university professors have been
saying this for centuries. You have to wonder why the
College Board, which administers the test, has only now
caught on.

This year 2004 copywritten article by Joe Rodriguez is ten years out of
date, at least to this one small factoid:
The final time the Scholastic APTITUDE Test was offered was January 1994.
BTW, that January 1994 test was the final SAT test that Mensa allows as
acceptable for its membership criteria. By April 1994, the SAT was replaced
by the Scholastic ASSESSMENT Test. This new "SAT" has been claimed by
several critics (Charles Sykes and Martin Gross, among others) of the status
quo in education as being a simplified version.
I remember reading in a daily in Madison WI about THREE seniors at one HS
(Madison West) scoring 1600 the first year after the change to the
ASSESSMENT test. Must be hard...
Gary
.
User: "Donna Metler"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 06:41:52 PM
"Gary Schnabl" <gschnabl@LivernoisYards.com> wrote in message
news:KaOdnQfwjMu8bq3cRVn-pA@comcast.com...


"LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message
news:412B8D00.C6B9E51F@igs.net...

Time to dump the SATs?

by Joe Rodriguez

They're trying to reform the SAT again, which is like
trying to turn a pit bull into a toy poodle. What they
ought to do is euthanize this mutt.

This time they've added a writing section to the
Scholastic Aptitude Test. That's because educators have
been saying that writing is critical for success in
college. Actually, university professors have been
saying this for centuries. You have to wonder why the
College Board, which administers the test, has only now
caught on.


This year 2004 copywritten article by Joe Rodriguez is ten years out of
date, at least to this one small factoid:

The final time the Scholastic APTITUDE Test was offered was January 1994.
BTW, that January 1994 test was the final SAT test that Mensa allows as
acceptable for its membership criteria. By April 1994, the SAT was

replaced

by the Scholastic ASSESSMENT Test. This new "SAT" has been claimed by
several critics (Charles Sykes and Martin Gross, among others) of the

status

quo in education as being a simplified version.

I remember reading in a daily in Madison WI about THREE seniors at one HS
(Madison West) scoring 1600 the first year after the change to the
ASSESSMENT test. Must be hard...

I attended a high school which had the 800 club-students who had scored an
800 on at least on section. We averaged at least 5-6 students per year,
back in the 1980's before I graduated. And, since you can take the test more
than once and count the highest score on each, the common thing to do was to
take the test twice, blow off the math one time and the verbal the next. We
often had several 1600s doing it that way. It wasn't hard even then.


Gary


.
User: "Gary Schnabl"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 06:51:12 PM
"Donna Metler" <dmmetler@xxxbellsouthxxx.net> wrote in message
news:uI8Yc.30783$N11.5937@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

I attended a high school which had the 800 club-students who had scored an
800 on at least on section. We averaged at least 5-6 students per year,
back in the 1980's before I graduated. And, since you can take the test

more

than once and count the highest score on each, the common thing to do was

to

take the test twice, blow off the math one time and the verbal the next.

We

often had several 1600s doing it that way. It wasn't hard even then.

The stat that would be useful here is the percentage of 800s or 1600s over
the years.
Gary
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 10:13:58 PM
"Gary Schnabl" <gschnabl@LivernoisYards.com> wrote:

"Donna Metler" <dmmetler@xxxbellsouthxxx.net> wrote in message
news:uI8Yc.30783$N11.5937@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

I attended a high school which had the 800 club-students who had scored an
800 on at least on section. We averaged at least 5-6 students per year,
back in the 1980's before I graduated. And, since you can take the test

more

than once and count the highest score on each, the common thing to do was

to

take the test twice, blow off the math one time and the verbal the next.

We

often had several 1600s doing it that way. It wasn't hard even then.


The stat that would be useful here is the percentage of 800s or 1600s over
the years.

http://www.collegeboard.com/press/article/0,3183,10429,00.html (dated
8/28/01)

SAT scores have risen significantly over the past decade. Since 1991,
verbal scores have increased 7 points while math scores have
increased 14 points. This year, more than 20 percent of SAT
test-takers achieved a combined verbal and math score of 1200 or
higher on the exams, and 587 students scored a perfect 1600.

587 out of 1.3 million taking the test.
http://www.collegeboard.com/sat/cbsenior/cbs/cbs96/totalvm.html
1996
there were 545 1600 scores out of 1,084,725 taking the test
http://www.collegeboard.com/sat/cbsenior/cbs/cbs00/totlvm00.html
2000
there were 541 1600 scores out of 1,260,278 taking the test
In 1984, pre-renorming, there were 5 perfect 1600s out of nearly a
million tests taken:
http://www.eskimo.com/~miyaguch/megadata/fifthnorm.html
Thus anyone in the 1980s that thinks that they knew 5 or 6 students
with perfect 1600s were being lied to by said students.
http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2003/pdf/2003_WISCONSIN.pdf
In 2003, in Wisconsin, 257 scored between 750 and 800 on the Verbal,
and 263 scored between 750 and 800 on Math, each around 6% of the
total 4500 taking the test. In Wisconsin, it appears that a
relatively low percent of students take the test.
Nationally, there were 25114 verbal and 30440 math scores between 750
and 800, each around 2% of the 1.4 million tests that were taken.
Nationally, of those scores over 750, there were only 897 perfect 1600
scores in the nation, 3% of the math scores between 750 and 800:
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/08/26/sprj.sch.sat.scores.ap/
If Wisconsin was proportionate, then there would have only been 7 or 8
perfect 1600s in the entire state of Wisconsin last year.
(BTW, if you take the test multiple times, the College Board sends
*all* the results to your college, not just the best score, and
certainly not the best of each section over several takings. This was
specifically noted in the report to my daughter when she took the test
last year.)
Given a normal distribution, with 1 million tests, we would expect
..135% to exceed 3 standard deviations (1450 score), 1350 students, and
..003167% to exceed 4 standard deviations, 32 students. Thus, the 1984
scores had a 1600 corresponding to around 4.5 standard deviations from
the mean. The 2001 scores have a 1600 corresponding to 3.3 to 3.4 std
deviations from the mean.
lojbab
--
lojbab

Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
User: "Gary Schnabl"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 29 Aug 2004 12:44:16 AM
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:a2f2j05l4p3dhdfudo4qej9aht1g6gj6fl@4ax.com...
http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2003/pdf/2003_WISCONSIN.pdf

In 2003, in Wisconsin, 257 scored between 750 and 800 on the Verbal,
and 263 scored between 750 and 800 on Math, each around 6% of the
total 4500 taking the test. In Wisconsin, it appears that a
relatively low percent of students take the test.

Nationally, there were 25114 verbal and 30440 math scores between 750
and 800, each around 2% of the 1.4 million tests that were taken.

Nationally, of those scores over 750, there were only 897 perfect 1600
scores in the nation, 3% of the math scores between 750 and 800:
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/08/26/sprj.sch.sat.scores.ap/
If Wisconsin was proportionate, then there would have only been 7 or 8
perfect 1600s in the entire state of Wisconsin last year.

Bob, you are obviously unaware that the states near WI are not in SAT
country. MI and WI are ACT states. However, many students take both.
Gary
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 29 Aug 2004 01:05:43 AM
"Gary Schnabl" <gschnabl@LivernoisYards.com> wrote:

"Bob LeChevalier" <

> wrote in message
news:a2f2j05l4p3dhdfudo4qej9aht1g6gj6fl@4ax.com...
http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2003/pdf/2003_WISCONSIN.pdf

In 2003, in Wisconsin, 257 scored between 750 and 800 on the Verbal,
and 263 scored between 750 and 800 on Math, each around 6% of the
total 4500 taking the test. In Wisconsin, it appears that a
relatively low percent of students take the test.

Nationally, there were 25114 verbal and 30440 math scores between 750
and 800, each around 2% of the 1.4 million tests that were taken.

Nationally, of those scores over 750, there were only 897 perfect 1600
scores in the nation, 3% of the math scores between 750 and 800:
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/08/26/sprj.sch.sat.scores.ap/
If Wisconsin was proportionate, then there would have only been 7 or 8
perfect 1600s in the entire state of Wisconsin last year.


Bob, you are obviously unaware that the states near WI are not in SAT
country. MI and WI are ACT states. However, many students take both.

I was aware of it - as I noted in the first paragraph, relatively few
take the test. In 1996 it was 8% vs a national 41%, but generally it
is better students that take both tests. It seems unlikely that there
were more than 4 or 5 perfect 1600s in the entire state last year, and
possibly fewer.
lojbab
--
lojbab

Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
User: "Donna Metler"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 29 Aug 2004 09:06:50 AM
"Bob LeChevalier" <
> wrote in message
news:53s2j09ke02t6u8trg5tuuoubpq777h9q2@4ax.com...

"Gary Schnabl" <gschnabl@LivernoisYards.com> wrote:

"Bob LeChevalier" <

> wrote in message
news:a2f2j05l4p3dhdfudo4qej9aht1g6gj6fl@4ax.com...


http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2003/

pdf/2003_WISCONSIN.pdf

In 2003, in Wisconsin, 257 scored between 750 and 800 on the Verbal,
and 263 scored between 750 and 800 on Math, each around 6% of the
total 4500 taking the test. In Wisconsin, it appears that a
relatively low percent of students take the test.

Nationally, there were 25114 verbal and 30440 math scores between 750
and 800, each around 2% of the 1.4 million tests that were taken.

Nationally, of those scores over 750, there were only 897 perfect 1600
scores in the nation, 3% of the math scores between 750 and 800:
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/08/26/sprj.sch.sat.scores.ap/
If Wisconsin was proportionate, then there would have only been 7 or 8
perfect 1600s in the entire state of Wisconsin last year.


Bob, you are obviously unaware that the states near WI are not in SAT
country. MI and WI are ACT states. However, many students take both.


I was aware of it - as I noted in the first paragraph, relatively few
take the test. In 1996 it was 8% vs a national 41%, but generally it
is better students that take both tests. It seems unlikely that there
were more than 4 or 5 perfect 1600s in the entire state last year, and
possibly fewer.

I believe we had about 20 people in the 800 club over 4 years, of which
perhaps 1-2 had true 1600s and a few more had 1600s via the "take the test
twice method". There were also a few people who were inducted by virtue of
having equivalent ACT scores.
This was in a high school with a strong math/science focus and which drew
academically gifted students from a region, though.

lojbab
--
lojbab


Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org

.

User: "Donna Metler"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 29 Aug 2004 09:11:37 AM
FWIW, the essay question on the SAT has been considered (as have changes)
for some time. I took a trial SAT, which included an essay and a free
response math section for norming purposes back in 1987 or so, for the
express purpose of comparing with the traditional score. I guess it took
this long to get the bugs out of the system, or to decide to go to the
effort of hand scoring multiple tests.
BTW, there are writing sections on the AP exams, and on some states
graduation tests. TN requires a writing section on the English Gateway exam
(one of several required to graduate with a real diploma). And I don't think
I've ever seen a college application without an essay question. An essay on
the SAT is hardly an unusual thing.
.







User: "rwwff"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 24 Aug 2004 06:55:43 PM
LeMod Pol <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message news:<412B8D00.C6B9E51F@igs.net>...

Some years ago, former University of California
President Richard Atkinson called for dumping the SAT.

[snipped rant of rich vs poor]
Its always someone elses fault.
Fact:
The poor kid who scores 1400 is going to have a better chance of
honest collegiate success than a rich kid who scores 900.
Fact:
The rich kid who scores 1400 is going to have a better chance of
honest collegiate success than a poor kid who scores 900.
Thats reality in general. There are exceptions, no surprises there.
As to dumping SAT to replace with subject specific tests, it won't
really make much difference for 99% of the kids, those that score 1400
on the SAT also score near the 800(perfect) mark on the subject
specific achievement tests; and their weakest scores will still be
well over the 500 mark. The kid that makes 900 on the SAT is also
going to bomb the achievement tests; though I doubt many 900's bother
to take them at the moment.
One final point: you deride the SAT prep courses, which coincidently
came into strong popularity the year after I took the SAT for the
first time and decided that my score was adequate. (early 80s) SAT
prep courses have a strong similarity to "cramming" for a set of
finals. I'd always simply coasted through school, so I never learned
this skill.. It is a skill that could have easily improved my final
GPA half a point.
.
User: "Herman Rubin"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 26 Aug 2004 02:00:05 PM
In article <8c88725.0408241555.41e54065@posting.google.com>,
rwwff <rwwff@yahoo.com> wrote:

LeMod Pol <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message news:<412B8D00.C6B9E51F@igs.net>...

Some years ago, former University of California
President Richard Atkinson called for dumping the SAT.

[snipped rant of rich vs poor]
Its always someone elses fault.
Fact:
The poor kid who scores 1400 is going to have a better chance of
honest collegiate success than a rich kid who scores 900.
Fact:
The rich kid who scores 1400 is going to have a better chance of
honest collegiate success than a poor kid who scores 900.
Thats reality in general. There are exceptions, no surprises there.
As to dumping SAT to replace with subject specific tests, it won't
really make much difference for 99% of the kids, those that score 1400
on the SAT also score near the 800(perfect) mark on the subject
specific achievement tests; and their weakest scores will still be
well over the 500 mark. The kid that makes 900 on the SAT is also
going to bomb the achievement tests; though I doubt many 900's bother
to take them at the moment.

The SAT or ACT is the only clear educational item available.
Many GOOD schools are now refusing to even provide the class
rank or the GPA because of the educationist idiots and bean
counters who cannot understand that a C in a good course may
indicate far more knowledge than an A in some of the weak
schools. On the gifted mailing list, someone in an
admissions office stated that there was one class
valedictorian with an SAT total of as little as 600.
The SAT is NOT a good test, and is getting worse. The new
writing part will give points for producing fiction; this is
not going to make much difference in learning, especially in
learning to think.

One final point: you deride the SAT prep courses, which coincidently
came into strong popularity the year after I took the SAT for the
first time and decided that my score was adequate. (early 80s) SAT
prep courses have a strong similarity to "cramming" for a set of
finals. I'd always simply coasted through school, so I never learned
this skill.. It is a skill that could have easily improved my final
GPA half a point.

But at the expense of understanding what you are learning.
Only once, and this was a rather unusual situation, did I
ever study the day before an examination, so I had to learn.
Students today memorize well, but have no idea how to use
the material even in slightly different situations.
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.
User: "rwwff"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 27 Aug 2004 09:12:02 AM
(Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cglbvl$11h0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...

The SAT or ACT is the only clear educational item available.
Many GOOD schools are now refusing to even provide the class
rank or the GPA because of the educationist idiots and bean
counters who cannot understand that a C in a good course may
indicate far more knowledge than an A in some of the weak

caveat: Just using past personal experience here....
I think you overstate this, sure my B's and occassional C's in
'honors' English gave me a slightly lower grade point than if I had
taken the regular English and coasted through with an 'A'. [I was
borderline on the English subject, so they gave me a choice.] But not
by much; competitively, there were very few in the regular English
making solid A's; and those few rarely took anything other than
freshman biology and maybe the algebra I. This locked my class rank
right at the bottom of the all-honors folks, but well above everyone
else. (17/517).
I doubt this basic math has changed much; and I doubt there are many
college administrators who don't understand this. Now fortunately, I
live in a state where class rank is used instead of affirmative
action, so this measure of competitive standing is currently
available, and will likely remain so for quite a while. [top 10% of
all high school classes are automatically accepted into the states
public universities.]
Querry: who are these educationist idiots and bean counters you are
concerned about?

schools. On the gifted mailing list, someone in an
admissions office stated that there was one class
valedictorian with an SAT total of as little as 600.

But those are singular point cases, they have no impact on the overall
result. I can recall when I went for the "campus tour" for college,
that the guide was a student that was technically "valedictorian", but
that was because she was from a tiny school (less than 10 kids) in a
tiny rural town.

The SAT is NOT a good test, and is getting worse. The new
writing part will give points for producing fiction; this is
not going to make much difference in learning, especially in
learning to think.

No takeable test is going to be wonderful; adequate is all that you
need, and the SAT is adequate. I don't think the creative writing
thing will be as bad as you think though. The graders aren't going to
be reading them to be entertained, they'll be using a systematic
scoring method. I haven't really looked into it, so I don't know all
the categories of things they'll be looking at. In general I suspect
they'll be looking for how well the person uses language to develop
and present an idea, grammar, structure, spelling, etc. This is
certainly no worse than the take a word and pick the opposite from a
list of words method. I always felt those were more about
determining whether the kid knows how to manage the question, rather
than whether they have a great vocabulary.

prep courses have a strong similarity to "cramming" for a set of
finals. I'd always simply coasted through school, so I never learned
this skill.. It is a skill that could have easily improved my final
GPA half a point.


But at the expense of understanding what you are learning.

No, not really at the expense of, but rather in addition to what was
actually learned.

Only once, and this was a rather unusual situation, did I
ever study the day before an examination, so I had to learn.

I never really was much for studying before exams either. As I
mentioned earlier, I did try it a few times, but was never able to
really make the extra effort pay off.

Students today memorize well, but have no idea how to use
the material even in slightly different situations.

I never could memorize anything. I got through high school trig by
concentrating all my memory effort on remembering the shape of the sin
and cos curves and then deriving all the remaining identities as they
were needed.
Maybe cramming would have been an impossible skill for me to master,
but still, it would have been nice to try.
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 27 Aug 2004 12:28:19 PM
(rwwff) wrote:

hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cglbvl$11h0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...

The SAT is NOT a good test, and is getting worse. The new
writing part will give points for producing fiction; this is
not going to make much difference in learning, especially in
learning to think.


No takeable test is going to be wonderful; adequate is all that you
need, and the SAT is adequate. I don't think the creative writing
thing will be as bad as you think though.

The SAT writing test won't be "creative writing" at all, or "fiction".
The student will have an hour to write an essay on an issue,
presenting a point of view, and showing critical thinking skills and
ideally evidence and examples. Similar essays are found on the GRE,
the NY Regents test, the NAEP, and the Mass teacher competency test.
The essay is score on a 0 to 6 scale as indicated in the following:
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay_scoring.html
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay.html
has a samples essay question. Based on a famous Edison quote it asks
the student:

Assignment: What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to
achieve success? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your
point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and
examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or
observations.

I see no benefit for a fiction-writer in answering that question.
The writing test also includes some multiple choice questions, of
which samples can be found at
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/sat/lc_two/writ/prac/pracStart.html
lojbab
--
lojbab

Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 06:46:49 AM
Bob LeChevalier wrote:


rwwff@yahoo.com (rwwff) wrote:


No takeable test is going to be wonderful; adequate is all that you
need, and the SAT is adequate. I don't think the creative writing
thing will be as bad as you think though.


http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay.html
has a samples essay question. Based on a famous Edison quote it asks
the student:

Assignment: What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to
achieve success? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your
point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and
examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or
observations.


I see no benefit for a fiction-writer in answering that question.

I have my doubts about this whole process. The word is going to get
around about the options, and the "prepared" student will go in with
pre-written essays encoded on his/her sleeves, and copy off the
one that fits. The essay question has to be more specific so there
is no way to cheat.
.

User: "Herman Rubin"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 27 Aug 2004 04:03:18 PM
In article <u7rui0lsdtv796q33g78apnnsm134rplbl@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

rwwff@yahoo.com (rwwff) wrote:

hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cglbvl$11h0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...

The SAT is NOT a good test, and is getting worse. The new
writing part will give points for producing fiction; this is
not going to make much difference in learning, especially in
learning to think.

No takeable test is going to be wonderful; adequate is all that you
need, and the SAT is adequate. I don't think the creative writing
thing will be as bad as you think though.

The SAT writing test won't be "creative writing" at all, or "fiction".
The student will have an hour to write an essay on an issue,
presenting a point of view, and showing critical thinking skills and
ideally evidence and examples.

The first part of good critical thinking is LOGIC, and
I see little understanding of that. The part of logic
which is best understood is extremely precise and formal;
but it is not going to be learned by a memorization and
routine calculation method. Adequate courses in logic,
through the first order predicate calculus, which is
what we understand, and what is used in mathematics and
science, can be taught in elementary school (they have
been) to a large proportion of the students, but is
rarely done for anyone. The old geometry course was
more useful for its logic and introduction to formal
proof than for learning geometric facts, which is one
reason why it is rarely taught.
Similar essays are found on the GRE,

the NY Regents test, the NAEP, and the Mass teacher competency test.
The essay is score on a 0 to 6 scale as indicated in the following:
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay_scoring.html

I have seen lots of student essays; if you know how to
recognize baloney (or bologna if you are particular),
you catch them quickly. But what are students going
to be able to write if you ask them about their career
hopes in mathematics or science if they do not know
much about the subject matter?

http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay.html
has a samples essay question. Based on a famous Edison quote it asks
the student:

Assignment: What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to
achieve success? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your
point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and
examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or
observations.

I see no benefit for a fiction-writer in answering that question.

I see no way to answer it which is not fiction writing.
I consider this quote to be ridiculous, and so how could
I give examples? Similarly with another quote of his,
"Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration."
If you look at the _Sherlock Holmes_ stories, you will
find little perspiration, just "seeing the obvious".
I am considered to be a genius. Seeing the obvious is
not always easy, and one MAY "perspire" a lot in looking
for it, but the hard part is writing it up.

The writing test also includes some multiple choice questions, of
which samples can be found at
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/sat/lc_two/writ/prac/pracStart.html

--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 27 Aug 2004 05:44:42 PM
(Herman Rubin) wrote:

In article <u7rui0lsdtv796q33g78apnnsm134rplbl@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <

> wrote:

The SAT writing test won't be "creative writing" at all, or "fiction".
The student will have an hour to write an essay on an issue,
presenting a point of view, and showing critical thinking skills and
ideally evidence and examples.


The first part of good critical thinking is LOGIC, and
I see little understanding of that. The part of logic
which is best understood is extremely precise and formal;

Formal logic is worthless outside of contexts where the premises can
be specified and controlled, which is in most of real life.

Similar essays are found on the GRE,

the NY Regents test, the NAEP, and the Mass teacher competency test.
The essay is score on a 0 to 6 scale as indicated in the following:
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay_scoring.html


I have seen lots of student essays; if you know how to
recognize baloney (or bologna if you are particular),
you catch them quickly. But what are students going
to be able to write if you ask them about their career
hopes in mathematics or science if they do not know
much about the subject matter?

They aren't asking that sort of question.

http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay.html
has a samples essay question. Based on a famous Edison quote it asks
the student:

Assignment: What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to
achieve success? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your
point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and
examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or
observations.


I see no benefit for a fiction-writer in answering that question.


I see no way to answer it which is not fiction writing.

You have a strange definition of fiction. The essay graders certainly
don't expect fiction. They expect analysis and examples and
reasoning, as well as skillful writing.

I consider this quote to be ridiculous, and so how could
I give examples? Similarly with another quote of his,

"Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration."

If you look at the _Sherlock Holmes_ stories, you will
find little perspiration, just "seeing the obvious".

Therefore a student with knowledge of fiction might use Sherlock
Holmes as a counterexample arguing against that claim. But likely
they would also need examples from real life in order to be
convincing.

I am considered to be a genius. Seeing the obvious is
not always easy, and one MAY "perspire" a lot in looking
for it, but the hard part is writing it up.

Writing it up is part of the perspiration.
lojbab
--
lojbab

Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
User: "Herman Rubin"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 10:59:26 AM
In article <b2evi0995d57deij7tkqhg1f4qf0tq8gda@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote:

In article <u7rui0lsdtv796q33g78apnnsm134rplbl@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

The SAT writing test won't be "creative writing" at all, or "fiction".
The student will have an hour to write an essay on an issue,
presenting a point of view, and showing critical thinking skills and
ideally evidence and examples.

The first part of good critical thinking is LOGIC, and
I see little understanding of that. The part of logic
which is best understood is extremely precise and formal;

Formal logic is worthless outside of contexts where the premises can
be specified and controlled, which is in most of real life.

Not so; it can be applied to situations in which the
one making the argument makes assumptions (premises),
and then proceeds to argue in a contradictory manner.
It can also be used to question conclusions, which are
frequently made without consideration of the assumptions.
Assumptions always have to be made; full objectivity is
impossible, and this is denied by those who claim that
their morals or values are objective. When assumptions
are in doubt, one is cast into the realm of statistical
decision theory, which is easy to explain to those who
do not think they know "the way to do things".

Similar essays are found on the GRE,

the NY Regents test, the NAEP, and the Mass teacher competency test.
The essay is score on a 0 to 6 scale as indicated in the following:
http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay_scoring.html

I have seen lots of student essays; if you know how to
recognize baloney (or bologna if you are particular),
you catch them quickly. But what are students going
to be able to write if you ask them about their career
hopes in mathematics or science if they do not know
much about the subject matter?

They aren't asking that sort of question.

http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/newsat/writing/essay.html
has a samples essay question. Based on a famous Edison quote it asks
the student:

Assignment: What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to
achieve success? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your
point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and
examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or
observations.

I see no benefit for a fiction-writer in answering that question.

I see no way to answer it which is not fiction writing.

You have a strange definition of fiction. The essay graders certainly
don't expect fiction. They expect analysis and examples and
reasoning, as well as skillful writing.

I consider this quote to be ridiculous, and so how could
I give examples? Similarly with another quote of his,
"Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration."
If you look at the _Sherlock Holmes_ stories, you will
find little perspiration, just "seeing the obvious".

Therefore a student with knowledge of fiction might use Sherlock
Holmes as a counterexample arguing against that claim. But likely
they would also need examples from real life in order to be
convincing.

A student with a knowledge of the kind of fiction usually
taught would not see any of this. Genius is highly
downplayed; "ordinary people" are the current vogue.

I am considered to be a genius. Seeing the obvious is
not always easy, and one MAY "perspire" a lot in looking
for it, but the hard part is writing it up.

Writing it up is part of the perspiration.

But it is not part of genius.
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 12:24:07 PM
(Herman Rubin) wrote:

In article <b2evi0995d57deij7tkqhg1f4qf0tq8gda@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <

> wrote:

Formal logic is worthless outside of contexts where the premises can
be specified and controlled, which is in most of real life.


Not so; it can be applied to situations in which the
one making the argument makes assumptions (premises),
and then proceeds to argue in a contradictory manner.

It can also be used to question conclusions, which are
frequently made without consideration of the assumptions.

Usually because there are no assumptions to consider.

Assumptions always have to be made;

Generally it is the conclusion that is assumed. There is no "logic"
leading up to it, and therefore no logic that could be faulty. If
anything, the effort tends to be to seek out assumptions which justify
the conclusions that one wishes to reach.
This is what I believe libertarianism has done - the assumption is
really that they want to minimize government, and the so-called
"assumptions" that lead to this conclusion are in fact the
back-derived conclusions based on their assumptions. Likewise for
other ideologies, which is why I reject ideology.
Human behavior and beliefs simply are not logical.

When assumptions
are in doubt, one is cast into the realm of statistical
decision theory, which is easy to explain to those who
do not think they know "the way to do things".

But of course, as you have said, probabilistic statistical decision
theory requires knowledge of all possible outcomes, which is seldom
available. What ends up happening is that people use analogical
thinking, and highly subjective analogical thinking at that, to decide
that this or that will happen because it is "like" something else that
has happened in their knowledge or experience.

I consider this quote to be ridiculous, and so how could
I give examples? Similarly with another quote of his,


"Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration."


If you look at the _Sherlock Holmes_ stories, you will
find little perspiration, just "seeing the obvious".


Therefore a student with knowledge of fiction might use Sherlock
Holmes as a counterexample arguing against that claim. But likely
they would also need examples from real life in order to be
convincing.


A student with a knowledge of the kind of fiction usually
taught would not see any of this. Genius is highly
downplayed; "ordinary people" are the current vogue.

Knowledge of fiction isn't especially relevant though.
Here is another essay example, in this case from the 12th grade NAEP
writing test, and thus probably fairly close to what the SAT will
expect. The question is that of the responsibility of voting, and the
student can choose either of two positions (or perhaps even a third
position, which some of the respondents try to do). For this example,
they give several student answers, and they show how they rated with
the scorers.
Please identify the fiction-writing component of these essays.

I am considered to be a genius. Seeing the obvious is
not always easy, and one MAY "perspire" a lot in looking
for it, but the hard part is writing it up.


Writing it up is part of the perspiration.


But it is not part of genius.

No one cares about genius; they care about whether you can produce
results. It is the results that Edison was talking about, and it is
the results that the SAT is attempting to predictively measure.
lojbab
--
lojbab

Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
User: "Herman Rubin"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 02:53:00 PM
In article <sje1j0tu53ekab2r7pp9s6jon4an4db1qp@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote:

In article <b2evi0995d57deij7tkqhg1f4qf0tq8gda@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

Formal logic is worthless outside of contexts where the premises can
be specified and controlled, which is in most of real life.

Not so; it can be applied to situations in which the
one making the argument makes assumptions (premises),
and then proceeds to argue in a contradictory manner.
It can also be used to question conclusions, which are
frequently made without consideration of the assumptions.

Usually because there are no assumptions to consider.

Assumptions always have to be made;

Generally it is the conclusion that is assumed. There is no "logic"
leading up to it, and therefore no logic that could be faulty. If
anything, the effort tends to be to seek out assumptions which justify
the conclusions that one wishes to reach.

That is what demagogues and the like do.

This is what I believe libertarianism has done - the assumption is
really that they want to minimize government, and the so-called
"assumptions" that lead to this conclusion are in fact the
back-derived conclusions based on their assumptions. Likewise for
other ideologies, which is why I reject ideology.

Libertarians start out from the position that the
purpose of government is to help keep people safe
from the actions of others to cause them harm.
As for rejecting ideology, you seem to have a strong
ideological belief that the government, if it expresses
the "will of the people", can do just about anything.

Human behavior and beliefs simply are not logical.

So you would impose illogical actions of governments
on people?

When assumptions
are in doubt, one is cast into the realm of statistical
decision theory, which is easy to explain to those who
do not think they know "the way to do things".

But of course, as you have said, probabilistic statistical decision
theory requires knowledge of all possible outcomes, which is seldom
available.

Just as we use engineering approximations to handle physical
problems, we can use such an approach for decision theory.
This has been noted a half century ago or more.
What ends up happening is that people use analogical

thinking, and highly subjective analogical thinking at that, to decide
that this or that will happen because it is "like" something else that
has happened in their knowledge or experience.

Only if they are ignorant or stupid. It was known 50
years ago that raising tax rates could lower the amount
of taxes collected. Those who are knowledgeable in
mathematics and science know that the model is generally
not that simple, and careful calculations are needed.
....................

I am considered to be a genius. Seeing the obvious is
not always easy, and one MAY "perspire" a lot in looking
for it, but the hard part is writing it up.

Writing it up is part of the perspiration.

But it is not part of genius.

No one cares about genius; they care about whether you can produce
results. It is the results that Edison was talking about, and it is
the results that the SAT is attempting to predictively measure.

The result needed is the ability to understand conceptual
material, not memorization and routine. This can be
measured only by testing the use of concepts. Few high
school mathematics teachers understand the concepts which
can be learned in elementary school, and have the block
against learning them which is caused by too much emphasis
on trivial "results".
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 09:09:48 PM
(Herman Rubin) wrote:

As for rejecting ideology, you seem to have a strong
ideological belief that the government, if it expresses
the "will of the people", can do just about anything.

No. I have a strong pragmatic belief that they can do just about
anything.
I make no statement about what government "should" or "should not" do,
because "should" is a purely subjective matter, and I know that what I
think "should" be isn't gonna match what others think.
I recognize that those who get the most votes will in general tend to
have their way.

Human behavior and beliefs simply are not logical.


So you would impose illogical actions of governments
on people?

It isn't up to me.
Illogical actions of governments WILL be imposed on people, regardless
of what I or any other individual thinks, so what's the point in
contemplating the impossible ideal of some alternative.

When assumptions
are in doubt, one is cast into the realm of statistical
decision theory, which is easy to explain to those who
do not think they know "the way to do things".


But of course, as you have said, probabilistic statistical decision
theory requires knowledge of all possible outcomes, which is seldom
available.


Just as we use engineering approximations to handle physical
problems, we can use such an approach for decision theory.
This has been noted a half century ago or more.

For engineering, it is pretty-well agreed what assumptions serve for
an approximation. For political decisions, this is not the case.

What ends up happening is that people use analogical

thinking, and highly subjective analogical thinking at that, to decide
that this or that will happen because it is "like" something else that
has happened in their knowledge or experience.


Only if they are ignorant or stupid.

People are ignorant or stupid then, even some of us who are geniuses,
since I know that I have made decisions that way a lot of times.

It was known 50
years ago that raising tax rates could lower the amount
of taxes collected.

Not by most people. And indeed, I don't believe any economic theory
is valid, so I don't "know" it.

Those who are knowledgeable in
mathematics and science know that the model is generally
not that simple, and careful calculations are needed.

Economic models are pseudoscience.
....................


I am considered to be a genius. Seeing the obvious is
not always easy, and one MAY "perspire" a lot in looking
for it, but the hard part is writing it up.


Writing it up is part of the perspiration.


But it is not part of genius.


No one cares about genius; they care about whether you can produce
results. It is the results that Edison was talking about, and it is
the results that the SAT is attempting to predictively measure.


The result needed is the ability to understand conceptual
material, not memorization and routine.

The result the colleges are interested in testing in the writing SAT
is the ability to communicate what you understand. You may be a
supergenius able to understand the innermost workings of the universe,
and if you cannot communicate your understandings such that others
understand you, your capabilities are worthless.
lojbab
--
lojbab

Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 29 Aug 2004 08:04:45 AM
Bob LeChevalier wrote:


The result the colleges are interested in testing in the writing SAT
is the ability to communicate what you understand. You may be a
supergenius able to understand the innermost workings of the universe,
and if you cannot communicate your understandings such that others
understand you, your capabilities are worthless.

Fast_Forward to Year_2007 where the SAT folks have added a "Best_Essay"
Award for the SAT-taker who demonstrates the highest (in Bob's words)
"ability to communicate what you understand..."
Here was the winner:
*************** Award Winning SAT Essay ************************
MuthaFukkah! Wat be'z dis ezzay sheee-it? Ah'z doan needz no
phat SaT/aCTpointz scorz booshee-it. Dat fo' dem ig'nant honkeyz
'n coconutz! Us naztiezt QuotaNiggaz be'z goin ta Harvird 'r Yayl
on skolarship. Doan hab eben spel mah naym correck! Party wid da
brothaz 'n sistahz "whe mah crakpipe, *****?" MuthaFukkah!
Gotz mah MOVE on!! Free ride, muthafukkah we DOWN wid dat, no jing!
SLAP MAH FRO!! Wat it be, momma...sheee-it...MUTHAFUKKAH!!!
****************************************************************
.








User: "Herman Rubin"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 27 Aug 2004 03:44:04 PM
In article <8c88725.0408270612.14cb1cef@posting.google.com>,
rwwff <rwwff@yahoo.com> wrote:

hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cglbvl$11h0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...

The SAT or ACT is the only clear educational item available.
Many GOOD schools are now refusing to even provide the class
rank or the GPA because of the educationist idiots and bean
counters who cannot understand that a C in a good course may
indicate far more knowledge than an A in some of the weak

caveat: Just using past personal experience here....
I think you overstate this, sure my B's and occassional C's in
'honors' English gave me a slightly lower grade point than if I had
taken the regular English and coasted through with an 'A'. [I was
borderline on the English subject, so they gave me a choice.] But not
by much; competitively, there were very few in the regular English
making solid A's; and those few rarely took anything other than
freshman biology and maybe the algebra I. This locked my class rank
right at the bottom of the all-honors folks, but well above everyone
else. (17/517).

I never stated that it was always the case; but in many
schools it is. This is very much the case in strong
high schools, where students very definitely avoid honors
courses because of concern for grades.

I doubt this basic math has changed much; and I doubt there are many
college administrators who don't understand this.

THIS IS FALSE! The college preparatory mathematics
which was standard before WWII is not even available
in most high schools, and there is no way that anyone
can tell from a transcript whether the old "Euclid"
geometry course was given, or the "modern" memorize
and compute, or even memorize proofs, junk is the
case. The old algebra I is often worth more than
two years of algebra now.
Most high school teachers teach computation and
formulas. This makes it harder to learn the real
basics later.
Now fortunately, I

live in a state where class rank is used instead of affirmative
action, so this measure of competitive standing is currently
available, and will likely remain so for quite a while. [top 10% of
all high school classes are automatically accepted into the states
public universities.]

What about that class valedictorian I cited with a
total GPA of 600? What about the student who takes
hard courses and gets lower grades, but learns more?

Querry: who are these educationist idiots and bean counters you are
concerned about?

Most of the current teachers, almost all of the
current educational administrators, and anyone who
thinks the quality of teaching is reflected in the
overall performance of the students, without taking
into account the WIDE difference in ability.

schools. On the gifted mailing list, someone in an
admissions office stated that there was one class
valedictorian with an SAT total of as little as 600.

But those are singular point cases, they have no impact on the overall
result. I can recall when I went for the "campus tour" for college,
that the guide was a student that was technically "valedictorian", but
that was because she was from a tiny school (less than 10 kids) in a
tiny rural town.

This was from a larger school. But if the "best"
student got a 600, I would not trust anything from
that school.

The SAT is NOT a good test, and is getting worse. The new
writing part will give points for producing fiction; this is
not going to make much difference in learning, especially in
learning to think.

No takeable test is going to be wonderful; adequate is all that you
need, and the SAT is adequate. I don't think the creative writing
thing will be as bad as you think though. The graders aren't going to
be reading them to be entertained, they'll be using a systematic
scoring method. I haven't really looked into it, so I don't know all
the categories of things they'll be looking at. In general I suspect
they'll be looking for how well the person uses language to develop
and present an idea, grammar, structure, spelling, etc. This is
certainly no worse than the take a word and pick the opposite from a
list of words method. I always felt those were more about
determining whether the kid knows how to manage the question, rather
than whether they have a great vocabulary.

It is worse. Creative writing is often absent in many
bright people, because they know that they are doing a poor
job in stating what they mean. They may still be very good
at understanding. I was able to get by at a "B" level, but
it was because I had no problem with the technical points,
and could manage a small amount of window dressing. As for
presenting ideas, at the level a knowledgeable child can
do it, the graders would not have the background to understand
it. Would the presentation of the structure of a mathematical
concept be understandable to an English teacher?

prep courses have a strong similarity to "cramming" for a set of
finals. I'd always simply coasted through school, so I never learned
this skill.. It is a skill that could have easily improved my final
GPA half a point.

But at the expense of understanding what you are learning.

No, not really at the expense of, but rather in addition to what was
actually learned.

Only once, and this was a rather unusual situation, did I
ever study the day before an examination, so I had to learn.

I never really was much for studying before exams either. As I
mentioned earlier, I did try it a few times, but was never able to
really make the extra effort pay off.

Students today memorize well, but have no idea how to use
the material even in slightly different situations.

I never could memorize anything. I got through high school trig by
concentrating all my memory effort on remembering the shape of the sin
and cos curves and then deriving all the remaining identities as they
were needed.
Maybe cramming would have been an impossible skill for me to master,
but still, it would have been nice to try.

--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.
User: "rwwff"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 11:37:04 AM
(Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cgo6ek$1dau@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...

In article <8c88725.0408270612.14cb1cef@posting.google.com>,
rwwff <rwwff@yahoo.com> wrote:

(Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cglbvl$11h0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...
I think you overstate this, sure my B's and occassional C's in
'honors' English gave me a slightly lower grade point than if I had
taken the regular English and coasted through with an 'A'. [I was
borderline on the English subject, so they gave me a choice.] But not
by much; competitively, there were very few in the regular English
making solid A's; and those few rarely took anything other than
freshman biology and maybe the algebra I. This locked my class rank
right at the bottom of the all-honors folks, but well above everyone
else. (17/517).


I never stated that it was always the case; but in many
schools it is. This is very much the case in strong
high schools, where students very definitely avoid honors
courses because of concern for grades.

You are arguing about student choices now, and that is a completely
different matter than arguing about what is available or whether the
SATs are adequate. Yes, there will always be lazy kids with parents
who aren't paying attention that will avoid the honors classes in
order to score the easy 'A'. My point is that with an honors A being
scored as a 7, and a regular courses A being scored as a 6; there will
be no sub 6.1 valedictorians, there will be very few kids who score
5.8 - 6.0 while taking no honors courses, and the upper 5% to 2% range
will be cluttered with kids who take honors courses and make B's and
C's.

I doubt this basic math has changed much; and I doubt there are many
college administrators who don't understand this.


THIS IS FALSE! The college preparatory mathematics
which was standard before WWII is not even available
in most high schools, and there is no way that anyone
can tell from a transcript whether the old "Euclid"
geometry course was given, or the "modern" memorize
and compute, or even memorize proofs, junk is the
case. The old algebra I is often worth more than
two years of algebra now.

That has always been the case. Courses change over time. The
preparatory classes tought in 1900 were different than the ones tought
in 1935, just as the ones tought today are different than the ones
tought in 1950. Big surprise. I do worry a *little* about the early
introduction of electronic aides (computers and calculators); but the
tools is so ubiquitous now, it may just be my particular ludite
instincts working their way to the surface.
I do know that I will *not* be relying upon the schools to teach my
daughter math and science, thats my job. If she gets a little extra
out of school, then so much the better; but it remains primarily my
responsibility as a parent to insure that she can do calculus and
design and execute a analytically meaningful experiment to test a
hypothesis.

Most high school teachers teach computation and
formulas. This makes it harder to learn the real
basics later.

Its always been this way. With luck, you'll meet one or two smart
ones while in high school, but the rest are just coasting, trying to
avoid trouble, and collect a paycheck. I've seen the courses they
take to get certified, how they are graded. Not so secret to getting
your teacher's certification, show up at the classes, say as little as
possible, turn in your projects, and forget the class as quickly as
possible.

Now fortunately, I
live in a state where class rank is used instead of affirmative


What about that class valedictorian I cited with a
total GPA of 600? What about the student who takes
hard courses and gets lower grades, but learns more?

Are we talking GPA or SAT here, GPA is normally expressed in a range
using a regular "A" as 6 or 4. Do you mean a 6.00 GPA, which would be
decent, if a little lower than what I'd expect. A valedictorian with
a SAT score of 600, that would suck, but I wouldn't say impossible. I
could see someone very smart, with English as a rusty second or third
language being able to do well on project and essay graded classes,
but being unable to complete the SAT in the alloted time. These
special cases are going to be rare, I'd bet well below 1 in 10,000
high school graduates.
As to the harder courses and lower grades issue, yes, thats the way it
works; and if you are stupid enough to let your kid get away with it,
well then, you deserve the result. My parents always pushed me, but
they never would have tolerated me taking easier math and science
classes (not that I didn't ask.) Just ask yourself, which is more
important to a future science/engineering student, class rank, or a
high math SAT and one or more 800's on science/math achievement tests.
My 800 on the chem achievement test was the only thing that really
got a serious reaction from my interviewers for the various colleges.
I don't think I had one comment about class rank either positive or
negative.

Querry: who are these educationist idiots and bean counters you are
concerned about?


Most of the current teachers, almost all of the
current educational administrators, and anyone who
thinks the quality of teaching is reflected in the
overall performance of the students, without taking
into account the WIDE difference in ability.

I don't disagree with the concept of measuring teaching performance by
overall group performance; though it should be normalized against past
performance of the same group.
On a side note, I should point out that while I went to public school,
I have no intention of sending my daughter to public school. If
people think its expensive or whatever, I ask, which is more important
to you, a new car, or your kids education? They cost about the same.
Which lasts longer? So I do without having two cars in the driveway
and ride my bicycle to the grocery store. I end up with a school and
teachers who have a financial interest in seeing that I am pleased
with the quality of my child's education.

This was from a larger school. But if the "best"
student got a 600, I would not trust anything from
that school.

I would be only concerned if the 600 SAT was the best score in the
school; which I doubt. Just because the valedictorian makes a 600,
doesn't mean everyone else in the class made lower.

It is worse. Creative writing is often absent in many
bright people, because they know that they are doing a poor
job in stating what they mean. They may still be very good

Then write more, its a skill. And with computers and wordprocessors,
its easy as pie to write lots of stuff on lots of topics. Besides,
the essays are not creative writing as someone else pointed out. They
are "here's a topic, pick a side, provide your reasoning.". In point
of fact, that is exactly the kind of essay I was asked to write in
college when they were determining what amount of English each
freshman would need to take. Its a very easy type of composition to
do.

it. Would the presentation of the structure of a mathematical
concept be understandable to an English teacher?

Thats not the point, the graders don't need to understand the concept
in question in order to tell whether you've presented what you think
you know in a clear and rational manner. These compositions aren't
about getting a "right" answer. They are about testing the persons
ability to communicate in writing.
.
User: "Herman Rubin"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 12:21:16 PM
In article <8c88725.0408280837.6aaff29f@posting.google.com>,
rwwff <rwwff@yahoo.com> wrote:

hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cgo6ek$1dau@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...

In article <8c88725.0408270612.14cb1cef@posting.google.com>,
rwwff <rwwff@yahoo.com> wrote:

hrubin@odds.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) wrote in message news:<cglbvl$11h0@odds.stat.purdue.edu>...

....................
<> I never stated that it was always the case; but in many
<> schools it is. This is very much the case in strong
<> high schools, where students very definitely avoid honors
<> courses because of concern for grades.

You are arguing about student choices now, and that is a completely
different matter than arguing about what is available or whether the
SATs are adequate. Yes, there will always be lazy kids with parents
who aren't paying attention that will avoid the honors classes in
order to score the easy 'A'. My point is that with an honors A being
scored as a 7, and a regular courses A being scored as a 6; there will
be no sub 6.1 valedictorians, there will be very few kids who score
5.8 - 6.0 while taking no honors courses, and the upper 5% to 2% range
will be cluttered with kids who take honors courses and make B's and
C's.

This is not the case in most schools. Frankly, the colleges
should not be willing to accept students who have not taken
honors courses given up to the high standards they should
have, and graded for understanding, not memorization. But
at this point, this cannot even be done; most honors and
AP courses are weak.
<> >I doubt this basic math has changed much; and I doubt there are many
<> >college administrators who don't understand this.
<> THIS IS FALSE! The college preparatory mathematics
<> which was standard before WWII is not even available
<> in most high schools, and there is no way that anyone
<> can tell from a transcript whether the old "Euclid"
<> geometry course was given, or the "modern" memorize
<> and compute, or even memorize proofs, junk is the
<> case. The old algebra I is often worth more than
<> two years of algebra now.

That has always been the case. Courses change over time. The
preparatory classes tought in 1900 were different than the ones tought
in 1935, just as the ones tought today are different than the ones
tought in 1950.

To a SMALL extent, yes. There was more mathematics taught
in the program in 1935 and 1950 than in 1900, and there were
more facts (not that important) in the science courses.
Big surprise. I do worry a *little* about the early

introduction of electronic aides (computers and calculators); but the
tools is so ubiquitous now, it may just be my particular ludite
instincts working their way to the surface.

I am quite familiar with the times BC (before computers), and
I am quite good at mental arithmetic, enough so that I was
able to avoid having to use a slide rule when it was "required".
However, I do not think it is bad, if properly used.

I do know that I will *not* be relying upon the schools to teach my
daughter math and science, thats my job. If she gets a little extra
out of school, then so much the better; but it remains primarily my
responsibility as a parent to insure that she can do calculus and
design and execute a analytically meaningful experiment to test a
hypothesis.

I suggest you keep her out of the school courses in those.
Also, teach logic, including proofs, and algebra VERY early.
<> Most high school teachers teach computation and
<> formulas. This makes it harder to learn the real
<> basics later.

Its always been this way. With luck, you'll meet one or two smart
ones while in high school, but the rest are just coasting, trying to
avoid trouble, and collect a paycheck. I've seen the courses they
take to get certified, how they are graded. Not so secret to getting
your teacher's certification, show up at the classes, say as little as
possible, turn in your projects, and forget the class as quickly as
possible.

<> >Now fortunately, I
<> >live in a state where class rank is used instead of affirmative
<> What about that class valedictorian I cited with a
<> total GPA of 600? What about the student who takes
<> hard courses and gets lower grades, but learns more?

Are we talking GPA or SAT here, GPA is normally expressed in a range
using a regular "A" as 6 or 4. Do you mean a 6.00 GPA, which would be
decent, if a little lower than what I'd expect. A valedictorian with
a SAT score of 600, that would suck, but I wouldn't say impossible. I
could see someone very smart, with English as a rusty second or third
language being able to do well on project and essay graded classes,
but being unable to complete the SAT in the alloted time. These
special cases are going to be rare, I'd bet well below 1 in 10,000
high school graduates.
As to the harder courses and lower grades issue, yes, thats the way it
works; and if you are stupid enough to let your kid get away with it,
well then, you deserve the result. My parents always pushed me, but
they never would have tolerated me taking easier math and science
classes (not that I didn't ask.) Just ask yourself, which is more
important to a future science/engineering student, class rank, or a
high math SAT and one or more 800's on science/math achievement tests.
My 800 on the chem achievement test was the only thing that really
got a serious reaction from my interviewers for the various colleges.
I don't think I had one comment about class rank either positive or
negative.

<> >Querry: who are these educationist idiots and bean counters you are
<> >concerned about?
<> Most of the current teachers, almost all of the
<> current educational administrators, and anyone who
<> thinks the quality of teaching is reflected in the
<> overall performance of the students, without taking
<> into account the WIDE difference in ability.

I don't disagree with the concept of measuring teaching performance by
overall group performance; though it should be normalized against past
performance of the same group.
On a side note, I should point out that while I went to public school,
I have no intention of sending my daughter to public school. If
people think its expensive or whatever, I ask, which is more important
to you, a new car, or your kids education? They cost about the same.
Which lasts longer? So I do without having two cars in the driveway
and ride my bicycle to the grocery store. I end up with a school and
teachers who have a financial interest in seeing that I am pleased
with the quality of my child's education.

<> This was from a larger school. But if the "best"
<> student got a 600, I would not trust anything from
<> that school.

I would be only concerned if the 600 SAT was the best score in the
school; which I doubt. Just because the valedictorian makes a 600,
doesn't mean everyone else in the class made lower.

<> It is worse. Creative writing is often absent in many
<> bright people, because they know that they are doing a poor
<> job in stating what they mean. They may still be very good

Then write more, its a skill. And with computers and wordprocessors,
its easy as pie to write lots of stuff on lots of topics. Besides,
the essays are not creative writing as someone else pointed out. They
are "here's a topic, pick a side, provide your reasoning.". In point
of fact, that is exactly the kind of essay I was asked to write in
college when they were determining what amount of English each
freshman would need to take. Its a very easy type of composition to
do.

<> it. Would the presentation of the structure of a mathematical
<> concept be understandable to an English teacher?

Thats not the point, the graders don't need to understand the concept
in question in order to tell whether you've presented what you think
you know in a clear and rational manner. These compositions aren't
about getting a "right" answer. They are about testing the persons
ability to communicate in writing.

--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.


User: "toto"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 09:48:23 AM
On 27 Aug 2004 15:44:04 -0500,
(Herman
Rubin) wrote:

What about that class valedictorian I cited with a
total GPA of 600?

You mean SAT score here?

What about the student who takes
hard courses and gets lower grades, but learns more?

What about him or her? Since, in general, gpas are
weighted for honors and AP courses, it is likely that
s/he will get into a good college and get the education
s/he wants and needs.
--
Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
.
User: "Herman Rubin"

Title: Re: Time to dump the SATs? 28 Aug 2004 11:09:21 AM
In article <gn61j0df3cs839dd5686omg33t3h7ek9v6@4ax.com>,
toto <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote:

On 27 Aug 2004 15:44:04 -0500,

(Herman
Rubin) wrote:

What about that class valedictorian I cited with a
total GPA of 600?

You mean SAT score here?

Yes. Considering that the lowest reported score on
any section is 200, this is abominable for an
elementary school "graduate".

What about the student who takes
hard courses and gets lower grades, but learns more?

What about him or her? Since, in general, gpas are
weighted for honors and AP courses, it is likely that
s/he will get into a good college and get the education
s/he wants and needs.

Generally, they are not weighted. Some places weight
them, most do not. Also, a huge part of the grade is
often on "busy work".
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Stati