A topic to generate endless philosophical discussion, forever



 Science > Philosophy > A topic to generate endless philosophical discussion, forever

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Philosophy
User: ""
Date: 13 Nov 2006 12:19:27 PM
Object: A topic to generate endless philosophical discussion, forever
=AE=F3=F1=A9 =A9 =B2 * =B9=B0=B0=B3 wrote:

On 13 Nov 2006 09:12:52 -0800,

wrote and
included this (or some of this):

Toodle-Lewd-Wench-Sky. Nicean meeting you all. Don't be just too mean
to me, I do have a smidgen of feelings left after 53 years. A rib, a
dare - cheese. Alf's weiner seine.

Yeh, OK, he's daft enough. Can we keep him for a bit?
(And he didn't even X-post to his clever group)

(He has now).

--
=AE=F3=F1=A9 =A9 =B2 * =B9=B0=B0=B3

Good Morning > =AE=F3=F1=A9 =A9 =B2 * =B9=B0=B0=B3,
(That sounded like the start of a really bad Ray Bradbury story),
Are decisions made by committee here? THEN I WANT OUT!!!!!!!!!!
"Clever group". Meaning------DRHof? Aroonn??????????????? No, this
is a present for just youse guise.
(You can see action has dried up on my regular groups)
Daft aint the fuckin 1/2 of it. Remember my Law # 1???
"Fantastic insight into the true meaning of Reality is isomorphic to
insanity."
And damn, every time I list one the other two just sorta naturally
follow:
2=2E Arthur C. Clarke was (is?) (law will fall into one form or the other
here some day) a pessimist (a metalaw)
3=2E Civilizations do not advance technologically linearly. Instead,
their technological advancement explodes by paradigm shift like a
triggered off H-bomb. Luckily, cybernetic self-organization keeps it
under control.
4=2E For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction....no,
wait..that one's been done.
Donsky Oatsky
.

User: ""

Title: Re: A topic to generate endless philosophical discussion, forever 13 Nov 2006 03:54:49 PM
wrote:

=AE=F3=F1=A9 =A9 =B2 * =B9=B0=B0=B3 wrote:

On 13 Nov 2006 09:12:52 -0800,

wrote and
included this (or some of this):


Toodle-Lewd-Wench-Sky. Nicean meeting you all. Don't be just too mean
to me, I do have a smidgen of feelings left after 53 years. A rib, a
dare - cheese. Alf's weiner seine.


Yeh, OK, he's daft enough. Can we keep him for a bit?


(And he didn't even X-post to his clever group)


(He has now).

--
=AE=F3=F1=A9 =A9 =B2 * =B9=B0=B0=B3


Good Morning > =AE=F3=F1=A9 =A9 =B2 * =B9=B0=B0=B3,

(That sounded like the start of a really bad Ray Bradbury story),

Are decisions made by committee here? THEN I WANT OUT!!!!!!!!!!

"Clever group". Meaning------DRHof? Aroonn??????????????? No, this
is a present for just youse guise.

(You can see action has dried up on my regular groups)

Daft aint the fuckin 1/2 of it. Remember my Law # 1???

"Fantastic insight into the true meaning of Reality is isomorphic to
insanity."

And damn, every time I list one the other two just sorta naturally
follow:

2. Arthur C. Clarke was (is?) (law will fall into one form or the other
here some day) a pessimist (a metalaw)

3. Civilizations do not advance technologically linearly. Instead,
their technological advancement explodes by paradigm shift like a
triggered off H-bomb. Luckily, cybernetic self-organization keeps it
under control.

4. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction....no,
wait..that one's been done.

Donsky Oatsky

Don, he said, Hofstadterianly self-referentially. How do you generate
urine best, most useless endless debates? Why----HAVE THEM AGAINST
URINESELF!!!!!!
Don: Don, do we have free will?
Don: Yes, we do.
Don: No, we don't.
Don: Of course we have free will, Don. It's an a priori/aposteriori
dichotomy. A priori oui 1/2 awl kinds of choices ( =3D free will);
afterwards (a posteriori, we don't). That's where some brain dead
fucking philosophers will get all confused and argue with you endlessly
concerning what any 4 year old realizes with Ramanujan intuition.
Don: It's a pity you haven't moved on yet, Don
Don: Oh.
Don: Lets see. What's next. Let's argue the Global Brain.
Don: The Global Brain has formed or will form.
Don: No. The Global Brain is a myth.
Don: The Global brain has formed or will form.
Don: No. The Global Brain is a myth.
Don: The Global brain has formed or will form.
Don: No. The Global Brain is a myth.
Don: The Global brain has formed or will form.
Don: No. The Global Brain is a myth.
Don: The Global brain has formed or will form.
Don: No. The Global Brain is a myth.
Don: The Global brain has formed or will form.
Don: No. The Global Brain is a myth.
Don: The Global brain has formed or will form.
Don: No. The Global Brain is a myth.
..=2E..(see Principia Cybernetica write-up on the "Actualized Infinity'
A Rod Serling Production
Have a nice day.
Addreess your issues:
Issues
666 Hell St.
Hell, Texas 66666
TBTSLATHOTW
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Philosophical discussion
College Trend: Film Discussion Instead of Reading Discussion
What kind of discussion would happen if ...
Request for discussion. The following was posted to another newsgroup.
Any interest in starting a public philosophy discussion group in Brighton East Sussex?!?
hegel discussion
Optagon's Radio Discussion with Dr. Kevin Barrett
Johnny One Note Kerry Helping Republicons Get the Public Discussion Off of Economic Issues
Toronto Area Meetup: Discussion of Postmodern / Late Modern Culture
Invitation to Discussion
Re: Ethics Discussion
:: more focus on the constructive discussion
Always remember JY, there is no shame in discussing or searching forthe truth...the only shame is when this search or discussion is being stifledby egoistic self serving pride.
MI5 Persecution: Newsgroup members join in the discussion (2082)
Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER