| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"Laurent" |
| Date: |
05 Jan 2008 02:37:08 PM |
| Object: |
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space. It is composed by many different
particles, like photons or EMR, which are considered particles, and
ZPR, also considered particles but of a very different nature. What I
call aether is before this material space, it is what Einstein called
'the gravitational ether'.
What I call space is not the same as what 19th century and early 20th
century physicists called space. Back then there were no CBR, nor
Wheeler's quantum foam. Today, space is considered to be material, a
collection of small particles, some of which are called dark energy or
zero point radiation. This is why modern physics now say space is
grainy.
Gravity causes space to flow as an electromotive force is created by a
body's rotation. The gravitational field, as described by Einstein, is
continuous, not quantized like the CBR is. As morphic fields
surrounding rotating bodies cut through the CBR, there is friction
which creates matter-waves, just as EMR is created when you shake an
electron. These matter-waves, or matter selective quanta, are pulled
in by an electromotive force orthogonal to the direction of rotation
of bodies, inwardly pulling ZPR particles to the center of the system.
This process depends on the characteristics of the matter-waves, which
in turn depend on the characteristics of the rotating body. This model
explains why some planets have greater concentrations of some elements
than others.
Gravitation comes from a pressure differential in material space
caused by the constant radially flowing matter waves into bodies with
mass as quantum matter condenses and crystallizes into its objective
state. Space particles are carried by matter-selective, inwardly
flowing quanta, in an electrical current. Just like electrons are
moved by electromotive forces. Now, if material space is made from
particles, then it may also be subject to changes in pressure and
density, like a gas. Therefore, if space particles carried by matter
waves continuously condense into material objects, that would mean
that the closer you get to the object, the denser space would become
as a function of the object's mass and radius, explaining why gravitic
pressure, as described in flowing space theories, also obeys the
inverse square law.
Picture two bodies, like the Earth and the Moon, now imagine space
flowing into the Earth and into the Moon at the same time, that causes
gravitation. Because there is flow going in opposite directions, and
material space's density decreases, there is a drop in pressure,
causing objects to drift towards the lower pressure region as pressure
tries to equalize itself. That's how we get tide movement; the Moon
casts a shadow, so to speak, causing gravitic pressure to drop between
the two bodies, consequently making the sea level to rise where the
shadow is.
Inertia
Inertia, as conceived by Galileo, meant a resistance to change, and
process, in this view, is synonymous to change. Reality is process and
gravity and inertia are products of this process. Inertia is the
result of 'aether drag', a resistance to change in space flow rate,
into and from the particle, as the particle moves through space.
Inertia comes from the tension created by a system as the rate of
space flow changes, as it accelerates within the chaotic medium. There
is a momentum/information exchange, through EMR, between particles and
space, as they continuously need to reset their spatial relationships
in order for Thermodynamics laws to hold as required by the
Equivalency and Relativity Principles. (Unruh-Davies radiation and
Timothy Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum' )
While a particle is moving at a constant speed and all the geometrical
parameters are set, it won't experience any inertial forces, but, as
it accelerates and the relationships change, it needs to keep re-
adjusting to its new energy/space consumption settings. That's why
relativistic effects are so real. When accelerated in relation to
other particles, space shrinks, time slows down and mass (process)
grows within the particle, in order to balance energy usage in
momentum space and maintain its dependence and relation to spacetime
in accordance to energy conservation laws.
There is a delay as matter reaches thermal equilibrium with its
surroundings, we experience it as inertia. This is the nature of
Timothy Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum'. It takes time for any moving
object to reach thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, as it jumps
from frame to frame in spacetime! Each frame being, in reality, marked
by the collapse of each matter-wave-front, like a quantum clock, as
inwardly flowing matter waves bring with them some of the information
necessary for each quantization, before reaching each successive
frame's objective state. Each object having its own rate, its own
wavelength, or, its own pulse, so to speak. Therefore, inertia may be
viewed as drag caused by this radial space flowing process and the
time it takes to occur.
Information about a material system must be contained within the
system, it doesn't come from anywhere else in space. The only external
information being brought to the system by EM waves is the momentum
and the location of the particle in relation to the world. This
systems are comprised by a particle and its particular standing matter-
waves. Particles are selected, quantized and turned into parts, by
standing matter waves, as space particles condense into the particle/
system. The parts, not the information, to construct and maintain the
system intact as it moves through the medium, come from the chaotic
hyperspace. CBR is the material space from where that new geometrical
information is created and incorporated into the system as it moves
through spacetime, it is the prime matter with which volumes are
formed.
Mass
There are matter waves and EMR between you and everything around you,
flowing towards and outwards everything, including yourself. EMR
'bounces' off, picking and transmitting information regarding each
surrounding object's objective state, while matter waves flow
inwardly, towards each object, also bringing information about the
environment, as objects continuously crystallize into spacetime.
Mass is the result of matter's field interactions within itself and
the space in which it sits. Matter is a continuous, time dependent,
and thermodynamically open, self-organizing process. Particles, as
they move through the CBR, need to continuously re-ordinate the space
that constitutes them. Particles are in constant motion, continuously
processing space/information. Matter is formed by this process, and
mass increases directly proportional to the amount of process. This is
why the denser a particle is, or the faster it moves in relation to
other objects, the more massive it becomes.
When a particle is moving at a constant rate there is no informational
lag created by space/information flow within the particle, its spatial
energetic and geometrical relationships remain constant, but, as the
particle is accelerated, the energetic and geometrical relationships
between the particle and space will be in a constant state of change,
causing this space flow tension we call inertia. That's where tensor
math and space curvature comes from.
Each object, according to its own material properties, will
consequently exhibit its own inertial properties, like its own weight
and momentum. Gravitation is caused by radial space/information flow.
As material space in hyperspace is converted to spacetime, or to
matter, by an autopoietic process which is driven by Logic (Syntax and
Topology) and the laws of Thermodynamics.
Mass is caused by the continuous internal process occurring within
matter as space/information radially flows towards the center of all
matter, as it precipitates from hyperspace into spacetime. Mass and
inertia are by-products of a quantum mechanical process where a drag
force is created by the continuous inwardly flow of space into matter.
Mass is equivalent to process.
--
Laurent
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
07 Jan 2008 11:48:19 AM |
|
|
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
[snip crap]
Mass is caused by the continuous internal process occurring within
matter as space/information radially flows towards the center of all
matter, as it precipitates from hyperspace into spacetime.
[snip rest of crap]
If you paid for that text scrambling software, you were robbed.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
05 Jan 2008 03:37:31 PM |
|
|
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
No
.
|
|
|
| User: "quadruple" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
05 Jan 2008 03:52:19 PM |
|
|
On Jan 5, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
No
no what and why,
what kinda stooped unswer is that
are you sure?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
05 Jan 2008 05:25:56 PM |
|
|
quadruple wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
No
no what and why,
what kinda stooped unswer is that
are you sure?
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space. That's what "no"
means.
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
Need a visual?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060323.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laurent" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
05 Jan 2008 09:55:23 PM |
|
|
On Jan 5, 6:25=A0pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
quadruple wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
=A0 =A0No
no what and why,
what kinda stooped unswer is that
are you sure?
=A0 =A0The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
=A0 =A0the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
=A0 =A0big bang. the CMB does not make up material space. That's what "no"=
=A0 =A0means.
=A0 =A0No Center
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
=A0 =A0Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
=A0 =A0WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
=A0 =A0 =A0http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
=A0 =A0WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
=A0 =A0 =A0http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
=A0 =A0Need a visual?
=A0 =A0 =A0http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060323.html
CMBR, ZPR, EMR, Dark Energy... Alan Guth's false vacuum... I just find
it easier to call it CBR or background radiation.
--
Laurent
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
06 Jan 2008 07:00:30 AM |
|
|
Laurent wrote:
On Jan 5, 6:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
quadruple wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
No
no what and why,
what kinda stooped unswer is that
are you sure?
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space. That's what "no"
means.
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
Need a visual?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060323.html
CMBR, ZPR, EMR, Dark Energy... Alan Guth's false vacuum... I just find
it easier to call it CBR or background radiation.
--
Laurent
Physics has little room for imprecision...
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laurent" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
06 Jan 2008 05:04:50 PM |
|
|
On Jan 6, 8:00 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
On Jan 5, 6:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
quadruple wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
No
no what and why,
what kinda stooped unswer is that
are you sure?
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space. That's what "no"
means.
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
Need a visual?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060323.html
CMBR, ZPR, EMR, Dark Energy... Alan Guth's false vacuum... I just find
it easier to call it CBR or background radiation.
--
Laurent
Physics has little room for imprecision...
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space.
Oh! And what does, if I may ask?
--
Laurent
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
06 Jan 2008 05:38:15 PM |
|
|
Laurent wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:00 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space.
Oh! And what does, if I may ask?
--
Laurent
Laurent, "material space" usually refers to solids. Care to
define "material space" in another context?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laurent" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
06 Jan 2008 06:02:51 PM |
|
|
On Jan 6, 6:38 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:00 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space.
Oh! And what does, if I may ask?
--
Laurent
Laurent, "material space" usually refers to solids. Care to
define "material space" in another context?
Material space as in space is matter. Got it?
Now, go tell Wikipedia to make a correction or we will boicot them.
heheh
------------------------------------
Cosmic microwave background radiation
From Wikipedia:
In cosmology, the cosmic microwave background radiation (most often
abbreviated CMB but occasionally CMBR, CBR or MBR, also referred to as
relic radiation) is a form of electromagnetic radiation discovered in
1965 that fills the entire universe.[1] It has a thermal 2.725 kelvin
black body spectrum which peaks in the microwave range at a frequency
of 160.2 GHz, corresponding to a wavelength of 1.9 mm. Most
cosmologists consider this radiation to be the best evidence for the
Big Bang model of the universe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation
.
|
|
|
| User: "G. L. Bradford" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
07 Jan 2008 01:59:27 PM |
|
|
"Laurent" <cyberdyno@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:93fc0513-ea92-4d93-b898-2992efa99965@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 6, 6:38 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:00 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space.
Oh! And what does, if I may ask?
--
Laurent
Laurent, "material space" usually refers to solids. Care to
define "material space" in another context?
Material space as in space is matter. Got it?
Now, go tell Wikipedia to make a correction or we will boicot them.
heheh
The Big Bang horizon, or Big Bang singularity, is of the event horizon of
the Big Crunch. It is supposed that nothing exists back of the Planck level
horizon of the Universe but a "miniature black hole." The Planck level
horizon is NO PART! of the Big Crunch event horizon. It is tied forever to
the Big Bang horizon / singularity. Regarding the back ground of the Planck
level horizon of the entire infinite Universe those physicists have the
arrow of time pointed in the wrong direction (to "miniature black hole").
Should eternally be 'from', never 'to'.
Where [is] the event horizon of the Big Crunch? The [local] event horizon
of every [local] black hole everywhere in the whole of the infinite Universe
(beginningless end of universe).
Where [is] the Big Bang singularity? 1) Back of and immediate to the
Planck level horizon of the entire Universe. 2) The most distant horizon of
the entire Universe (a universal constant) astronomers will ever try to look
out to. 3) The background base of 'Unity', '1', thus NON-LOCALITY! Seamless
with "Planck unit....." Always doubling as -- always having duality with --
"initial condition" or "early universe" (endless beginning of universe).
A multi-entrance (local) (the end of time), single exit (non-local) (the
beginning of time) wormhole.
"NO PART of the Big Crunch event horizon"?! Well....so it is transcendent.
The "cosmological constant" [is] '0'.
GLB
------------------------------------
Cosmic microwave background radiation
From Wikipedia:
In cosmology, the cosmic microwave background radiation (most often
abbreviated CMB but occasionally CMBR, CBR or MBR, also referred to as
relic radiation) is a form of electromagnetic radiation discovered in
1965 that fills the entire universe.[1] It has a thermal 2.725 kelvin
black body spectrum which peaks in the microwave range at a frequency
of 160.2 GHz, corresponding to a wavelength of 1.9 mm. Most
cosmologists consider this radiation to be the best evidence for the
Big Bang model of the universe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
06 Jan 2008 06:48:07 PM |
|
|
Laurent wrote:
Cosmic microwave background radiation
From Wikipedia:
In cosmology, the cosmic microwave background radiation (most often
abbreviated CMB but occasionally CMBR, CBR or MBR, also referred to as
relic radiation) is a form of electromagnetic radiation discovered in
1965 that fills the entire universe.[1] It has a thermal 2.725 kelvin
black body spectrum which peaks in the microwave range at a frequency
of 160.2 GHz, corresponding to a wavelength of 1.9 mm. Most
cosmologists consider this radiation to be the best evidence for the
Big Bang model of the universe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation
Not too shabby.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
07 Jan 2008 09:12:18 AM |
|
|
On Jan 5, 9:55=A0pm, Laurent <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 5, 6:25=A0pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
quadruple wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
=A0 =A0No
no what and why,
what kinda stooped unswer is that
are you sure?
=A0 =A0The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -=
=A0 =A0the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after th=
e
=A0 =A0big bang. the CMB does not make up material space. That's what "n=
o"
=A0 =A0means.
=A0 =A0No Center
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
=A0 =A0Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
=A0 =A0WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
=A0 =A0 =A0http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
=A0 =A0WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
=A0 =A0 =A0http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
=A0 =A0Need a visual?
=A0 =A0 =A0http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060323.html
CMBR, ZPR, EMR, Dark Energy... Alan Guth's false vacuum... I just find
it easier to call it CBR or background radiation.
Calling them all the same thing does not make them all the same thing.
They are all very different.
--
Laurent- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laurent" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
07 Jan 2008 01:03:12 PM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 10:12 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 5, 9:55 pm, Laurent <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 5, 6:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
quadruple wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Laurent wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space.
No
no what and why,
what kinda stooped unswer is that
are you sure?
The CMB photons are left over from an era in the early universe -
the decoupling of matter and light at roughly 380000 yrs after the
big bang. the CMB does not make up material space. That's what "no"=
means.
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
Need a visual?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060323.html
CMBR, ZPR, EMR, Dark Energy... Alan Guth's false vacuum... I just find
it easier to call it CBR or background radiation.
Calling them all the same thing does not make them all the same thing.
They are all very different.
--
Laurent- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
OK, the observable universe is 5=D710-5 of the total density of the
universe. Wasn't I referring specifically to the observable universe
when I called it material space? Is Alan Guth's 'false vacuum'
considered to be matter? Is dark energy matter as we know it? But I
will concede, from now on I will say the CBR fills the entire
observable universe. OK?
EMR refers to all types of radiation. All radiation is made from
photons. All photons are particle and wave at the same time. The point
I am making is that space is material and behaves, in many ways, like
a gas. That space has the properties of pressure and density, like a
gas. And that flowing space and process physics theories are factually
correct and able to make accurate and falsifiable predictions.
--
Laurent
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dono" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
07 Jan 2008 01:07:22 PM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 11:03=A0am, Laurent <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
08 Jan 2008 03:48:29 PM |
|
|
On Jan 5, 3:37=A0pm, Laurent <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space. It is composed by many different
particles, like photons or EMR, which are considered particles, and
ZPR, also considered particles but of a very different nature. What I
call aether is before this material space, it is what Einstein called
'the gravitational ether'.
Well, not really. Einstein called whatever obervations that were
not 100% reverse compatible with Newtonian mechanics, "not real".
Which is exactly where quantum mechanics is still at today.
Since gravitional "ether" is nothing not but a bunch of equations
that describe where matter would go in a fictitous universe
with no other forces.
But since Newtonian mechanics oberservations depend
entirely on the order the three laws are given, you
never get any repeatable observations.
What I call space is not the same as what 19th century and early 20th
century physicists called space. Back then there were no CBR, nor
Wheeler's quantum foam. Today, space is considered to be material, a
collection of small particles, some of which are called dark energy or
zero point radiation. This is why modern physics now say space is
grainy.
Gravity causes space to flow as an electromotive force is created by a
body's rotation. The gravitational field, as described by Einstein, is
continuous, not quantized like the CBR is. As morphic fields
surrounding rotating bodies cut through the CBR, there is friction
which creates matter-waves, just as EMR is created when you shake an
electron. These matter-waves, or matter selective quanta, are pulled
in by an electromotive force orthogonal to the direction of rotation
of bodies, inwardly pulling ZPR particles to the center of the system.
This process depends on the characteristics of the matter-waves, which
in turn depend on the characteristics of the rotating body. This model
explains why some planets have greater concentrations of some elements
than others.
Gravitation comes from a pressure differential in material space
caused by the constant radially flowing matter waves into bodies with
mass as quantum matter condenses and crystallizes into its objective
state. Space particles are carried by matter-selective, inwardly
flowing quanta, in an electrical current. Just like electrons are
moved by electromotive forces. Now, if material space is made from
particles, then it may also be subject to changes in pressure and
density, like a gas. Therefore, if space particles carried by matter
waves continuously condense into material objects, that would mean
that the closer you get to the object, the denser space would become
as a function of the object's mass and radius, explaining why gravitic
pressure, as described in flowing space theories, also obeys the
inverse square law.
Picture two bodies, like the Earth and the Moon, now imagine space
flowing into the Earth and into the Moon at the same time, that causes
gravitation. Because there is flow going in opposite directions, and
material space's density decreases, there is a drop in pressure,
causing objects to drift towards the lower pressure region as pressure
tries to equalize itself. That's how we get tide movement; the Moon
casts a shadow, so to speak, causing gravitic pressure to drop between
the two bodies, consequently making the sea level to rise where the
shadow is.
Inertia
Inertia, as conceived by Galileo, meant a resistance to change, and
process, in this view, is synonymous to change. Reality is process and
gravity and inertia are products of this process. Inertia is the
result of 'aether drag', a resistance to change in space flow rate,
into and from the particle, as the particle moves through space.
Inertia comes from the tension created by a system as the rate of
space flow changes, as it accelerates within the chaotic medium. There
is a momentum/information exchange, through EMR, between particles and
space, as they continuously need to reset their spatial relationships
in order for Thermodynamics laws to hold as required by the
Equivalency and Relativity Principles. (Unruh-Davies radiation and
Timothy Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum' )
While a particle is moving at a constant speed and all the geometrical
parameters are set, it won't experience any inertial forces, but, as
it accelerates and the relationships change, it needs to keep re-
adjusting to its new energy/space consumption settings. That's why
relativistic effects are so real. When accelerated in relation to
other particles, space shrinks, time slows down and mass (process)
grows within the particle, in order to balance energy usage in
momentum space and maintain its dependence and relation to spacetime
in accordance to energy conservation laws.
There is a delay as matter reaches thermal equilibrium with its
surroundings, we experience it as inertia. This is the nature of
Timothy Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum'. It takes time for any moving
object to reach thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, as it jumps
from frame to frame in spacetime! Each frame being, in reality, marked
by the collapse of each matter-wave-front, like a quantum clock, as
inwardly flowing matter waves bring with them some of the information
necessary for each quantization, before reaching each successive
frame's objective state. Each object having its own rate, its own
wavelength, or, its own pulse, so to speak. Therefore, inertia may be
viewed as drag caused by this radial space flowing process and the
time it takes to occur.
Information about a material system must be contained within the
system, it doesn't come from anywhere else in space. The only external
information being brought to the system by EM waves is the momentum
and the location of the particle in relation to the world. This
systems are comprised by a particle and its particular standing matter-
waves. Particles are selected, quantized and turned into parts, by
standing matter waves, as space particles condense into the particle/
system. The parts, not the information, to construct and maintain the
system intact as it moves through the medium, come from the chaotic
hyperspace. CBR is the material space from where that new geometrical
information is created and incorporated into the system as it moves
through spacetime, it is the prime matter with which volumes are
formed.
Mass
There are matter waves and EMR between you and everything around you,
flowing towards and outwards everything, including yourself. EMR
'bounces' off, picking and transmitting information regarding each
surrounding object's objective state, while matter waves flow
inwardly, towards each object, also bringing information about the
environment, as objects continuously crystallize into spacetime.
Mass is the result of matter's field interactions within itself and
the space in which it sits. Matter is a continuous, time dependent,
and thermodynamically open, self-organizing process. Particles, as
they move through the CBR, need to continuously re-ordinate the space
that constitutes them. Particles are in constant motion, continuously
processing space/information. Matter is formed by this process, and
mass increases directly proportional to the amount of process. This is
why the denser a particle is, or the faster it moves in relation to
other objects, the more massive it becomes.
When a particle is moving at a constant rate there is no informational
lag created by space/information flow within the particle, its spatial
energetic and geometrical relationships remain constant, but, as the
particle is accelerated, the energetic and geometrical relationships
between the particle and space will be in a constant state of change,
causing this space flow tension we call inertia. That's where tensor
math and space curvature comes from.
Each object, according to its own material properties, will
consequently exhibit its own inertial properties, like its own weight
and momentum. Gravitation is caused by radial space/information flow.
As material space in hyperspace is converted to spacetime, or to
matter, by an autopoietic process which is driven by Logic (Syntax and
Topology) and the laws of Thermodynamics.
Mass is caused by the continuous internal process occurring within
matter as space/information radially flows towards the center of all
matter, as it precipitates from hyperspace into spacetime. Mass and
inertia are by-products of a quantum mechanical process where a drag
force is created by the continuous inwardly flow of space into matter.
Mass is equivalent to process.
--
Laurent
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laurent" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
09 Jan 2008 11:06:46 AM |
|
|
On Jan 8, 4:48 pm, "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net>
wrote:
On Jan 5, 3:37 pm, Laurent <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space. It is composed by many different
particles, like photons or EMR, which are considered particles, and
ZPR, also considered particles but of a very different nature. What I
call aether is before this material space, it is what Einstein called
'the gravitational ether'.
Well, not really. Einstein called whatever obervations that were
not 100% reverse compatible with Newtonian mechanics, "not real".
Which is exactly where quantum mechanics is still at today.
Since gravitional "ether" is nothing not but a bunch of equations
that describe where matter would go in a fictitous universe
with no other forces.
But since Newtonian mechanics oberservations depend
entirely on the order the three laws are given, you
never get any repeatable observations.
He thought, like Newton, that once particles were formed the link
between empty space (aether) and the particles would cease to exist,
ignoring the continuous flow of energy between the particle and the
substrate. He knew about the link, he knew about particle non-
complementarity and the Heisenberg's UP, but it seems as if he was
still somewhat stuck on Newton's billiard ball model, you know, like
Uncle Al.
--
Laurent
What I call space is not the same as what 19th century and early 20th
century physicists called space. Back then there were no CBR, nor
Wheeler's quantum foam. Today, space is considered to be material, a
collection of small particles, some of which are called dark energy or
zero point radiation. This is why modern physics now say space is
grainy.
Gravity causes space to flow as an electromotive force is created by a
body's rotation. The gravitational field, as described by Einstein, is
continuous, not quantized like the CBR is. As morphic fields
surrounding rotating bodies cut through the CBR, there is friction
which creates matter-waves, just as EMR is created when you shake an
electron. These matter-waves, or matter selective quanta, are pulled
in by an electromotive force orthogonal to the direction of rotation
of bodies, inwardly pulling ZPR particles to the center of the system.
This process depends on the characteristics of the matter-waves, which
in turn depend on the characteristics of the rotating body. This model
explains why some planets have greater concentrations of some elements
than others.
Gravitation comes from a pressure differential in material space
caused by the constant radially flowing matter waves into bodies with
mass as quantum matter condenses and crystallizes into its objective
state. Space particles are carried by matter-selective, inwardly
flowing quanta, in an electrical current. Just like electrons are
moved by electromotive forces. Now, if material space is made from
particles, then it may also be subject to changes in pressure and
density, like a gas. Therefore, if space particles carried by matter
waves continuously condense into material objects, that would mean
that the closer you get to the object, the denser space would become
as a function of the object's mass and radius, explaining why gravitic
pressure, as described in flowing space theories, also obeys the
inverse square law.
Picture two bodies, like the Earth and the Moon, now imagine space
flowing into the Earth and into the Moon at the same time, that causes
gravitation. Because there is flow going in opposite directions, and
material space's density decreases, there is a drop in pressure,
causing objects to drift towards the lower pressure region as pressure
tries to equalize itself. That's how we get tide movement; the Moon
casts a shadow, so to speak, causing gravitic pressure to drop between
the two bodies, consequently making the sea level to rise where the
shadow is.
Inertia
Inertia, as conceived by Galileo, meant a resistance to change, and
process, in this view, is synonymous to change. Reality is process and
gravity and inertia are products of this process. Inertia is the
result of 'aether drag', a resistance to change in space flow rate,
into and from the particle, as the particle moves through space.
Inertia comes from the tension created by a system as the rate of
space flow changes, as it accelerates within the chaotic medium. There
is a momentum/information exchange, through EMR, between particles and
space, as they continuously need to reset their spatial relationships
in order for Thermodynamics laws to hold as required by the
Equivalency and Relativity Principles. (Unruh-Davies radiation and
Timothy Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum' )
While a particle is moving at a constant speed and all the geometrical
parameters are set, it won't experience any inertial forces, but, as
it accelerates and the relationships change, it needs to keep re-
adjusting to its new energy/space consumption settings. That's why
relativistic effects are so real. When accelerated in relation to
other particles, space shrinks, time slows down and mass (process)
grows within the particle, in order to balance energy usage in
momentum space and maintain its dependence and relation to spacetime
in accordance to energy conservation laws.
There is a delay as matter reaches thermal equilibrium with its
surroundings, we experience it as inertia. This is the nature of
Timothy Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum'. It takes time for any moving
object to reach thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, as it jumps
from frame to frame in spacetime! Each frame being, in reality, marked
by the collapse of each matter-wave-front, like a quantum clock, as
inwardly flowing matter waves bring with them some of the information
necessary for each quantization, before reaching each successive
frame's objective state. Each object having its own rate, its own
wavelength, or, its own pulse, so to speak. Therefore, inertia may be
viewed as drag caused by this radial space flowing process and the
time it takes to occur.
Information about a material system must be contained within the
system, it doesn't come from anywhere else in space. The only external
information being brought to the system by EM waves is the momentum
and the location of the particle in relation to the world. This
systems are comprised by a particle and its particular standing matter-
waves. Particles are selected, quantized and turned into parts, by
standing matter waves, as space particles condense into the particle/
system. The parts, not the information, to construct and maintain the
system intact as it moves through the medium, come from the chaotic
hyperspace. CBR is the material space from where that new geometrical
information is created and incorporated into the system as it moves
through spacetime, it is the prime matter with which volumes are
formed.
Mass
There are matter waves and EMR between you and everything around you,
flowing towards and outwards everything, including yourself. EMR
'bounces' off, picking and transmitting information regarding each
surrounding object's objective state, while matter waves flow
inwardly, towards each object, also bringing information about the
environment, as objects continuously crystallize into spacetime.
Mass is the result of matter's field interactions within itself and
the space in which it sits. Matter is a continuous, time dependent,
and thermodynamically open, self-organizing process. Particles, as
they move through the CBR, need to continuously re-ordinate the space
that constitutes them. Particles are in constant motion, continuously
processing space/information. Matter is formed by this process, and
mass increases directly proportional to the amount of process. This is
why the denser a particle is, or the faster it moves in relation to
other objects, the more massive it becomes.
When a particle is moving at a constant rate there is no informational
lag created by space/information flow within the particle, its spatial
energetic and geometrical relationships remain constant, but, as the
particle is accelerated, the energetic and geometrical relationships
between the particle and space will be in a constant state of change,
causing this space flow tension we call inertia. That's where tensor
math and space curvature comes from.
Each object, according to its own material properties, will
consequently exhibit its own inertial properties, like its own weight
and momentum. Gravitation is caused by radial space/information flow.
As material space in hyperspace is converted to spacetime, or to
matter, by an autopoietic process which is driven by Logic (Syntax and
Topology) and the laws of Thermodynamics.
Mass is caused by the continuous internal process occurring within
matter as space/information radially flows towards the center of all
matter, as it precipitates from hyperspace into spacetime. Mass and
inertia are by-products of a quantum mechanical process where a drag
force is created by the continuous inwardly flow of space into matter.
Mass is equivalent to process.
--
Laurent
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laurent" |
|
| Title: Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass* |
09 Jan 2008 11:16:08 AM |
|
|
On Jan 9, 12:06 pm, Laurent <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 8, 4:48 pm, "zzbun...@netscape.net" <zzbun...@netscape.net>
wrote:
On Jan 5, 3:37 pm, Laurent <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote:
About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
Gravity
CBR is what makes up material space. It is composed by many different
particles, like photons or EMR, which are considered particles, and
ZPR, also considered particles but of a very different nature. What I
call aether is before this material space, it is what Einstein called
'the gravitational ether'.
Well, not really. Einstein called whatever obervations that were
not 100% reverse compatible with Newtonian mechanics, "not real".
Which is exactly where quantum mechanics is still at today.
Since gravitional "ether" is nothing not but a bunch of equations
that describe where matter would go in a fictitous universe
with no other forces.
But since Newtonian mechanics oberservations depend
entirely on the order the three laws are given, you
never get any repeatable observations.
He thought, like Newton, that once particles were formed the link
between empty space (aether) and the particles would cease to exist,
ignoring the continuous flow of energy between the particle and the
substrate. He knew about the link, he knew about particle non-
complementarity and the Heisenberg's UP, but it seems as if he was
still somewhat stuck on Newton's billiard ball model, you know, like
Uncle Al.
He also knew about Bohr's model and had accepted it. That's why I say
he failed to differentiate between empty space and material space
(spacetime).
--
Laurent
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|