X-No-archive: yes
"John Jones" <jiversjivers@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:cfoulo$7dg$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
How is it that something 'can' be something else?
err...potential?
either it is or it isn't.
it is this , it can be that...
We need not invoke ,
earnestly solicit or call on a
'being-ness'
POV gradually coming into being
If we wish to sustain both
sustaining what can be and what is?
in a single image
in a mental picture
within the framework of
within a structure of
'possibility'
what can be
we must invent 'being-ness'.
we must create a POV of gradually coming into being
But
there can only ever 'be' one thing or another,
there is either this ( what is)
or that ( what can be)
whether in the realm of
possibility
( what can be)
or certainty.
(what is)
What do you really mean jellybean?
.
