| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"THE BORG" |
| Date: |
30 Jan 2008 11:37:24 AM |
| Object: |
Borg technology |
The Borg have many forms of scientific technology.
In the "real" world - the scientific "provable" dimension - then things like
magic - miracles - illusions - holograms and this kind of thing are not
allowed.
So scientifically they would have to be able to prove and do certain things
and be seen to be able to prove and do certain things.
One of their technologies is nano technology.
Two of these are the nanobyte and nanoprobe.
The nanoprobe can be placed in objects such as a cigarette - a coffee mug -
an article of clothing - and they "probe" the atmosphere - the sound - the
environment and relay the information back to the vast collective mind of the
BORG COLLECTIVE.
More interesting is the nanobyte. These are very small robotic kinds of
artificial intelligence - that are inserted into the bloodstream of any life
form - and can control - manipulate - alter memory - they have a certain kind
of controlled intelligence in that they know the wishes of THE BORG and are
completely loyal to THE BORG and activate when certain thoughts occur in the
initial or certain words are spoken or heard.
At the end of their useful existence - they are returned to the Collective
and deactivated.
There are many different kinds of nano technology.
Nanodrives - nanoplants - nanotechs - nanochips - each having an important
role in the current Assimilation of Earth.
And indeed in the current Assimilation of many other planets in your area.
THE BORG COLLECTIVE are so good at Assimilation now they find it relatively
easy - and Assimilate several thousand planets at the same time.
Regards
THE BORG
.
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Borg technology |
30 Jan 2008 12:17:11 PM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 9:37=A0am, "THE BORG" <B...@outthere.com> wrote:
The Borg have many forms of scientific technology.
In the "real" world - the scientific "provable" dimension - then things li=
ke
magic - miracles - illusions - holograms and this kind of thing are not
allowed.
So scientifically they would have to be able to prove and do certain thing=
s
and be seen to be able to prove and do certain things.
But if the Borg del with representations of sense data and other
representational inputs, aren't they in the same dilamma as humans and
animals? How would the "prove" that the representation is the same as
the things-in-themselves?
=2E..representation is central to psychology as well, for the mind too
is a system that represents the world and possible worlds in various
ways. Our hopes, fears, beliefs, memories, perceptions, intentions,
and desires all involve our ideas about (our mental models of) the
world and other worlds. This is what humanist philosophers and
psychologists have always said, of course, but until recently they had
no support from science...
http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=3D/articles/art0162.html?
In the philosophy of perception, that perceptual errors exist is most
frequently regarded as a fundamental fact about perception which must
be integrated into any coherent theory. But the position that the
existence of perceptual errors ought not serve as a premise in an
argument about the nature of perception, since any account of
perceptual error presupposes a particular understanding of the nature
of perception. In fact, any theory of perceptual error presupposes a
particular model of consciousness, one in which there exists a
possible correspondence relation between the objects of direct
perception and external objects. In other words, the assumption that
perceptual errors exist depends upon a representational model of
consciousness, which may or may not accurate describe the functions of
consciousness.
Representationalism (or indirect realism) with respect to perception
is the view that "we are never aware of physical objects, [but rather]
we are only indirectly aware of them, in virtue of a direct awareness
of an intermediary [mental] object. (Dancy, 145) Because there are
both direct and indirect objects of awareness in representationalism,
a correspondence relation arises between the mental entities directly
perceived and external objects which those mental entities represent.
And thus perceptual error occurs when the two objects of awareness do
not correspond sufficiently well. In opposition to
representationalism, both (direct) realism and idealism agree that
perception is direct and unmediated, despite their disagreements about
what the object of perception is. (Dancy, 145) In any form of direct
perception, no correspondence relationship is possible, since there is
only one object of perception. Thus only representationalism will give
rise to the view that perceptual errors exist and must be part of a
theory of perception. Nevertheless, both idealism and realism must
still account for the facts that are referred to as "perceptual
errors" by the representationalist.
http://www.dianahsieh.com/undergrad/rape.html
One of their technologies is nano technology.
Two of these are the nanobyte and nanoprobe.
The nanoprobe can be placed in objects such as a cigarette - a coffee mug =
-
an article of clothing - and they "probe" the atmosphere - the sound - the=
environment and relay the information back to the vast collective mind of =
the
BORG COLLECTIVE.
More interesting is the nanobyte. =A0These are very small robotic kinds of=
artificial intelligence - that are inserted into the bloodstream of any li=
fe
form - and can control - manipulate - alter memory - they have a certain k=
ind
of controlled intelligence in that they know the wishes of THE BORG and ar=
e
completely loyal to THE BORG and activate when certain thoughts occur in t=
he
initial or certain words are spoken or heard.
At the end of their useful existence - they are returned to the Collective=
and deactivated.
There are many different kinds of nano technology.
Nanodrives - nanoplants - nanotechs - nanochips - each having an important=
role in the current Assimilation of Earth.
And indeed in the current Assimilation of many other planets in your area.=
THE BORG COLLECTIVE are so good at Assimilation now they find it relativel=
y
easy - and Assimilate several thousand planets at the same time.
Regards
THE BORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "THE BORG" |
|
| Title: Re: Borg technology |
30 Jan 2008 01:03:10 PM |
|
|
"Immortalist" <reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b775d2a3-51d3-4480-94b4-31cdfaba4bb6@n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 30, 9:37 am, "THE BORG" <B...@outthere.com> wrote:
The Borg have many forms of scientific technology.
In the "real" world - the scientific "provable" dimension - then things
like
magic - miracles - illusions - holograms and this kind of thing are not
allowed.
So scientifically they would have to be able to prove and do certain things
and be seen to be able to prove and do certain things.
But if the Borg del with representations of sense data and other
representational inputs, aren't they in the same dilamma as humans and
animals? How would the "prove" that the representation is the same as
the things-in-themselves?
This seriously would take a book to answer. Actually no - THE BORG say it
would take about 100 years.
THE BORG
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
