Boycott the mother fucker



 Science > Philosophy > Boycott the mother fucker

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Philosophy
User: "Akira Bergman"
Date: 12 Jan 2007 02:41:58 PM
Object: Boycott the mother fucker
The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control
Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!
.

User: "Bill Snyder"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 05:01:46 PM
"Akira Bergman" <akirab@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:1168634516.920372.231800@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control

Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!

While I do not agree with you on a theoretical basis (i.e., I believe that
we should engage and take responsibility for the idiocy our governments and
societies perpetrate), in practice, I am very close to your views. I do
support various charities (those directed at preserving wildlife and our
environment and those aiming at feeding and housing the "drek" which our
society deliberately leaves behind). But as for me, myself, actively
engaging anything! I'm almost 80, and I say "Boycott the mother fucker.
Minimise your life NOW!"
--
BS
"But I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now."
.
User: "Akira Bergman"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 05:52:29 PM
Thank you for your support Bill. Maybe "Minimise your life NOW" should
be "Minimise your consumption NOW". Our biggest problem is that the
bullies control most essential stuff for living as well. Our mere
living is contributing to the problem for that reason. I agree with you
very much on doing positive non-consumer stuff. In fact life becomes
larger with less consumtion, paradoxially.
Bill Snyder wrote:

"Akira Bergman" <akirab@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:1168634516.920372.231800@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control

Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!

While I do not agree with you on a theoretical basis (i.e., I believe that
we should engage and take responsibility for the idiocy our governments and
societies perpetrate), in practice, I am very close to your views. I do
support various charities (those directed at preserving wildlife and our
environment and those aiming at feeding and housing the "drek" which our
society deliberately leaves behind). But as for me, myself, actively
engaging anything! I'm almost 80, and I say "Boycott the mother fucker.
Minimise your life NOW!"

--
BS
"But I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now."

.
User: "tooly"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 06:56:22 PM
"Akira Bergman" <akirab@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:1168645949.785700.222250@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

Thank you for your support Bill. Maybe "Minimise your life NOW" should
be "Minimise your consumption NOW". Our biggest problem is that the
bullies control most essential stuff for living as well. Our mere
living is contributing to the problem for that reason. I agree with you
very much on doing positive non-consumer stuff. In fact life becomes
larger with less consumtion, paradoxially.


"...Life becomes larger with less consumption."...
Now that is a modern conveyance of an old idea about 'material decadence' if
I've ever heard one. The materials of life are important of course, but
they are only 'means' to a greater end, that end being the better
intangibles found in human relationships. Happiness, fullfillment,
satisfaction...these will always be a function of those relationships, and
no amount of life's materials can ever replace them.
..
.

User: "AlanS"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 14 Jan 2007 04:53:05 AM
"Akira Bergman" <akirab@tpg.com.au> wrote:

In fact life becomes larger with less consumtion, paradoxially.

Tell that to those with next to no consumption, starving in Africa.
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 09:33:56 PM
Akira Bergman wrote:

Minimise your life NOW!

So ***** and stop fucking polluting cyberspace with your envy ridden
socialist commie tree hugging fucking idiotic crap.
MG
.
User: "Tim"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 13 Jan 2007 04:01:34 AM
<mikegordge@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1168659232.673312.132650@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...


Akira Bergman wrote:

Minimise your life NOW!


So ***** and stop fucking polluting cyberspace with your envy ridden
socialist commie tree hugging fucking idiotic crap.


MG

You conformist *****. Mikey's way or the highway eh? You Randroids iz all the
same: there's wrong and there's Rand. What a bunch of dummies.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 13 Jan 2007 05:56:09 AM
Tim wrote:


You conformist *****.

Stupid *****, its not me calling for a halt to progress ewe dumb arse,
goodgod ewe poor desperate commie *****. Hows the sheep fucking going?
MG
.
User: "Tim"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 13 Jan 2007 07:23:48 AM
<mikegordge@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1168689368.278585.284690@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


Hows the sheep fucking going?

MG

The latest statistics show that 9 out of 10 residents of NZ ***** sheep. This
puts NZ way ahead of Wales. Since you're from NZ I'm at a loss as to why
you'd ask me, afterall your the expert. Taken your wife to see the vet yet,
ya cheap *****?
.

User: "Sammybaby"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 14 Jan 2007 06:26:56 AM
skrev:

Tim wrote:


You conformist *****.


Stupid *****, its not me calling for a halt to progress ewe dumb arse,
goodgod ewe poor desperate commie *****. Hows the sheep fucking going?

MG

Mr. Mike,
are you so limited in imagination as to assume that the present range
of products out there are necessary for PROGRESS. Like if we stop
buying most of the shitty made for morons with bad taste products otu
there allt he scientists and inventors and researchers will die. You
poor thing. Clinging in terror to a life raft made out of plastic toy
robots and cans of sugar water and $200 sneakers and busts of elvis and
so on.
.
User: "-Phil Clemence"

Title: Re: BoyGeorge the mother fucker 13 Feb 2007 09:10:46 PM
"Sammybaby" <roastfreesteel@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168777616.687649.159930@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


mikegordge@xtra.co.nz skrev:

Tim wrote:


You conformist *****.


Stupid *****, its not me calling for a halt to progress ewe dumb arse,
goodgod ewe poor desperate commie *****. Hows the sheep fucking going?

MG


Mr. Mike,
are you so limited in imagination as to assume that the present range
of products out there are necessary for PROGRESS. Like if we stop
buying most of the shitty made for morons with bad taste products otu
there allt he scientists and inventors and researchers will die. You
poor thing. Clinging in terror to a life raft made out of plastic toy
robots and cans of sugar water and $200 sneakers and busts of elvis and
so on.

.





User: "kevirwin"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 07:43:22 PM
Akira Bergman wrote:

The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control

Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!

Boycott which mother fucker??
oh, do "out of control" and "sheepish" belong in the same sentence??
just wonderin'
K e v
.
User: "Akira Bergman"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 08:49:07 PM
kevirwin wrote:

Akira Bergman wrote:

The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control

Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!


Boycott which mother fucker??

Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.


oh, do "out of control" and "sheepish" belong in the same sentence??

Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.


just wonderin'
K e v

.
User: "AlanS"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 14 Jan 2007 05:03:04 AM
"Akira Bergman" <akirab@tpg.com.au> wrote:

Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.

Of course, we all do. You have consumed power and bandwidth by this
post, and worse yet, if you own the computer you are posting from, you
are consuming non-renewable resources, materials and contributing to
pollution, global warming, consumerism... etc (less if you are using a
shared computer, but nonzero nontheless). And yet, you chose to post.
Why? Because you like to consume, maybe?
Ah, but it's OK to consume in order to try to convince others about
the ills of consuming. (Hint: This is where you suddenly realize that
everybody has their *own* reasons for consuming.)
.
User: "Akira Bergman"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 14 Jan 2007 01:25:01 PM
It seems you have enough intelligence to figure that out. Bravo. Now
what is required is a bit more intellectual effort to understand the
concept of priority. You can do it, if you put your heart in it.
AlanS wrote:

"Akira Bergman" <akirab@tpg.com.au> wrote:

Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.


Of course, we all do. You have consumed power and bandwidth by this
post, and worse yet, if you own the computer you are posting from, you
are consuming non-renewable resources, materials and contributing to
pollution, global warming, consumerism... etc (less if you are using a
shared computer, but nonzero nontheless). And yet, you chose to post.
Why? Because you like to consume, maybe?

Ah, but it's OK to consume in order to try to convince others about
the ills of consuming. (Hint: This is where you suddenly realize that
everybody has their *own* reasons for consuming.)

.
User: "AlanS"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 15 Jan 2007 07:43:25 PM
"Akira Bergman" <akirab@tpg.com.au> wrote:

It seems you have enough intelligence to figure that out. Bravo. Now
what is required is a bit more intellectual effort to understand the
concept of priority. You can do it, if you put your heart in it.

As far as priorities go, self is the highest priority - not the human
species, not the earth, certainly not the Yangtze dolphin. You cannot
convince people to consume less when benefits of consuming are
immediate, apparent and real for self. Thus, you are wasting
bandwidth. People can only be made to consume less by punishing
consumption or rewarding non-consumption.
.



User: "kevirwin"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 09:01:25 PM
Akira Bergman wrote:

Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.

It wasn't clear. That's why I asked. Maybe you don't know me. I'm
probably the least materialistic person in this forum. I acquire only
that which I need to survive.

Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.

I don't follow **any** "shepherds"....I can make my own decisions.
K e v
.
User: "Akira Bergman"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 09:40:54 PM
Then please forgive my presumption. I am pleased to meet another
minimalist. My poem (if it can be called that) was written at a
moment's inspiration. It is not meant to lecture anyone. More like an
invitation.
AB
kevirwin wrote:

Akira Bergman wrote:

Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.

It wasn't clear. That's why I asked. Maybe you don't know me. I'm
probably the least materialistic person in this forum. I acquire only
that which I need to survive.

Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.


I don't follow **any** "shepherds"....I can make my own decisions.
K e v

.
User: ""

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 12 Jan 2007 09:57:06 PM
Akira Bergman wrote:

Then please forgive my presumption.

Honestly you fucking evil troglodyte hypocritical knuckle-dragging
commie creeps are a disgrace to mankind, you use a computer made from
plastic produced after millions of tonnes of pollution and you use
space age technology to promote your filthy anti-human crap.
Why the ***** aren't you riding a fucking bike and wearing grass skirts
you fucking ape?
Ewe fucking commie creeps remind me of the dirty leftist anti-human
scum, who do not complain that a farmer once sold his land, near a
beach which enables them to live by the sea, who then turn around and
vote to stop further land development stopping other new and younger
generations from having the same values.
***** you commie *****.
MG
.

User: "kevirwin"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 13 Jan 2007 12:13:37 AM
Akira Bergman wrote:

Then please forgive my presumption. I am pleased to meet another
minimalist. My poem (if it can be called that) was written at a
moment's inspiration. It is not meant to lecture anyone. More like an
invitation.
AB

kevirwin wrote:

Akira Bergman wrote:

Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.

It wasn't clear. That's why I asked. Maybe you don't know me. I'm
probably the least materialistic person in this forum. I acquire only
that which I need to survive.

Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.


I don't follow **any** "shepherds"....I can make my own decisions.
K e v

We're good....
If you haven't met Mikey already, his replies were normal for him when
he's drunk. You can make your own decisions on whether to ignore the
moron or reply in kind (I do both).
Peace,
K e v
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 13 Jan 2007 01:30:30 AM
kevirwin wrote:

If you haven't met Mikey already, his replies were normal for him

I am sober but ewe are still a stupid commie *****.
.




User: "chazwin"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 15 Jan 2007 05:52:44 AM
Akira Bergman wrote:

kevirwin wrote:

Akira Bergman wrote:

The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control

Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!


Boycott which mother fucker??


Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.


oh, do "out of control" and "sheepish" belong in the same sentence??


Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.

Sheep do not exist in natural state. They have been domestically
selected for thousands of years and if man were not around to shear and
dip them and to protect them they would not survive. You have only to
compare a typical sheep with its nearest "wild" cousins to know that.
The evolutionary success of the species is utterly bound up with human
evolution.



just wonderin'
K e v

.
User: "Tim"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 15 Jan 2007 05:58:41 AM
"chazwin" <chazwyman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168861964.859505.78130@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...


Akira Bergman wrote:

kevirwin wrote:

Akira Bergman wrote:

The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control

Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!


Boycott which mother fucker??


Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.


oh, do "out of control" and "sheepish" belong in the same sentence??


Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.


Sheep do not exist in natural state. They have been domestically
selected for thousands of years and if man were not around to shear and
dip them and to protect them they would not survive. You have only to
compare a typical sheep with its nearest "wild" cousins to know that.
The evolutionary success of the species is utterly bound up with human
evolution.




just wonderin'
K e v


By "wild" cousins do you mean Mike Gordge and family?
.
User: "chazwin"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 15 Jan 2007 06:30:32 AM
Tim wrote:

"chazwin" <chazwyman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168861964.859505.78130@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...


Akira Bergman wrote:

kevirwin wrote:

Akira Bergman wrote:

The environment is going down the gurgler
Scores of people are getting killed for material interest
And the corporate bully is preparing to do more of the same
While the sheepish consumer is out of control

Take charge of your own destiny
Boycott the mother fucker
Minimise your life NOW!


Boycott which mother fucker??


Boycott all consumption and it's agents that harm nature and us. This
should be clear in the writing. Maybe you like to consume.


oh, do "out of control" and "sheepish" belong in the same sentence??


Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.


Sheep do not exist in natural state. They have been domestically
selected for thousands of years and if man were not around to shear and
dip them and to protect them they would not survive. You have only to
compare a typical sheep with its nearest "wild" cousins to know that.
The evolutionary success of the species is utterly bound up with human
evolution.




just wonderin'
K e v



By "wild" cousins do you mean Mike Gordge and family?

Hehhe - Well this would only apply if he was to have more survival
potential than the rest of his Libertarian sheep family. If his views
were ever implemented in full, he would be the first to the slaughter
house of the free-market. So although he appears wild he is really a
domestic sheep in wild sheep's clothing.
Chazwin
.


User: "Akira Bergman"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 15 Jan 2007 01:26:15 PM
Thanks for the correction. In suitable wild conditions they may survive
but you are right, they have been distanced from their natural state
quite a bit. Unlike many domestic cats. Cats will quickly switch.
chazwin wrote:



oh, do "out of control" and "sheepish" belong in the same sentence??


Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.


Sheep do not exist in natural state. They have been domestically
selected for thousands of years and if man were not around to shear and
dip them and to protect them they would not survive. You have only to
compare a typical sheep with its nearest "wild" cousins to know that.
The evolutionary success of the species is utterly bound up with human
evolution.


.
User: "chazwin"

Title: Re: Boycott the mother fucker 16 Jan 2007 04:03:03 AM
Akira Bergman wrote:

Thanks for the correction. In suitable wild conditions they may survive
but you are right, they have been distanced from their natural state
quite a bit. Unlike many domestic cats. Cats will quickly switch.

Indeed most will.
Howeverthere examples of breeds where we have managed to breed out much
of their natural instinctual beahviour. In the USA there is a cat that
you can throw around the living room and it will not try to grasp.
These fat bundles seem to have lost the cat's famous "landing on their
feet" response: they will make no attempt to move their legs. They do
not scratch, bite or make a fuss. They are basically furry tribbles.


chazwin wrote:



oh, do "out of control" and "sheepish" belong in the same sentence??


Sheep who obey the greedy shepherd instead of it's own instincts. Even
sheep are good in natural state.


Sheep do not exist in natural state. They have been domestically
selected for thousands of years and if man were not around to shear and
dip them and to protect them they would not survive. You have only to
compare a typical sheep with its nearest "wild" cousins to know that.
The evolutionary success of the species is utterly bound up with human
evolution.


.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER