| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"Bret Cahill" |
| Date: |
02 Jan 2006 10:17:52 PM |
| Object: |
Flawsibility |
You won't find me calling myself a "wordsmith" but "flawsibility" is a
durn good word.
Now all we need to know is what it means.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
| User: "Tron" |
|
| Title: Re: Flawsibility |
03 Jan 2006 12:44:25 AM |
|
|
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> skrev i melding
news:1136261872.412523.300140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
You won't find me calling myself a "wordsmith" but "flawsibility" is a
durn good word.
Now all we need to know is what it means.
A generally acclaimed - applauded, i.e. credible or verisimilar - flaw, or,
a flawed assumption.
T
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Fletcher" |
|
| Title: Re: Flawsibility |
03 Jan 2006 09:07:03 AM |
|
|
"Tron" <tronfuru@frizurf.no> wrote in message
news:Zbidnb8ktu1SgSfeRVnzvA@telenor.com...
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> skrev i melding
news:1136261872.412523.300140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
You won't find me calling myself a "wordsmith" but "flawsibility" is a
durn good word.
Now all we need to know is what it means.
A generally acclaimed - applauded, i.e. credible or verisimilar - flaw,
or, a flawed assumption.
T
Better still 'flawsability'. The ability to recognise you have no flaws.
BOfL
.
|
|
|
| User: "steveo" |
|
| Title: Re: Flawsibility |
03 Jan 2006 10:17:33 AM |
|
|
"Brian Fletcher" <brianf88@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:rqwuf.167573$V7.83674@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Tron" <tronfuru@frizurf.no> wrote in message
news:Zbidnb8ktu1SgSfeRVnzvA@telenor.com...
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> skrev i melding
news:1136261872.412523.300140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
You won't find me calling myself a "wordsmith" but "flawsibility" is a
durn good word.
Now all we need to know is what it means.
A generally acclaimed - applauded, i.e. credible or verisimilar - flaw,
or, a flawed assumption.
T
Better still 'flawsability'. The ability to recognise you have no flaws.
Wouldn't that be inflawsable?
steveo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mahalia" |
|
| Title: Re: Flawsibility |
03 Jan 2006 11:01:28 AM |
|
|
This is a new word coined by FEMA, Bret! LOL
Mahalia
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dare" |
|
| Title: Re: Flawsibility |
03 Jan 2006 10:14:13 AM |
|
|
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1136261872.412523.300140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
You won't find me calling myself a "wordsmith" but "flawsibility" is a
durn good word.
Now all we need to know is what it means.
Flawsibility: the quality or state of being flawed.
Generally used to indicate the degree to which
a plan or design is flawed prior to implementation.
Often employed by analysts to explain a disaster.
.
|
|
|
| User: "sam ende" |
|
| Title: Re: Flawsibility |
08 Jan 2006 07:51:54 AM |
|
|
Dare wrote:
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1136261872.412523.300140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
You won't find me calling myself a "wordsmith" but "flawsibility" is
a durn good word.
Now all we need to know is what it means.
Flawsibility: the quality or state of being flawed.
Generally used to indicate the degree to which
a plan or design is flawed prior to implementation.
Often employed by analysts to explain a disaster.
that sounds almost flawsable.
sammi
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "sam ende" |
|
| Title: Re: Flawsibility |
08 Jan 2006 07:49:21 AM |
|
|
Bret Cahill wrote:
You won't find me calling myself a "wordsmith" but "flawsibility" is a
durn good word.
it certainly is.
Now all we need to know is what it means.
yes. not that i've a clue mind you though. :)
sammi
.
|
|
|
|
|
