| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"George E. Hammond" |
| Date: |
12 Jul 2005 09:24:06 PM |
| Object: |
GOD=G_uv REPLY TO SEAN MONAGHAN |
"Sean Monaghan" <shamrock2736@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:42d37168$0$58497$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
George E. Hammond wrote:
"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in
message news:yqGAe.229274$w15.194205@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
George E. Hammond wrote:
[Hammond]
WRONG GARY. I'm sorry the scientific explanation of God
is not a simple minded theory so that you can understand it..
but that's life Gary....... if you're an uneducated dork with
no scientific degrees you CANNOT enjoy the priviliges of
educated scientists......... sorry.
Fact is, you CAN'T "see Heaven" by using a "slow motion"
camera....... if you could every ***** with a home movie
projector would have discovered it 30 years ago.
The REASON you can't is the SAME REASON you can't
"replace artists with camera's".
YOU CAN'T REPLACE REMBRANT WITH A CAMERA
and the reason that "Heaven" cannot be seen by a "slow motion
camera" is that the IDENTITY of people and objects CHANGE
CHARACTER as your mental speed changes. A film of
a person shown in slow motion just looks like the SAME PERSON
moving in slow motion. But fact is, if his mental speed was to
change, he would NOT look like the same person only moving
slower........ he would look like a TOTALLY DIFFERENT
personality type!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He would have a different
IDENTITY. And this is WHY........ ONLY A BRILLIANT
ARTIST CAN ACTUALLY PAINT PICTURES OF HEAVEN......
which is what they do for a living........ and which is why the
Mona Lisa is worth $50,000,000 dollars. It can't be
reproduced by "photographic means".
Anyway........ it's obvious that a stooge like you is not
capapble of understanding this........... or of understanding
what God is......... you're just another aggravated stooge
Gary.
So how in the ***** would you know this?
Gary Eickmeier
[Hammond]
Because I have discovered the world's first experimentally
confirmed scientific proof of God Gary........THAT'S HOW!
How the ***** else would I be able to claim that I know as
much about God as Jesus, Peter, Augustine, Gregory, Origin,
Basil, Aquinas and the Pope............. whadau think I'm a
madman who thinks he's equal to the world's greatest
thinkers and authorities.........OF COURSE NOT........ I am
simply a modern scientist who has accidentally stumbled
on the world's first scientific proof of God..... and therefore
I DON'T HAVE TO BE A GENIUS to know what Jesus,
Augustine, Aquianas and Pope Paul II knew.
100,000 year ago you had to be a GENIUS to light a fire
by banging two rocks together........ today anybody can
be an equivalent genius bywhipping out his Zippo lighter
and starting the same fire.
Same with the SPOG......... understand the SPOG and
you will know more about God than Jesus did!
Christ Gary.............. it's 2005 AD, you know!
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
====================================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================
Hello there, Mr. Hammond. I realise that you do not accept amateur
posts on ASR-P-O-GM. Perhaps you could take a moment, or two, to
summarise your theory of relativistic proof of God, in layman's terms,
dummed-down, in a few paragraphs? It would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, in advance.
--
Sean Monaghan
[Hammond]
I'd be glad too... particularly since I see that you're Irish which means
that you are obviously (culturally) sophisticated enough to know what
the theory of God is about.
Basically... there are at least a dozen central "CLAIMS" that Religion
makes concerning God:
1. There physically exists an "invisible world" known as
"Heaven" which is similar to Earth only that it is a paradise.
2. "God" is an invisible man who lives there and is all
powerful and rules the actual (visible) world from there.
3. This God can produce miracles which transcend
the (known) laws of Physics.
4. Historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism
(many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
5. Christianity predicts the world is transforming itself into
Heaven and will actually arrive there at a date known as
"Kingdom Come"... or the "end of the world".
6. There is such a thing as "Eternal Life".
7. Jesus was the physical "incarnation of God"
8. The Cross for some reason is the central symbol of
(Western) Religion.
9. For some reason our main canonical text is written
in 4 identical versions known as the "4-Gospel Canon".
10. God "created the world" only a matter of "thousands"
of years ago (Genesis) not "billions" of years ago as
Science maintains.
11. God created man "in his own image".
12. There is a "Trinity of God", functionally speaking.
OK.... as you know there has never been any "scientific proof" of
these claims..... and as Christians (or Moslems, or Jews) we have
always accepted these claims (more or less) as a matter of
"faith" or "belief".
OK.... now what HAMMOND is saying, is that a new scientific
phenomena has been discovered, which actually EXPLAINS AND
PROVES why all of these claims are actually "scientific fact".
To make a long story short..... Man has 5-senses and a brain, and
this system forms an "image" of external reality. We do not
physically see external reality itself, we only see an "image" of
reality created by our 5-senses and brain.... This is proven by
drinking, taking drugs or having a head injury in which case our
"image" of reality suddenly changes... but in fact external reality
does not!
OK... we know that drinking, drugs and head injuries change
our "image" of reality.... but since other people are not affected,
we quickly realize this is something wrong with our brain, and
not something wrong with the world... i..e. other people quickly
let us know that we "aren't seeing true reality" (like traffic cops for
instance).
OK.... but Hammond has recognized that there IS a UNIVERSAL
brain condition that EVERYBODY suffers from, and which is
completely NATURAL...... and because EVERYBODY suffers
from it, it is nearly unnoticeable! And in fact, this universal
brain condition does severely affect out IMAGE of external
reality. This universal brain syndrome is caused by the
Secular Trend in Human Growth!
The Secular Trend in Human Growth was only discovered 100
years ago, but has been highly studied since that time. It is
responsible for instance for the common observation that modern
soldiers can't even fit into a medieval suit of armor because they
are way too big! Humans are getting bigger and bigger with
each passing generation, and have been doing so for thousands
of years... expecially recently. It is caused by the increasing
standard of living... mainly nutrition.
OK........ if the whole human body is becoming more fully
grown, this means that the BRAIN is also becoming more
fully grown....... in particular, it means that if the body has never
been full grown, then neither has the brain. Again, of course,
this is not generally recognized by people, because it affects
EVERYBODY so nobody notices it... until Science discovered
it 100 years ago.
OK... what this means is that a substantial percentage of everybodies
BRAIN is not fully grown...... in a sense it is simply "missing"..
although modern science has discovered that it is still functioning
although at a "subconscious" level... and hence it is called the
"subconscious mind" (by Freud for instance).
Anyway.... the fact is, that on average, 20% of the average
persons BRAIN is essentially "missing" (e.g. not conscious).
THIS DRASTICALLY AFFECTS OUR *IMAGE*
OF TRUE REALITY.
IN FACT, IT MAKES 20% OF TRUE REALITY
INVISIBLE....meaning that our "image" of reality
only consists of 80% of "true reality".
HAMMOND was the first to posit that this 20% of
true reality which is "invisible" is actually the scientific
explanation of "Heaven" in Religion!
OK.... so Hammond began investigating the situation, and
REMARKABLY actually discovered the experimental
PROOF of this thesis in Psychometry and Relativity.
It turns out that "Psychometry space" which is a measure
of this "internal image" of reality, is actually CURVED
(in the sense of Relativity) whereby this "curvature" causes
a "space and time dilation" (magnification and speeding up,
in laymans terms) of the IMAGEwith respect to true
reality. Then, this "magnification and speeding up" simply
pushes 20% of the "image" outside the bounds of the
"bandwidth" of the observer..... thus making it INVISIBLE..
and thus creating the "invisible world" of "Heaven".
The "speeding up" of the IMAGE is easily seen as a direct
result of Psychometry measurements that have been publsihed
for 50 years. The fact that this speeding up causes the image
to become "invisible" is demonstrated for instance by the
PFF (movie picture fusion frequency test), and is well known.
So... the thesis is plausible on the face of it, AND the hard
experimental evidence now supports and CONFIRMS it
OVERWHELMINGLY!
This phenomena explains ALL 12 of the "historical claims"
made by religion above.
1. God is the ungrown (and therefore invisible) part of Man.
2. The part of true reality which is invisble is simply what
we call "Heaven".
3. Only a fully grown man can see this invisible world, and
this fully grown man is called "God".. and since he doesn't
exist in the world, he is called "invisble" also.
4. Naturally anyone who could see "true reality" would have
the drop on anyone who couldn't... therefore god is
said to be "omnipotent".
5. It turns out that human perception (and the brain) is
actually somewhat labile, so that an increase in the percentage
of the world that can be seen, is called a "miracle".
6. The "Cross"is simply the "Cartesian coordinate system"
of spacetime.
7. Our IMAGE of reality only came into existance when Man
came into existence (approx. 100,000 years ago).... therefore
it is correct to say that "reality" came into being 100,000
years ago...... and this is the Biblical creation story in
Genesis.... the "world" (as we know it) WAS created
only 100,000 years ago........ Big Bang and all.
8. etc.....
Thus the ENTIRE CORPUS OF RELIGION is explained by
a SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC FACT....... namely that our
IMAGE of reality is only a "curved version" of true reality.. this
is expressed in the now famous equation: GOD=G_uv.
The fact that the "entire corpus of Religion" can be scientifically
explained by ONE SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLE...
(GOD=G_uv) overwhelmingly, convincingly, and experimentally
verified,
MAKES IT PRIMA FACIE EVIDENT, THAT THE
WORLD'S FIRST TRUE SCIENTIFIC
PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED
By the way, the theory has been published in the peer
reviewed scientific literature:
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Theory of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic Press)
(online copy located at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html )
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
====================================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================
.
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO SEAN MONAGHAN |
13 Jul 2005 12:17:36 AM |
|
|
"George E. Hammond" <nowhere11@nospam1.net> wrote in message
news:aX_Ae.2668$dU3.2242@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Sean Monaghan" <shamrock2736@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:42d37168$0$58497$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
George E. Hammond wrote:
"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in
message news:yqGAe.229274$w15.194205@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
George E. Hammond wrote:
[Hammond]
WRONG GARY. I'm sorry the scientific explanation of God
is not a simple minded theory so that you can understand it..
but that's life Gary....... if you're an uneducated dork with
no scientific degrees you CANNOT enjoy the priviliges of
educated scientists......... sorry.
Fact is, you CAN'T "see Heaven" by using a "slow motion"
camera....... if you could every ***** with a home movie
projector would have discovered it 30 years ago.
The REASON you can't is the SAME REASON you can't
"replace artists with camera's".
YOU CAN'T REPLACE REMBRANT WITH A CAMERA
and the reason that "Heaven" cannot be seen by a "slow motion
camera" is that the IDENTITY of people and objects CHANGE
CHARACTER as your mental speed changes. A film of
a person shown in slow motion just looks like the SAME PERSON
moving in slow motion. But fact is, if his mental speed was to
change, he would NOT look like the same person only moving
slower........ he would look like a TOTALLY DIFFERENT
personality type!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He would have a different
IDENTITY. And this is WHY........ ONLY A BRILLIANT
ARTIST CAN ACTUALLY PAINT PICTURES OF HEAVEN......
which is what they do for a living........ and which is why the
Mona Lisa is worth $50,000,000 dollars. It can't be
reproduced by "photographic means".
Anyway........ it's obvious that a stooge like you is not
capapble of understanding this........... or of understanding
what God is......... you're just another aggravated stooge
Gary.
So how in the ***** would you know this?
Gary Eickmeier
[Hammond]
Because I have discovered the world's first experimentally
confirmed scientific proof of God Gary........THAT'S HOW!
How the ***** else would I be able to claim that I know as
much about God as Jesus, Peter, Augustine, Gregory, Origin,
Basil, Aquinas and the Pope............. whadau think I'm a
madman who thinks he's equal to the world's greatest
thinkers and authorities.........OF COURSE NOT........ I am
simply a modern scientist who has accidentally stumbled
on the world's first scientific proof of God..... and therefore
I DON'T HAVE TO BE A GENIUS to know what Jesus,
Augustine, Aquianas and Pope Paul II knew.
100,000 year ago you had to be a GENIUS to light a fire
by banging two rocks together........ today anybody can
be an equivalent genius bywhipping out his Zippo lighter
and starting the same fire.
Same with the SPOG......... understand the SPOG and
you will know more about God than Jesus did!
Christ Gary.............. it's 2005 AD, you know!
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
====================================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================
Hello there, Mr. Hammond. I realise that you do not accept amateur
posts on ASR-P-O-GM. Perhaps you could take a moment, or two, to
summarise your theory of relativistic proof of God, in layman's terms,
dummed-down, in a few paragraphs? It would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, in advance.
--
Sean Monaghan
[Hammond]
I'd be glad too... particularly since I see that you're Irish which means
that you are obviously (culturally) sophisticated enough to know what
the theory of God is about.
Bwaahahhaaaaaaaa.... you're one hell of a fucking psycho!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr.LouisSlotin" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO SEAN MONAGHAN |
12 Jul 2005 10:52:45 PM |
|
|
OFF TOPIC Please take sci.physics out of your crossposting
.
|
|
|
| User: "George E. Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO SEAN MONAGHAN |
13 Jul 2005 03:32:14 PM |
|
|
"Dr.LouisSlotin" <invalid@nospam.com> wrote in
message news:42d48fe7$1$82107$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
OFF TOPIC Please take sci.physics out of your crossposting
[George Hammond]
GOD=G_uv is an applied Physics theory.
It has been published in the peer reviewed
Physics literature, and was reviewed by
several PhD physicists including the editor
before publication.
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Theory of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244
(online copy located at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html )
I am a graduate physicist (M.S. 1967).
THEREFORE discussion of this subject is NOT
off-topic in the Physics newsgroups.
Please keep your jackass personal jealousy
and off topic comments
OFF THIS THREAD!
=========original target post=========
"Sean Monaghan" <shamrock2736@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
message news:42d37168$0$58497$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
George E. Hammond wrote:
"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in
message news:yqGAe.229274$w15.194205@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
George E. Hammond wrote:
[Hammond]
WRONG GARY. I'm sorry the scientific explanation of God
is not a simple minded theory so that you can understand it..
but that's life Gary....... if you're an uneducated dork with
no scientific degrees you CANNOT enjoy the priviliges of
educated scientists......... sorry.
Fact is, you CAN'T "see Heaven" by using a "slow motion"
camera....... if you could every ***** with a home movie
projector would have discovered it 30 years ago.
The REASON you can't is the SAME REASON you can't
"replace artists with camera's".
YOU CAN'T REPLACE REMBRANT WITH A CAMERA
and the reason that "Heaven" cannot be seen by a "slow motion
camera" is that the IDENTITY of people and objects CHANGE
CHARACTER as your mental speed changes. A film of
a person shown in slow motion just looks like the SAME PERSON
moving in slow motion. But fact is, if his mental speed was to
change, he would NOT look like the same person only moving
slower........ he would look like a TOTALLY DIFFERENT
personality type!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He would have a different
IDENTITY. And this is WHY........ ONLY A BRILLIANT
ARTIST CAN ACTUALLY PAINT PICTURES OF HEAVEN......
which is what they do for a living........ and which is why the
Mona Lisa is worth $50,000,000 dollars. It can't be
reproduced by "photographic means".
Anyway........ it's obvious that a stooge like you is not
capapble of understanding this........... or of understanding
what God is......... you're just another aggravated stooge
Gary.
So how in the ***** would you know this?
Gary Eickmeier
[Hammond]
Because I have discovered the world's first experimentally
confirmed scientific proof of God Gary........THAT'S HOW!
How the ***** else would I be able to claim that I know as
much about God as Jesus, Peter, Augustine, Gregory, Origin,
Basil, Aquinas and the Pope............. whadau think I'm a
madman who thinks he's equal to the world's greatest
thinkers and authorities.........OF COURSE NOT........ I am
simply a modern scientist who has accidentally stumbled
on the world's first scientific proof of God..... and therefore
I DON'T HAVE TO BE A GENIUS to know what Jesus,
Augustine, Aquianas and Pope Paul II knew.
100,000 year ago you had to be a GENIUS to light a fire
by banging two rocks together........ today anybody can
be an equivalent genius bywhipping out his Zippo lighter
and starting the same fire.
Same with the SPOG......... understand the SPOG and
you will know more about God than Jesus did!
Christ Gary.............. it's 2005 AD, you know!
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
====================================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================
Hello there, Mr. Hammond. I realise that you do not accept amateur
posts on ASR-P-O-GM. Perhaps you could take a moment, or two, to
summarise your theory of relativistic proof of God, in layman's terms,
dummed-down, in a few paragraphs? It would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, in advance.
--
Sean Monaghan
[Hammond]
I'd be glad too... particularly since I see that you're Irish which means
that you are obviously (culturally) sophisticated enough to know what
the theory of God is about.
Basically... there are at least a dozen central "CLAIMS" that Religion
makes concerning God:
1. There physically exists an "invisible world" known as
"Heaven" which is similar to Earth only that it is a paradise.
2. "God" is an invisible man who lives there and is all
powerful and rules the actual (visible) world from there.
3. This God can produce miracles which transcend
the (known) laws of Physics.
4. Historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism
(many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
5. Christianity predicts the world is transforming itself into
Heaven and will actually arrive there at a date known as
"Kingdom Come"... or the "end of the world".
6. There is such a thing as "Eternal Life".
7. Jesus was the physical "incarnation of God"
8. The Cross for some reason is the central symbol of
(Western) Religion.
9. For some reason our main canonical text is written
in 4 identical versions known as the "4-Gospel Canon".
10. God "created the world" only a matter of "thousands"
of years ago (Genesis) not "billions" of years ago as
Science maintains.
11. God created man "in his own image".
12. There is a "Trinity of God", functionally speaking.
OK.... as you know there has never been any "scientific proof" of
these claims..... and as Christians (or Moslems, or Jews) we have
always accepted these claims (more or less) as a matter of
"faith" or "belief".
OK.... now what HAMMOND is saying, is that a new scientific
phenomena has been discovered, which actually EXPLAINS AND
PROVES why all of these claims are actually "scientific fact".
To make a long story short..... Man has 5-senses and a brain, and
this system forms an "image" of external reality. We do not
physically see external reality itself, we only see an "image" of
reality created by our 5-senses and brain.... This is proven by
drinking, taking drugs or having a head injury in which case our
"image" of reality suddenly changes... but in fact external reality
does not!
OK... we know that drinking, drugs and head injuries change
our "image" of reality.... but since other people are not affected,
we quickly realize this is something wrong with our brain, and
not something wrong with the world... i..e. other people quickly
let us know that we "aren't seeing true reality" (like traffic cops for
instance).
OK.... but Hammond has recognized that there IS a UNIVERSAL
brain condition that EVERYBODY suffers from, and which is
completely NATURAL...... and because EVERYBODY suffers
from it, it is nearly unnoticeable! And in fact, this universal
brain condition does severely affect out IMAGE of external
reality. This universal brain syndrome is caused by the
Secular Trend in Human Growth!
The Secular Trend in Human Growth was only discovered 100
years ago, but has been highly studied since that time. It is
responsible for instance for the common observation that modern
soldiers can't even fit into a medieval suit of armor because they
are way too big! Humans are getting bigger and bigger with
each passing generation, and have been doing so for thousands
of years... expecially recently. It is caused by the increasing
standard of living... mainly nutrition.
OK........ if the whole human body is becoming more fully
grown, this means that the BRAIN is also becoming more
fully grown....... in particular, it means that if the body has never
been full grown, then neither has the brain. Again, of course,
this is not generally recognized by people, because it affects
EVERYBODY so nobody notices it... until Science discovered
it 100 years ago.
OK... what this means is that a substantial percentage of everybodies
BRAIN is not fully grown...... in a sense it is simply "missing"..
although modern science has discovered that it is still functioning
although at a "subconscious" level... and hence it is called the
"subconscious mind" (by Freud for instance).
Anyway.... the fact is, that on average, 20% of the average
persons BRAIN is essentially "missing" (e.g. not conscious).
THIS DRASTICALLY AFFECTS OUR *IMAGE*
OF TRUE REALITY.
IN FACT, IT MAKES 20% OF TRUE REALITY
INVISIBLE....meaning that our "image" of reality
only consists of 80% of "true reality".
HAMMOND was the first to posit that this 20% of
true reality which is "invisible" is actually the scientific
explanation of "Heaven" in Religion!
OK.... so Hammond began investigating the situation, and
REMARKABLY actually discovered the experimental
PROOF of this thesis in Psychometry and Relativity.
It turns out that "Psychometry space" which is a measure
of this "internal image" of reality, is actually CURVED
(in the sense of Relativity) whereby this "curvature" causes
a "space and time dilation" (magnification and speeding up,
in laymans terms) of the IMAGEwith respect to true
reality. Then, this "magnification and speeding up" simply
pushes 20% of the "image" outside the bounds of the
"bandwidth" of the observer..... thus making it INVISIBLE..
and thus creating the "invisible world" of "Heaven".
The "speeding up" of the IMAGE is easily seen as a direct
result of Psychometry measurements that have been publsihed
for 50 years. The fact that this speeding up causes the image
to become "invisible" is demonstrated for instance by the
PFF (movie picture fusion frequency test), and is well known.
So... the thesis is plausible on the face of it, AND the hard
experimental evidence now supports and CONFIRMS it
OVERWHELMINGLY!
This phenomena explains ALL 12 of the "historical claims"
made by religion above.
1. God is the ungrown (and therefore invisible) part of Man.
2. The part of true reality which is invisble is simply what
we call "Heaven".
3. Only a fully grown man can see this invisible world, and
this fully grown man is called "God".. and since he doesn't
exist in the world, he is called "invisble" also.
4. Naturally anyone who could see "true reality" would have
the drop on anyone who couldn't... therefore god is
said to be "omnipotent".
5. It turns out that human perception (and the brain) is
actually somewhat labile, so that an increase in the percentage
of the world that can be seen, is called a "miracle".
6. The "Cross"is simply the "Cartesian coordinate system"
of spacetime.
7. Our IMAGE of reality only came into existance when Man
came into existence (approx. 100,000 years ago).... therefore
it is correct to say that "reality" came into being 100,000
years ago...... and this is the Biblical creation story in
Genesis.... the "world" (as we know it) WAS created
only 100,000 years ago........ Big Bang and all.
8. etc.....
Thus the ENTIRE CORPUS OF RELIGION is explained by
a SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC FACT....... namely that our
IMAGE of reality is only a "curved version" of true reality.. this
is expressed in the now famous equation: GOD=G_uv.
The fact that the "entire corpus of Religion" can be scientifically
explained by ONE SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLE...
(GOD=G_uv) overwhelmingly, convincingly, and experimentally
verified,
MAKES IT PRIMA FACIE EVIDENT, THAT THE
WORLD'S FIRST TRUE SCIENTIFIC
PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED
By the way, the theory has been published in the peer
reviewed scientific literature:
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Theory of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic Press)
(online copy located at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html )
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
====================================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO SEAN MONAGHAN |
14 Jul 2005 01:34:58 AM |
|
|
"George E. Hammond" <nowhere11@nospam1.net> wrote in message
news:iTeBe.2999$dU3.2216@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dr.LouisSlotin" <invalid@nospam.com> wrote in
message news:42d48fe7$1$82107$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net...
OFF TOPIC Please take sci.physics out of your crossposting
[George Hammond]
GOD=G_uv is an applied Physics theory.
It has been published in the peer reviewed
Physics literature, and was reviewed by
several PhD physicists including the editor
before publication.
God=G_uv is nothing more than insane crap!
Noetic press is NOT "peer reviewed" literature! "Physics" and other such
printings ARE peer reviewed physics/scientific literature - and you will NOT
see George ANYWHERE in there!!!!
Editorial reading of an article is NOT "peer reviewed" - as ANY real
scientist would know!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Midjis" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv REPLY TO SEAN MONAGHAN |
14 Jul 2005 01:39:47 AM |
|
|
"George E. Hammond" <nowhere11@nospam1.net> wrote:
[George Hammond]
GOD=G_uv is an applied Physics theory.
It has been published in the peer reviewed
Physics literature, and was reviewed by
several PhD physicists including the editor
before publication.
The SPOG has not appeared in any physics literature. It's appeared only in
the Noetic Journal - a publication that declares itself unbound by the
conventions of science and which therefore cannot qualify as a scientific
journal.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
