Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk)



 Science > Philosophy > Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Philosophy
User: "Immortalist"
Date: 18 Jul 2004 11:02:22 AM
Object: Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk)
MR. RUSSERT: To Dr. Flynn's point rather than saying, "It's over there," the
problems here, in light of the fact that we have not found weapons of mass
destruction, the primary rationale given to the American people for the war in
Iraq, would it have not been better to spend the $200 billion we've spent in Iraq
back here on securing our cargos, our ports, our cyberspace?
REP. COX: There are weapons of mass destruction abroad, including all of those
weapons of mass destruction that the United Nations inventoried that Saddam
Hussein had and are not accounted for right now, not the nuclear weapons program
that we had flawed intelligence about, but weapons that we know that were
stockpiled in Iraq. We've also got radiological loose-nuke problems or low-level
radiological devices, again, such as Steve points out in his book. A lot of
these problems are going to come to us from overseas. Without...
MR. RUSSERT: But was there an imminent threat in Iraq?
REP. COX: I don't think there's any question that when you've got a guy who is
responsible for having murdered over one million of his own people--we've
discovered over 400,000 people in mass graves, some of it with chemical weapons;
when you've got the 9-11 Commission documenting the contacts with international
terrorists--they, of course, debunked the notion that there was any planning by
Saddam Hussein in connection with the attacks on America of 9/11, but they also
found that there was plenty of intercourse between Saddam Hussein and global
terrorism. I think removing a person who is that hostile to the United States,
who was providing safe haven for people like Abu Zarqawi, who, remember, we
chased out of Afghanistan--that's where he was. He was under the protection of
the Taliban. He was given safe harbor by Saddam Hussein. He got a prosthetic
fitted because we blew off his leg while he was trying to get out. Zarqawi is
now continuing to lead global terror from Iraq. But when he was in Afghanistan he
was focused on the development of chemical and biological weapons.
Meet the Press 18th July 04;
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5458209
.

User: "Tim"

Title: Re: Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk) 18 Jul 2004 11:20:50 AM
Reporter: Mr. Bush how can you say that Iraq has WMD's?
Mr. Bush: We have the receipts!
More proof: http://www.museumofconceptualart.com/un_proof/index.html
"Immortalist" <Reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:leadnR13U6PHAmfdRVn-hg@comcast.com...

MR. RUSSERT: To Dr. Flynn's point rather than saying, "It's over there,"

the

problems here, in light of the fact that we have not found weapons of mass
destruction, the primary rationale given to the American people for the

war in

Iraq, would it have not been better to spend the $200 billion we've spent

in Iraq

back here on securing our cargos, our ports, our cyberspace?

REP. COX: There are weapons of mass destruction abroad, including all of

those

weapons of mass destruction that the United Nations inventoried that

Saddam

Hussein had and are not accounted for right now, not the nuclear weapons

program

that we had flawed intelligence about, but weapons that we know that were
stockpiled in Iraq. We've also got radiological loose-nuke problems or

low-level

radiological devices, again, such as Steve points out in his book. A lot

of

these problems are going to come to us from overseas. Without...

MR. RUSSERT: But was there an imminent threat in Iraq?

REP. COX: I don't think there's any question that when you've got a guy

who is

responsible for having murdered over one million of his own people--we've
discovered over 400,000 people in mass graves, some of it with chemical

weapons;

when you've got the 9-11 Commission documenting the contacts with

international

terrorists--they, of course, debunked the notion that there was any

planning by

Saddam Hussein in connection with the attacks on America of 9/11, but they

also

found that there was plenty of intercourse between Saddam Hussein and

global

terrorism. I think removing a person who is that hostile to the United

States,

who was providing safe haven for people like Abu Zarqawi, who, remember,

we

chased out of Afghanistan--that's where he was. He was under the

protection of

the Taliban. He was given safe harbor by Saddam Hussein. He got a

prosthetic

fitted because we blew off his leg while he was trying to get out.

Zarqawi is

now continuing to lead global terror from Iraq. But when he was in

Afghanistan he

was focused on the development of chemical and biological weapons.

Meet the Press 18th July 04;
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5458209



.
User: "Immortalist"

Title: Re: Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk) 18 Jul 2004 12:09:14 PM
"Tim" <arg@rag.dsj> wrote in message
news:pe2dnTX_D59wPmfd4p2dnA@edaptivity.com...

Reporter: Mr. Bush how can you say that Iraq has WMD's?
Mr. Bush: We have the receipts!

There are weapons of mass destruction abroad, including all of those weapons of
mass destruction that the United Nations inventoried that Saddam Hussein had and
are not accounted for right now, not the nuclear weapons program that we had
flawed intelligence about, but weapons that we know that were stockpiled in Iraq.
We've also got radiological loose-nuke problems or low-level radiological
devices, again, such as Steve points out in his book. A lot of these problems are
going to come to us from overseas.
When you've got a guy who is responsible for having murdered over one million of
his own people--we've discovered over 400,000 people in mass graves, some of it
with chemical weapons;
When you've got the 9-11 Commission documenting the contacts with international
terrorists--they, of course, debunked the notion that there was any planning by
Saddam Hussein in connection with the attacks on America of 9/11, but they also
found that there was plenty of intercourse between Saddam Hussein and global
terrorism.
Removing a person who is that hostile to the United States, who was providing
safe haven for people like Abu Zarqawi, who, remember, we chased out of
Afghanistan--that's where he was.
He was under the protection of the Taliban. He was given safe harbor by Saddam
Hussein. He got a prosthetic fitted because we blew off his leg while he was
trying to get out. Zarqawi is now continuing to lead global terror from Iraq. But
when he was in Afghanistan he was focused on the development of chemical and
biological weapons.
Meet the Press 18th July 04;
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5458209
.
User: "Tim"

Title: Re: Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk) 18 Jul 2004 05:17:22 PM
"Immortalist" <Reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:q8WdnUEeJ4WYMmfdRVn-jA@comcast.com...


"Tim" <arg@rag.dsj> wrote in message
news:pe2dnTX_D59wPmfd4p2dnA@edaptivity.com...

Reporter: Mr. Bush how can you say that Iraq has WMD's?
Mr. Bush: We have the receipts!


There are weapons of mass destruction abroad, including all of those

weapons of

mass destruction that the United Nations inventoried that Saddam Hussein

had and

are not accounted for right now, not the nuclear weapons program that we

had

flawed intelligence about, but weapons that we know that were stockpiled

in Iraq.


We've also got radiological loose-nuke problems or low-level radiological
devices, again, such as Steve points out in his book. A lot of these

problems are

going to come to us from overseas.

When you've got a guy who is responsible for having murdered over one

million of

his own people--we've discovered over 400,000 people in mass graves, some

of it

with chemical weapons;

When you've got the 9-11 Commission documenting the contacts with

international

terrorists--they, of course, debunked the notion that there was any

planning by

Saddam Hussein in connection with the attacks on America of 9/11, but they

also

found that there was plenty of intercourse between Saddam Hussein and

global

terrorism.

Removing a person who is that hostile to the United States, who was

providing

safe haven for people like Abu Zarqawi, who, remember, we chased out of
Afghanistan--that's where he was.
He was under the protection of the Taliban. He was given safe harbor by

Saddam

Hussein. He got a prosthetic fitted because we blew off his leg while he

was

trying to get out. Zarqawi is now continuing to lead global terror from

Iraq. But

when he was in Afghanistan he was focused on the development of chemical

and

biological weapons.

Meet the Talking Heads 18th July 04;
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5458209



Do you think Bin-blowin-stuff-up and Madass Insane control the techtonic
plates that terrorize the U.S West coast and the hurricanes that terrorize
the East coast? Ma nature - terrorist at large?- in cahoots with the way of
the turban?
.


User: "Eltoropoo"

Title: Re: Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk) 18 Jul 2004 01:54:24 PM
"Tim" <arg@rag.dsj> wrote in message
news:pe2dnTX_D59wPmfd4p2dnA@edaptivity.com...

Reporter: Mr. Bush how can you say that Iraq has WMD's?
Mr. Bush: We have the receipts!

More proof: http://www.museumofconceptualart.com/un_proof/index.html


Iraq uranium claim gets some support...
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apmideast_story.asp?category=1107&slug=US%20Iraq%20Uranium
Where are Democrats and the media - now that Bush may have been right?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/benedetto/2004-07-18-benedetto_x.htm
.
User: "ehollo"

Title: Re: Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk) 19 Jul 2004 01:01:25 AM
May have been right??
Just like he MAY have been right about all those WMDs???/
Jesus, your denial is un-fucking-believable.
"Eltoropoo" <eltoropoo@removehotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uCzKc.37$2r4.38041@news.uswest.net...


"Tim" <arg@rag.dsj> wrote in message
news:pe2dnTX_D59wPmfd4p2dnA@edaptivity.com...

Reporter: Mr. Bush how can you say that Iraq has WMD's?
Mr. Bush: We have the receipts!

More proof: http://www.museumofconceptualart.com/un_proof/index.html



Iraq uranium claim gets some support...

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apmideast_story.asp?category=1107&slug=US%20Iraq%20Uranium

Where are Democrats and the media - now that Bush may have been right?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/benedetto/2004-07-18-benedetto_x.htm



.
User: "Eltoropoo"

Title: Re: Got Weapons of Mass Destruction? (Milk) 19 Jul 2004 07:12:00 PM
"ehollo" <ehollo@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:VsJKc.12387$gt1.4338@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

May have been right??

Just like he MAY have been right about all those WMDs???/

Jesus, your denial is un-fucking-believable.

For a moronic top-poster, you are well spoken.
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER