Science > Philosophy > Identify Correctly The Existence Of The Religionist Mystic's God
| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"Michael Gordge" |
| Date: |
28 Dec 2007 04:03:10 PM |
| Object: |
Identify Correctly The Existence Of The Religionist Mystic's God |
A Kantian wrote
Yet you don't have to accept that God exists in
order to deny It.
Its certainly very encouraging to see ewe trying to think &&^^, the
simple fact is god does exist and the complete lack of sensory
evidence offered, and all of the contradictions required to cause it
to exist, prove conclusively that it exists only as an idea, a dopey
one at that, therefore totally utterly subject--ive--ism crap.
Ewe seeeee &&^^, your mission, should ewe ever choose to awaken from
your Kantian slumber, is to identify what it is that the mystic's god
exists as.
And yes, it is a perfectly rational and reasoned process to identify
man's ideas, why? Because neither you or I can deny the existence of
even your own ideas dopey Kantian indoctrinated ideas, &&^^, you
dimbulb simpleton dumb-arse.
So that leaves man no choice, except for ewe Kantians of course, who
choose not to think, your're not men, you're girls, it leaves the mind
of reason, no choice but then to identify those ideas.
e.g. ask yourself, does the idea correspond to something in sensory
reality, does it contain any known and or blatant contadictions OR is
it totally 100% mind dependent, e.g. Kant's idea that space and tree
exist where each other exists at the same moment, therefore complete
total utter crap.
Michael Gordge
.
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Identify Correctly The Existence Of The Religionist Mystic's God |
28 Dec 2007 11:39:08 PM |
|
|
On Dec 28, 2:03=A0pm, Michael Gordge <mikegor...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
A Kantian wrote
Yet you don't have to accept that God exists in
order to deny It.
Any proposition either affirming or denying, about a God necessarily
entails that this concept exists, but this doesn't determine whether a
God actually exists or not. Current evolutionary theory argues that it
is easier to believe in God or gods than not to believe in them. But
even if this is a drive it doesn't determine whether one exists or
not. Agnostisim continues to rule the day.
Its certainly very encouraging to see ewe trying to think &&^^, the
simple fact is god does exist and the complete lack of sensory
evidence offered, and all of the contradictions required to cause it
to exist, prove conclusively that it exists only as an idea, a dopey
one at that, therefore totally utterly subject--ive--ism crap.
Ewe seeeee &&^^, your mission, should ewe ever choose to awaken from
your Kantian slumber, is to identify what it is that the mystic's god
exists as.
And yes, it is a perfectly rational and reasoned process to identify
man's ideas, why? Because neither you or I can deny the existence of
even your own ideas dopey Kantian indoctrinated ideas, &&^^, you
dimbulb simpleton dumb-arse.
So that leaves man no choice, except for ewe Kantians of course, who
choose not to think, your're not men, you're girls, it leaves the mind
of reason, no choice but then to identify those ideas.
e.g. ask yourself, does the idea correspond to something in sensory
reality, does it contain any known and or blatant contadictions OR is
it totally 100% mind dependent, e.g. Kant's idea that space and tree
exist where each other exists at the same moment, therefore complete
total utter crap.
Michael Gordge
Acourding to good logic, in order to make any claim for there to be a
time for something to happen and a space for it to happen, necessarily
entails the conclusion time and space exist. This theoretical custom
of logic and necessity, of course, niether argues for or against this
spacetime actually existing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate_logic
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gordge" |
|
| Title: Re: Identify Correctly The Existence Of The Religionist Mystic's God |
29 Dec 2007 12:23:03 AM |
|
|
On Dec 29, 2:39=A0pm, Immortalist
Any proposition either affirming or denying, about a > God..........
The claim is, that a god exists as a being, some say as a spirit
(which is closer to fact, spirit being a result of the state of man's
consciousness), the claim is, god as a creator existing, but the
mystics dont say precisely where, its said to be the creator of all
things from no things.
In the absense of ANY sensory evidence of such a beast, combined with
the incredulously dopey contradictions of the claims of its identity,
leave the mind of reason NO CHOICE but to identify the mystic's god as
an idea, based entirely upon an idea. Kant does exact the same thing
in his identity of space and time. So does Mortal when claiming he is
unable to give certainty any certain meaning, without contradicting
his idea that he cant be certain of anything.
God actually exists or not.
You cant deny the existence of ideas, therefore, they need to be
identified "ideas about and based upon what", go on Mortal have a
crack at denying the existence of your ideas.
Agnostisim continues to rule the day.
Agnostic about what?
Acourding to good logic, in order to make any claim for there to be a
time for something to happen and a space for it to happen, necessarily
entails the conclusion time and space exist.
Why seperate the man made concepts time and space from other concepts
which are also required in the identity of entities in reality, e.g.
but limited to, volume, mass, height, weight, distance?
Michael Gordge
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
