Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill



 Science > Philosophy > Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Philosophy
User: "Bret Cahill"
Date: 13 Nov 2007 12:06:01 PM
Object: Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill
Every Fourth of July the MIM (monied interest media) media reliably
point of that Jefferson had slaves [and therefore we have moved beyond
the quaint "sovereignty of the people" and other barbaric Jeffersonian
nonsense onto something much loftier].
The fact that Jefferson did more to set things up for the eventual
abolishment of slavery than anyone else in history is always "merely
omitted" from the corp. sponsored media. The fact that Jefferson's
populism is the greatest hope for advancement for people of color is
"merely omitted" as well.
The media "merely omit" these facts like Shultzberger Sr. "merely
omitting" the Holocaust from the _New York Times_ during WWII.
They merely omit these facts because their corp. sponsors _tell_ them
to omit them.
The Jefferson had slaves scam is the biggest of all the Big Lies By
Omission.
It would be nice to be able to say the same about Al Gore and his
carbon footprint.
Sure Gore creates 100 times more CO2 than the average American. No
one including Al Gore will deny that any more than Jefferson would
deny that he had slaves.
But if Gore supporters could claim Gore helped to set things up for
the eventual abolishment of CO2 emissions, then Gore, like Jefferson,
should get a memorial on the Mall.
The problem with that theory is Gore never set anything up for the
eventual abolishment of CO2 emmissions.
Gore never had and never will have any solutions to AGW other than
everyone else except Tipper and the kids and some personal help
vacating the planet ASAP.
Moreover Jefferson was astute enough to know that freedom required
collective action, that freeing his own slaves without changing the
entire structure of Southern society wouldn't be in anyone's interest.
In sharp contrast, anyone can take purely unilateral individualist
action to reduce his carbon footprint.
Gore is a misanthrope and his "concern" about global warming is only
motivated his hatred of people. It's just one more thing the
sanctimonious jerk can use as a pretext to be preachy.
Bret Cahill
.

User: "Miller"

Title: Re: Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill 14 Nov 2007 05:49:01 AM
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote in message > action to reduce his
carbon footprint.


Gore is a misanthrope and his "concern" about global warming is only
motivated his hatred of people. It's just one more thing the
sanctimonious jerk can use as a pretext to be preachy.


Bret Cahill

Yikes! It seems like there are misanthropes everywhere these days.
Especially on the internet!
Scott
.
User: "Bret Cahill"

Title: Re: Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill 14 Nov 2007 09:29:45 PM

Gore is a misanthrope and his "concern" about global warming is

only

motivated =EF=BF=BDhis hatred of people. =EF=BF=BDIt's just one more thi=

ng the

sanctimonious jerk can use as a pretext to be preachy.

Yikes! =EF=BF=BDIt seems like there are misanthropes everywhere these days=

..

Especially on the internet!

You ain't seen nothin' yet.
Just wait for the _ real_ geo wars.
Bret Cahill
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill 13 Nov 2007 03:18:27 PM
On Nov 13, 1:06 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

Every Fourth of July the MIM (monied interest media) media reliably
point of that Jefferson had slaves [and therefore we have moved beyond
the quaint "sovereignty of the people" and other barbaric Jeffersonian
nonsense onto something much loftier].

The fact that Jefferson did more to set things up for the eventual
abolishment of slavery than anyone else in history is always "merely
omitted" from the corp. sponsored media. The fact that Jefferson's
populism is the greatest hope for advancement for people of color is
"merely omitted" as well.

The media "merely omit" these facts like Shultzberger Sr. "merely
omitting" the Holocaust from the _New York Times_ during WWII.

They merely omit these facts because their corp. sponsors _tell_ them
to omit them.

The Jefferson had slaves scam is the biggest of all the Big Lies By
Omission.

It would be nice to be able to say the same about Al Gore and his
carbon footprint.

Sure Gore creates 100 times more CO2 than the average American. No
one including Al Gore will deny that any more than Jefferson would
deny that he had slaves.

But if Gore supporters could claim Gore helped to set things up for
the eventual abolishment of CO2 emissions, then Gore, like Jefferson,
should get a memorial on the Mall.

The problem with that theory is Gore never set anything up for the
eventual abolishment of CO2 emmissions.

Gore never had and never will have any solutions to AGW other than
everyone else except Tipper and the kids and some personal help
vacating the planet ASAP.

Moreover Jefferson was astute enough to know that freedom required
collective action, that freeing his own slaves without changing the
entire structure of Southern society wouldn't be in anyone's interest.

In sharp contrast, anyone can take purely unilateral individualist
action to reduce his carbon footprint.

Gore is a misanthrope and his "concern" about global warming is only
motivated his hatred of people. It's just one more thing the
sanctimonious jerk can use as a pretext to be preachy.

Bret Cahill

I sort of disagree. I think Gore is in it for the fame and the
money. So far I would say He is successful.
.
User: "Bret Cahill"

Title: Re: Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill 13 Nov 2007 04:18:44 PM

Every Fourth of July the MIM (monied interest media) media reliably
point of that Jefferson had slaves [and therefore we have moved beyond
the quaint "sovereignty of the people" and other barbaric Jeffersonian
nonsense onto something much loftier].


The fact that Jefferson did more to set things up for the eventual
abolishment of slavery than anyone else in history is always "merely
omitted" from the corp. sponsored media. The fact that Jefferson's
populism is the greatest hope for advancement for people of color is
"merely omitted" as well.


The media "merely omit" these facts like Shultzberger Sr. "merely
omitting" the Holocaust from the _New York Times_ during WWII.


They merely omit these facts because their corp. sponsors _tell_ them
to omit them.


The Jefferson had slaves scam is the biggest of all the Big Lies By
Omission.


It would be nice to be able to say the same about Al Gore and his
carbon footprint.


Sure Gore creates 100 times more CO2 than the average American. No
one including Al Gore will deny that any more than Jefferson would
deny that he had slaves.


But if Gore supporters could claim Gore helped to set things up for
the eventual abolishment of CO2 emissions, then Gore, like Jefferson,
should get a memorial on the Mall.


The problem with that theory is Gore never set anything up for the
eventual abolishment of CO2 emmissions.


Gore never had and never will have any solutions to AGW other than
everyone else except Tipper and the kids and some personal help
vacating the planet ASAP.


Moreover Jefferson was astute enough to know that freedom required
collective action, that freeing his own slaves without changing the
entire structure of Southern society wouldn't be in anyone's interest.


In sharp contrast, anyone can take purely unilateral individualist
action to reduce his carbon footprint.


Gore is a misanthrope and his "concern" about global warming is only
motivated his hatred of people. It's just one more thing the
sanctimonious jerk can use as a pretext to be preachy.

I sort of disagree.

Maybe not.

I think Gore is in it for the fame and the
money.

Oh, Gore _definitely_ is getting paid to help greenwash the rich. No
question at all about that.
I knew I should have included that as soon as I posted.
The question is will it work?
The answer is it is as worthless as SUV exhaust in a dust devil, one
of the biggest miscalculations since a bunny rabbit froze in my
headlights then jumped under the tire.
Global warming is probably the greatest weapon against the
"individualist" nonsense spread by the de facto oligarchy. The more
Gore highlights AGW the more the rich will have to pay, not just Gore
but every one else on the planet.
As for fame the shallow senator's son _definitely_ likes to priss
around in public in front of Tipper.
But that's just part of being a sanctimonious misanthrope.

So far I would say He is successful.

"So far" is just about over.
When you consider the questions that will naturally arise after
Hillary trounces, not just the GOP candidate, but the entire
Republican Party, questions like "how did BushCo get into office in
the first place? What was THAT all about?" the answer will be
obvious:
Democrats didn't run anyone for president in 2000.
Hillary will be passing all kinds of health care and other progressive
legislation and inviting Hollywood and other celebrities over to the
White House to party around the clock -- just the kind of thing that
will make a shallow person like Al Gore green with envy.
I'm going to rub Gore's face into his own poop all the way to 2016.
This time the Clintons can get someone worthwhile for VP, not some do
nothing misanthropic senator's son who never did a day's work in his
entire life.
Chelsea will be 35 by 2016. Get her to run for governor of Arkansas
or something _right now_. Bill can get her into the White House too.
Bret Cahill
.


User: "kevirwin"

Title: Re: Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill 13 Nov 2007 03:51:21 PM
On Nov 13, 1:06 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

Every Fourth of July the MIM (monied interest media) media reliably
point of that Jefferson had slaves [and therefore we have moved beyond
the quaint "sovereignty of the people" and other barbaric Jeffersonian
nonsense onto something much loftier].

The fact that Jefferson did more to set things up for the eventual
abolishment of slavery than anyone else in history is always "merely
omitted" from the corp. sponsored media. The fact that Jefferson's
populism is the greatest hope for advancement for people of color is
"merely omitted" as well.

The media "merely omit" these facts like Shultzberger Sr. "merely
omitting" the Holocaust from the _New York Times_ during WWII.

They merely omit these facts because their corp. sponsors _tell_ them
to omit them.

The Jefferson had slaves scam is the biggest of all the Big Lies By
Omission.

It would be nice to be able to say the same about Al Gore and his
carbon footprint.

Sure Gore creates 100 times more CO2 than the average American. No
one including Al Gore will deny that any more than Jefferson would
deny that he had slaves.

But if Gore supporters could claim Gore helped to set things up for
the eventual abolishment of CO2 emissions, then Gore, like Jefferson,
should get a memorial on the Mall.

The problem with that theory is Gore never set anything up for the
eventual abolishment of CO2 emmissions.

Gore never had and never will have any solutions to AGW other than
everyone else except Tipper and the kids and some personal help
vacating the planet ASAP.

Moreover Jefferson was astute enough to know that freedom required
collective action, that freeing his own slaves without changing the
entire structure of Southern society wouldn't be in anyone's interest.

In sharp contrast, anyone can take purely unilateral individualist
action to reduce his carbon footprint.

Gore is a misanthrope and his "concern" about global warming is only
motivated his hatred of people. It's just one more thing the
sanctimonious jerk can use as a pretext to be preachy.

Bret Cahill

Very interesting opinion...Given your hatred for Republicans, I was
somewhat surprised at your post...Good contrast between the two...
I saw Gore on the History channel (which should be re-named to the
"Doom & Gloom" channel) talking about global warming (along with a
host of scientists, of course). So, by his notoriety, if he helps to
elevate awareness on this particular issue, does it matter what his
motivation was to do it???
K e v
.
User: "Bret Cahill"

Title: Re: Jefferson's Slaves vs Gore's 2 MegaWatt-Hr/Mo Electric Bill 13 Nov 2007 05:35:01 PM

Every Fourth of July the MIM (monied interest media) media reliably
point of that Jefferson had slaves [and therefore we have moved beyond
the quaint "sovereignty of the people" and other barbaric Jeffersonian
nonsense onto something much loftier].


The fact that Jefferson did more to set things up for the eventual
abolishment of slavery than anyone else in history is always "merely
omitted" from the corp. sponsored media. The fact that Jefferson's
populism is the greatest hope for advancement for people of color is
"merely omitted" as well.


The media "merely omit" these facts like Shultzberger Sr. "merely
omitting" the Holocaust from the _New York Times_ during WWII.


They merely omit these facts because their corp. sponsors _tell_ them
to omit them.


The Jefferson had slaves scam is the biggest of all the Big Lies By
Omission.


It would be nice to be able to say the same about Al Gore and his
carbon footprint.


Sure Gore creates 100 times more CO2 than the average American. No
one including Al Gore will deny that any more than Jefferson would
deny that he had slaves.


But if Gore supporters could claim Gore helped to set things up for
the eventual abolishment of CO2 emissions, then Gore, like Jefferson,
should get a memorial on the Mall.


The problem with that theory is Gore never set anything up for the
eventual abolishment of CO2 emmissions.


Gore never had and never will have any solutions to AGW other than
everyone else except Tipper and the kids and some personal help
vacating the planet ASAP.


Moreover Jefferson was astute enough to know that freedom required
collective action, that freeing his own slaves without changing the
entire structure of Southern society wouldn't be in anyone's interest.


In sharp contrast, anyone can take purely unilateral individualist
action to reduce his carbon footprint.


Gore is a misanthrope and his "concern" about global warming is only
motivated his hatred of people. It's just one more thing the
sanctimonious jerk can use as a pretext to be preachy.


Bret Cahill


Very interesting opinion...Given your hatred for Republicans, I was
somewhat surprised at your post...

Not when you consider Gore did everything he could to save the GOP
from Bill Clinton.

Good contrast between the two...
I saw Gore on the History channel (which should be re-named to the
"Doom & Gloom" channel) talking about global warming (along with a
host of scientists, of course). So, by his notoriety, if he helps to
elevate awareness on this particular issue, does it matter what his
motivation was to do it???

Gore undermines everything he ostensibly supports. The truth behind
his base motivations always comes out, no matter how the media try to
spin it.
The Nobel committee was well intentioned but they don't understand U.
S. politics.
Bret cahill
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER