Science > Philosophy > Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire
| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"Bret Cahill" |
| Date: |
15 Aug 2005 07:28:11 AM |
| Object: |
Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
What really interesting is the only people who support AwOL's quagmire
are in the administration, mostly scribblers who have never DONE
anything in their entire lives.
There isn't ONE SINGLE ACCOMPLISHED person who isn't opposed to it.
It's time for rightards to give up the ghost.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
26 Aug 2005 09:37:14 PM |
|
|
Bret Cahill wrote:
What really interesting is the only people who support AwOL's quagmire
are in the administration, mostly scribblers who have never DONE
anything in their entire lives.
There isn't ONE SINGLE ACCOMPLISHED person who isn't opposed to it.
It's time for rightards to give up the ghost.
Bret Cahill
Nobody's happy with the situation as it is now, but notice those
contending for the Democratic nomination in 2008, including Hillary
Clinton and Joe Biden, don't advocating pulling out. Biden is
criticizing the administration for not sending in more troops- A.
McIntire
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
16 Aug 2005 12:25:45 AM |
|
|
Bret Cahill wrote:
What really interesting is the only people who support AwOL's quagmire
are in the administration, mostly scribblers who have never DONE
anything in their entire lives.
There isn't ONE SINGLE ACCOMPLISHED person who isn't opposed to it.
It's time for rightards to give up the ghost.
Bret Cahill
are you a rightard disguised as a liberdope in suspenders and spandix
or just a left turd?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tooly" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
20 Aug 2005 07:40:31 AM |
|
|
"Immortalist" <reanimater_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124169945.524621.39120@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Bret Cahill wrote:
What really interesting is the only people who support AwOL's quagmire
are in the administration, mostly scribblers who have never DONE
anything in their entire lives.
There isn't ONE SINGLE ACCOMPLISHED person who isn't opposed to it.
It's time for rightards to give up the ghost.
Bret Cahill
are you a rightard disguised as a liberdope in suspenders and spandix
or just a left turd?
Ah...Immortalist doing a bit of slumming(?)...interesting. He/she is human
after all.
What happened to this newsgroup anyway. I used to come here to learn a
thing or two. Even the non-academics seemed intelligent. Ah, but I suppose
with introspect, I should recognize nature's niching...and a place for all
things. In this, a reflection in a mirror, I always have to remind myself
of my own 'rube' stature [against such contrast as your own for one].
Still, there is the question of being worthy isn't there. Are the denizens
on the wrong side of the tracks [however such tracks are defined]...worthy?
Is not even a 'child' but a philosopher at a certain stage of discovery?
Ah, but who else here aches for a meeting of minds?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
20 Aug 2005 09:28:40 AM |
|
|
< Ah...Immortalist doing a bit of slumming(?)...interesting.
Not really. I can drive a real conservative to distraction in seconds.
In fact, that how the current batch of loonies got into the White
House. Clinton used my stuff to run all the [functional] conservatives
out of DC.
The dregs of politics filled the vacuum.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Day Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
20 Aug 2005 02:15:35 PM |
|
|
tooly wrote:
Ah, but who else here aches for a meeting of minds?
Dont that assume there is another mind? No, you're wrong, we are
all nothing but Turing machines programmed to string you along.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tooly" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
22 Aug 2005 05:26:28 PM |
|
|
"Day Brown" <daybrown@artelco.com> wrote in message
news:Ku4Oe.2422$Bb7.75694124@typhoon.cei.net...
tooly wrote:
Ah, but who else here aches for a meeting of minds?
Dont that assume there is another mind? No, you're wrong, we are
all nothing but Turing machines programmed to string you along.
Yea...but then you're messing it up by letting me know that. Shame,
shame...
Actually, it is curious I once took a trip [ahem...not to beleaguer a
foolish youth long ago in a galaxy far away] whereupon I convinced myself of
exactly what you write here. Oh...sure, sure...a messed up head...but
realize, REALITY for us all is only a matter of what we percieve. For that
moment, my PERCEPTION became this reality. It was a different angle on the
notion of God. Consider a BEing; caught for all time, that is beyond time
itself [what we can only call the infinite...but just a catchall term to
mean we can't understand it]. What does a BEing...even an omnipotent BEing
do for eternity? Sleep? Run around the block trying to better their PR?
Ha...no, no...well, yea, maybe that too. Experience. Need new experience I
would imagine. And thusly, could this be the impetus behind creation?
Ah...who knows. In the meantime you guys keep the act up so I can
experience this life as a common mortal, with no powers whatsoever [can't
even get laid properly]...even having to suffer unbearably at times.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Day Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
23 Aug 2005 04:24:10 PM |
|
|
tooly wrote:
"Day Brown" <daybrown@artelco.com> wrote in message
news:Ku4Oe.2422$Bb7.75694124@typhoon.cei.net...
tooly wrote:
Ah, but who else here aches for a meeting of minds?
Dont that assume there is another mind? No, you're wrong, we are
all nothing but Turing machines programmed to string you along.
Yea...but then you're messing it up by letting me know that. Shame,
shame...
Actually, it is curious I once took a trip [ahem...not to beleaguer a
foolish youth long ago in a galaxy far away] whereupon I convinced myself of
exactly what you write here. Oh...sure, sure...a messed up head...but
realize, REALITY for us all is only a matter of what we percieve. For that
moment, my PERCEPTION became this reality. It was a different angle on the
notion of God. Consider a BEing; caught for all time, that is beyond time
itself [what we can only call the infinite...but just a catchall term to
mean we can't understand it]. What does a BEing...even an omnipotent BEing
do for eternity? Sleep? Run around the block trying to better their PR?
Ha...no, no...well, yea, maybe that too. Experience. Need new experience I
would imagine. And thusly, could this be the impetus behind creation?
Ah...who knows. In the meantime you guys keep the act up so I can
experience this life as a common mortal, with no powers whatsoever [can't
even get laid properly]...even having to suffer unbearably at times.
Ah, well. there you have it. There's no reason really, in this day and
age with safe sex and birth control for you not to get laid. We just
like stringing you along with the idea that someday you *mite*.
One of the great promises of the Internet age is the remotely controlled
vaginal orifice you can buy and hook up to your pc that is hooked to an
internet ***** with a ***** that matches your every move. Perfectly safe
sex, no paternity suits. And now I've seen, like on Tripping the Rift, a
totally synthetic bimbo to ***** this way. I just *love* the way her tits
wiggle. But hey- the software is there to modify her looks any way you
like. you can shrink her tits to puppy size, remove all the pubic hair,
and have sex with "11 year old virgins" if that's what floats your boat.
It aint child porn... cause there's no *child*. <snurk>
.
|
|
|
| User: "tooly" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
26 Aug 2005 05:25:39 PM |
|
|
"Day Brown" <daybrown@artelco.com> wrote in message
news:jF5Pe.2457$qw7.76447914@typhoon.cei.net...
tooly wrote:
"Day Brown" <daybrown@artelco.com> wrote in message
news:Ku4Oe.2422$Bb7.75694124@typhoon.cei.net...
tooly wrote:
Ah, but who else here aches for a meeting of minds?
Dont that assume there is another mind? No, you're wrong, we are
all nothing but Turing machines programmed to string you along.
Yea...but then you're messing it up by letting me know that. Shame,
shame...
Actually, it is curious I once took a trip [ahem...not to beleaguer a
foolish youth long ago in a galaxy far away] whereupon I convinced myself
of exactly what you write here. Oh...sure, sure...a messed up head...but
realize, REALITY for us all is only a matter of what we percieve. For
that moment, my PERCEPTION became this reality. It was a different angle
on the notion of God. Consider a BEing; caught for all time, that is
beyond time itself [what we can only call the infinite...but just a
catchall term to mean we can't understand it]. What does a BEing...even
an omnipotent BEing do for eternity? Sleep? Run around the block trying
to better their PR?
Ha...no, no...well, yea, maybe that too. Experience. Need new
experience I would imagine. And thusly, could this be the impetus behind
creation?
Ah...who knows. In the meantime you guys keep the act up so I can
experience this life as a common mortal, with no powers whatsoever [can't
even get laid properly]...even having to suffer unbearably at times.
Ah, well. there you have it. There's no reason really, in this day and
age with safe sex and birth control for you not to get laid. We just
like stringing you along with the idea that someday you *mite*.
One of the great promises of the Internet age is the remotely controlled
vaginal orifice you can buy and hook up to your pc that is hooked to an
internet ***** with a ***** that matches your every move. Perfectly safe
sex, no paternity suits. And now I've seen, like on Tripping the Rift, a
totally synthetic bimbo to ***** this way. I just *love* the way her tits
wiggle. But hey- the software is there to modify her looks any way you
like. you can shrink her tits to puppy size, remove all the pubic hair,
and have sex with "11 year old virgins" if that's what floats your boat.
It aint child porn... cause there's no *child*. <snurk>
I meant I was miserable...not 'sick'.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Day Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
25 Aug 2005 11:26:51 PM |
|
|
tooly wrote:
It aint child porn... cause there's no *child*. <snurk>
I meant I was miserable...not 'sick'.
But who cares? Is there some purpose in being miserable? People will
do things we find disgusting and reprehensible, but like with the
child porn and 3D virtual reality snuff games younger kids use, no
other being is affected in any way. I hate to see couch potatos waste
life watching sitcoms, sports, soaps, and Fox, which makes vastly more
people sick, but there aint nutting I can do about it. I cant care.
Even in ASCII, there are so few sentient beings to read, that is
clear we are all being swept along with the insane inane.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Not One Single Reputable Accomplished Person Supports W's Quagmire |
16 Aug 2005 08:51:51 PM |
|
|
You are supposed to name someone other than an unaccomplished scribbler
who suppostes the quagmire.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
