| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"Bret Cahill" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2008 01:20:45 PM |
| Object: |
Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? Because they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
| User: "galathaea" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 01:38:07 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 11:20 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? Because they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
bret
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
is just pure sickness on your part
many black politicians get elected
receiving their necessary majorities
why do all of hillary's supporters end up so sick?
is it because you guys hate admitting
she voted for the patriot act
she voted for authorisation of iraq
she still funds it
she's been getting a ton of money from that industry
and her health care suggestion is the most banal and unworkable
of all the solutions offered
simply hooking an economic sector up to people's money
a lot of people are turning away from hillary
because of people like you bret
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 02:23:54 PM |
|
|
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? =EF=BF=BDBecause they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. It's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Just sticking your head in the sand and pretending racism isn't a
problem doesn't make racism go away. It makes it worse.
Second, Obama isn't unelectable. The GOP will be almost defunct by
Nov. -- this is actually Bill Clinton's not Dumbya's doing -- so just
about any Democrat except maybe Gore or Kerry could get elected.
The rich white Repugs funneling money to the Obama campaign certainly
hope Obama will lose the general election but even if he doesn't
they'll at least have a weaker opponent than the politically astute
Clintons.
At a minimum the rich white Repugs supporting Obama managed to
introduce race to a campaign when black family income rose faster
under Bill Clinton than any time since the Civil War. In contrast
Omama admires Reagan who, with his constantly rising violent crime
rate Reaganomics and "tough on crime" rhetoric, got more blacks locked
up than any president since the Civil War.
After Hillary wins some blacks are going to wrongly feel politically
disenfranchized.
In any event Obama and his supporters are naive thinking all his money
came from people interested in poor blacks.
A naive president isn't a good president.
Results oriented politics is _reason_. It's _hard work_. It is not
for romantics like the Green Party idiots think.
Ask Bob Graham, one of the most respected accomplished members of the
Senate. He'll _tell_ you political science is hard work.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Miller" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 05:10:19 PM |
|
|
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@aol.com> wrote in message
news:b8cac601-8cdd-45a8-984c-a69043dee46c@n22g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? ?Because they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. It's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Obama is electable and a far sight better choice than Hillary never have we
had such a truely dishonest person running for the Whitehouse.
Remember the Whitehouse Travel office? She couldn't simply have them
laid off or fired to hire their friends to do the job. She would have
seemed
mean and heartless. Better to slander them and accuse them of fraud and
theft. To make it look justified to fire them for cause.
Robert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 10:53:06 PM |
|
|
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? ?Because they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. =EF=BF=BDIt's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Obama is electable and a far sight better choice than Hillary
Face reality:
Bill Clinton put the Party of Gipper on the ash heap of history.
Get used to it.
Bret cahill
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "galathaea" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 02:32:08 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 12:23 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? =EF=BF=BDBecause they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. It's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Just sticking your head in the sand and pretending racism isn't a
problem doesn't make racism go away. It makes it worse.
Second, Obama isn't unelectable. The GOP will be almost defunct by
Nov. -- this is actually Bill Clinton's not Dumbya's doing -- so just
about any Democrat except maybe Gore or Kerry could get elected.
The rich white Repugs funneling money to the Obama campaign certainly
hope Obama will lose the general election but even if he doesn't
they'll at least have a weaker opponent than the politically astute
Clintons.
At a minimum the rich white Repugs supporting Obama managed to
introduce race to a campaign when black family income rose faster
under Bill Clinton than any time since the Civil War. In contrast
Omama admires Reagan who, with his constantly rising violent crime
rate Reaganomics and "tough on crime" rhetoric, got more blacks locked
up than any president since the Civil War.
After Hillary wins some blacks are going to wrongly feel politically
disenfranchized.
In any event Obama and his supporters are naive thinking all his money
came from people interested in poor blacks.
A naive president isn't a good president.
Results oriented politics is _reason_. It's _hard work_. It is not
for romantics like the Green Party idiots think.
Ask Bob Graham, one of the most respected accomplished members of the
Senate. He'll _tell_ you political science is hard work.
so you think hillary worked hard
to get the patriot act passed?
her support for violence against a country
that did not attack or threaten america
is a sign of her ability to get stuff accomplished?
bush may be helping the bankruptcy of america
but it is congress that passes the funding bills
and hillary has done more to bankrupt america
if you want to look at the hard work involved
supporting hillary
means not supporting accountability
if she gets elected
it is merely a sign that a politician can do whatever they please
because no one cares enough to do anything about it
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D=
-=3D-=3D-=3D-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 03:44:27 PM |
|
|
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? =EF=BF=BDBecause they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. =C2=A0It's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Just sticking your head in the sand and pretending racism isn't a
problem doesn't make racism go away. =C2=A0It makes it worse.
Second, Obama isn't unelectable. =C2=A0The GOP will be almost defunct by=
Nov. -- this is actually Bill Clinton's not Dumbya's doing -- so just
about any Democrat except maybe Gore or Kerry could get elected.
The rich white Repugs funneling money to the Obama campaign certainly
hope Obama will lose the general election but even if he doesn't
they'll at least have a weaker opponent than the politically astute
Clintons.
At a minimum the rich white Repugs supporting Obama managed to
introduce race to a campaign when black family income rose faster
under Bill Clinton than any time since the Civil War. =C2=A0In contrast
Omama admires Reagan who, with his constantly rising violent crime
rate Reaganomics and "tough on crime" rhetoric, got more blacks locked
up than any president since the Civil War.
After Hillary wins some blacks are going to wrongly feel politically
disenfranchized.
In any event Obama and his supporters are naive thinking all his money
came from people interested in poor blacks.
A naive president isn't a good president.
Results oriented politics is _reason_. =C2=A0It's _hard work_. =C2=A0It =
is not
for romantics like the Green Party idiots think.
Ask Bob Graham, one of the most respected accomplished members of the
Senate. =C2=A0He'll _tell_ you political science is hard work.
so you think hillary worked hard
=C2=A0 to get the patriot act passed?
Small spuds. The only reason for the quagmire in the _first_ place is
because Clinton I had Repugs desperate for a distraction. The old
Reagan way wouldn't work anymore. Confidence man Rove was running
around saying "we need to think big, BIG, I tell ya! We can start an
eternal patriotic war that the Democrats will oppose [because it is so
moronic] and that will 'lock us in' power forever. We'll call our
opponents 'Saddam lovers' if they don't support tax cuts."
Twice Sen. Kennedy, sometimes a critic of Bill Clinton, has indicated
something to this effect.
Shortly after the invasion Sen. Kennedy said, in morbid fascination/
disgust, that the quagmire idea was "hatched in Texas" and BushCo
screamed at Kennedy's "outrage."
That screaming just indicates Kennedy was correct.
Later after appointing judge Alito Kennedy said that Bush was doing it
"out of weakness, not out of strength."
Actually Kennedy didn't go far enough. The GOP was walking dead by
2000. All it would have taken was someone willing to grab a shovel
and bury the stinking mess but the words "grab a shovel" and "Al Gore"
will never appear together in any sentence except this one.
Hillary was just going along with the nonsense because the quagmire
was for domestic consumption where the Clintons can always win
anyway. With all due respect to Mersheimer, et. al, the neocons' only
role was that of chumps. Ever notice how sanguine Bush and Cheney are
with their quagmire compared to the neocons? Think about it. Kennedy
is right.
The loss of life under Bush is significant but it is miniscule
compared to the lives that can be saved with another high tax economic
boom, with health care, with having the Clintons back in power.
As for international respect, the heavily Democratic Congress can
appoint a prosecutor to handle the war crimes charges against Bush,
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and Rove. That's the only way to regain
respect. Bush and Cheney are both on record saying an invasion of
Iraq would result in a senseless loss of life which is a war crime per
se. The prosecution is trivial.
I'm not punishment oriented but the U. S. does need to show it doesn't
harbor war criminals.
=2E . .
bush may be helping the bankruptcy of america
but it is congress that passes the funding bills
=C2=A0 and hillary has done more to bankrupt america
=C2=A0 if you want to look at the hard work involved
supporting hillary
means not supporting accountability
Michael Moore is a punishment oriented Democrat.
I'm a results oriented Democrat.
I try to look at the larger picture.
Bret Cahill
"Always mistrust those who want to punish."
-- Nietzsche
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 03:53:16 PM |
|
|
The fastest surest way to get rid of the Patriot Act is to vote for
Hillary.
The Scalito Court will then suddenly find a copy of the constitution
and strike it down January 20, 2009.
They don't want Hillary listening in to GOP strategy like Cheney does
with the Democrats.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "zinnic" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 04:20:33 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 2:23=C2=A0pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? =EF=BF=BDBecause they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. =C2=A0It's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Nope. It is more than that. It is like accepting that nothing can be
changed, so one may as well go to the back of the bus.
so just about any Democrat except maybe Gore or Kerry could get elected.
Yep! The election of Hillary will confirm that. IMO the USA deserves
better than an 'in-law' nonentity shoo-ed in on the basis of name-
recognition. That is how Bush was elected. You want four more years of
the same sort of inadequacy?
The rich white Repugs funneling money to the Obama campaign certainly
hope Obama will lose the general election but even if he doesn't
they'll at least have a weaker opponent than the politically astute
Clintons.
Politically astute? Personally, I am sick of a Party that is so
'astute' that it equates being Democratic with being anti-Republican.
At a minimum the rich white Repugs supporting Obama managed to
introduce race to a campaign when black family income rose faster
under Bill Clinton than any time since the Civil War. =C2=A0In contrast
Omama admires Reagan who, with his constantly rising violent crime
rate Reaganomics and "tough on crime" rhetoric, got more blacks locked
up than any president since the Civil War.
With typical "political astuteness" you make this patently false
charge. I guess anything, even mis-representation, is justified! Obama
said he admired Reagan's political astuteness in convincing democrats
not to vote for the Democratic party. Which,in his opinion, was
against their better interests. By no stretch can this be distorted
into your and Hillary's claim that he admired Reagan's political
philosophy. You KNOW that, Hillary and Bill know that, but I guess
y'all do not regard honesty as being politically astute!
A naive president isn't a good president.
Sleeping in a marriage bed with a president does not qualify anyone,
naive or not, to be a good president.
Results oriented politics is _reason_. =C2=A0It's _hard work_. =C2=A0It is=
not
for romantics like the Green Party idiots think.
Ask Bob Graham, one of the most respected accomplished members of the
Senate. =C2=A0He'll _tell_ you political science is hard work.
Results-oriented politics is reason? Bret, 1984 has come and gone?
Are you trying to rewrite fictional history or what?
Ask citizens of communist states what it is that results from "results
oriented politics". Communist parties work very hard, but it is much,
much harder work to reverse the consequences when their 'results
oriented' and dishonest politics achieve their intended result.
Talk about naive, will you guys never learn?
Zinnic
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 10:49:15 PM |
|
|
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? =EF=BF=BDBecause they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. =C2=A0It's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Nope. It is more than that. It is like accepting that nothing can be
changed, =C2=A0
No one suggested we allow Republicons to maintain the status quo.
It means the fastest way to equality might not be to judge someone by
the color of their skin.
That's why all the _real_ civil rights leaders support Hillary.
=2E . .
The rich white Repugs funneling money to the Obama campaign certainly
hope Obama will lose the general election but even if he doesn't
they'll at least have a weaker opponent than the politically astute
Clintons.
Politically astute?
No one denies that.
Personally, I am sick of a Party that is so
'astute' that it equates being Democratic with being anti-Republican.
Republicans demonized anyone who didn't support tax cuts for the rich
as a "Saddam lover."
At a minimum the rich white Repugs supporting Obama managed to
introduce race to a campaign when black family income rose faster
under Bill Clinton than any time since the Civil War. =C2=A0In contrast
Omama admires Reagan who, with his constantly rising violent crime
rate Reaganomics and "tough on crime" rhetoric, got more blacks locked
up than any president since the Civil War.
With typical "political astuteness" you make this patently false
charge.
That proves what I say it true.
=2E . .
A naive president isn't a good president.
Sleeping in a marriage bed with a president does not qualify anyone,
naive or not, to be a good president.
She certainly set some kind of record when it comes to upsetting
pollsters.
Results oriented politics is _reason_. =C2=A0It's _hard work_. =C2=A0It =
is not
for romantics like the Green Party idiots think.
Ask Bob Graham, one of the most respected accomplished members of the
Senate. =C2=A0He'll _tell_ you political science is hard work.
Results-oriented politics is reason?
It isn't issue dodging like the GOP "market" economists.
And it isn't election dodging which is what Repugcowards always do
when the Clintons run for president.
Hillary.
15+ points
General election.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
| User: "zinnic" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
25 Jan 2008 08:39:12 AM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 10:49=A0pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
First, saying Obama isn't electable because there are a lot of racists=
in the country doesn't mean that person is a racist. It's just
admitting the reality that bigots do in fact exist in large numbers.
Nope. It is more than that. It is like accepting that nothing can be
changed, =A0
No one suggested we allow Republicons to maintain the status quo.
That's once
It means the fastest way to equality might not be to judge someone by
the color of their skin.
That's why all the _real_ civil rights leaders support Hillary.
. . .
The rich white Repugs funneling money to the Obama campaign certainly
hope Obama will lose the general election but even if he doesn't
they'll at least have a weaker opponent than the politically astute
Clintons.
Politically astute?
No one denies that.
Personally, I am sick of a Party that is so
'astute' that it equates being Democratic with being anti-Republican.
Republicans demonized anyone who didn't support tax cuts for the rich
as a "Saddam lover."
That's twice
At a minimum the rich white Repugs supporting Obama managed to
introduce race to a campaign when black family income rose faster
under Bill Clinton than any time since the Civil War. =A0In contrast
Omama admires Reagan who, with his constantly rising violent crime
rate Reaganomics and "tough on crime" rhetoric, got more blacks locked=
up than any president since the Civil War.
With typical "political astuteness" you make this patently false
charge.
That proves what I say it true.
. . .
A naive president isn't a good president.
Sleeping in a marriage bed with a president does not qualify anyone,
naive or not, to be a good president.
She certainly set some kind of record when it comes to upsetting
pollsters.
Results oriented politics is _reason_. =A0It's _hard work_. =A0It is n=
ot
for romantics like the Green Party idiots think.
Ask Bob Graham, one of the most respected accomplished members of the
Senate. =A0He'll _tell_ you political science is hard work.
Results-oriented politics is reason?
It isn't issue dodging like the GOP "market" economists.
That's three times
And it isn't election dodging which is what Repugcowards always do
when the Clintons run for president.
That's four times you demonstrate that your 'democratic' policy is
shallow anti-republicism. You prove my point with your otherwise
'content-less' response. I guess you "astute" politicians love
vacuities!
Hillary.
15+ points
General election.
Bret Cahill
Don't worry Bret if they cancel the Inauguration. King Hillie and
Queen Billie will invite all their sycophants to the Coronation. Long
live the Monarchy.
Zinnic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
25 Jan 2008 05:19:15 PM |
|
|
That's four times you demonstrate that your 'democratic' policy is
shallow anti-republicism. =A0
Well don't keep us settin' on the edges of our chairs.
What's left of the GOP except a few hate filled bigots?
And _no_ the Scalito Court and Scaife do _not_ count.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
| User: "zinnic" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
26 Jan 2008 07:03:42 AM |
|
|
On Jan 25, 5:19=A0pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
That's four times you demonstrate that your 'democratic' policy is
shallow anti-republicism. =A0
Well don't keep us settin' on the edges of our chairs.
What's left of the GOP except a few hate filled bigots?
And _no_ the Scalito Court and Scaife do _not_ count.
Bret Cahill
How astute!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "zinnic" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 02:44:03 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 1:38=A0pm, galathaea <galath...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 24, 11:20 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? =A0Because they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
bret
you have become the worst of the racists supporting hillary
your constant insinuation that black means unelectable
=A0 is just pure sickness on your part
many black politicians get elected
=A0 receiving their necessary majorities
why do all of hillary's supporters end up so sick?
is it because you guys hate admitting
=A0 she voted for the patriot act
=A0 she voted for authorisation of iraq
=A0 she still funds it
=A0 she's been getting a ton of money from that industry
and her health care suggestion is the most banal and unworkable
=A0 of all the solutions offered
simply hooking an economic sector up to people's money
a lot of people are turning away from hillary
because of people like you bret
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=
=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
Yep! Bret's bratishness has become hillaryous! It's ironic that in
Hillary he finds his Ayn true Rand!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 03:49:30 PM |
|
|
Actually it's Obama's "supporters" who sing "Obama you are so
beautiful" or at least I haven't heard anyone say they are paid
shills.
Clinton supporters are pragmatists, not romantics.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
24 Jan 2008 03:46:15 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 2:20 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? Because they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
Bret Cahill
Scam!!!!!
What Thomas isn't black? Do his parents know? I demand a recount
(I'm sure I saw a chad hanging somewhere).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
26 Jan 2008 08:24:48 AM |
|
|
Obama got a lot, possibly most of his funding from Republicons.
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Why? =EF=BF=BDBecause they are so sensitive about black issues?
No, it's just another scam like Justice Thomas.
Bret Cahill
Scam!!!!!
What Thomas isn't black? =EF=BF=BD
He hasn't started bleaching his skin yet but other than that, he'll do
anything to be white.
That's why GHW Bush cynically appointed him to the DC circuit as soon
as he heard that the first black justice was in failing health.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Weiss" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
26 Jan 2008 12:46:40 PM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 9:24 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Oh? I thought it was the Clintons.
Of course Osama and his supporters then gleefully grabbed the ball and
ran with it for all it was worth.
Speaking of which, can I make a suggestion. You remember the way the
Kerry campaign had to lock Teresa in a closet the last few weeks of
the campaign (of course by then the damage had been done and it was
too late). Well, I think they need to do that with Bill, now. Ya
think? I mean, with each passing day he becomes more and more of an
embarrassment - although of course no more than he was as president.
Fred Weiss
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: Obama Didn't Get His $100 Million From SC Voters |
26 Jan 2008 01:19:27 PM |
|
|
The Repugs wanted to introduce race to the primaries.
Oh? I thought it was the Clintons.
The entire purpose of Repugs funding Obama was to introduce race.
Then their buddies in the media try to spin a mountain out of thin air
and act triumphant about disenfranchizing blacks from the political
process.
The high tax Clinton economic boom increased black family income
faster than any time since the Civil War.
That's why the civil rights establishment supports Clinton, not Obama.
Of course Osama and his supporters then gleefully grabbed the ball and
ran with it for all it was worth.
Clinton will now have to make amends by appointing a lot of people of
color to high office.
How gleeful will your too clever by half Repug bigots -- that's all
that's left to the GOP -- be then?
Speaking of which, can I make a suggestion. You remember the way the
Kerry campaign had to lock Teresa in a closet the last few weeks of
the campaign (of course by then the damage had been done and it was
too late). Well, I think they need to do that with Bill, now.
Bill's drawing rightard blood, is he?
That's nothing new.
Scream all you want. Earplugs are cheap.
And get used to the fact that fundies aren't going to vote for Romney.
Hillary.
15+ points.
General election.
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
