Science > Philosophy > On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical)
| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"NotSoQuick" |
| Date: |
08 Jan 2004 02:52:13 AM |
| Object: |
On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
The banning of pot is killing people. I wonder why I hadn't
thought of this before. I don't use that drug and haven't gotten
high in over 30 years.
Banning pot kills people because legalizing it would not add to
the alcohol problem, but might replace alcohol in many people's
lives. There might be less battering of spouses and there might be
a lot less deaths by drunk drivers.
.
|
|
| User: "NotSoQuick" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 09:22:43 PM |
|
|
"NotSoQuick" <no@spam.net> wrote in message
news:tT8Lb.57161$PK3.49271@okepread01...
The banning of pot is killing people. I wonder why I hadn't
thought of this before. I don't use that drug and haven't gotten
high in over 30 years.
Banning pot kills people because legalizing it would not add to
the alcohol problem, but might replace alcohol in many people's
lives. There might be less battering of spouses and there might be
a lot less deaths by drunk drivers.
No comments?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "NotSoQuick" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 09:40:09 PM |
|
|
"NotSoQuick" <no@spam.net> wrote in message
news:tT8Lb.57161$PK3.49271@okepread01...
The banning of pot is killing people. I wonder why I hadn't
thought of this before. I don't use that drug and haven't gotten
high in over 30 years.
This should have read:
The criminalizing of pot is killing people. I haven't heard anyone
mention that if pot replaced alcohol in people's lives who do use
drugs for recreation or self-therapy that there would be a lot less
car accidents and spousal abuse and who knows what else.
I don't use illegal drugs and haven't for over 30 years and don't have
any personal reason to want marijuana legalized.
Banning pot kills people because legalizing it would not add to
the alcohol problem, but might replace alcohol in many people's
lives. There might be less battering of spouses and there might be
a lot less deaths by drunk drivers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anti- Corporation" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 10:42:24 PM |
|
|
I do not think pot would replace alcohole, there are only two kinds of
eole in this world, those who smoke pot and those who drink booze, and
of course those of us who are rather 'diverse' in their interests and
partake in both.
People who drink, I mean really drink, like booze, not pot, and people
who smoke the bud, usually are not really into the drinking. I do not
think the liquor industry really is behind this, I think it is the
corrupt corporat pharmeceutical motherfucking transnational steal
everyones fucking feedom bastards who must fucking DIE before they rot
in fucking hell.
Drinkers like to drink and smokers like to smoke. What ever happened
to concept of fucking choice around here? Oh, that's ight, you have to
go throgh a 'doctor' and purchase this FREE FUCKING PLANT from the
transnational corpratists who must profit from it through the
exploitation of the masses. They need to use pesticides on it and
genetically modify then make you pay foreign aid to foreign countries
where they previously bombed so they can grow it cheaper than in Amerca
because of the unions who have forced all the corporations to go pollute
the ground water and air in third-world countries to increase the
profits they must stash tax-free in of-shore havens whie invitig mexican
illegals into this country via your govt. so they can collect social
security while depressing wages.
Yeah, I wouldn't shed a tear if some more planes came crasing down on
these pricks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "NotSoQuick" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 11:13:14 PM |
|
|
"Anti- Corporation" <anticorporation@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:28386-3FFE3130-933@storefull-2276.public.lawson.webtv.net...
I do not think pot would replace alcohole, there are only two kinds of
eole in this world, those who smoke pot and those who drink booze, and
of course those of us who are rather 'diverse' in their interests and
partake in both.
People who drink, I mean really drink, like booze, not pot, and people
who smoke the bud, usually are not really into the drinking. I do not
think the liquor industry really is behind this, I think it is the
corrupt corporat pharmeceutical motherfucking transnational steal
everyones fucking feedom bastards who must fucking DIE before they rot
in fucking hell.
Drinkers like to drink and smokers like to smoke. What ever happened
to concept of fucking choice around here? Oh, that's ight, you have to
go throgh a 'doctor' and purchase this FREE FUCKING PLANT from the
transnational corpratists who must profit from it through the
exploitation of the masses. They need to use pesticides on it and
genetically modify then make you pay foreign aid to foreign countries
where they previously bombed so they can grow it cheaper than in Amerca
because of the unions who have forced all the corporations to go pollute
the ground water and air in third-world countries to increase the
profits they must stash tax-free in of-shore havens whie invitig mexican
illegals into this country via your govt. so they can collect social
security while depressing wages.
Yeah, I wouldn't shed a tear if some more planes came crasing down on
these pricks.
I wonder. If pot was legal there have got to be a lot of people
who are using alcohol just to avoid the possibility of breaking the
law. And how many people who drink have never tried pot because
of the law. There should be a statement by the American Medical
Association stating that pot smoking is better for you than alcohol
Do you know of any reason that the vitamin that stops chirosis isn't
put in alcohol? I'm under the impression that it could be done and
that there is no good reason for it not to be done.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "NotSoQuick" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 02:57:00 AM |
|
|
Also since pot can be grown there isn't any need for distilleries
and taxing it would be difficult. Follow the money to find the real
reason why pot isn't legal. Some people, even those who support
legalization, deal with the arguement that if pot had any medicinal
properties or if and when any medicinal properties are found then
the question will be revisited. If there aren't any known medicinal
properties then why is synthetic marijuana already prescribed?
Some of the anti-pot people are sincere but some are strictly looking
out for the financial interests of the liquor manufacturers and others.
Who knows who else. At least it's a possiblity worth considering.
"NotSoQuick" <no@spam.net> wrote in message
news:tT8Lb.57161$PK3.49271@okepread01...
The banning of pot is killing people. I wonder why I hadn't
thought of this before. I don't use that drug and haven't gotten
high in over 30 years.
Banning pot kills people because legalizing it would not add to
the alcohol problem, but might replace alcohol in many people's
lives. There might be less battering of spouses and there might be
a lot less deaths by drunk drivers.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Not so quick" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 12:22:19 PM |
|
|
The other post on pot reminded me of a lot of stuff.
Has anyone ever heard of Fetal Marijuana Syndrome?
How about Fetal Alcohol Syndrome...
"NotSoQuick" <no@spam.net> wrote in message
news:tT8Lb.57161$PK3.49271@okepread01...
The banning of pot is killing people. I wonder why I hadn't
thought of this before. I don't use that drug and haven't gotten
high in over 30 years.
Banning pot kills people because legalizing it would not add to
the alcohol problem, but might replace alcohol in many people's
lives. There might be less battering of spouses and there might be
a lot less deaths by drunk drivers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anti- Corporation" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 10:33:10 PM |
|
|
it is just another fucked-up conspiracy by some who believe they have
some sort of mandate to excert power and control over other people,
truly satanic evil cult members in my philosophical revalation of "Who
to Fucking Kill and Why' by JK Lawless.
These people can not argue their case, they just say "its the law".
Freedom and democracy is a fucked-up lie we are fucking prisoners, free
me would smoke pot and nobody culd kill them for doing so. Why do you
think they do not let guys who smoke dope have fully automatic assault
rifles with armour piercing ammunition, flame throwers and grenade
launchers, why? Because if they did they could smoke pot withot the
fear of swat coming in and killing them or imprisoning them.
Question for you? How many dead swat members and corrupt corporate
transnational govt. people would have to DIE before it was safe to go
down to the beach and smoke a joint wthout fear of reprisal? You know
these same fuckers are trying to make it illegal to go down to the beach
at sunset and hav a couple of drinks? ***** ME, something needs to be
done right about now, I wonder if there was a massive small-pox outbreak
withmillions of corrupt corporate consumers DYING if they would still
feel the need to pick on people who smoke pot? What if there were
massive pot rebel attacks against these people? I tell you VIOLENCE is
the surest and quickest way to implement change. If all the people who
smoked pot would just kill one corporate assholes or govt. official I
think this would institute CHANGE in their fucked-up policys of
criminalising HALF OF FUCKING AMERICA. This would also go along way in
cutting down the population. Do you know how many Americans smoke pot?
Fucking millions. Millions of criminals walking the street. This is
what I call voting with a bullet, he, it actually counts for something
and can not be over-ridden by corrupt corporate legislation by your
bought and paid for 'representatives'.
.
|
|
|
| User: "NotSoQuick" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
08 Jan 2004 11:09:16 PM |
|
|
"Anti- Corporation" <anticorporation@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:28386-3FFE2F06-932@storefull-2276.public.lawson.webtv.net...
it is just another fucked-up conspiracy by some who believe they have
some sort of mandate to excert power and control over other people,
truly satanic evil cult members in my philosophical revalation of "Who
to Fucking Kill and Why' by JK Lawless.
These people can not argue their case, they just say "its the law".
Freedom and democracy is a fucked-up lie we are fucking prisoners, free
me would smoke pot and nobody culd kill them for doing so. Why do you
think they do not let guys who smoke dope have fully automatic assault
rifles with armour piercing ammunition, flame throwers and grenade
launchers, why? Because if they did they could smoke pot withot the
fear of swat coming in and killing them or imprisoning them.
Question for you? How many dead swat members and corrupt corporate
transnational govt. people would have to DIE before it was safe to go
down to the beach and smoke a joint wthout fear of reprisal? You know
these same fuckers are trying to make it illegal to go down to the beach
at sunset and hav a couple of drinks? ***** ME, something needs to be
done right about now, I wonder if there was a massive small-pox outbreak
withmillions of corrupt corporate consumers DYING if they would still
feel the need to pick on people who smoke pot? What if there were
massive pot rebel attacks against these people? I tell you VIOLENCE is
the surest and quickest way to implement change. If all the people who
smoked pot would just kill one corporate assholes or govt. official I
think this would institute CHANGE in their fucked-up policys of
criminalising HALF OF FUCKING AMERICA. This would also go along way in
cutting down the population. Do you know how many Americans smoke pot?
Fucking millions. Millions of criminals walking the street. This is
what I call voting with a bullet, he, it actually counts for something
and can not be over-ridden by corrupt corporate legislation by your
bought and paid for 'representatives'.
I don't remember ever feeling like killing anyone when I smoked pot.
I felt like killing myself after the paranoid feeling I got while driving
stoned.
well not really that bad.
AntiC,
Do you think there would be less violence, greater productivity, less cancer
and cirrosis and fetal alcohol syndrome, if some people switched from
alcohol to pot?
Not, like that's a leading question... : -)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anti- Corporation" |
|
| Title: Re: On pot (and why banning it may be killing people - non medical) |
09 Jan 2004 12:03:53 AM |
|
|
NSQ- I don't remember ever feeling like killing anyone when I smoked
pot. I felt like killing myself after the paranoid feeling I got while
driving stoned.
well not really that bad.
AntiC,
Do you think there would be less violence, greater productivity, less
cancer and cirrosis and fetal alcohol syndrome, if some people switched
from alcohol to pot?
Not, like that's a leading question... : -)"
I don't think that "productivity" would be increased, ha ha, but,
yeah, violence isn't a real high-priority for the stoned, we'll leave
that for the drunks.
You know, I get that same "paranoid" feeling while driving boozed-up
but not stoned. I think driving is a much cooler experience under the
influence, more of a challenge if you know what I mean? If you drive
really fast when totally stoned you get this tunnel-vision, this is real
freedom, utilizing technology and drugs to their ultimate conclusion.
Here is what I think, it is all a conspiracy by those who want to
control people; they make all these laws, put out all this propaganda
about how 'bad' it is to drink and drive, make people out to be
'criminals', for what, having some fucking fun? If you drink and drive
ou will kill peope, if you get high and drive around you will run over
little kids. All they do is manipulate the statical probabilities an
make false conclusions that 100% of the time the result will be
fatalities.
What ever happened to reason and logic, enlightenment, you know,
telling the fucking truth? Do you know how many times people drive
around fucked-up? Versus how many actual accidents, the odds are in the
peoples favour, yet, wth all of their ***** lying un-truthful
propaganda you would think people are dying by the millions o something,
only about 50,000 car fatalities a year, no big deal, and a *****-load of
them are sober.
You know, I do ave a soution to back-up all my *****, but do you
think they would impement? ***** NO, because they are lying *****
corrupt corporate transnationa CONTROL FREAKS. What's the solution you
may ask?
Putting fucking giant rubber bumpers around all cars and on the lane
dividers. Pretty fucking simple eh? How many car fatalities now
motherfuckers? But, oh FUCKING NO, CAN'T DO THAT, THAT WOULD ACTUALLY
SOLVE ALL THE FUCKING PROBLEMS. No, instead we have to create a giant
fucking bureaucratic DMV and court system, put cops all over the fucking
place. We can't fucking help people do what they enjoy, NO, we have to
turn them into fucking criminals, regulate their behaviour, CONTROL AND
PUNISH THEM, fucking sadistic assholes make me sick.
No one could figure this out, giant rubber fucking bumpers everywhere?
No, let's just en-fucking-slave them instead, they are stupid enough to
go for the freedom crap and imprison themselves at the same time. Don't
be fucking innovative, don't increase free behaviour, no, utilize
everything to control them.
Oh, the cost of the bumper? Who fucking cares, if I could drive while
F.U.B.B'ed I would be worth it (fucked up beyond belief) to not be
<<<<<PARANOID>>>>>>> OH THE FUCKING TERRORISTS, THE FUCKING TERRORISTS,
please save me, oh, hel me help me, go through my luggage, scan my
email, look at my bank accounts-FUCKING RUBBER BUMPERS PEOPLE.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|