sorry for terminology crappiness in this rambling :P

11.5.5

Sensation(Image)... Object...
----------------------
Only self is known/proven but we seek a solid reality "out there".
Objective verification of personal experience is impossible.
The "I'll believe it when I see it!" faith still trust the objective
reality of their personal experience as if it were a direct

of reality, remembered by a sane mind. We can only study the "Show".
(mindfulness leads to this very personal POV? "subjective

----------------------
When aware of the observing self the objective substance of

turns to vapour?
----------------------
Right quadrants (objective-physical) are experienced in the UL
(upper-left, interior) sensory level. the objects of personal sensory
experience and mental interpretation.
I think some reduce the world to a category of experience, Wilber
allows that and gives the actual world its own dimension entirely
seperate from experiential levels aswell.
There has to be space in our theory for the objective story.
----------------------
12.5.5

Solipsism, Integralism, Materialism: (..?)
Self/just-visuals/character/characters...nothing outside...
Self/just-visuals/etcetc...plus actual reality...other beings...
Physical reality...nothing inside...
----------------------
reductions/explain-aways:
World = category of experience (of self) .. by Immaterialism
Experience = function of brain .. by Materialism
----------------------
fields.
sensory: tactile, visual, auditory, scent, taste.
emotional.
mental.
----------------------
Awareness...Experience...etc. Body-Land. Other people.
----------------------
"Any Reality is an Opinion."

-Timothy Leary.
----------------------
"I don't believe in anything, but I have many suspiscions.

I strongly suspect that a world "external to," or atleast independent
of, my senses exists in some sense."

-Robert Anton Wilson, rawilson.com.
----------------------
Leary keeps a strong awareness on neurology and drug use in its
connection to psychological states and circuit activations.
UR and UL (inner and outer individual)...8 levels. not sure if he
divides the inner/outer heirarchies so clearly.
----------------------
where do the chakras fit in?
external corresponding to internal, like brain levels?
----------------------
they are seen as physical type energy balls located within the body,
and are corresponded to different levels of inner experience from
impulse to intuition.
----------------------
The neuro and chakra conceptions seem to be used as good "resting
points" for scientists and esoteric students to think about the
internal spectrum of experiences/functions/etc.
----------------------
personal condition, interpersonal relations, objective situation.
----------------------
Aurobindos synthesis took a number of internal lines through lower to
superconscious levels into one map and practice. It integrates all
levels and all main yogic paths.
matter-life-mind-soul-spirit | Knowledge/Devotion/Works
Pretty "integral" but not very aware of other quadrants, of material
reality and contextual cultures. Which scientific and socio-cultural
studies have shed light on.
----------------------
RAW's "maybe-logic" cognition is one internal level of one line, but
invites other lines to match it. same with "vision-logic".
I think RAW and KW (Wilson and Wilber) both focus on cognition

it's a first step to correlating development in other lines (morals,
needs, self, etc)..and quadrants.
----------------------
The "Holographic Universe" theory is idealistic, spirit centred, and
opposed to mechanical material reductionism. It offers to smash your
materialistic POV and replace it with a solipstic type dream POV of

world based on spirit/consciousness.
----------------------
4 quadrants.
interior space-phenomena, external body, external world, other
interiors.
----------------------
13.5.5

the modern person has to match their morals to their cognition, and
their technology must be kept out of earlier stage people/s.
----------------------
status report on:
my interior lines/levels, my body/brain condition, lines/levels of my
cultures, external circumstances.
----------------------
Some of the levels of consciousness (the 8 Circuits) seem to include
access to other realms besides the physical and internal... it's not
just about higher internal development but access to another

I guess) world where other apparently real beings can be encountered,
either disembodied or with same level brain activations in the
gross-realm.
----------------------
mind-sensation... suspected world and body in sensation window...
suspected others experiencing and thinking with supposed bodies
percieved through the senses interpreted by the mind-emotions,
witnessed by the Self.
----------------------
the connection of feelings with either physical tensions or with
energies takes away the "etherealness" of the experience. It's an
experience coming directly from a reality. I tried to do that with
mental experience aswell, as if I were seeing into a mental

some ghostly empty illusion (Nowhere-Land). But maybe we're never
touched by a reality outside ourselves, maybe it is all ghostly
illusion? The physical world aswell as the mind and mental imagery...
both creations from the soul/self for the soul/self. ("It's all

-Pothead). but the dream continues so we must make space in our view
for the world as it appears to be and to have been, and the

correlations to subjectives states, etc.
----------------------
too much
father principle = "nazi fascist *****"
mother principle = "they just wallow, they're self-contained, they're
whiney, they want the world to take care of them, they're a momma's
boy, and so on"
----------------------
14.5.5

Hardware for the vision and mind software.
the brain relays sensory information to and allows thought for the
soul..? All the physical information, etc, is transformed through the
pineal gland into sensory-mental experience for the soul?
----------------------
turn off the software and the hardware isn't even seen... it is seen
via an experience display to the soul via developed (or naturally
evolved) hardware.
I think this is the best way to see my object vs image thingie.
----------------------
whatever I see, whoever I meet, I never actually leave my computer
screen. self-presence is coming back to this lucid POV... were were
just lost in the movie, program, etc.
----------------------
the transformation of thingies into images is still very mysterious.
----------------------
computer software understanding vs hardware understanding is similar

biology/neurology vs psychology? there's this kind of imaginary POV
needed in software and psychology because the experiences don't
literally exist in a space-time, locatable, sense. cyberspace,
virtual-reality. I donno... I think that's the difference between
software-hardware that's annoyed me so long?
----------------------
there is no way to experience material reality except through a
machine's reception and translation into subjective experience. no
direct view.
existence vs experience+self... the mysterious connection...
----------------------
the "4Q" of computing is: hardware-software, internet-cyberspace.
----------------------
the internet is both thought of as a physical network and as a
"cyberspace". like a collective mind and neural network.
----------------------
Learys 8 circuits are neural structures, like computer circuits, and
software upgrade levels (psychological).
actual, internal, and behavioural (internal/software expressive

h-ware/body...robotics).
----------------------
there isn't much difference in the human hardware of today vs a
thousand years ago, but what we have still seems to allow for much
internal development.
----------------------
brain gives self access to senses, mind, and even soul experiences

subtle reality, similar to gross experience but inspired?)?
these mystical visions, etc, are either psychological or they're
windows to other realities much like the sense-doors.
if more than an experience then the subtle objects must be
lumped/organized into the objective reality quadrants, like the sense
objects.
----------------------
that me and W's ex are both interested in computers and psychology,
tending toward psychology, is interesting.
Is there a link between the two interests?
Wilbers main character in Boomeritis is also a computer student of

i-net generation, curious about A.I., whos interests are heading more
into the interior developmental studies.
I think the difficulty with A.I. exposed in Boomeritis is one I

which is... however complex and apparently free and considerate a
program how do you go from that to injecting consciousness..? How do
you gives the artificialy intelligent visual an awareness and

directed intelligence? How did nature do it?
----------------------
hardware - electricity - software
body - energies - mind
----------------------
oneday information now stored in our brains (and accessed
psychologically) might be downloadable into computers, translated,

displayed on a monitor?
----------------------
Psi-Tech ... Brain-Mind-Tech ...
----------------------
If we got some kind of brain chips hackers and govnt and groups could
begin brain-hacking the population.
I think all this is part of the "cyberpunk" future-vision.
----------------------
physical dislocation, lucid sometimes overwhelming mental

that is the common characteristic in computer/internet geeks and
psychology introverts? And potheads, according to Crowley. world is
on-screen.