Re: Heidegger and "the nothing"



 Science > Philosophy > Re: Heidegger and "the nothing"

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Philosophy
User: "AKA gray asphalt"
Date: 16 Dec 2005 04:35:11 AM
Object: Re: Heidegger and "the nothing"
<jacobmorse@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1134531547.942301.122830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

I've been a philosophy student for about 3 years, and I can typically
"wrap my brain around" new philosophers and concepts fairly easily.
However, I am currently taking Metaphysics, and Heidegger has proven
quite difficult, and a little frustrating.

I'm in the process of writing a paper on Heigegger's "What is
Metaphysics," and I simply need to hear some different views. I have my
own interpretation, and I have done a little research which turned up a
few interesting items amidst a sea of convoluted nonsense. I am not
fluent in German, so I am dependent upon David Krell's (seemingly good)
English translation.

Sorry for the long preface: I am a bit confused with Heidegger's
concept of "the nothing." For example, when he states, "...in our
inquiry concerning the nothing it has by now become manifest that
scientific existence is possible only if in advance it holds itself out
into the nothing" (p. 109, Krell), what exactly does he mean?

I'd really appreciate some good input. Once there are a couple
responses, I'll post my own thoughts on the subject. If anyone here is
particularly knowledgeable of Heidegger, I'd love to see some input on
the idea of anxiety and/or nihilation. These concepts are giving me a
little trouble as well (all because of my weak understanding of the
"nothing").

Thanks in advance!

It may simply mean that for someone to study something they
must not be part of the thing beind studied. The complexity of
adjusting for the distortion of being part of that which is being
studied is immense and unknowable, perhaps, in my case
impossible. But I don't really know and this idea is not one that
I've thought about. The idea that the observer must be in 'the
nothing' to study that which exists, is kind of a cool thought,
even if a misinterpretation although with an unpleasant and
unintended association with death.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Heidegger and "the nothing" 16 Dec 2005 10:49:57 AM
Dec 16, 2005, 2:35am (CST-2) From: (AKA=A0gray=A0asphalt) wrote:

...The idea that the observer must
be in 'the nothing' to study that
which exists, is kind of a cool
thought, even if a misinterpretation
although with an unpleasant and
unintended association with death.

Yes, I think you got it because we cannot ignore the influence of his
teacher, Husserl. Consider what Husserl wrote about how philosophy
should be a rigorous science and phenomenology should not merely resume
or take over from what came before:
"we accept nothing given in advance, allow nothing traditional to pass
as a beginning, nor ourselves to be blinded by any names however great,
but rather seek to attain beginnings in a free dedication to the
problems themselves and to the demands stemming for them"
Heidegger words are similar. It is probably a homage to Husserl after
all.
Jillar
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER