Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"



 Science > Philosophy > Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Philosophy
User: "Gary Childress"
Date: 04 Jun 2005 01:32:28 PM
Object: Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
wrote:

On 4 Jun 2005 07:35:03 -0700, "Gary Childress" <grchildrss@aol.com>
wrote:



Robert Cohen wrote:

The unvarnished HUMAN EVENTS, the philosophical/ideological opposite of
a left publication, lists its conservative judges' selections, and thus
political-economic philosophies & argumentations are more or less fun
than should be allowed.

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591



A great post BTW Robert!



You getting your brown shirt out and getting ready for the bon fires?

Fucking fear mongering fascists.

Why would I be doing that? The only book on the list I would possibly
burn is Hitler's and that would only be because I'd be half bored to
death by all the worthless drivel, although I'm not particularly fond
of Marx either. Still I believe Marx has some good points and wouldn't
advocate burning his books. I wouldn't advocate overthrowing the world
in a "glorious revolution" which would cost millions of lives either.
As I tried to indicate (perhaps unsuccessfuly) in my previous post I
don't believe books could be more harmful than guns.
I believe what people do with books is more an indication of their own
inner constitution or else with prevailing material conditions (to cite
from Marx's ideas themselves) than with a book telling them to do
something or *making* them do it. An author should have the freedom to
write and *try* to publish whatever he or she likes even if it is the
most horrid worthless drivel ever committed to paper. I just thought
the post was a good one. Some of the authors such as John Dewey, John
Stuart Mill, Charles Darwin and Michel Foucualt I admire so I was
fascinated by the fact that they could show up on a list of "dangerous
books". It made me think about my own values and commitments and
wonder if I might be wrong about some things and gives me a better idea
of who I am and where I stand in relation to others.
Gary

-------------------------

"My definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular."

Adlai E. Stevenson Jr.

.

User: "Joseph H"

Title: Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries" 05 Jun 2005 05:35:22 PM
Gary Childress wrote:

retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:

On 4 Jun 2005 07:35:03 -0700, "Gary Childress" <grchildrss@aol.com>
wrote:



Robert Cohen wrote:

The unvarnished HUMAN EVENTS, the philosophical/ideological opposite of
a left publication, lists its conservative judges' selections, and thus
political-economic philosophies & argumentations are more or less fun
than should be allowed.

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591



A great post BTW Robert!



You getting your brown shirt out and getting ready for the bon fires?

Fucking fear mongering fascists.


Why would I be doing that? The only book on the list I would possibly
burn is Hitler's and that would only be because I'd be half bored to
death by all the worthless drivel, although I'm not particularly fond
of Marx either. Still I believe Marx has some good points and wouldn't
advocate burning his books. I wouldn't advocate overthrowing the world
in a "glorious revolution" which would cost millions of lives either.
As I tried to indicate (perhaps unsuccessfuly) in my previous post I
don't believe books could be more harmful than guns.

I believe what people do with books is more an indication of their own
inner constitution or else with prevailing material conditions (to cite
from Marx's ideas themselves) than with a book telling them to do
something or *making* them do it. An author should have the freedom to
write and *try* to publish whatever he or she likes even if it is the
most horrid worthless drivel ever committed to paper. I just thought
the post was a good one. Some of the authors such as John Dewey, John
Stuart Mill, Charles Darwin and Michel Foucualt I admire so I was
fascinated by the fact that they could show up on a list of "dangerous
books". It made me think about my own values and commitments and
wonder if I might be wrong about some things and gives me a better idea
of who I am and where I stand in relation to others.


Gary


-------------------------

"My definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular."

Adlai E. Stevenson Jr.

Totally agree with you that this is a great posting. I hope it
stimulates further debate.
Joseph H
.

User: ""

Title: Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries" 04 Jun 2005 08:25:57 PM
On 4 Jun 2005 11:32:28 -0700, "Gary Childress" <grchildrss@aol.com>
wrote:

Some of the authors such as John Dewey, John
Stuart Mill, Charles Darwin and Michel Foucualt I admire so I was
fascinated by the fact that they could show up on a list of "dangerous
books". It made me think about my own values and commitments and
wonder if I might be wrong about some things and gives me a better idea
of who I am and where I stand in relation to others.

That's not hard. To the left of the neocon conservative idiots they
pulled together to make this list. The very idea of compiling a list
of "dangerous books" says a lot about them. Anyone who would
participate would almost have to be a jr. fascist.
Anyone the least familiar with history knows why people ask these
questions and where they want to go with them.
____________
"The highest patriotism is not a blind acceptance
of official policy, but a love of one's country
deep enough to call her to a higher standard."
--George McGovern
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Re: HUMAN EVENTS: "Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th & 20th Centuries"
Culpability of Corp. ***** Media In 20th Cent. Wars
Time To Pop Some Geezers' Bubbles; Bushies Far Worse Than Nixon and Energy Situation Is Far Worse Than the Wars of the 20th Century
Book Review De-Constructs Mid-20th Century Conservative Russell Kirk
One of the greatest philosophers of science of the 20th century - Karl Popper - Summer Reading?
I'm the Undertaker of the 20th Century
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER