Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]



 Science > Philosophy > Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Philosophy
User: "Bob"
Date: 02 Nov 2005 09:57:58 PM
Object: Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:23:34 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:

Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.

Where do you get this crap?
You atheists are real nut cases.
--
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
-- George Bernard Shaw
.

User: "Jim07D5"

Title: Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate] 02 Nov 2005 11:00:05 PM
(Bob) said:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:23:34 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:

Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.


Where do you get this crap?

You clipped the cite.


You atheists are real nut cases.

You hang out with real nut cases.
--- Jim07D5
.
User: "Bob"

Title: Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate] 03 Nov 2005 03:53:10 AM
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 05:00:05 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:

You atheists are real nut cases.

You hang out with real nut cases.

No, you are the interloper.
I subscribed to alt.philosophy, not alt.atheism.
--
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
-- George Bernard Shaw
.
User: "Jim07D5"

Title: Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate] 03 Nov 2005 09:44:17 AM
(Bob) said:

On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 05:00:05 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:

You atheists are real nut cases.


You hang out with real nut cases.


No, you are the interloper.

I subscribed to alt.philosophy, not alt.atheism.

But you are the one with the issue. Maybe you should delete
alt.atheism from your posts.
--- Jim07D5
.
User: "Bob"

Title: Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate] 03 Nov 2005 10:06:41 AM
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:44:17 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:

I subscribed to alt.philosophy, not alt.atheism.

But you are the one with the issue.

What issue? There are many issues here. If there weren't then it would
not be worth the time to participate.
My point is that I did not expect alt.philosophy to degenerate into an
atheist forum.

Maybe you should delete alt.atheism from your posts.

It is not my prerogative to trim ngs. Once subscribers are brought
into a thread it is not right to cut them out arbitrarily.
--
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
-- George Bernard Shaw
.
User: "Jim07D5"

Title: Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate] 03 Nov 2005 10:35:45 AM
(Bob) said:

On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:44:17 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:

I subscribed to alt.philosophy, not alt.atheism.


But you are the one with the issue.


What issue? There are many issues here. If there weren't then it would
not be worth the time to participate.

My point is that I did not expect alt.philosophy to degenerate into an
atheist forum.

Oh yes that is the meaning behind calling atheists nut jobs.


Maybe you should delete alt.atheism from your posts.


It is not my prerogative to trim ngs. Once subscribers are brought
into a thread it is not right to cut them out arbitrarily.

Not when you can insult them instead.
--- Jim07D5
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
Re: Ontology in the Age of Science [was: Free will is of a hollow debate]
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER