| Topic: |
Science > Philosophy |
| User: |
"Immortalist" |
| Date: |
24 Aug 2005 12:14:45 PM |
| Object: |
Re: When is it valid to invoke 'Nazis'? |
Thomas Keske wrote:
Last night, I noticed some TV talking-heads pontificating
about the Democrat who compared Guantanamo to
Nazis concentration camps.
"Referring to the Nazis is simply *wrong*", huffed one
commentator, with a dignified air of superior wisdom and
moral virtue. "I agree completely", chimed in another,
immediately.
Let's take a reality check on that.
Political Correctness
by Philip Atkinson
What Is Political Correctness?
Political Correctness (PC) is the communal tyranny that erupted in the
1980s. It was a spontaneous declaration that particular ideas,
expressions and behaviour, which were then legal, should be forbidden
by law, and people who transgressed should be punished. It started with
a few voices but grew in popularity until it became unwritten and
written law within the community. With those who were publicly declared
as being not politically correct becoming the object of persecution by
the mob, if not prosecution by the state.
The Odious Nature Of Political Correctness
To attempt to point out the odious nature of Political Correctness is
to restate the crucial importance of plain speaking, freedom of choice
and freedom of speech; these are the communities safe-guards against
the imposition of tyranny, indeed their absence is tyranny (see "On
Liberty", Chapter II, by J.S. Mill). Which is why any such restrictions
on expression such as those invoked by the laws of libel, slander and
public decency, are grave matters to be decided by common law
methodology; not by the dictates of the mob.
Clear Inspiration For Political Correctness
The declared rational of this tyranny is to prevent people being
offended; to compel everyone to avoid using words or behaviour that may
upset homosexuals, women, non-whites, the crippled, the mentally
impaired, the fat or the ugly. This reveals not only its absurdity but
its inspiration. The set of values that are detested are those held by
the previous generation (those who fought the Second World War), which
is why the terms niggers, coons, dagos, wogs, poofs, spastics and
sheilas, have become heresy, for, in an act of infantile rebellion,
their subject have become revered by the new generation. Political
Correctness is merely the resentment of spoilt children directed
against their parent's values.
The Origins Of Political Correctness
A community declines when the majority of its citizens become selfish,
and under this influence it slowly dismantles all the restraints upon
self-indulgence established by manners, customs, tradition and law (See
the law of reverse civilisation). As each subsequent generation of
selfish citizens inherits control of the community, it takes its
opportunity to abandon more of the irksome restraints that genius and
wisdom had installed. The proponents of this social demolition achieve
their irrational purpose by publicly embracing absurdity through
slogans while vilifying any who do not support their stance. The
purpose of the slogan is to enshrine irrational fears, or fancies, as
truth through the use of presumptuous words, so public pronouncement:
Dissembles the real nature of the claim
Identifies any dissenters as enemies of the truth
Acts as an excuse for any crimes committed in its name
For example the slogan Australia is Multicultural is a claim that:
Different cultures are compatible.
People who contradict this claim are blinded by prejudice against other
cultures.
People who contradict this claim are trouble-making bigots, which makes
them enemies of the community, if not humanity, and deserving
persecution.
Which is an attack upon truth, clear thinking and plain speaking.
From Bourgeois To Racist
Naturally as the restraints shrink the rebellion grows ever more
extreme in nature. When the author of Animal Farm wrote an article in
1946 about the pleasures of a rose garden, he was criticised for being
bourgeois. George Orwell mentions this in his essay A Good Word For The
Vicar Of Bray, published in the Tribune, 1946. The term bourgeois was
then a popular slogan meaning having humdrum middle class ideas- The
Oxford English Dictionary 3rd Edition, 1938 - which is just a blatant
attack upon tradition.
Outright Assault Upon Tradition
Now, in the late 1990s, the results of being bourgeois (retaining
traditional notions), is being labelled racist, sexist etc. and risk
losing your job, your reputation, being jostled in the street, being
subject to judicial penalty and death threats. And it is this very
extremity of reaction that has won media attention and the name
Political Correctness, though the reaction will become even more
unpleasant with the next generation.
Parental Values Always Attacked
The inevitable scapegoat for people impatient of restraint must always
be parents, because these are society's agents for teaching private
restraint. So the cherished notions of the parents are always subject
to attack by their maturing offspring. This resentment of tradition was
observed in his own civilisation by Polybius (c. 200-118 BC), the Greek
historian, who said:
"For every democracy which has enjoyed prosperity for a considerable
period first develops through its nature an attitude of discontent
towards the existing order,.."
Tyranny Grows
Once a community embraces tyranny the penalties can only grow in
severity. This gradual increase is easily seen by the example of
Toastmasters. As the members of the club became more concerned about
the delights of socialising and less concerned about the disciplines of
public speaking, they became more intolerant of citizens who were
earnest about learning the art of rhetoric. Once those members who did
their duty by truthfully pointing out the shortcomings in another
member's performance were just labelled as negative or discouraging;
later this became a risk of being socially ostracised. Now (since 1998)
unpopularity can result in being permanently ejected from the club by a
majority vote.
Australian Experience Of PC Tyranny
In my country the tyranny erupted with the persecution of public
figures such as Arthur Tunstall for uttering truths that had become
unpopular, either directly in a speech, or indirectly by telling jokes.
The maiden speech of the Federal Member of Parliament for Ipswich
contained so many disliked truths that the rabble escalated the
ferocity of their attack and extended them to her supporters,
introducing terror into Australian politics. Anyone who watched the TV
coverage (1997/8) of Pauline Hanson's political campaign will have seen
the nature of her opponents; a throng who looked and behaved more like
barbarians than citizens of a civilised community. And any mob that
chants "Burn the witch" (when she spoke outside an Ipswich hall after
she had been refused entry) leaves no doubt as to their intent or
character.
Widespread Throughout The Community
Revealing the extent of the mob's support, their sentiments (suitably
refined) were enthusiastically echoed by the media and the
administration. And in an unprecedented act of cooperation, all the
political parties conspired to eject Ms Hanson from the federal
parliament in the election of October 3rd 1998. This was revealed by
the how-to-vote cards of the parties contesting the seat of Blaire,
which all placed Ms Hanson last. This was a public admission by both
the major parties that they would rather risk losing the election than
allow this forthright woman to keep her seat in parliament.
International Experience Of PC Tyranny
And it is not just in Australia but in every western democratic country
popular demands have been made for restrictions on expression. Bowing
to the clamour of the electorate, politicians in these countries have
enacted absurd laws. The Australian community wide declaration of
irrational hatred displayed by the persecution of Pauline Hanson,
paralleled the Canadian experience of Paul Fromm, director of the
Canadian Association for Free Expression Inc., and the examples of the
national soccer coach of England and a prominent public servant in
Washington, USA confirm that the hysteria is everywhere.
The Inevitable Result Of Political Correctness
By using the excuse of not upsetting anyone, the politically correct
are demanding that people behave like the fool who would please
everyone; that everyone must become such a fool! All must accept the
notions of the Politically Correct as truth, or else! This is the same
mentality that inspired the Inquisition and forced Galileo to recant;
the same mentality that inspired the Nazis and obtained the Holocaust.
Once expression gets placed in a straitjacket of official truth, then
the madness that occurs in all totalitarian states is obtained. Life,
in private and public, becomes a meaningless charade where delusion
thrives and terror rules.
Examples Of Denying Freedom Of Speech
Evidence of this effect is amply demonstrated by the Soviets, who
embraced Political Correctness with the Communist Revolution. The
lumbering, pompous, impoverished, humourless monster this Nation became
is now History. And it should be remembered that in 1914 Tsarist Russia
was considered by Edmund Cars, a French economist who then published a
book about the subject, to be an economic giant set to overshadow
Europe. The SBS television program "What Ever Happened To Russia",
which was broadcast at 8.30 pm on 25th August 1994, detailed the
terrible effect the Bolshevik's oppression had on their empire. And SBS
further detailed the terrible crimes inflicted upon the Russians by
their leader Stalin, in the series "Blood On The Snow" broadcast in
March 1999.
An Old Witness
Helen, a member of Parramatta writers club in 1992, was a citizen of
Kiev during the Red Terror, and described living with official truth
and the constant threat of arrest. Knowing the content of the latest
party newspaper was critical to avoiding internment, as public
contradiction, either directly or indirectly, meant denouncement to the
KGB. If you complained about being hungry when food shortages were not
officially recognised, then you became an enemy of the state. If you
failed to praise a Soviet hero, or praised an ex-hero, then again your
fate was sealed. The need to be politically correct dominated all
conversation and behaviour, as failure meant drastic penalty.
Uncertainty and fear pervaded everything, nobody could be sure that an
official request to visit Party headquarters meant imprisonment,
torture, death, public reward or nothing important.
Living with such a terrible handicap naturally destroyed all
spontaneity of thought or action, rendering the whole community mad.
The awful effect this had upon Helen's sanity was made clear when she
escaped to Australia. Here she encountered the free press, which had an
unpleasant impact upon her. One day she read The Australian newspaper
which happened to carry two separate articles about Patrick White, one
praising, the other denigrating, this well known writer. Poor Helen
found herself turning from one to the other, which was she to repeat as
correct? She nearly had a nervous breakdown.
Political Correctness Is Social Dementia
Unless plain speaking is allowed, clear thinking is denied. There can
be no good reason for denying freedom of expression, there is no case
to rebut, only the empty slogans of people inspired by selfishness and
unrestrained by morality. The proponents of this nonsense neither
understand the implications of what they say, nor why they are saying
it.
Social Decline Grows Worse With Each Generation
Political Correctness is part of the social decline that generation by
generation makes public behaviour less restrained and less rational.
=AB Support This Site =BB =AB Retreat From Reason =BB =AB Hatred Of Truth =
=BB
=AB A Study Of Our Decline =BB =AB Home =BB
http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&q=3Dpolitical+correctness
http://www.users.bigpond.com/smartboard/pc.htm
In the world according to Rush Limbaugh,
women's rights supporters were "FemiNazis".
Persons who supported environmental protection
were "EcoNazis".
Of course, for legal abortion, no matter what the circumstances-
rape, serious birth defects, inability to afford,
danger to life of mother - these things have all long been lumped
together with a broad stroke and compared to a Nazis
"Holocaust". This has been relatively common rhetoric for
supposedly mainstream religious institutions,
much less the cranks.
Now, here comes a situation where finally the comparison
might make a bit more sense, rather than being mere demagoguery
and hyperbole. It is a case involving torture and even
death, that is extra-judicial.
Due process has been suspended, making it likely
that eventually, innocent people could wind up among
the brutally tortured.
The thought of someone getting tortured to death-
that doesn't seem to spark any comment or moral indignation.
But the thought of a politician making a historical
reference to what once went on in concentration camps-
my, doesn't that send the talking-heads into high gear?
It is nonsense to say that all references to Nazis are
invalid. In Vietnam, there were incidents of American
troops shooting old men, women and children for
hours on end, into mass graves. When confronted,
they defended themselves by saying that they
were just following orders, echoing the Nazis
defending themselves at Nuremberg.
The flag-wavers of our country want to act like it is
something unpatriotic and hateful to mention such things,
but for a country to remain as anything worthwhile,
such incidents need to spark a loud outcry.
The outcry- that is what most makes for a decent country.
If perspectives were not upside-down, it is the criticism
that would be considered the act of patriotism, not
the blind eye, the denial, the unconcern, and the
conspiracy of silence.
Before the public can decide to what degree the torture at
Guantanamo deserves the "Nazis" comparison, perhaps
we need to hear more of the lurid details and
the scope. There have been repeated reports of people
getting raped, obscenely mistreated, and
even dying after being tortured.
How cameras ever caught some of the previous
scandalous incidents, and how this ever made it out
to the public, is an amazing thing. The public should
realize: Most of the time, there will be no photographs,
no videotapes, no proof, just a sophisticated cover-up
and a stonewall of denial. That is the more-typical
nature of war and the nature of powerful governments.
Most of the time, the only evidence that you will be
able to get is the rumors and verbal reports. How convenient
that makes things for right-wing propagandists to bury
the dirty-work behind a flurry of ridicule aimed at the
whistle-blowers and the media, for their supposed "low standards"
in reporting.
Nothing that "Deep Throat" had been saying had any
solid proof behind it, for a long time, either, yet it was all
perfectly true. Sometimes, the sources are perfectly
credible and really do need to be protected.
Sometimes, the proof comes later,
when corrupt power has been defeated and loses
its capability to cover-up the truth.
Even credible verbal reports need to be taken seriously
and investigated independently, not investigated
by the accused, themselves.
It is barely even disputed that there has been torture
and there have been deaths during confinement.
The only question is the details and the scope.
The outcry over the comparison to Nazis is another
example of the hypocrisy of the Right. They have
long used similar comparisons for reasons far more
frivolous. The point that the Democrat was making
is probably not so much to suggest that there is a
literal equality of scale. The point is that we cannot
ignore the lessons of history, how a country can
start becoming lawless, brutal, and out-of-control
when its people look the other way.
=20
Tom Keske
.
|
|
| User: "Day Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: When is it valid to invoke 'Nazis'? |
23 Aug 2005 03:45:21 PM |
|
|
Well all right...
Caesar:"You will havta forgive the man Mercutio; he is a barbarian, and
thinks the taboos and customs of his tribe are the laws of Nature."
So- In Denmark, the age of consent is 12. It turns out that there are
British reports from Bengal of the pubescent rites of passage in the
Temples of Kali that begin at this age with sacred dildos.
I can see that this would be legal in Denmark. Do you have a problem
with it? Nazis would, altho they'd be glad to deflower the girls
themselves behind closed doors.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: When is it valid to invoke 'Nazis'? |
25 Aug 2005 12:05:51 PM |
|
|
Day Brown wrote:
Well all right...
Caesar:"You will havta forgive the man Mercutio; he is a barbarian, and
thinks the taboos and customs of his tribe are the laws of Nature."
So- In Denmark, the age of consent is 12. It turns out that there are
British reports from Bengal of the pubescent rites of passage in the
Temples of Kali that begin at this age with sacred dildos.
I can see that this would be legal in Denmark. Do you have a problem
with it? Nazis would, altho they'd be glad to deflower the girls
themselves behind closed doors.
Many sentences of that form are plainly false. For example, many people
differ in their beliefs about the world around us, but this does not
imply that in each case a different belief is correct. If I believe
that the correct number of planets is eight and you believe that the
correct number is ten, it is not that one number is correct for me and
another correct for you. Both you and I are wrong, both of our beliefs
are incorrect, because there is one and only one correct number of
planets, and that number is nine.
Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction
by James W. Cornman, Keith Lehrer, George Sotiros Pappas
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0872201244/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Day Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: When is it valid to invoke 'Nazis'? |
24 Aug 2005 11:40:51 PM |
|
|
Immortalist wrote:
Day Brown wrote:
Well all right...
Caesar:"You will havta forgive the man Mercutio; he is a barbarian, and
thinks the taboos and customs of his tribe are the laws of Nature."
So- In Denmark, the age of consent is 12. It turns out that there are
British reports from Bengal of the pubescent rites of passage in the
Temples of Kali that begin at this age with sacred dildos.
I can see that this would be legal in Denmark. Do you have a problem
with it? Nazis would, altho they'd be glad to deflower the girls
themselves behind closed doors.
Many sentences of that form are plainly false. For example, many people
differ in their beliefs about the world around us, but this does not
imply that in each case a different belief is correct. If I believe
that the correct number of planets is eight and you believe that the
correct number is ten, it is not that one number is correct for me and
another correct for you. Both you and I are wrong, both of our beliefs
are incorrect, because there is one and only one correct number of
planets, and that number is nine.
I havent said what the right number is; you already know about 18, and
I cite 12, being the bottom of the range I know about. If you think
there is a right number, can you tell me what it is, and why you think
it should be right for all of us?
In fact, I dont advocate a number at all, but am perfectly willing to
let the mothers and grandmothers of any given community decide what is
the right time for any of their own kids, without regard to either your,
or my, opinion.
And whatever number you have in mind, the fact is that most communities
permit the children of drug addicts or other incompetent parents to go
to court and petition for 'emancipation', at which time they are granted
the full rights of self determination normally given at age 18 or what-
ever the local law was. If they have a job and are self supporting, the
court has no interest in what their sexual preferences are or what they,
as private citizens do with them.
My granddaughter, at age 15, has accepted full funding for a residential
prep school, and in effect has, by her superior academic performance
been granted de facto emancipation that neither her mother nor I would
object to should she seek to make it official. She is an independent
sentient being who, as far as I am concerned, can make her own choices
about sex or any other aspect of her life. What you choose to do with
your kids is your business. What we do with ours is ours; there is *no*
"right number".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: When is it valid to invoke 'Nazis'? |
26 Aug 2005 11:14:36 AM |
|
|
Day Brown wrote:
Immortalist wrote:
Day Brown wrote:
Well all right...
Caesar:"You will havta forgive the man Mercutio; he is a barbarian, and
thinks the taboos and customs of his tribe are the laws of Nature."
So- In Denmark, the age of consent is 12. It turns out that there are
British reports from Bengal of the pubescent rites of passage in the
Temples of Kali that begin at this age with sacred dildos.
I can see that this would be legal in Denmark. Do you have a problem
with it? Nazis would, altho they'd be glad to deflower the girls
themselves behind closed doors.
Many sentences of that form are plainly false. For example, many people
differ in their beliefs about the world around us, but this does not
imply that in each case a different belief is correct. If I believe
that the correct number of planets is eight and you believe that the
correct number is ten, it is not that one number is correct for me and
another correct for you. Both you and I are wrong, both of our beliefs
are incorrect, because there is one and only one correct number of
planets, and that number is nine.
I havent said what the right number is; you already know about 18, and
I cite 12, being the bottom of the range I know about. If you think
there is a right number, can you tell me what it is, and why you think
it should be right for all of us?
In fact, I dont advocate a number at all, but am perfectly willing to
let the mothers and grandmothers of any given community decide what is
the right time for any of their own kids, without regard to either your,
or my, opinion.
And whatever number you have in mind, the fact is that most communities
permit the children of drug addicts or other incompetent parents to go
to court and petition for 'emancipation', at which time they are granted
the full rights of self determination normally given at age 18 or what-
ever the local law was. If they have a job and are self supporting, the
court has no interest in what their sexual preferences are or what they,
as private citizens do with them.
My granddaughter, at age 15, has accepted full funding for a residential
prep school, and in effect has, by her superior academic performance
been granted de facto emancipation that neither her mother nor I would
object to should she seek to make it official. She is an independent
sentient being who, as far as I am concerned, can make her own choices
about sex or any other aspect of her life. What you choose to do with
your kids is your business. What we do with ours is ours; there is *no*
"right number".
I believe that there is a right number and it is based upon critical
stages when capacities come to be able to process particular data;
If at particular critical stages of a cats vision development it is
shown only vertical lines the nerves required for recognizing
horizontal lines die and so that capacity is not as readily available.
----------------------------------
Experiments on visual development in cats have shown that the feline's
mature visual system is affected by the kind of light stimulation it
receives early in life. Kittens that were allowed to experience only
horizontal lines, for example, could not detect vertical barriers in a
test maze and repeatedly blundered into them. Evidently the brain cells
that normally detect vertical lines had ceased functioning.
Neuroscientists have articulated a "use it or lose it" principle to
account for such findings. This would clearly apply to the sensory
problems of feral children. A similar explanation may apply to the
language problems of socially isolated children, most of whom can
master only a few words even after years of dedicated instruction. This
also explains the problems of socially deprived institutional children.
Sensory problems that are rooted in developmental brain anomalies are
likely to be irreversible. Orphanages in which there is extreme social
and sensory deprivation may produce sensory deficits resembling those
found among feral children. Children adopted out of extremely
neglectful Romanian orphanages during the 1990s had a persistently
impaired capacity to respond to most types of sensory information,
probably because their brains had not received enough stimulation early
in life. They lacked the normal capacity to feel pain, hear sounds, and
guide movements using visual feedback. Institutional children generally
score about ten points lower in IQ tests than others, which is possibly
due to the effects of early social and sensory deprivation on brain
development.
Enriched environments promote the development of brain cells leading to
increased ability to solve problems. Social stimulation is a critical
component of environmental enrichment.
The Science of Romance - by Nigel Barber
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1573929700/
-----------------------------
Notice the layers of interpretation of various features:
http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~psyc351/Images/visualcortex.jpg
http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~psyc351/imagelist.htm
http://www.bruker-biospin.de/MRI/applications/images/biov2a.jpg
http://image.korea.ac.kr/korean/Research/Retina/retina2.jpg
Taking Apart the Visual Image
http://williamcalvin.com/bk7/bk7ch13.htm
http://williamcalvin.com/bk7/img/bk7p209.jpg
http://www.normanallan.com/Sci/vision.htm
http://www.normanallan.com/Sci/images/hubelsimp2.jpg
http://www.brain.riken.go.jp/bsi-news/bsinews5/no5/issue1e.html
http://camelot.mssm.edu/~andrei/elastic_net_tutorial/elastic_net_tutorial.htm
http://camelot.mssm.edu/~andrei/elastic_net_tutorial/od_or_maps_hubener.jpg
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.quartz.html
http://www.ifi.uio.no/infneuro/Gamle/H2002/hafliger/coding/
http://www.ifi.uio.no/infneuro/Gamle/H2002/hafliger/coding/hubel_wiesel.gif
http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~baojie/acad/current/hnn/hypercolumn.gif
http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~baojie/acad/current/hnn/hnn.htm
Vulnerable periods during the development of the nervous system are
sensitive to environmental insults because they are dependent on the
temporal and regional emergence of critical developmental processes
(i.e., proliferation, migration, differentiation, synaptogenesis,
myelination, and apoptosis). Evidence from numerous sources
demonstrates that neural development extends from the embryonic period
through adolescence. In general, the sequence of events is comparable
among species, although the time scales are considerably different.
Developmental exposure of animals or humans to numerous agents (e.g.,
X-ray irradiation, methylazoxymethanol, ethanol, lead, methyl mercury,
or chlorpyrifos) demonstrates that interference with one or more of
these developmental processes can lead to developmental neurotoxicity.
Different behavioral domains (e.g., sensory, motor, and various
cognitive functions) are subserved by different brain areas. Although
there are important differences between the rodent and human brain,
analogous structures can be identified. Moreover, the ontogeny of
specific behaviors can be used to draw inferences regarding the
maturation of specific brain structures or neural circuits in rodents
and primates, including humans. Furthermore, various clinical disorders
in humans (e.g., schizophrenia, dyslexia, epilepsy, and autism) may
also be the result of interference with normal ontogeny of
developmental processes in the nervous system. Of critical concern is
the possibility that developmental exposure to neurotoxicants may
result in an acceleration of age-related decline in function. This
concern is compounded by the fact that developmental neurotoxicity that
results in small effects can have a profound societal impact when
amortized across the entire population and across the life span of
humans. Key words: abnormal neurological development, apoptosis,
behavioral testing methodology, delayed neurotoxicity, differentiation,
migration, myelination, neurobiological substrates of function,
neuronal plasticity, neurotrophic factor, primate, rodent. -- Environ
Health Perspect 108(suppl 3):511-533 (2000).
http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2000/suppl-3/511-533rice/abstract.html
The vulnerability of the developing brain is dependent on two main
exposure issues. The first factor relates to whether an agent or its
active metabolite(s) reaches the developing nervous system, and the
second factor relates to the period of exposure. Exposure to
environmental toxicants coincident with the ontogeny of developmental
processes is more likely to cause adverse effects if they interfere
with the cascade of these developmental processes. In general, if
exposure occurs before or after an organ develops, it is less
vulnerable to perturbation than if exposure occurs during development
of that organ.
It is critical for the risk assessment of environmental chemicals that
we have a good understanding of the time lines of normal neural
development in humans and other species used in toxicological testing.
This understanding should include both pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic factors that may differ across species. Both species-
and age-related differences in pharmacokinetic parameters are out of
the scope of this review paper, but other papers have attempted to
describe these parameters in a limited way with pesticides (1-5),
metals (6-10), and a solvent (11).
There is general recognition that the developing nervous system is
qualitatively different from the adult nervous system. The normal
ontogeny of neural development in rodents is different from humans
because rodents have considerable postnatal development and humans have
considerably more prenatal maturation of their nervous systems. These
differences may be confounded with differences in the route of exposure
during critical periods of nervous system development and thus
differences in vulnerability between developing animals and humans
(e.g., lactational transfer during the first postnatal week in rodents
and transplacental transfer during the third trimester in humans).
Key aims of this article are to characterize the profiles of
developmental processes, describe similarities and differences in
windows of vulnerability between rodents and humans, and describe
similarities and differences in effects after perturbations of
developmental processes in humans and animal models, including rodents
and monkeys. The brain areas subserving various behavioral functions
are described for human infants and the ontogeny of these specific
structures is discussed in the context of the effects of lesions in
nonhuman primates with altered performance on these tasks. This will
further our understanding of developmental neurotoxicology, improve our
ability to predict adverse outcomes in animals, and assist in the
extrapolation of these adverse outcomes to risks to human health.
Development of the Brain in Utero
The cell precursors of the brain and spinal cord, which compose the
central nervous system (CNS), begin to develop early in embryogenesis
through the process called neurulation. The notochord, which is a
cellular rod that defines the primitive axis of the embryo, will be
incorporated into the vertebral system. The notochord induces the
overlying ectodermal tissue to form the neural plate at approximately 2
weeks of gestation in humans. This overlying ectodermal tissue gives
rise to the CNS. In humans on approximately gestational day (GD) 18,
the neural plate invaginates along its central axis to form the neural
groove with neural folds on each side. By the end of the third week of
gestation in humans, the neural folds have begun to move together and
fuse, forming the neural tube near the anterior end of the notochord;
this fusion progresses both cranially and caudally in a zipperlike
manner. The neural tube then separates from the overlying ectoderm,
which becomes a contiguous surface over the back of the embryo and
differentiates into the epidermis of the skin. As the neural tube
forms, a population of cells separates from the surface ectoderm at the
apex of the neural folds to form the neural crest, which will give rise
to the sensory ganglia of spinal and cranial nerves, Schwann cells (the
cells covering peripheral nerves), the meningeal covering of the brain
and spinal cord, and some skeletal and muscle components of the head,
among other structures. The neural tube begins to close in the area of
the hindbrain above the origin of the notochord and proceeds anteriorly
and posteriorly, creating a caudal-to-rostral gradient in development
of the brain. Neural tube formation is complete at approximately GD
10.5-11 in rats and from GD 26 to 28 in humans; the anterior neuropore
closes first (rats GD 10.5, humans GD 24-26) and the posterior
neuropore closes later (rats GD 11.3, humans GD 25-28) [reviewed by
DeSesso (12)].
Interruption of neural development during this early period can result
in severe abnormalities of the brain and spinal cord. ...
http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2000/suppl-3/511-533rice/rice-full.html
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=periods+during+the+development+of+the+nervous+system&btnG=Google+Search
.
|
|
|
| User: "Day Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: When is it valid to invoke 'Nazis'? |
25 Aug 2005 03:12:28 PM |
|
|
Immortalist wrote:
I believe that there is a right number and it is based upon critical
stages when capacities come to be able to process particular data;
If at particular critical stages of a cats vision development it is
shown only vertical lines the nerves required for recognizing
horizontal lines die and so that capacity is not as readily available.
But the problem is that the right number is not a number of *years*.
as you yourself show below, development varies. My own experience as
a mental health professional has shown me women, over 18, severely
retared wards of the state, who will *never* become sentient beings,
and yet who have been knocked up repeatedly by men who picked them
off the bus on their way home from the sheltered workshop.
All completely legal. No statuatory rape charges. I dont think anything
you post before deals with that problem. Age is *not* an adequate tool.
----------------------------------
Experiments on visual development in cats have shown that the feline's
mature visual system is affected by the kind of light stimulation it
receives early in life. Kittens that were allowed to experience only
horizontal lines, for example, could not detect vertical barriers in a
test maze and repeatedly blundered into them. Evidently the brain cells
that normally detect vertical lines had ceased functioning.
Neuroscientists have articulated a "use it or lose it" principle to
account for such findings. This would clearly apply to the sensory
problems of feral children. A similar explanation may apply to the
language problems of socially isolated children, most of whom can
master only a few words even after years of dedicated instruction. This
also explains the problems of socially deprived institutional children.
Sensory problems that are rooted in developmental brain anomalies are
likely to be irreversible. Orphanages in which there is extreme social
and sensory deprivation may produce sensory deficits resembling those
found among feral children. Children adopted out of extremely
neglectful Romanian orphanages during the 1990s had a persistently
impaired capacity to respond to most types of sensory information,
probably because their brains had not received enough stimulation early
in life. They lacked the normal capacity to feel pain, hear sounds, and
guide movements using visual feedback. Institutional children generally
score about ten points lower in IQ tests than others, which is possibly
due to the effects of early social and sensory deprivation on brain
development.
Enriched environments promote the development of brain cells leading to
increased ability to solve problems. Social stimulation is a critical
component of environmental enrichment.
The Science of Romance - by Nigel Barber
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1573929700/
-----------------------------
Notice the layers of interpretation of various features:
http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~psyc351/Images/visualcortex.jpg
http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~psyc351/imagelist.htm
http://www.bruker-biospin.de/MRI/applications/images/biov2a.jpg
http://image.korea.ac.kr/korean/Research/Retina/retina2.jpg
Taking Apart the Visual Image
http://williamcalvin.com/bk7/bk7ch13.htm
http://williamcalvin.com/bk7/img/bk7p209.jpg
http://www.normanallan.com/Sci/vision.htm
http://www.normanallan.com/Sci/images/hubelsimp2.jpg
http://www.brain.riken.go.jp/bsi-news/bsinews5/no5/issue1e.html
http://camelot.mssm.edu/~andrei/elastic_net_tutorial/elastic_net_tutorial.htm
http://camelot.mssm.edu/~andrei/elastic_net_tutorial/od_or_maps_hubener.jpg
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.quartz.html
http://www.ifi.uio.no/infneuro/Gamle/H2002/hafliger/coding/
http://www.ifi.uio.no/infneuro/Gamle/H2002/hafliger/coding/hubel_wiesel.gif
http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~baojie/acad/current/hnn/hypercolumn.gif
http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~baojie/acad/current/hnn/hnn.htm
Vulnerable periods during the development of the nervous system are
sensitive to environmental insults because they are dependent on the
temporal and regional emergence of critical developmental processes
(i.e., proliferation, migration, differentiation, synaptogenesis,
myelination, and apoptosis). Evidence from numerous sources
demonstrates that neural development extends from the embryonic period
through adolescence. In general, the sequence of events is comparable
among species, although the time scales are considerably different.
Developmental exposure of animals or humans to numerous agents (e.g.,
X-ray irradiation, methylazoxymethanol, ethanol, lead, methyl mercury,
or chlorpyrifos) demonstrates that interference with one or more of
these developmental processes can lead to developmental neurotoxicity.
Different behavioral domains (e.g., sensory, motor, and various
cognitive functions) are subserved by different brain areas. Although
there are important differences between the rodent and human brain,
analogous structures can be identified. Moreover, the ontogeny of
specific behaviors can be used to draw inferences regarding the
maturation of specific brain structures or neural circuits in rodents
and primates, including humans. Furthermore, various clinical disorders
in humans (e.g., schizophrenia, dyslexia, epilepsy, and autism) may
also be the result of interference with normal ontogeny of
developmental processes in the nervous system. Of critical concern is
the possibility that developmental exposure to neurotoxicants may
result in an acceleration of age-related decline in function. This
concern is compounded by the fact that developmental neurotoxicity that
results in small effects can have a profound societal impact when
amortized across the entire population and across the life span of
humans. Key words: abnormal neurological development, apoptosis,
behavioral testing methodology, delayed neurotoxicity, differentiation,
migration, myelination, neurobiological substrates of function,
neuronal plasticity, neurotrophic factor, primate, rodent. -- Environ
Health Perspect 108(suppl 3):511-533 (2000).
http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2000/suppl-3/511-533rice/abstract.html
The vulnerability of the developing brain is dependent on two main
exposure issues. The first factor relates to whether an agent or its
active metabolite(s) reaches the developing nervous system, and the
second factor relates to the period of exposure. Exposure to
environmental toxicants coincident with the ontogeny of developmental
processes is more likely to cause adverse effects if they interfere
with the cascade of these developmental processes. In general, if
exposure occurs before or after an organ develops, it is less
vulnerable to perturbation than if exposure occurs during development
of that organ.
It is critical for the risk assessment of environmental chemicals that
we have a good understanding of the time lines of normal neural
development in humans and other species used in toxicological testing.
This understanding should include both pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic factors that may differ across species. Both species-
and age-related differences in pharmacokinetic parameters are out of
the scope of this review paper, but other papers have attempted to
describe these parameters in a limited way with pesticides (1-5),
metals (6-10), and a solvent (11).
There is general recognition that the developing nervous system is
qualitatively different from the adult nervous system. The normal
ontogeny of neural development in rodents is different from humans
because rodents have considerable postnatal development and humans have
considerably more prenatal maturation of their nervous systems. These
differences may be confounded with differences in the route of exposure
during critical periods of nervous system development and thus
differences in vulnerability between developing animals and humans
(e.g., lactational transfer during the first postnatal week in rodents
and transplacental transfer during the third trimester in humans).
Key aims of this article are to characterize the profiles of
developmental processes, describe similarities and differences in
windows of vulnerability between rodents and humans, and describe
similarities and differences in effects after perturbations of
developmental processes in humans and animal models, including rodents
and monkeys. The brain areas subserving various behavioral functions
are described for human infants and the ontogeny of these specific
structures is discussed in the context of the effects of lesions in
nonhuman primates with altered performance on these tasks. This will
further our understanding of developmental neurotoxicology, improve our
ability to predict adverse outcomes in animals, and assist in the
extrapolation of these adverse outcomes to risks to human health.
Development of the Brain in Utero
The cell precursors of the brain and spinal cord, which compose the
central nervous system (CNS), begin to develop early in embryogenesis
through the process called neurulation. The notochord, which is a
cellular rod that defines the primitive axis of the embryo, will be
incorporated into the vertebral system. The notochord induces the
overlying ectodermal tissue to form the neural plate at approximately 2
weeks of gestation in humans. This overlying ectodermal tissue gives
rise to the CNS. In humans on approximately gestational day (GD) 18,
the neural plate invaginates along its central axis to form the neural
groove with neural folds on each side. By the end of the third week of
gestation in humans, the neural folds have begun to move together and
fuse, forming the neural tube near the anterior end of the notochord;
this fusion progresses both cranially and caudally in a zipperlike
manner. The neural tube then separates from the overlying ectoderm,
which becomes a contiguous surface over the back of the embryo and
differentiates into the epidermis of the skin. As the neural tube
forms, a population of cells separates from the surface ectoderm at the
apex of the neural folds to form the neural crest, which will give rise
to the sensory ganglia of spinal and cranial nerves, Schwann cells (the
cells covering peripheral nerves), the meningeal covering of the brain
and spinal cord, and some skeletal and muscle components of the head,
among other structures. The neural tube begins to close in the area of
the hindbrain above the origin of the notochord and proceeds anteriorly
and posteriorly, creating a caudal-to-rostral gradient in development
of the brain. Neural tube formation is complete at approximately GD
10.5-11 in rats and from GD 26 to 28 in humans; the anterior neuropore
closes first (rats GD 10.5, humans GD 24-26) and the posterior
neuropore closes later (rats GD 11.3, humans GD 25-28) [reviewed by
DeSesso (12)].
Interruption of neural development during this early period can result
in severe abnormalities of the brain and spinal cord. ...
http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2000/suppl-3/511-533rice/rice-full.html
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=periods+during+the+development+of+the+nervous+system&btnG=Google+Search
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|