Science > Physics > #1 book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics and Setting it on Course for the Next 2 Millenium"
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"a_plutonium" |
| Date: |
18 Jan 2007 12:52:25 AM |
| Object: |
#1 book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics and Setting it on Course for the Next 2 Millenium" |
a_plutonium wrote:
Proof of most of the World's unsolved Math Problems due to the fact
that Natural Numbers are these 0,1,2,3, ...., ...999999
Correcting the Logic of these mistakes in mathematics
(1) Infinity exists in only one unique form, and proof thereof
(2) Peano Axioms are gap ridden and self contradictory
(3) Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, Indirect Method
I will number these posts as I prepare them for print publication.
I will do these posts more of an announcement, and
not as a thread to argue with hatemongers. And most of these
ideas have been argued around in the years 1993-2006 when I posted
many of these ideas. But now I have much of the detail and time
to assemble these ideas into a long clear and concise discussion
for print publication. So I announce the ideas and proofs
and other details and usually abandon the thread.
(4) Riemann Hypothesis
(5) Fermat's Last Theorem
(6) generalized FLT (known as Beals conjecture)
(7) Goldbach Conjecture
(8) Infinitude of Twin Primes
(9) Infinitude of 4-primes, 6-primes, 8-primes,....
(10) Infinitude of Perfect Numbers
(11) Infinitude of primes of form (2^n) +1
(12) the number 1 is the only odd perfect number
I will prove those above listed 4-12 by the key fact that the
Natural-Numbers are this set:
0 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11, ........., .....9999996,
....999997, ......999998, .....9999999
I will also prove these unsolved problems of mathematics:
(13) Kepler Packing
(14) 4-Color-Mapping
(15) 2-Color-Mapping
(16) Poincare Conjecture
Let me include the NP problem as number (17) for I smell that
it is rife with ill-defining and that it is a problem not of
mathematics
at all but belongs to engineering and physics. Somehow the
intellectual community never sorted out this problem as belonging
to physics and allowed it to reside in mathematics where it never
really belonged.
(17) NP Problem
Finally, I will have travelled far on the road of proving these two claims
which I consider my best gifts to mathematics.
But really my finest overall gift to mathematics is to tie it and
connect
it completely with physics and that physics is King and mathematics
a mere tiny subset of physics.
(18) Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom
(19) and because numbers form geometry and likewise, geometry forms
number that this is true Adics + (negative Adics) = Reals
That should do it. In fact the above is the most ambitious tackling of
mathematics
by any one single human. I even outchampioned my reincarnate of
Archimedes of Ancient Greek.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
| User: "Tonico" |
|
| Title: Re: #1 book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics and Setting it on Course for the Next 2 Millenium" |
18 Jan 2007 04:23:49 AM |
|
|
a_plutonium wrote:
.........[unbelievable stupidities snipped].................
That should do it. In fact the above is the most ambitious tackling of
mathematics
by any one single human. I even outchampioned my reincarnate of
Archimedes of Ancient Greek.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
**************************************************
Cacofonix, the village artist in the comics Asterix, is the village's
artist and we're said that the opinions about his talent are divided:
he thinks he's excelse, ALL the other village's people thinks he's an
annoying huge pain in the *****.
I think that from now on I'll think of you as Plutoniumix Moronix...
Toniux
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: #1 book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics and Setting it onCourse for the Next 2 Millenium" |
18 Jan 2007 03:51:30 AM |
|
|
a_plutonium wrote:
That should do it. In fact the above is the most ambitious tackling of
mathematics
by any one single human. I even outchampioned my reincarnate of
Archimedes of Ancient Greek.
You forgot to take your meds again.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Proginoskes" |
|
| Title: Quiz for Archimedes Plutonium; Was: Re: #1 book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics and Setting it on Course for the Next 2 Millenium" |
18 Jan 2007 08:00:34 PM |
|
|
a_plutonium wrote:
a_plutonium wrote:
Proof of most of the World's unsolved Math Problems due to the fact
that Natural Numbers are these 0,1,2,3, ...., ...999999
[...]
Let me include the NP problem as number (17) for I smell that
it is rife with ill-defining and that it is a problem not of mathematics
at all but belongs to engineering and physics. Somehow the
intellectual community never sorted out this problem as belonging
to physics and allowed it to reside in mathematics where it never
really belonged.
(17) NP Problem [...]
How do any of us know whether AP knows enough about algorithms to say
something meaningful about the NP problem?
How about a simple (2 problem) test:
(1) Describe a procedure that uses at most n/2 comparisons that solves
the following problem, whenever n is at least 100:
Given a list L(1), L(2), ..., L(n) of integers, which is sorted in
increasing
order, and a number N, determine whether there is an integer M
between
1 and n such that L(M) = N.
(2) Prove that the Euclidean algorithm (
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EuclideanAlgorithm.html ) is a
polynomial-time algorithm.
And no copying from other sources; it has to be in your own words,
Archimedes. (That means no one else out there can give him help.)
And no saying "I will not take a test given by someone who can't prove
the Infinitude of Primes" nonsense. That especially doesn't apply to
problem (1).
Archimedes Plutonium has no right to talk about the NP problem unless
he can do problems (1) and (2) above.
--- Christopher Heckman
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
