*1* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"



 Science > Physics > *1* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "a_plutonium"
Date: 18 Jan 2007 02:01:14 PM
Object: *1* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"
At the moment I am preparing a book for publication in mathematics that
solves most of the unsolved
math problems of the past such as Riemann Hypothesis. I have posted
those ideas to the Internet from
1993 - 2007 and need to assimilate into book form.
I need to do the same with my Atom Totality theory of physics and get
it ready for book print
publication. The Atom Totality theory has also been discussed and
debated on the Internet
from 1993 -2007 and it is time to put into print publication. So I will
assimilate the data
and evidence and get it ready for print.
These posts are meant mostly as announcements.
The physical and logical and mathematical evidence that favors Atom
Totality Theory and
destroys the Big Bang theory

Now I have listed these supporting evidences according to what I deem
the greatest weight of support
Observational and experimental support
1) density and distribution of galaxies
2) Tifft quantized galaxy speeds
3) layered age recent galaxies 6.5 billion years old and older galaxies
of the Uranium atom totality 20.2 billion years old Freedman versus
Sandage data
4) uniform blackbody 2.71 K cosmic microwave background radiation
5) Dark Night sky Olber's Paradox
6) missing mass conundrum
7) distribution of chemical elements
8) color of the cosmos Johns Hopkins Univ findings
Mathematical and logic beauty support
9) Atomic Theory as the foundation of science universal law
10) inverse fine structure constant and proton to electron mass ratio
11) pi, e explained
As of recently I never thought that density and distribution of
galaxies would be the highest supporting evidence of the Atom Totality
theory and would trashcan the Big Bang theory. Just last year I still
thought the age discrepancy by Freedman and Sandage would be the
"decisive evidence" or the "deciding experimental proof".
But more and more, it is looking like the distribution of galaxies is
going to the the clincher between the Atom Totality theory versus the
Big Bang. I say this because the Sloan Great Wall was discovered in
2003 and my list above started on the Internet in 1993.
The Atom Totality theory predicts that galaxy distribution is dense
near the Nucleus and gradually thins out the further away one goes. The
electron-dot-cloud of p, d, f orbitals of electrons shows this pattern.
The Sloan Great Wall and the Great Wall are evidence of dense
clustering of galaxies near the Nucleus of the Atom Totality. The Big
Bang would not have a high density with a thinning out. The Big Bang
would have galaxies uniformly and homogenously distributed.
The Atom Totality predicts that as we penetrate further beyond the
Sloan Great Wall that we will find an even denser Wall beyond the
Sloan. And the Atom Totality predicts that in the opposite direction of
Sloan Great Wall to planet Earth that the number of galaxies thins out
enormously.
This sort of reminds me of a list in a murder mystery where the list
has its best evidence first and lesser evidences below. And that galaxy
distribution is like blood splatter on the wall at the scene of the
crime. And that the Atom Totality predicts a blood splatter of dense
blood near the violence and thinning out of blood splatter the more
distance away from the violence. The Big Bang would say the blood
splatter should be uniform throughout a sphere away from the violence
with no blood at the spot of violence.
So one can imagine that Galaxy distribution can decide which of these
two theories is the truth and which is the faker.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
*1* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"; Picture introduction
*6* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; Missing Mass conundrum & Cosmic distribution of chemical elements
*9* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"; Inverse-Fine-Structure Constant and proton to electron rest mass explained
*8* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"; shape of the Cosmos is 6 lobed or Luminet team of Dodecahedron
*7* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; color of the universe matches silvery white plutonium
*4* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; age of Cosmos versus oldest stars
#22 Table of Comparison of these two theories Re: new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"
*3* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; Tifft quantized galaxy speeds
#1 new book; preface Re: ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANG THEORY IN PHYSICS
*10* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"; (pi) and (e) explained
*5* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; Cosmic blackbody microwave radiation
*11* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"; ATOMIC THEORY as primal axiom of all science
*2* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY...." ; galaxy density gradient
Silly-Skeptics DENY Totality
Re: Silly-Skeptics DENY Totality
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER