Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
ELECTRON
::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y:)
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy.
Look in a quantum physics textbook or a chemistry
textbook for pictures of
what an electron looks like. An electron is many white
dots surrounding a
nucleus. This is commonly called the "Electron Cloud".
Now, look at the night
sky and replace those shining galaxies with the white
dots of an electron
cloud. And there you have the Atom Universe Totality
theory in a picture.
Why is the universe the isotope 231Pu? Because there
are very special numbers
in both physics and mathematics. And the only chemical
element, isotope that
fits these special numbers best is 231Pu. A few of
these special numbers are
the electromagnetic fine-structure constant, pi, e,
cosmic microwave
background radiation temperature and others.
This is the cover of my textbook on the theory circa
1991.
(include in book)
But I like this one because it contrasts the accepted
old view of one electron
with the new Atom Totality theory.
The picture above showing two books overlapping.
The one picture on the left is the cover of my book
PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY
THEORY, circa 1991, and it has three smaller pictures
within itself. My cover is a tripartate picture. The
cover of my textbook is
tripartate showing (1) the 5f6 of 231PU dot pattern
supposed to look like the
dark night sky of galaxies and to the top left corner
I tried to dot pattern the
Solar System; (2) below the 231PU is the night sky
showing galaxies, stars and
constellations. Do you see the Big Dipper and Sirius
which the white dots are
supposed to represent? (3) to the right of the 231PU
is the periodic table of
chemical elements only much of it is blocked from view
by the second textbook.
The second textbook to the right of my tripartate
cover is a page from
Halliday & Resnick textbook PHYSICS, Part 2, Extended
Version , 1986, of page
572. This is a large electron cloud dot picture for
which I quote the caption.
CHAP.26 CHARGE AND MATTER.
Figure 26-5
An atom, suggesting the electron
cloud and, above, an enlarged view
of the nucleus.
You see, the dots of the electron cloud are the
galaxies of the night sky.
The dots of the electron cloud are actual mass chunks
or pieces of the last 6
electrons, the 5f6 of 231PU.
I may not get around to posting many of the pictures
I have made of electron
clouds. They are some of the pictures of atoms that
caught my interest. The one
which was instrumental in my discovering the Atom
Universe theory is the one
above by Halliday & Resnick and I repeat it below.
That picture of the atom with
dots caught my attention long before 7 Nov 1990 and it
was on that day in 7 Nov
1990 where I connected the dots of the electron cloud
with actual galaxies. Thus
this picture was instrumental in the discovery of the
Plutonium Universe theory.
But, and let me emphasize strongly here that none of
the electron cloud dot
pictures really show clearly the night sky of shining
galaxies and stars. The
discovery of a new theory sees more than what is
contained in past wisdom and
adds something new and pushes it into the new wisdom.
I had seen many pictures
of electron cloud dot patterns mostly in books and
even in movies and TV.
Somehow it was the Halliday & Resnick picture above
which jolted my mind into
the discovery step and although in that picture the
white dots are too dense to
look like the night sky of shining galaxies and stars
it was enough that they
were white dots and that helped tremendously. In most
of the other pictures of
the electron cloud they are black or blue dots set
against a light background,
or they are too fuzzy as shown in _my_ photo of a page
from the Encyclopedia
Britannica.
After 7NOV1990 I have searched many texts to find
other pictures which
have dot pictures of the electron cloud. Provided I
have enough room on
this web site I will scan all of those pictures in my
personal collection
and post to this site. Pictures speak a thousand words
as the old saying
goes, but better yet, pictures remain in the mind
longer than written words.
The Atom Universe is very easy to explain and this
ease is credit to the
theory that it is the truth. When truth comes to
physics the ideas are
immediate, quick, connecting to past great ideas. In
one of the pictures of
me where I am holding the Feynman Lectures text in my
hand and please read the
first chapter and see what Feynman thought was the
greatest physics idea of all.
_My_ photo of pages from the Feynman Lectures on
Physics where he discusses the
Atomic Theory. This came out as a very nice picture
for those atoms look almost
golden due to the vinyl bookcover.
This text stating the Atomic Fact as Feynman
emphasizes was
another "push" to my mind to hurdle me into the
discovery that the universe
itself was an atom. For you see, the math logic
implication of the Atomic Fact
or Atomic Hypothesis as so eloquently printed by
Feynman comes to the inexorable
conclusion that since all things are made up of atoms,
means that the sum total
of atoms must also be an atom itself. Restating it, if
you hold that all matter
is made up of atoms leads to the conclusion that the
whole-of-the-universe must
itself be an atom. That is just pure math and science
logic. All things made up
of atoms pushed to math logic conclusion means or
implies or leads to the fact
that the universe itself is an atom. Which atom is it?
Well, of course there are
plenty of special numbers in both physics and math and
the atom which fits best
all of those special numbers is the isotope 231PU. The
chemical element or
isotope that fits all the special numbers of both
physics and math best is
plutonium, specifically 231PU. ATOM
And I had to figure roughly what the 5f6 looks like
from the Schroedinger
Equation in order for me to make my own picture for
the front cover of my text.
This is the dot picture I used on the
sci.hierarchies of Internet for most
of the time to Internet until this page. You
can see that I tried to
simulate my 231PU on the front cover of my
text above in ascii art without
spending too much time. Art can take a long
time; time away from physics.
94th ELECTRON OF 231PU
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
ELECTRON
::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y:)
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy.
Halliday and Resnick show white dots but their white
dots are too dense.
The white dots should be spread out more on the scale
of what we see in the
night sky of white dots of stars and galaxies. The
night sky that we see is
just the space and mass of the last electrons of
231PU.
When I showed those 30 pictures, one of them was the
electron cloud from
FEYNMAN LECTURES ON PHYSICS. The white dots of the
electron cloud are too
dense. And now that the world has the true theory of
the origin of the universe
and its future purpose, then textbooks of the future
will start to make more
accurate and more detailed pictures of electron
orbitals. I tried to show the
constellations and brightest stars and galaxies on my
cover of my book PLUTONIUM
ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE because the observable night
sky of stars and galaxies
are the dots of the 231PU One Atom Everything
Universe.
This is a beautiful irony in the history of physics.
To unravel what the
atom was, when earnestly pursued in the early 1900s
the atom was conceived
as a miniature Solar System with the electrons as
miniature planets revolving
around a Nuclear Sun. That is what Feynman is showing
in his diagram in this
picture from his Lectures. Now with the Atom Universe
the idea and picture is
the reverse. That the Solar System of stars and
planets, and better yet that
the galaxies all, are bits and pieces of an electron.
Our observable universe
is merely electron space and electron mass. That my
friends, is the biggest
irony in all of science history!
I showed two pictures that are representative of the
early models of atoms.
One is the Rutherford model and the other is the Bohr
model of the early 1900's.
As I said above, the supreme irony in the history of
all the sciences is that
first we wanted to make electrons as miniature
planets revolving around a
nuclear Sun. And now it turns out that the entire
observable universe is merely
the last electrons of a One Atom Everything Universe.
The electron orbital of an atom is a dot
picture seen as approximating
spherical or elliptical or lobelike or
toroidal or cylindrical or plane
geometry in shape.
The atom is governed by a probabilistic math which
means there is a probability
of finding the electron at some position around the
nucleus. This meaning is
the statistical interpretation given by Born to the
probability wavefunction.
This probability results in a dot picture. Drawing
a general outline picture
of an electron orbital is accurate only for a
hydrogen atom but for any atom
which has more than one electron then the outline
picture of the electron
orbital is only a first approximation, because the
picture is very complex due
to the many electron-electron interactions. The
position of the electron is
governed by this probability wavefunction and so
reinterpreting Born's
interpretation, I assert that the probability
density, the dots themselves are
parts of the mass of the last 6 electrons, the 5f6 of
231PU. The parts of mass
is what we see as galaxies. Whenever we collapse the
wavefunction of the
probability density of the 5f6 then what we observe
are galaxies of the night
sky.
In the uncollapsed wavefunction, all electrons
go out to infinity because
the electromagnetic potential V is proportional to
1/r, where r is distance of
the electron from the nucleus. Since the
electromagnetic potential is infinite,
this implies that the dots of electron density
distribution is infinite. Since
the dots of the probability density distribution
represent galaxies (large dots),
stars and planets (smaller dots inside the larger
galaxy dots), and astronomical
objects and life (tiny dots inside the planet dots);
the V implies that
astronomical objects are infinite. Astronomical
objects have no end in the
uncollapsed wavefunction. The further in space we make
observations, the further
we will collapse the probability wavefunction and
consequently materialize newer
astronomical objects. We will never come to an end in
observing matter of the
93rd and 94th electron. Galaxies are more dense near
the nucleus and become
sparser the further out from the nucleus. Much further
out from the nucleus,
there are no more stars or planets, only astronomical
objects are materializable.
Every electron is infinite in the uncollapsed
state.
_My_ photograph of a picture taken from a book (I am
trying to locate
the book.) I am trying to show electron cloud dot
pictures of s, p, d,
and f orbitals. I liked the density of the dots in
this picture because
one can see them sort of like individual separate
galaxies. Of course
the 5f6 of 231PU is not an s,p,or d orbital but an f
orbital.
_My_ photograph of a picture taken from the book
QUANTA: A Handbook of Concepts, 1991, 2nd ed, page 260
showing p-orbital. The cover of this book shows a 4f
orbital.
Perhaps this is the first book ever that has a f
orbital as its cover. In the
future there will be many texts of the 5f6 as its
front cover.
_My_ photograph of a picture taken from a book and I
am trying to locate
this book. I am trying to show electron cloud dot
pictures of s, p, d, and f
orbitals. In a p orbital one can see the importance of
spin and in a Atom
Totality, the galactic clustering contrasted with
large voids implies spin to
the whole entire universe. If you accept spin in the
universe in toto, then you
must accept the universe as one entity. The only
entity which makes sense would
be an atom.
The above is _my_ photograph of a picture from the
book
PHYSICS: Part 2 Extended Version, Halliday & Resnick,
1986, page 1194.
These pictures are the probability density psi^2 for
hydrogen atoms in
higher energy states such as the p-orbitals shown. The
dots making the electron
cloud represent 90% of finding the electron according
to Born interpretation,
but according to my interpretation those dots
represent 90% of the actual
electron mass.
Again _my_ photograph of a picture taken from a book.
The author was
Mortimer and was my chemistry textbook I used in 1968
and one
of my first encounters of what electrons look like. I
believe my very first
encounter of what an electron looks like occurred
circa 1966-1967 in my
High School physics class where I saw a film which
showed the electron cloud
as many white dots. The above is the d orbital.
_My_ photo of a picture out of the textbook QUANTA by
Atkins showing the
f-orbitals, not the 5f but the 4f and this is what the
caption reads "The
boundary surfaces of 4f electrons."
The above is my photograph of a picture from White's
text on atomic spectra.
Few books try to show what the 5f6 looks like.
H. E. White in his textbook INTRODUCTION TO ATOMIC
SPECTRA, 1934 uses a
spinning top to make pictures of what atomic orbitals
look like.
Here I tried to rework White's spinning top look of
the 5f6 with a dot and sheet
pattern for the galaxies. It is becoming apparent to
astronomers that galaxies
are clumped in sheets (The Great Wall) with large
voids between. And in my
rework, knowing that the electron cloud density
decreases the further away from
the nucleus you go, thus I have extended the
galaxy-dot-pattern decreasingly
outward. Each dot represents a galaxy. White in his
picture has his borders all
black, but to be more accurate the galaxy-dots extend
out to infinity but ever
so decreasingly. Talking of tops reminds me of this
favorite picture located in
Halliday & Resnick and shown below is _my_ photo of
that picture.
And again I have reworked White's spinning top look of
atomic orbitals
in his original picture trying to show the electron
cloud dot picture where
each dot represents a galaxy. The galaxy dots go out
to infinity but they
become less dense the further from the nucleus that
you go.
The above is _my_ photograph of a picture from the
book THE ELEMENTS BEYOND
URANIUM, 1990. On page 73, it reads below the picture:
"Figure 3.5 Pictorial representation of the
nonrelativistic f orbital shapes."
There is quite a lot of artistic allowance in the
math. And so my picture of
the 5f6 is quite different from these. But it appears
that the shape of the 5f6
of plutonium has those elongated lobes as seen in the
above pictures and in my
picture. I ask the question would elongated lobes be
visible or detectable in
the night sky of galaxies in some way? And the best I
can come up with is the
fact that we observe these high redshifted galaxy
centers. We call these objects
quasars. And the power source behind quasars are as
yet unknown. But what is
certain about quasars are that they are a phenomenon
of only galaxies. Quasars
do not exist in the Milky Way Galaxy, or do they?
Using the Atom Totality theory,
I make the guess that quasars are just normal galaxy
centers but that their
location, their galaxy location in the 5f6 space is in
a highly curved portion
of one of those lobes. And only because of the quasars
position in space of a
lobe is the spectra so tremendously shifted in the
red. And hence, our Milky Way
galaxy as seen by one of these quasars would appear as
a quasar to them. So that
quasars in an Atom Totality are just normal galaxy
centers that happen to lie in
a highly curved lobe of the 5f6.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
