Now to minimize this disturbance I place on top of the
water four 12 liter plastic pails that ride on top of
the disturbance of water and thus hopefully dampening
the waves so no water sloshes out of the wheelbarrow.

Last time I discussed FBP was in April. Today I made some progress and
insights into another working model
for the turbulence in a tokamak.

Let me first blurt out the problem for College physics students to
work on. I have a large 200 liter wheelbarrow
and I put inside it 120 liters of water. Now the trouble is that I
want to take the wheelbarrow of water a distance
on uneven ground and so the water sloshes back and forth in a wave of
disturbance. Now to minimize this
disturbance I place on top of the water four 12 liter plastic pails
that ride on top of the disturbance of water
and thus hopefully dampening the waves so no water sloshes out of the
wheelbarrow. Now the question I
have for College physics students as a problem for them to work out is
what configuration of those 4 pails
and how much water in those four pails to obtain maximum dampening of
water waves so I lose the
least amount of water?

Now here is the statement of the Fusion Barrier Principle:
Fusion Barrier Principle. Fission energy is the highest form of
energy that is able to be controlled and surpass breakeven. A Tokamak
such as JET or ITER can only reach 2/3 breakeven because 1/3 of the
input energy is forever lost in controlling the device.

Now the proof of the Fusion Barrier Principle follows from this logic:
The four Maxwell Equations are divided into two static and two dynamic
equations. The Coulomb force is a
static Maxwell Equation and the Faraday law is a dynamic Maxwell
Equation. Now the Coulomb law
is mathematically equivalent to a sphere and the Faraday Law is
equivalent to a cylinder. Now when you fit
a sphere into a cylinder the maximum surface area and maximum volume
is 2/3, which in mathematics
is called "enclosing problems".

Now in physics, such as tokamak engineering fusion is attempted by
using the Coulomb force and to control
the plasma the tokamak uses Faraday's Law. So what happens is that
"controlled fusion" by any machine,
not just a tokamak, has to use either Faraday's Law or Ampere's Law to
control the fusion process and which
overcomes the Coulomb force. So essentially, all fusion machines
resolve into a case of enclosing a sphere
inside of a cylinder. Thus, all fusion machines that control fusion,
(the word control is essential), that
1/3 of all the input energy is irretrievably lost in the controlling
of the fusion events. Stated another way,
fusion machines can only reach a maximum of 2/3 breakeven.

In a fusion bomb, where the machine does not seek continuous control,
then breakeven is surpassed.

In the Sun and stars which are controlled machines, fusion reaches
only about 20% to 30% breakeven.
And alot of pupils of science have a tough time understanding that a
star fusion is so small compared
to the enormous inward energy of gravity as the controlling energy.
This means that the smallest fusion
machine that is controllable is the smallest fusion shining star. That
no machine ever built on Earth will
control and simultaneously reach breakeven. That all machines built on
Earth can only reach 2/3
breakeven and no more.

So what the working model above is an analogy to that of the FBP where
the water in the wheelbarrow
is the protons in a tokamak and the buckets or pails are controls over
the plasma protons. Think of the
turbulence in a tokamak.

So at what configuration of those buckets leads to the maximum
dampening of the water so that little
water is lost? Do we have the 2/3 and 1/3 ratio of buckets of water?