| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Ian Parker" |
| Date: |
26 Mar 2007 07:01:04 AM |
| Object: |
3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
Details are in the blog http://ip3d.blogspot.com
Consider this as a disclosure. As I said in
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.skeptic/browse_frm/thread/92799e12ac9e17a3?hl=en
the pseudo 3D of Vista, is not really useful without a true 3D.
As the blog says this should be producible with a sophisticated
multicore graphics processor. Also if all we are viewing in 3D is
windows at different distances even that would not be necessary as the
complete window would move as a block.
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer will no doubt want to patent it. Here is
a shot across the bows. This also applies to head up spectacles with
GPS that give windows in the sky.
.
|
|
| User: "Nomen Lapetos" |
|
| Title: Re: 3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
26 Mar 2007 07:15:30 AM |
|
|
"Ian Parker" <ianparker2@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174910464.659831.320000@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Details are in the blog http://ip3d.blogspot.com
Consider this as a disclosure. As I said in
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.skeptic/browse_frm/thread/92799e12ac9e17a3?hl=en
the pseudo 3D of Vista, is not really useful without a true 3D.
As the blog says this should be producible with a sophisticated
multicore graphics processor. Also if all we are viewing in 3D is
windows at different distances even that would not be necessary as the
complete window would move as a block.
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer will no doubt want to patent it. Here is
a shot across the bows. This also applies to head up spectacles with
GPS that give windows in the sky.
I invented that 5 years ago.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Parker" |
|
| Title: Re: 3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
26 Mar 2007 09:44:24 AM |
|
|
On 26 Mar, 13:15, "Nomen Lapetos" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
I invented that 5 years ago.
I don't want to make money. I am retired and there is considerable
expense and hassle. What I DO want to do is to stop someone else!
What is in fact concerns me is the way Microsoft uses its patent
position to block other people. In fact paradoxically it may be easier
to patent something like this than LSA (Latent Semantic Analysis)
which has been the subject of frequent publications. Microsoft could
claim that their version is significantly different to the literature
(it does do some parsing) strict LSA does not parse. I will take =3D yu
tomar=E9 and I would have thought parsing, at least in terms of the
elimination of auxiliary verbs was OBVIOUS in the sense of patent
acts.
Microsoft is claiming that Linux is infringing its patents. I want a
Linux (open source) to be a pane of glass. I would like to make a
small legal point here, those familiar with it please bear with me.
Copyright simply means you cannot make an identical copy. Microsoft
cannot be prevented from getting copyright on 3D screens. A patent is
anything that works on a similar basis.
In point of fact there is little incentivre to copy (in the sense of
making an exact copy) of software as the coding is only a small part
of total production. Despite sleeping with fosforos. (Quieres dormir
con fosforo) Google, given anybody's success with LSA will be able to
do the same fairly quickly - Unless Microsoft has blocks in place).
- Ian Parker
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Eagleson" |
|
| Title: Re: 3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
26 Mar 2007 07:54:35 AM |
|
|
On Mar 26, 8:01 am, "Ian Parker" <ianpark...@gmail.com> wrote:
Details are in the bloghttp://ip3d.blogspot.com
Consider this as a disclosure. As I said inhttp://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.skeptic/browse_frm/thread/92799e...
the pseudo 3D of Vista, is not really useful without a true 3D.
As the blog says this should be producible with a sophisticated
multicore graphics processor. Also if all we are viewing in 3D is
windows at different distances even that would not be necessary as the
complete window would move as a block.
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer will no doubt want to patent it. Here is
a shot across the bows. This also applies to head up spectacles with
GPS that give windows in the sky.
He only gives the concept, and that is enough for public domain
disclosure law to enact.
SO it was found disclosed.
Here is the trick.
View! He used fifth order scenery in his disclosure! All relative
view was the basic starting point. Use Bryce a true 3D scene
perspective maker to create the single view.
Tricky:
Mathematically alter a scene. A perspective to change dynamically.
That forms the eye's scene. And what happens to cause the double
perspective? W What replaces the two lenses? It was true 3d discussed.
So here is the answer.
Guess it is real true 3D!
A knowledge of the line between the face and the appearance appears
all that was required. A single funny thing is required. A strong
eye.
A funny habit caused the 3D. A change to the weak eye scene every
three strong eye picture scans allow it!
So the patent is disclosed. Maybe it is already patented of filed.
A better way appears possible though! A three-D scan of the phosphor!
Invert the scene to scan and the new device is publically disclosed.
My device.
When the word image on the screen is disclosed a formal transform
allowed the scan. A TV coil to eye correspondence invention now.
SO any picture appears effect. "So I disclosed how to coincidence
scan."
"A scan for each eye."
Not a separate technique could be used for LCD scans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Eagleson" |
|
| Title: Re: 3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
26 Mar 2007 10:02:17 AM |
|
|
On Mar 26, 8:54 am, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mar 26, 8:01 am, "Ian Parker" <ianpark...@gmail.com> wrote:
Details are in the bloghttp://ip3d.blogspot.com
Consider this as a disclosure. As I said inhttp://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.skeptic/browse_frm/thread/92799e...
the pseudo 3D of Vista, is not really useful without a true 3D.
As the blog says this should be producible with a sophisticated
multicore graphics processor. Also if all we are viewing in 3D is
windows at different distances even that would not be necessary as the
complete window would move as a block.
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer will no doubt want to patent it. Here is
a shot across the bows. This also applies to head up spectacles with
GPS that give windows in the sky.
He only gives the concept, and that is enough for public domain
disclosure law to enact.
SO it was found disclosed.
Here is the trick.
View! He used fifth order scenery in his disclosure! All relative
view was the basic starting point. Use Bryce a true 3D scene
perspective maker to create the single view.
Tricky:
Mathematically alter a scene. A perspective to change dynamically.
That forms the eye's scene. And what happens to cause the double
perspective? W What replaces the two lenses? It was true 3d discussed.
So here is the answer.
Guess it is real true 3D!
A knowledge of the line between the face and the appearance appears
all that was required. A single funny thing is required. A strong
eye.
A funny habit caused the 3D. A change to the weak eye scene every
three strong eye picture scans allow it!
So the patent is disclosed. Maybe it is already patented of filed.
A better way appears possible though! A three-D scan of the phosphor!
Invert the scene to scan and the new device is publically disclosed.
My device.
When the word image on the screen is disclosed a formal transform
allowed the scan. A TV coil to eye correspondence invention now.
SO any picture appears effect. "So I disclosed how to coincidence
scan."
"A scan for each eye."
Not a separate technique could be used for LCD scans.
People will tolerate a little bit of extra equipment. A small head
visor to ultrasonically place the eye position would eliminate the
sound uncertainty.
I believe this was implied in the blogsight.
All SOund placment was to be patentable!
People will actually hold still to maintain the true 3D image though.
So nondynamic system must be patentable also. So a central vision
system allows visorless usage!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Parker" |
|
| Title: Re: 3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
26 Mar 2007 10:28:57 AM |
|
|
On 26 Mar, 16:02, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
People will tolerate a little bit of extra equipment. A small head
visor to ultrasonically place the eye position would eliminate the
sound uncertainty.
I believe this was implied in the blogsight.
All SOund placment was to be patentable!
People will actually hold still to maintain the true 3D image though.
So nondynamic system must be patentable also. So a central vision
system allows visorless usage!- Hide quoted text -
NOT PATENTABLE - read my second contribution. To put the record
straight - GPS, All inertial sytems, painting a luminous/refective
spot on your forehead (any spectral band) is also covered and I think
obvious.
- Ian Parker
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: 3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
26 Mar 2007 02:28:42 PM |
|
|
Ian Parker wrote:
On 26 Mar, 16:02, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
People will tolerate a little bit of extra equipment. A small head
visor to ultrasonically place the eye position would eliminate the
sound uncertainty.
I believe this was implied in the blogsight.
All SOund placment was to be patentable!
People will actually hold still to maintain the true 3D image though.
So nondynamic system must be patentable also. So a central vision
system allows visorless usage!- Hide quoted text -
NOT PATENTABLE - read my second contribution. To put the record
straight - GPS, All inertial sytems, painting a luminous/refective
spot on your forehead (any spectral band) is also covered and I think
obvious.
- Ian Parker
A specific implementation of this might still be patentable...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Parker" |
|
| Title: Re: 3D viewing. A absolutely complete 3D picture |
27 Mar 2007 04:39:46 AM |
|
|
On 26 Mar, 20:28, Lawson English <Laws...@nowhere.none> wrote:
A specific implementation of this might still be patentable.
It would certainly be copyrightable, that is clear. If a specific
instance were patentable someone else could make something just so
slighly different and get away with it. It is not patentable in the
blanket sense.
I have had another idea and I am going to add to my original blog.
That of having a flying mouse. Suppose you ear (an) ultrasound
transmitter on your hand, lets say you clip it onto a ring. Now your
hand is projected 3m away behind the computer screen. You can now
touch the windows and click on any one of them far faster than you can
currently use a mouse.
If we had a solid world we could touch and move objects within that
world. Microsoft have produced a robotics studio.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/robotics/getstarted/v1_0/default.aspx
http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=microsoft+robotics+research&mkt=en-us&FORM=LVCP
Certainly the ability to actually put your hand into a 3D structure is
going to be of immense value in CAD/CAM.
At present Powerpoint is purely a 2 dimensional program but given this
sort of capability it could be developed to provide the capacity for
sculpture in a solid world. Hasn't this been done before? What about
CAD/CAM? This is part of the reasom I am writing this. Microsoft has
got a reputation for ignoring standards and then making the Microsoft
standard the de facto standard. If you develop sculpture "open source"
you will base your programs on existing CAD/CAM and Virtual Reality
software. More people will generate 3D once this becomes easier to do.
Sculpture will become a part of business presentations and will not
simply be the province of Engineering and specialized graphics.
- Ian Parker
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
